Dakota Formation

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Dakota Formation / Group
Stratigraphic range: Albian–Cenomanian [1]
Dakota Fm Dinosaur Ridge.jpg
Road cut into the lower Dakota Group at crest of Dinosaur Ridge, near Golden, Colorado
TypeGeologic formation or group
Sub-unitsType Location: Formation (Nebraska/Iowa):[2]

Woodbury
Nishnabotna

Formation (Kansas):
D/Johnson Clay Member
J/Terra Cotta Clay Member

Formation (San Juan Basin, etc.):[3]
Twowells Tongue
Paguate Tongue
Cubero Tongue

Formation (sw Utah):
(undivided conglomerate)

Group (Dinosaur Ridge):
South Platte Formation
Lytle Formation

Group (Denver Basin):
Muddy Formation
Skull Creek Shale
Plainview Sandstone
Lytle Formation

Group (Williston Basin):[4]
Mowry Shale
Newcastle Formation
Skull Creek Shale
Inyan Kara

Group (Colorado Plateau):[5]
Naturita Formation
Cedar Mountain Formation

Group (Dry Cimarron):[5]
Romeroville Sandstone
Pajarito Formation
Mesa Rica Sandstone

UnderliesGraneros Shale (sometimes included in the Colorado Group of the Great Plains or the Mancos Shale of the Southwest)
OverliesPrecambian (Sioux Quartzite), Permian, Early Cretaceous (Lytle), and Jurassic (Morrison Formation)
Lithology
Primaryvarying proportions of terrestrial sandstone, mudstone, and clay, with beds of shallow marine mud [1]
Othermarine shale, lignite, coal
Location
Coordinates42°18′25″N 96°27′14″W / 42.307°N 96.454°W / 42.307; -96.454
Approximate paleocoordinates38°54′N 66°24′W / 38.9°N 66.4°W / 38.9; -66.4
RegionGreat Plains, Rocky Mountains, Colorado Plateau, Rio Grande rift valley
Country United States
 Canada
Type section
Named forDakota City, Nebraska
Named byMeek and Hayden
Year defined1862[6]
Dakota Formation is located in the United States
Dakota Formation
Dakota Formation (the United States)
Dakota Formation is located in Nebraska
Dakota Formation
Dakota Formation (Nebraska)

The Dakota is a sedimentary geologic unit name of formation and group rank composed of sandstones, mudstones, clays, and shales deposited in the Mid-Cretaceous opening of the Western Interior Seaway.[7] The usage of the name Dakota for this particular Albian-Cenomanian strata is exceptionally widespread; from British Columbia and Alberta to Montana and Wisconsin to Colorado and Kansas to Utah and Arizona. It is famous for producing massive colorful rock formations in the Rocky Mountains and the Great Plains of the United States, and for preserving both dinosaur footprints and early deciduous tree leaves.

Owing to extensive weathering of older rocks during the Jurassic and Triassic, the Dakota strata lie unconformably atop many different formations ranging in age from Precambrian to Early Cretaceous. With a few local exceptions, it is the oldest Cretaceous unit exposed in the northern Great Plains, including Kansas, Nebraska, Iowa, Minnesota, and Wisconsin, as well as the Desert Southwest. It generally consists of sandy, shallow marine or beach deposits with marine-influenced mudflat sediments, and occasional stream deposits.[8][9]

Naming and Rank[edit]

F.B. Meek and F.V. Hayden first used Dakota in 1862 to name the distinctive red sandstone exposures along the Missouri River near Dakota City, Nebraska. But, with this name, they applied the term "group", which at that time had the meaning of formation rank, as presently used.[6] Dakota Formation is the unit's primary name and rank in the Great Plains. Formation rank is also applied in western extents (e.g., northeast Utah) as the unit thins and exhibits formational characteristics, the marine shales are absent, and fossil pollen species correlate with those found in the unit on the Missouri River.[10] In the San Juan Basin and other intermontane basins and plateaus of the Southwest, Dakota Sandstone is the formal name for the oldest Cretaceous sandstone as well as tongues of that terrestrial sandstone extending into the dark marine shales of the Mancos.[3] However, Dakota Sandstone is everywhere a common informal name for the unit, especially for the sandstone beds.[11]

