In British courts, beginning in 1823, a sentence of death recorded meant that the judge was abstaining from voicing a sentence of capital punishment in cases where the judge foresaw that a royal pardon would be forthcoming if a proper death sentence were to be issued. It was, in other words, a death sentence in name only, with no actual effect in law.
Royal pardons for capital punishment had become routine at the time for most common crimes. Under the Judgment of Death Act 1823, a "death recorded" sentence allowed the judge to meet common law sentencing precedent while avoiding mocking by the sentenced or the public who realised an actual death penalty sentence was likely to be overridden. As the verbal pronouncement of a death sentence was necessary for the criminal to be actually executed, a death recorded sentence meant no death penalty at all. The sentence became much less common after the Criminal Law Consolidation Acts 1861 greatly reduced the number of capital offences.
The number of offences for which death was nominally the sentence and the sentence of death recorded were criticized at the time of usage both for being capriciously cruel and for uncertainty of actual punishment:
If all the persons, who receive sentence of death at the Old Bailey, were actually to pass into the hands of the executioner, the feelings of the people would not tolerate the repeated exhibitions of the wholesale work of blood .... What a number of convicts, too, have the sentence of death recorded against them at the several Assizes, who, as a matter of course, never suffer the last punishment of the law! ... If death ought not to be inflicted--if, in fact, it dare not be inflicted on the greater number of those to whom our laws afford it, is not the solemn passing of the sentence, and the recording it in open Court, and in the face of the people, a mockery of retributive justice ...?
- Richard Ward. "Sentencing". The Digital Panopticon: Tracing London Convicts in Britain and Australia, 1780-1925. Universities of Liverpool, Sheffield, Oxford and Sussex. Retrieved 24 May 2019.
in 1823 a new practice of “death recorded” was introduced, whereby judges could abstain from pronouncing a sentence of death on any capital convict whom they considered to be a fit subject for a pardon. The carefully-choreographed theatre of sentencing and its emotional impact might also be undermined by open acts of defiance by the convict or the attending crowd. It was complained in the eighteenth century that some capital convicts made light of their sentence by comments and gestures.
- Elena Dzhanova (24 May 2019). "Here's an Actual Nightmare: Naomi Wolf Learning On-Air That Her Book Is Wrong". New York (magazine). Retrieved 24 May 2019.
“death recorded,” a 19th-century English legal term. “Death recorded” means that a convict was pardoned for his crimes rather than given the death sentence.
- Herbert Newman Mozley; George Crispe Whiteley (1908). Mozley and Whiteley's Law Dictionary. Butterworth & Company. p. 312. OCLC 7517961.
- Brewer, Ebenezer Cobham (2014). Dictionary of Phrase and Fable (1st (1870), reissued ed.). Cambridge University Press. p. 740. ISBN 1108068871. Retrieved 25 May 2019.
Death recorded means that the sentence of death is recorded or written by the recorder against the criminal, but not verbally pronounced by the judge. This is done when the capital punishment is likely to be remitted. It is the verbal sentence of the judge that is the only sufficient warrant of an execution.
- Society for the Diffusion of Information on the Subject of Capital Punishments, ed. (1836). The Punishment of Death: A Selection of Articles from the Morning Herald, with Notes. 1. London: Hatchard & Son--Smith, Elder, & Co. p. 4. OCLC 3386523.
- "Naomi Wolf and publisher discussing fixes for new book". Associated Press. 24 May 2019. Retrieved 24 May 2019.
He also pointed out that Wolf had misinterpreted the term “death recorded,” which the author had assumed meant the accused was executed. “Death recorded” meant the sentence was documented, but not carried out.
- Zipporah Osei (24 May 2019). "An Author Learned of a Mortifying Research Mistake Live on the Radio. Here's How Twitter Reacted". The Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved 24 May 2019.
In her book, Wolf cites the case of Thomas Silver, a 14-year-old she believed was sentenced to death for a homosexual act. Wolf said in the interview that she found several dozen similar “executions.” A newspaper report from the time, which Sweet presented to Wolf during the interview, shows that Silver was actually shown mercy because of his age.
|This article relating to law in the United Kingdom, or its constituent jurisdictions, is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.|