Dark at Noon

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Not to be confused with Darkness at Noon.
Dark at Noon
Dark at Noon.png
Directed by Raúl Ruiz
Produced by Leonardo De La Fuente Pierre Bernard Guiremand Antonio de Cunha Telles
Written by Raúl Ruiz
Paul Fontaine
Starring John Hurt
Didier Bourdon
Music by Jorge Arriagada
Cinematography Ramón F. Suárez
Edited by Helen Weiss-Miller
Distributed by Sidereal Distribution
Release date
  • 20 January 1993 (1993-01-20)
Running time
100 minutes
Country Portugal
France
Language English
French

Dark at Noon (French: L'Œil qui ment, lit. The Eye that Lies) is a 1993 Chilean-French comedy film directed by Raúl Ruiz.It was entered into the 1992 Cannes Film Festival.[1]

The film portrays a surrealist world that Felicien, the protagonist played by John Hurt, must navigate through as he seeks to learn what has become of his deceased father’s fortune. Described as “an elaborateDadaist joke” by The New York Times, Ruiz’s film was intended to emulate a Monty Python-esque humor with deadpan comedic tone.[2][3]

Plot[edit]

Post World War I, the French doctor Felicien travels to a small town in Portugal to visit a factory his father invested his fortune in prior to his death. Upon his arrival to the town with fields of crutches protruding from the ground, Felicien finds the area to be a surreal dream world where visions and miracles are such ordinary occurrences they become a nuisance. The dogs of the town are sacred animals and the people of the town are the sleep walking undead. Felicien finds his way to a mansion where Anthony, the wealthy owner of the factory that produces prosthetic limbs, resides with his wife Ines. After sitting through a very bizarre dinner with the residents of the mansion Felicien has an equally strange dream involving the couple.

While exploring the town Felicien meets a priest buried in the ground by Ellis, an artist who uses corpses to make living paintings and who looks identical to one of Felicien’s psychiatric patients. The priest is exhausted by the endless miracles, as it is his job to excommunicate people for performing miracles not authorized by the church. Felicien continues to have strange encounters that blur the lines between illusion and the real, including conversations withLe Marquis, who inhabits the same body as Anthony, and the Virgin Mary who mimics and mocks Felicien when she appears before him. He also meets a young boy who performs miracles and helps Felicien out when he can’t find a bathroom and needs to urinate. One of Felicien’s more unusual encounters is with a giant sculpture of a finger made from marble that crashes through the ceiling of the guest room of the mansion, nearly crushing him.

Felicien explores Anthony’s mansion to find a basement laboratory where disturbing experiments are performed. Felicien learns that doubles of Anthony and Ines were created in the lab when their souls left their bodies one night. The couple’s souls wander and sometimes occupy the body of Le Marquis. Towards the end of the film Felicien visits the laboratory again and gets thrown out of the lab where he finds himself stuck levitating in the air against his will. The miracle performing boy attempts to help him get back on the ground, but must first get permission to perform the miracle. In the meantime the priest lassoes a rope around Felicien and leads him around. Eventually the miracle boy is able to help him down to the ground. Felicien rushes back to the laboratory when he hears Le Marquis is dying to wish him farewell. Felicien finally leaves the strange town, floating away as he walks towards the sky.

Cast[edit]

Production[edit]

Locations[edit]

In an interview, Ruiz states he chose Portugal as the setting of the film because the county reminds him of Chile, specifically remarking on how the Portuguese and Chileans never look people in the eye, but instead look at the chest, but above all else the Portuguese possess a sense of secrecy which Ruiz was drawn to. He also comments “the Alentejo is the frontier, a very isolated place where history becomes an unbelievable blow” when ask why he chose Alentejo as the setting of the film.[4]

Casting[edit]

Originally, Ruiz had wanted to cast Nanni Moretti for the role of Felicien because a producer wanted the film to resemble a comedy as much as possible, but after seeing Didier Bourdon’s audition for a smaller role, Ruiz decided to make him one of the main characters. The role of the parish priest was also recast prior to filming. The role was originally intended for Jean-Francois Stevenin, but due to scheduling conflicts the role was re-cast and re-written for Daniel Prevost.[4]

Filming[edit]

Dark at Noon was the first film Ruiz made with panoramic framing. The film was shot on an Arri 535 camera with a very sensitive film stock, as opposed to previously shooting on 16 mm film.[3] Ruiz states the new technical means of the film helped create a distinction from the look and feel of television that was more cinematic and allowed him to create shots that gave viewers “the feeling that they occupied a precise and determined place from which their vision was exercised.”[4]

Reception[edit]

Dark at Noon premiered at the 1992 Cannes Film Festival where the film competed for the Palme d’Or.[5] The film also screened at the Chicago International Film Festival the same year and in 1993 it was briefly released theatrically in several countries.[6] Dark at Noon has received both positive and negative reviews from critics ranging from the highest praise to complaints about the plot being confusing and incomprehensible. Frédéric Richard wrote for theRevue Mensuelle de Cinema in Positif magazine July 1992 issue “The eye that lies was without a doubt the most original movie of the competition, the more positively innovative and most interesting for its look carried on the world of the pictures. No luck of prize, therefore, for Raul Ruiz to the festival of Cannes, dominated this year by a manifest reactionary tendency. With the oeii that lies, Ruiz achieves a funny, oniric and troubling movie.”[7] However, a less favorable review of Dark at Noon calls the film “intriguing or amusing at times, but mostly infuriatingly confusing and random.”[8] Richard Scheib gives the film a 1 star rating and claims Ruiz has no idea of plot.[9]

Further reading[edit]

Richard, Frédéric “L’oeil qui ment (Dark at Noon).” Positif - Revue Mensuelle de Cinéma; Paris July 1992: 91–92. Print.

Piazzo, Philippe, and Richard, Frédéric. “Entretien avec Raul Ruiz: Fabriquer du miracle.” Positif - Revue Mensuelle de Cinéma; Paris Feb. 1993: 25–30. Print.

References[edit]

  1. ^ "Festival de Cannes: Dark at Noon". festival-cannes.com. Archived from the original on 18 August 2011. Retrieved 14 August 2009. 
  2. ^ Holden, Stephen (August 20, 1993) Review/Film; Of Miracles and Visions In the Realm of the Everyday, nytimes.com. Retrieved March 1, 2017.
  3. ^ a b L'Œil qui ment, lecinemaderaoulruiz.com. Retrieved March 1, 2017.
  4. ^ a b c Piazzo, Philippe ; Richard, Frederick (February 1993) pp.25-30. Interview with Raul Ruiz: Making a Miracle Positive - Monthly Movie Review; Paris
  5. ^ Festival De Cannes: Dark at Noon, festival-cannes.fr. Retrieved March 1, 2017.
  6. ^ Review: Dark at Noon, fright.com. Retrieved March 1, 2017.
  7. ^ Richard, Frédéric (July 1992) pp. 91-92 L'oeil qui ment (Dark at Noon) Positif - Revue Mensuelle de Cinéma; Paris
  8. ^ The Worldwide Celluloid Massacre: Rauol Ruiz, thelastexit.com. Retrieved March 1, 2017.
  9. ^ Scheib, Richard (1999-2017) Moria: Science Fiction, Horror, and Fantasy Film Review: Dark At Noon, moria.com. Retrieved March 1, 2017.

External links[edit]