The Dakota Group rank is employed along the territory of the Dakota Hogback in Colorado and Wyoming, the Colorado Plateau,[5] the Dry Cimarron River,[5] and the Denver Basin. This group ranking recognizes sequences and members that exhibit local formational characteristics, especially marine shales that are less developed or absent further from the center of the seaway. As these locations were at the time of formation the earliest and deepest areas of the seaway, these groups can include older ages of rocks than are usually included elsewhere under the Dakota name. The names of the member formations of the Dakota Group vary between these regions as the geology there is studied further; but, the earliest unit included in Dakota Groups, excluded elsewhere, is the terrestrial Lytle Formation, which is older than any other Cretaceous rock in Colorado or Kansas.[11] The Skull Creek Shale and Plainview Sandstone of Colorado are also included in the Dakota Group, as is the Cedar Mountain Formation of Utah and its Buckhorn Conglomerate member. However, these units represent a separate seaway sequence in the time between the Lytle and "upper Dakota" (Mowry) sequences, and in the plains to the east, the same units are named Kiowa Shale and Cheyenne Sandstone, which are considered separate from the Dakota Formation as defined in Kansas and, moreover, do not appear at the type location in Nebraska.[12] However, subsequent sequence stratigraphic and palynostratigraphic research has demonstrated that the Dakota Formation at the type location includes sand and mudstones covering the same ages and sequences as the "marine shale facies of the Graneros" and "early Late Albian Kiowa-Skull Creek".[1]

In certain places, the classification is undivided; for example, in far southwest Utah, the strata is designated the Dakota Conglomerate without further division.[5]

When nearer the surface (within a couple thousand feet/hundreds of meters), the sandstone beds of the Dakota Formation form various Dakota Aquifers, important water sources in some areas of the Great Plains and the Southwest,[9] far greater in extent than the High Plains Aquifer,[13] and famous for its artesian properties.[14]

Elsewhere, when deeper, especially in the Denver Basin, these same sands have been sought after for hydrocarbon reserves. "Drillers", who navigate deep strata by monitoring material brought to the surface in the drilling mud, alphabetically designated the hydrocarbon "producing sands" of the Dakota in the Denver Basin as (highest) "D", "J", "M", and "O" (lowest). Colorado's "D" and "J" of the driller's Denver Basin have been particularly important to Nebraska, Kansas, and Oklahoma in their efforts of correlating their eastern outcrops with the Dakota units in the Denver Basin and the western units in general.[15][12]

Dakota Formation in Central Kansas

Geological history[edit]

Schematic reconstruction of the eastern side of the Cretaceous seaway during deposition of the sediments that eventually became the Dakota Formation. Erosional highlands occur in South Dakota and Minnesota.

Deposition of the sediments that would become the Dakota Formation began during the late Early Cretaceous (Albian). This deposition marked a reversal from over 100 million years of erosion (most of the Mesozoic).[1] This reversal was due to rising of the mouth of the rivers, called a rise in base level, as the Cretaceous Seaway formed. This rise lowered the gradient of the rivers causing them to deposit sediment inland because their velocity could no longer sustain high volumes of sediment.[16]

Measurements show that the rivers flowed westward and southwestward towards the encroaching sea from source areas near the present-day Great Lakes. The point of deposition slowly moved eastward as the seaway rose. This change is seen by a gradual shift in the composition of sandstones from having a lot of Paleozoic-age rock detritus in Kansas to sandstones having all Precambrian crystalline rock debris in Iowa.[17]

This shift means that the rivers had completely eroded away the Paleozoic rocks in the river source area by the time the Seaway rose high enough for the rivers to deposit sediments in Iowa. The very top of the Dakota Formation was deposited along the coast as indicated by some fossil marine invertebrates. Fossil plants, coal deposits and kaolinite clays show that the climate was warm and wet during deposition of the Dakota Formation.[17] Some of the ancient preserved soils show that an extensive flood plain forest was present.

