Dan Willard

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Dan Edward Willard is an American computer scientist and logician, and is a professor of computer science at the University at Albany.

Education and career[edit]

Willard did his undergraduate studies in mathematics at Stony Brook University, graduating in 1970. He went on to graduate studies in mathematics at Harvard University, earning a master's degree in 1972 and a doctorate in 1978. After leaving Harvard, he worked at Bell Labs for four years before joining the Albany faculty in 1983.[1]


Although trained as a mathematician and employed as a computer scientist, Willard's most highly cited publication is in evolutionary biology. In 1973, with biologist Robert Trivers, Willard published the Trivers–Willard hypothesis, that female mammals could control the sex ratio of their offspring, and that it would be evolutionally advantageous for healthier or higher-status females to have more male offspring and for less healthy or lower-status females to have more female offspring.[paper 1] Controversial at the time, especially because it proposed no mechanism for this control, this theory was later validated through observation,[2] and it has been called "one of the most influential and highly cited papers of 20th century evolutionary biology".[3]

Willard's 1978 thesis work on range searching data structures[paper 2] was one of the predecessors to the technique of fractional cascading,[4] and throughout the 1980s Willard continued to work on related data structure problems. As well as continuing to work on range searching, he did important early work on the order-maintenance problem,[paper 3] and invented the x-fast trie and y-fast trie, data structures for storing and searching sets of small integers with low memory requirements.[paper 4]

In computer science, Willard is best known for his work with Michael Fredman in the early 1990s on integer sorting and related data structures. Before their research, it had long been known that comparison sorting required time to sort a set of items, but that faster algorithms were possible if the keys by which the items were sorted could be assumed to be integers of moderate size. For instance, sorting keys in the range from to could be accomplished in time by radix sorting. However, it was assumed that integer sorting algorithms would necessarily have a time bound depending on , and would necessarily be slower than comparison sorting for sufficiently large values of . In research originally announced in 1990, Fredman and Willard changed these assumptions by introducing the transdichotomous model of computation. In this model, they showed that integer sorting could be done in time by an algorithm using their fusion tree data structure as a priority queue.[paper 5][5] In a follow-up to this work, Fredman and Willard also showed that similar speedups could be applied to other standard algorithmic problems including minimum spanning trees and shortest paths.[paper 6]

Since 2000, Willard's publications have primarily concerned self-verifying theories: systems of logic that have been weakened sufficiently, compared to more commonly studied systems, to prevent Gödel's incompleteness theorems from applying to them. Within these systems, it is possible to prove that the systems themselves are logically consistent, without this deduction leading to the self-contradiction that Gödel's theorem implies for stronger systems.[paper 7] In a preprint summarizing his oevre of work in this area, Willard has speculated that these logical systems will be of importance in developing artificial intelligences that can survive the potential extinction of mankind, reason consistently, and recognize their own consistency.[6]

Selected publications[edit]

  1. ^ Trivers, R. L.; Willard, D. E. (1973), "Natural selection of parental ability to vary the sex ratio of offspring", Science, 179 (4068): 90–2, Bibcode:1973Sci...179...90T, doi:10.1126/science.179.4068.90, JSTOR 1734960, PMID 4682135 .
  2. ^ Willard, D. E. (1978), Predicate-Oriented Database Search Algorithms, Ph.D. thesis, Harvard University .
  3. ^ Willard, Dan E. (1982), "Maintaining dense sequential files in a dynamic environment", Proc. 14th ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC '82), pp. 114–121, doi:10.1145/800070.802183 .
  4. ^ Willard, Dan E. (1983), "Log-logarithmic worst-case range queries are possible in space Θ(N)", Information Processing Letters, 17 (2): 81–84, doi:10.1016/0020-0190(83)90075-3, MR 0731126 .
  5. ^ Fredman, Michael L.; Willard, Dan E. (1993), "Surpassing the information-theoretic bound with fusion trees", Journal of Computer and System Sciences, 47 (3): 424–436, doi:10.1016/0022-0000(93)90040-4, MR 1248864 .
  6. ^ Fredman, Michael L.; Willard, Dan E. (1994), "Trans-dichotomous algorithms for minimum spanning trees and shortest paths", Journal of Computer and System Sciences, 48 (3): 533–551, doi:10.1016/S0022-0000(05)80064-9 .
  7. ^ Willard, Dan E. (2001), "Self-verifying axiom systems, the incompleteness theorem and related reflection principles", Journal of Symbolic Logic, 66 (2): 536–596, doi:10.2307/2695030, MR 1833464 .


  1. ^ Curriculum vitae, accessed 2013-06-04.
  2. ^ Simpson, M. J. A.; Simpson, A. E. (1982), "Birth sex ratios and social rank in rhesus monkey mothers", Nature, 300: 440–441, Bibcode:1982Natur.300..440S, doi:10.1038/300440a0 .
  3. ^ Mathews, Paul (2011), "Is there a psychological proximate mechanism for inducing a Trivers–Willard effect in humans? Results of an internet experiment looking at the desired sex composition of children after mortality priming" (PDF), Society, Biology, & Human Affairs, 76 (2): 11–23 [permanent dead link].
  4. ^ de Berg, M.; van Kreveld, M.; Overmars, M. H.; Schwarzkopf, O. (2008), Computational Geometry: Algorithms and Applications (3rd ed.), Springer-Verlag, p. 116, ISBN 9783540779735 .
  5. ^ Peterson, Ivars (June 29, 1991), "Computing 'fusion trees' to explode barriers: an algorithm that speeds up how fast computers can sort information", Science News .
  6. ^ Willard, Dan E. (2018), About the Chasm Separating the Goals of Hilbert’s Consistency Program From the Second Incompleteness Theorem, arXiv:1807.04717Freely accessible