Western Interior Seaway sequences[edit]

This Cretaceous seaway experienced a number of geological sequences (rise and fall cycles of sea level relative to land elevation), which, during patricular lowstands, temporarily reestablished a land connection between the east and west continent at the ancestral Transcontinental Arch. Each sequence represents a cycle of major progression of the seaway into the western interior of North America followed by retreat (see Walther's Law of Facies). The sequences of the seaway typically express facies sequences of, first, a low-stand erosional surface discontinuity (possibly with development of soils), then a transgressive pattern of terrestrial sand and mud followed by near shore marine sediments, a high stand pattern that may establish far-shore marine shale and limestone, a regressive pattern of a return to near shore marine sediments to terrestrial mud and sand, and a final low-stand erosional surface. Five of the first sequences of the Western Interior Seaway are relevant to the Dakota classifications.

The first sequence, typified by the Lytle Formation, did not complete the linkage of the north and south embayments before retreating. The second sequence is typified by the corresponding Skull Creek and Kiowa formations. These first two sequences are not present at the type area along the Missouri River. The sediments broadly considered as Dakota then record the Mowry sequence with the Muddy, J, or Lower Dakota sandstones and the D or Upper Dakota sandstones forming at the discontinuities at the beginning and end of that cycle. In the east the limited marine shales of the Mowry sequence are assigned to the Dakota Formation, while in the center the mudstones and marine shales are commonly assigned a separate unit between upper and lower sandstone units, and in the Southwest, the much thicker marine shales are assigned to tongues of the Lower Mancos. The Greenhorn Cycle is the final relevant sequence as it overlays all Dakota classifications, with the exception of certain sandstones of Graneros age, such as classified in Wisconsin and Iowa.[18][1]

Lithology[edit]

Over the range of the usage of the Dakota name, the unit is primarily known for its massive beds of sandstone, which commonly shows shades of red, but also gray, yellow, or white. The sand was carried and deposited by rivers or accumulated in dunes or shoreline strands, and later cemented by red iron oxide or white calcite, depending on the local groundwater conditions that followed the sedimentation. The degree of cementation can range from softly crumbling to resistant to hammering. The sandstone beds can have local conglomerations of gravel. The composition of the sand and gravel varies depending on the sources of the rivers that made each deposit.

The amount of sandstone, averaging 25-50%, can very greatly over short distances between extremes of 5% to 80%. The general remainder of the unit, however, generally in complementary 80% to 5% proportions, is layered mudstone and clay deposited on floodplains, swamps, and estuaries. Similar to the sand, the soil-forming mud was modified by groundwater conditions to accumulate iron oxide or calcite. Coloration can be dark to light red, grey, yellow, and white. Iron oxide accumulation can approach the hardness and luster of hematite.

In evidence of the general low-lying nature of the Dakota's lush, hot-house Earth environment, lignite and coal have formed within in various areas.

Marine shale is also a part of the Dakota sequences. Less common in the remote extents, particularly in the east, the shale is more representative of the deeper portions of the inland seaway. Moreover, shales on top of the upper Dakota on the plains of the east are usually assigned to the Granola or equivalent units, while in the west the thickest interbedding "tongues" of shale are generally assigned to the lower Marcos. Nevertheless, near the western limits, where the Dakota "pinches out" between the Morrison and the Mowry, the unit returns to the totally terrestrial sand-mud-sand pattern and fossil pollens of the Nebraska type location.[10]

These characteristics of chaotic, land-formed sandbanks and mudflats lying above flinty, whiter marine megacyclic Permian limestones and below grey, rhythmic, chalky shales, persist for thousands of miles, locally variable as they may be, causing common use of the name Dakota in spite of many efforts to apply localized names.[10]

Two sides of the seaway[edit]

Historically, Lower Cretaceous strata in the Rocky Mountain region have been called the Dakota Formation based on assumed correlation with the type section of the Dakota of the Great Plains. Witzke and Ludvigson have argued that use of the name "Dakota" must reflect actual, not presumed correlation based on stratigraphy and composition of the sedimentary rock.[17] To the west of the Rocky Mountains, such as on the Colorado Plateau, this sequence of Upper Cretaceous, predominately sandstone, sedimentary rocks was recommended to be known as the Dakota Group,[19] to dispel any suggestion of direct facies correlation. However, few authors of papers on the Dakota west of the Rocky Mountains, especially on the Colorado Plateau, recognize the Dakota as the Dakota Group, instead using the term Dakota Sandstone, of formation rank. Its subdivisions are recognized as members. Many authors have emphasized the fact that the marine Dakota Sandstone on the Colorado Plateau is intertongued with the marine lower part of the Mancos Shale, resulting in valid lithostratigraphic names such as the Whitewater Arroyo Tongue of the Mancos Shale which is directly overlain by the Twowells Sandstone Tongue of the Dakota Sandstone.[3] In the western San Juan Basin, the lowermost part of the Dakota Sandstone, although of marginal marine origin in the eastern San Juan Basin, is a complex of non-marine sandstones. These relationships are especially well displayed in the San Juan Basin of northwestern New Mexico

Beginning in the Early Cretaceous, the Cretaceous Seaway spread south from what is now the Arctic Ocean and connected with a short northward extension from the Gulf of Mexico.[20] This marine transgression of the ocean onto what was formerly land, was completed by the late Albian (~100 MA) thereby dividing North America in half. On the eastern side of the Seaway, sediments that would become the Dakota Formation were deposited as coastal and nearshore marine sands and silts. As the seaway continued to deepen and widen, this eastern shoreline moved progressively eastward; however, accumulation of abundant sedement delivered by massive rivers limited shoreline advancement past the type location throughout the Cenomanian until overtopped by the Greenhorn Seaway in the early Turonian.[1] Meanwhile, on the western side of the seaway, sediments were carried eastwards and northeastwards by rivers from mountains located along what is the Nevada-Utah border.

These western sediments accumulated as nearshore and coastal sands and silts as well, and are counterparts to the Dakota Formation on the eastern side of the Seaway. However, these counterpart sediments originated from the other side of the sea and were carried by rivers flowing in opposite directions. These western sediments are equivalent to the Dakota Formation of the Great Plains, but are not exactly the same strata. Individual formations in the western Dakota Group have local names. In Wyoming, the term Cloverly Formation has been expanded by some authors to include sediments formerly placed within the Dakota Formation.[citation needed] Along the Colorado Front Range, the lower, terrestrial beds, or facies, of the Dakota Group are sometimes called the Lytle Formation, and near-shore marine facies are called the South Platte Formation.[21] In eastern Utah and western Colorado, Young introduced the term Naturita Formation for a series of facies in the larger "Dakota Group".[19] However, despite Witzke and Ludvigson logic, geologist have continued to refer to the Lower Cretaceous sequence of formations on the Colorado Plateau and the Rocky Mountains as the Dakota Group.[22]

Economic geology[edit]

The Dakota has provided several resources in the Plains states as well as in parts of the mountainous west.

The predominant shales and mudstones are a source of hydrocarbons while the lenses and channels of sandstone form exploitable hydrocarbon reserves. Thus, the Dakota Group is an oil and gas source in the Denver Basin.[23]

When they are near the surface, these same structures function as aquitards and aquifers, respectively. The Dakota sandstones form crucial supplies of water on the Plains, especially on uplands between river valleys wherever it is found outside the boundaries of the Ogallala Aquifer.[24]

Lignite coal seam and mine, Wilson, Kansas, 1873

As the formation is uniquely terrestrial in origin, in contrast to the vast marine formations of the Plains, the Dakota has additional unique resources. Lignite coal has formed in the unit and was mined briefly in the 19th century. This supply was immediately mined for fuel by early American settlers, but was decidedly inferior to larger supplies of coal in the southeast of Kansas.[25] The widespread bog environments of the Dakota period resulted in concretions of iron, forming hematite, limonite, and beds of "ironstone", which are common in the Janssen clay member of Kansas.[25] Smelting of this limited iron source was only briefly attempted in conjunction with the lignite mining. The iron-cemented sandstone was found to be a durable and colorful building material on the treeless 19th century Plains. Historic 1860s buildings of Fort Harker (Kansas) and Fort Larned are constructed of this stone. The Dakota clays are quarried for tile and brick manufacture.[26]

Uranium is also found concentrated in the Dakota sandstone where percolating uranium-rich water has deposited the mineral in the aquifers.[27]

Paleoenvironment[edit]

The sands and muds of the Dakota represent wet lowlands, rivers, flood plains, and beaches with a shoreline deeply undulating between deltas and brackish marine embayments. Ground water flowing from inland reacted with changes in pH, oxygenation, and salinity as it encountered seawater, depositing iron oxide and calcite in underground layers near shorelines. These minerals hardened the material and fossils to preserve evidence of the ecology of those environments.[1] Sandstone with dinosaur tracks in the upper Dakota above the marine Skull Creek Shale near Denver demonstrates that the seaway occasionally retreated from the area.

Vertebrate paleofauna[edit]

Dinosaur fossils are very rare in the Dakota Formation and most[citation needed] of them come from Kansas. Some of them are found in Colorado and Nebraska. The most popular site for public viewing of Cretaceous dinosaur fossils in Colorado is Dinosaur Ridge. The best specimen is a partial skeleton of a nodosaurid ankylosaur called Silvisaurus condrayi.[28][29] Other isolated ankylosaur material may also belong to Silvisaurus.[30] Fossil dinosaur tracks are also known and include theropod and ankylosaur.[30] A large ornithopod femur is known from Burt County, Nebraska as well as fossil dinosaur tracks from Jefferson County.[31][32]

  • cf. Troodon sp
  • cf. Paronychodon (? troodontid indet)
  • cf. Richardoestesia sp. (theropod indet)
  • ? Barosaurus lentus
  • Silvisaurus condrayi – "Partial skeleton with skull, sacrum."[33]

Pterosaurs[edit]

Pterosaurs of the Dakota Formation
Taxon Presence Description Images
Suborder:
  1. Tracks
Known from both early and late Cretaceous strata in the Dakota Group.[34] Found at the John Martin Reservoir in Colorado.[34] Specimens kept at the Dinosaur Tracks Museum, of the University of Colorado at Denver.[34]

See also[edit]

References[edit]

  1. ^ a b c d e f g Greg A. Ludvigson, Brian J. Witzke (2010). "New Insights on the Sequence Stratigraphic Architecture of the Dakota Formation in Kansas–Nebraska–Iowa from a Decade of Sponsored Research Activity". Current Research in Earth Sciences: Palynostratigraphy and Correlation of the Dakota Formation in the Type Area, Iowa, Nebraska, and Kansas. Retrieved March 16, 2021.
  2. ^ "Geologic Unit: Woodbury". National Geologic Database. Geolex — Significant Publications. United States Geological Survey. Retrieved November 27, 2020.
  3. ^ a b c Molenaar, C.M., Cobban, W.A., Merewether, E.A., Pillmore, C.L., Wolfe, D.G., and Holbrook, J.M. (2002). "Regional stratigraphic cross sections of Cretaceous rocks from east-central Arizona to the Oklahoma Panhandle". National Geologic Map Database. USGS. Retrieved February 20, 2020.CS1 maint: uses authors parameter (link) [Sheet 1 illustrates Clay Mesa Tongue (Marcos), Paguate Tongue (Dakota), Whitewater Arroyo Tongue (Marcos), Twowells Tongue (Dakota)]
  4. ^ Edward Murphy, editor, North Dakota Stratigraphic Column, North Dakota Geological Surve.
  5. ^ a b c d e "Geologic Unit: Dakota". National Geologic Database. Geolex — Significant Publications. United States Geological Survey. Retrieved November 27, 2020.
  6. ^ a b Meek, F.B. and Hayden, F.V. (1862). "Descriptions of new Lower Silurian, (Primordial), Jurassic, Cretaceous, and Tertiary fossils, collected in Nebraska, by the exploring expedition under the command of Capt. Wm F. Reynolds, U.S. Top. Engineers, with some remarks on the rocks from which they were obtained". Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia Proceedings. 13: 415-447.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  7. ^ Monroe, James S. and Wicander, Reed (1997) The Changing Earth: Exploring Geology and Evolution (2nd edition) Wadsworth Publishing Company, Belmont, California, page 610, ISBN 0-314-09577-2
  8. ^ "Geology of the Quarry: Dakota Sandstone" Dinosaur National Monument, National Park Service
  9. ^ a b McLaughlin, Thad G. (1942) "Water-bearing Formations, continued: Cretaceous System: Dakota Group" Geology and Ground-Water Resources of Morton County, Kansas
  10. ^ a b c Douglas A. Sprinkel, Scott K. Madsen, James I. Kirkland, Gerald L. Waanders, and Gary J. Hunt (2012). "Cedar Mountain and Dakota Formations around Dinosaur National Monument—evidence of the first incursion of the Cretaceous Western Interior Seaway into Utah" (PDF). Utah Geological Survey Special Study. Utah Geological Survey (143): 9, 12-15. Retrieved February 21, 2021. The Dakota Formation ... has undergone a colorful history of nomenclature changes. ... Naturita has generally not been an accepted name for this section of rocks on the Colorado Plateau. ... The term Dakota Sandstone has been formally used in geologic maps and reports in the eastern Uinta Mountains (...); however, we revise the descriptive term to formation to reflect the lithologic heterogeneity of the Dakota in this region and to be consistent with usage elsewhere in Utah.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  11. ^ a b Jeremy McCreary. "Colorado Geology Photojournals - A Tribute to Colorado's Physical Past and Present - Colorado Geology Overview". cliffshade. Retrieved August 30, 2019.
  12. ^ a b "The Geologic Framework of the Dakota Aquifer". The Dakota Aquifer Program Annual Report. Kansas Geological Survey (FY89): Part 3b. (The report concludes that the Lytle Sequence is not present in Kansas or eastern Colorado, and observes that the Kiowa and Cheyenne correlate with the Skull Creek and Plainview. )
  13. ^ P. Allen Macfarlane, John H. Doveton, and Donald O. Whittemore. "User's Guide to the Dakota Aquifer in Kansas". Technical Series. Kansas Geological Survey (FY89): 2. Retrieved April 2, 2021. .... Across the Continental Divide, the Dakota aquifer is present in many of the intermontane basins. Thus, the Dakota is an important source of water in many areas of the North American continent.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  14. ^ Herbert F. Wang, Professor Emeritus of Geoscience, University of Wisconsin–Madison (2020). "2 Saga of the Dakota Aquifer". Groundwater Storage in Confined Aquifers. Guelph, Ontario, Canada: The Groundwater Project. ISBN 978-1-7770541-7-5. Retrieved April 5, 2021. While the Dakota sandstone is one of the most important of the known artesian reservoirs, .... – Powell testimony (1890) ... The Dakota aquifer in South Dakota is one of the classic artesian aquifers. Many modern ideas concerning artesian aquifers stem from N. H. Darton’s investigation of the Dakota aquifer in the 1890s and early 1900s. - Bredehoeft et al. (1983)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  15. ^ Boreing, M.J., 1953, Geology of the Denver basin, IN Moore, C.A., ed., Proceedings of the third subsurface geological symposium: University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, March 3-4, 1953, p. 72-81. "The two main producing sands in the basin are accordingly called the 'D' (upper) and the 'J' (middle). The basal sand members of the Cretaceous we shall call the 'M' and 'O' sands."
  16. ^ Bejnar, C. R. and Lessard, R. H. (1976) "Paleocurrents and depositional environments of The Dakota Group, San Miguel and Mora Counties, New Mexico" in Ewing, Rodney C. and Kues, Barry S. (eds.) (1976) Guidebook of Vermejo Park, Northeastern New Mexico: Twenty-seventh Field Conference, September 30, October 1 and 2, 1976 New Mexico Geological Society, Socorro, N.M., pp. 157–163, OCLC 2754478
  17. ^ a b c Witzke, B.J., and Ludvigson, G.A. 1994. The Dakota Formation in Iowa and its type area. In Shurr, G.W., Ludvigson, G.A., and Hammond, R.H. (eds). Perspectives on the eastern margin of the Cretaceous Western Interior Basin. Geological Society of America, Special Paper 287:43–78.
  18. ^ R.J. Weimer (1984). J.S. Schlee (ed.). "Relation of unconformities, tectonics, and sea-level changes, Cretaceous of Western Interior, United States" (PDF). AAPG Memoir. American Association of Petroleum Geologists (Memoir 36, Interregional unconformities and hydrocarbon accumulation): 7-35. Retrieved March 21, 2021. [The url is to a Rice University-hosted pdf of a book chapter adapted from the original Weimer 1984 paper.]
  19. ^ a b Young, Robert G. (1960) "Dakota Group of Colorado Plateau" American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin 44(2): pp 156–194
  20. ^ Kauffman, E.G. 1984. Paleobiogeography and evolutionary response dynamic in the Cretaceous Western Interior Seaway of North America. In Westermann, G.E.G. (ed), Jurassic-Cretaceous Biochronology and Paleogeography of North America, Geological Association of Canada Special Paper 27: 273–306.
  21. ^ Waagé, K. M. (1955) Dakota Group in northern Front Range Foothills, Colorado U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 274-B:15–49.
  22. ^ For example in east-central and northeast New Mexico the Dakota Group consists of the Mesa Rica Sandstone, the Pajarito Shale, and the Romeroville Sandstone, and includes the underlying Tucumcari Shale in the Tucumcari area and Glencairn Formation in Union County. "Dakota Group" U.S. Geological Survey
  23. ^ Debra K. Higley and Dave O. Cox (2007). "Petroleum Systems and Assessment of Undiscovered Oil and Gas in the Denver Basin Province, Colorado, Kansas, Nebraska, South Dakota, and Wyoming—USGS Province 39 : Chapter 2 Oil and Gas Exploration and Development along the Front Range in the Denver Basin of Colorado, Nebraska, and Wyoming" (PDF). U.S. Department of the Interior / U.S. Geological Survey: 3. Retrieved April 19, 2020. Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  24. ^ Alvin R. Leonard and Delmar W. Berry, U. S. Geological Survey (1961). "Geology and Ground-water Resources of Southern Ellis County and Parts of Trego and Rush Counties, Kansas". State Geological Survey of Kansas Bulletin 149. University of Kansas. Retrieved April 19, 2020.
  25. ^ a b Walter H. Schoewe (1952). "Coal Resources of the Cretaceous System (Dakota Formation) in Central Kansas". Kansas Geological Survey, Bulletin 96, Part 2. University of Kansas. Retrieved April 19, 2020.
  26. ^ "Welcome to Kansas Brick and Tile". Retrieved April 19, 2020. Our three brick plants are nestled in the Dakota clay deposits right here in the heart of Kansas.
  27. ^ Dr. John Hopkins (August 14, 2018). "Geology of Uranium Deposits in Colorado". Retrieved April 19, 2020.
  28. ^ Eaton, T.H. 1960. A new armored dinosaur from the Cretaceous of Kansas. University of Kansas Paleontological Contributions, Vertebrata, 8:1–24.
  29. ^ Carpenter, K. and J.I. Kirkland. 1998. Review of Lower and Middle Cretaceous ankylosaurs from North America. Lucas, S.G., Kirkland, J.I. and Estep, J.W., (eds.), Lower and Middle Cretaceous Terrestrial Ecosystems. New Mexico Museum of Natural History and Science Bulletin No. 14:249–270.
  30. ^ a b Liggett, G.A. 2005. A review of the dinosaurs from Kansas. Transactions of the Kansas Academy of Science 108(1–2), p.1-14.
  31. ^ Barbour, E. H. 1931. Evidence of dinosaurs in Nebraska. Bulletin of University of Nebraska State Museum, 1:187–190.
  32. ^ Joeckel, R. M., Cunningham, J. M., Corner, R. G., Brown, G. W., Phillips, P. L. and Ludvigson, G. A. 2004. Late Albian Dinosaur Tracks from the Cratonic (eastern) Margin of the Western Interior Seaway, Nebraska, USA. Ichnos, 11:275-284.
  33. ^ "Table 17.1," in Weishampel, et al. (2004). Page 365.
  34. ^ a b c d Lockley, M.; Harris, J.D.; and Mitchell, L. 2008. "A global overview of pterosaur ichnology: tracksite distribution in space and time." Zitteliana. B28. p. 187-198. ISSN 1612-4138.

Further reading[edit]

Current stratigraphic correlation charts[edit]

  • Robert G. Raynolds and James W. Hagadorn (2016). "Colorado Stratigraphic Chart". Colorado Geological Survey. Colorado School of Mines. Retrieved September 12, 2021.CS1 maint: uses authors parameter (link) : Isochronous stratigraphic chart correlates current usage from the eastern plains to the western border of Colorado. While the entre succession is illustrated, the reader can see the interaction of the West Shore Dakota stage with the Mesozoic discontinuities that preceded the seaway as well as the mountain building stages after the seaway.
  • "Cretaceous Chart and Fossils". Colorado Stratigraphy. Colorado Stratigraphy. 2018. Retrieved September 12, 2021. : Isochronous stratigraphic chart based on the CGS's chart and other sources, the focus entirely on the complex sequences of the Western Interior Seaway. By thereby expanding the vertical scale, the mechanism for vertically changing age of the West Shore Dakota over horizontal distances is clearly illustrated. Missing is the details of the Skull Creek/Kiowa sequence embodied within Colorado's particular definition of the Dakota Group.
Isochronous : The vertical scale is evenly progressing time rather than thickness; everything at the same level happened at the same time.

History of exploration[edit]

  • R.l. Brenner, G.A. Ludvigson, B.J. Witzke, A.N. Zawistoski, E.P. Kvale, R.L. Ravn, and R.M. Joeckel (2000). "Late Albian Kiowa-Skull Creek Marine Transgression, Lower Dakota Formation, Eastern Margin of Western Interior Seaway". Papers in Natural Resources. School of Natural Resources, University of Nebraska–Lincoln (1009). Retrieved September 9, 2021.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) : Application of sequence and palynostratographic methods matured on the West Shore to the East Shore. Reports new understandings of the marine influences on the development of the Dakota units, particularly at the Nebraska/Iowa type location. Identifies previously unreported discontinuity in the Dakota type, extending the upper Dakota/Woodbury member into the late Albian. Charts the Dakota unit and adjacent units with the new understanding of the discontinuities from the Kansas west border through the type location to Minnesota.

External links[edit]

From Colorado perspective, animations of the Western Interior Seaway including the landbridge between the Mowry retreat and the Graneros advance: