Decline of newspapers

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Newspapers on sale in Rome, Italy, May 2005

From the first newspaper publication in 1690 to the twenty-first century’s, newspapers have functioned in the nation as vehicles in the American Revolution and early nation; as promoters of consumerism and its values in the nineteenth century; as announcers for political and social issues, and as arbiters of national values. During the early period in the American Revolution around thirty newspapers were published throughout the American colonies, often to make a living from political currents and for a particular political agency. After the 1830s, the Mass-circulation developed and during 1990 newspaper circulation was at its highest.

The decline of newspapers has been debated, as the industry has faced slumping ad sales, the loss of much classified advertising and precipitous drops in circulation. "In recent years newspaper’s weekday circulation fell 7% and Sunday circulation fell 4%, both showing their greatest declines since 2010. Overall, the industry continues to shrink, with Editor & Publisher’s DataBook listing 126 fewer daily papers in 2014 than in 2004". To survive, newspapers are considering combining and other options,[1] although the outcome of such partnerships has been criticized.[2] Despite these problems, newspaper companies with significant brand value and which have published their work online have had a significant rise in viewership.

Causes for decline[edit]

Newsroom of The New York Times, 1942

The newspaper industry has always been cyclical, and the industry has weathered previous troughs. Television's arrival in the 1950s began the decline of newspapers as most people's source of daily news. But the explosion of the Internet in the 1990s increased the range of media choices available to the average reader while further cutting into newspapers' dominance as the source of news. Television and the Internet both bring news to the consumer faster and in a more visual style than newspapers, which are constrained by their physical format and their physical manufacturing and distribution. Competing mediums also offer advertisers moving images and sound. And the Internet search function allows advertisers to tailor their pitch to readers who have revealed what they are seeking—an enormous advantage.

The Internet has also gone a step further than television in eroding the advertising income of newspapers, as — unlike broadcast media — it proves a convenient vehicle for classified advertising, particularly in categories such as jobs, vehicles, and real estate. Free services like Craigslist have decimated the classified advertising departments of newspapers, some of which depended on classifieds for 70% of their ad revenue.[3] Research has shown that Craigslist cost the newspaper industry $5.4 billion from 2000-2007, and that changes on the classified side of newspaper business led to an increase in subscription prices, a decrease in display advertising rates, and impacted the online strategy of some newspapers.[4] At the same time, newspapers have been pinched by consolidation of large department stores, which once accounted for substantial advertising sums.

Press baron Rupert Murdoch once described the profits flowing from his stable of newspapers as "rivers of gold", but several years later said, "sometimes rivers dry up."[5] "Simply put", wrote The Buffalo News owner Warren Buffett, "if cable and satellite broadcasting, as well as the Internet, had come along first, newspapers as we know them probably would never have existed."[6]

As their revenues have been squeezed, newspapers have also been increasingly assailed by other media taking away not only their readers but their principal sources of profit. Many of these 'new media' are not saddled with expensive union contracts, printing presses, delivery fleets and overhead built over decades. Many of these competitors are simply 'aggregators' of news, often derived from print sources, but without print media's capital-intensive overhead.[7] One estimate put the percentage of online news derived from newspapers at 80%.[8]

"Newspapers are doing the reporting in this country," observed John S. Carroll, former editor of the Los Angeles Times for five years. "Google and Yahoo! aren't those people putting reporters on the street in any number. Blogs cannot afford it."[9] Many newspapers also suffer from the broad trend toward "fragmentation" of all media — in which small numbers of large media outlets attempting to serve substantial portions of the population are replaced by an abundance of smaller and more specialized organizations, often aiming only to serve specific interest groups. So-called narrowcasting has splintered audiences into smaller and smaller slivers. But newspapers have not been alone in this: the rise of cable television and satellite television at the expense of network television in countries such as the United States and United Kingdom is another example of this fragmentation.

With social media sites overtaking TV as a source for news for young people, news organisations have become increasingly reliant on social media platforms for generating traffic. A report by Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism described how a 'second wave of disruption' had hit news organisations,[10] with publishers such as The Economist having to employ large social media teams to optimise their posts and maximise traffic.[11] Major publishers such as Le Monde and Vogue now use advanced artificial intelligence (AI) technology from Echobox to post stories more effectively and generate higher volumes of traffic.[12]

According to Martin Hamer “One of the major reasons for the decline of local and regional newspapers was the rapid expansion of free newspapers”. During the 1970s and 1980s there was an increasing use of regional newspapers, known as “freesheets”. Now, local free newspapers are delivered directly to homes weekly and contain advertisements for businesses and services. An example of a free newspaper in USA is the Washington Post Express, distributed at buses and subway stations. To be financially viable, free newspapers focus more on marketing as part of their business model but the emergence of this free newspaper appears to have had a negative effect on the sales of paid-for newspapers.

Performance in the market (2000–present)[edit]

United States[edit]

Since the beginning of 2009, the United States has seen a number of major metropolitan dailies shuttered or drastically pruned after no buyers emerged, including the Rocky Mountain News, closed in February, and the Seattle Post-Intelligencer, reduced to a bare-bones Internet operation.[13] San Francisco Chronicle narrowly averted closure when employees made steep concessions.[14] In Detroit, both newspapers, Detroit Free Press and The Detroit News, slashed home delivery to three days a week, while prodding readers to visit the newspapers' Internet sites on other days.[15] In Tucson, Arizona, the state's oldest newspaper, the Tucson Citizen, said it would cease publishing on March 21, 2009, when parent Gannett Company failed to find a buyer.[16]

A number of other large, financially troubled newspapers are seeking buyers.[17] One of the few large dailies finding a buyer is The San Diego Union-Tribune, which agreed to be sold to a private equity firm for what The Wall Street Journal called "a rock-bottom price" of less than $50 million — essentially a real estate purchase.[18] (The newspaper was estimated to have been worth roughly $1 billion as recently as 2004.)[19] The Sun-Times Media Group, publisher of the eponymous bankrupt newspaper, fielded a meager $5 million cash bid, plus assumption of debt, for assets last claimed worth $310 million.

Large newspaper chains filing bankruptcy since December 2008 include the Tribune Company, the Journal Register Company, the Minneapolis Star Tribune, Philadelphia Newspapers LLC, Sun-Times Media Group and Freedom Communications.[20]

Some newspaper chains that have purchased other papers have seen stock values plummet.[21] The McClatchy Company, the nation's third-largest newspaper company, was the only bidder on the Knight Ridder chain of newspapers in 2005. Since its $6.5 billion Knight Ridder purchase, McClatchy's stock has lost more than 98% of its value.[22] McClatchy subsequently announced large layoffs and executive pay cuts, as its shares fell into penny stock territory.[23] (Although McClatchy faced delisting from the New York Stock Exchange for having a share price below $1, in September 2009, it was able to overcome this threat.[24] Others have not been so lucky. In 2008 and 2009, three other U.S. newspaper chains have seen their shares delisted by the New York Stock Exchange.[25])

Other newspaper company valuations have been similarly punished: the stocks of Gannett Company, Lee Enterprises and Media General traded at less than two dollars per share by March 2009, with The Washington Post Company's stock faring better than most, thanks to diversification into educational training programs — and away from publishing.[26] Similarly, UK-based Pearson PLC, owner of the Financial Times, increased earnings in 2008 despite a drop in newspaper profits, thanks to diversification away from publishing.[27]

By March 2018, it was acknowledged that the digital circulation for major newspapers was declining as well, leading to speculation that the entire newspaper industry in the United States was dying off.[28] Circulation for once promising online news sites such as Buzzfeed, Vice, and Vox declined in 2017 and 2018 as well.[28][29][30] In June 2018, a poll conducted by the Pew Research Center revealed a 9% decline in digital circulation of newspapers during the year 2017, suggesting that revenue from newspapers online could not offset the decline in print circulation.[31]

The deterioration in the United States newspaper market led one senator to introduce a bill in March 2009 allowing newspaper companies to restructure as nonprofit corporations with an array of tax breaks.[32] The Newspaper Revitalization Act would allow newspapers to operate as nonprofits similar to public broadcasting companies, barring them from making political endorsements.[33][34]

A 2015 report from the Brookings Institution shows that the number of newspapers per hundred million population fell from 1,200 (in 1945) to 400 in 2014. Over that same period, circulation per capita declined from 35 percent in the mid-1940s to under 15 percent. The number of newspaper journalists has decreased from 43,000 in 1978 to 33,000 in 2015. Other traditional news media have also suffered. Since 1980 the television networks have lost half their audience for evening newscasts; the audience for radio news has shrunk by 40%.[35]

United Kingdom[edit]

In the United Kingdom, newspaper publishers have been similarly hit. In late 2008 The Independent announced job cuts, and in 2016 The Independent's print edition ceased circulation.[36] In January the chain Associated Newspapers, now DMG Media, sold a controlling stake in the London Evening Standard as it announced a 24% decline in 2008 ad revenues. In March 2009 parent company Daily Mail and General Trust said job cuts would be deeper than expected, spanning its newspapers, which include the Leicester Mercury, the Bristol Evening Post and the Derby Telegraph.[37] One industry report predicted that 1 in 10 UK print publications would cut its frequency of publication in half, go online only or shut in 2009.[38]

Elsewhere[edit]

Newspaper market in Salta, Argentina, 2009

The challenges facing the industry are not limited to the United States, or even English-speaking markets. Newspapers in Switzerland and the Netherlands, for instance, have lost half of their classified advertising to the Internet.[39] At its annual convention[40] slated for May 2009, in Barcelona, Spain, the World Association of Newspapers and News Publishers has titled the convention's subject "Newspapers Focus on Print & Advertising Revenues in Difficult Times".[41]

In September 2008, the World Association of Newspapers called for regulators to block a proposed Google–Yahoo! advertising partnership, calling it a threat to newspaper industry revenues worldwide.[42] The World Association of Newspapers and News Publishers (WAN) painted a stark picture of the threat posed to newspapers by the search engine giants. "Perhaps never in the history of newspaper publishing has a single, commercial entity threatened to exert this much control over the destiny of the press," said the Paris-based global newspaper organization of the proposed pact.[43]

Of the world's 100 best-selling daily newspapers, 74 are published in Asia — with China, Japan and India accounting for 62 of those.

Sales of newspapers rose in Latin America, Asia and the Middle East, but fell in other regions of the world, including Western Europe, where the proliferation of free dailies helped bolster overall circulation figures. While Internet revenues are rising for the industry, the bulk of its Web revenues come from a few areas, with most revenue generated in the United States, western Europe and Asia–Pacific region.[44]

Technological change[edit]

The increasing use of the Internet search function, primarily through large engines such as Google, has also changed the habits of readers.[45] Instead of perusing general interest publications, such as newspapers, readers are more likely to seek particular writers, blogs or sources of information through targeted searches, rendering the agglomeration of newspapers increasingly irrelevant. "Power is shifting to the individual journalist from the news outlet with more people seeking out names through search, e-mail, blogs and social media," the industry publication Editor & Publisher noted in summarizing a recent study from the Project for Excellence in Journalism foundation.[46]

"When we go online", writes columnist Nicholas Kristof of The New York Times, "each of us is our own editor, our own gatekeeper."[47]

Where once the ability to disseminate information was restricted to those with printing presses or broadcast mechanisms, the Internet has enabled thousands of individual commentators to communicate directly with others through blogs or instant message services.[48] Even open journalism projects like Wikipedia have contributed to the reordering of the media landscape, as readers are no longer restricted to established print organs for information.[49]

But the search engine experience has left some newspaper proprietors cold. "The aggregators and plagiarists will soon have to pay a price for the co-opting of our content," Rupert Murdoch told the World Media Summit in Beijing, China. "If we do not take advantage of the current movement toward paid content, it will be the content creators – the people in this hall – who will pay the ultimate price and the content kleptomaniacs who triumph."[50]

Critics of the newspaper as a medium also argue that while today's newspapers may appear visually different from their predecessors a century ago, in many respects they have changed little and have failed to keep pace with changes in society. The technology revolution has meant that readers accustomed to waiting for a daily newspaper can now receive up-to-the-minute updates from Web portals, bloggers and new services such as Twitter.[51] The expanding reach of broadband Internet access means such updates have become commonplace for many users, especially the more affluent, an audience cultivated by advertisers.[52]

The gloomy outlook is not universal. In some countries, such as India, the newspaper remains more popular than Internet and broadcast media. Even where the problems are felt most keenly, in North America and Europe, there have been recent success stories, such as the dramatic rise of free daily newspapers, like those of Sweden's Metro International,[53] as well as papers targeted towards the Hispanic market, local weekly shoppers,[54] and so-called hyperlocal news.[55]

But these new revenue streams, such as that from newspapers' proprietary Web sites, are often a fraction of the sums generated by the previous advertisement- and circulation-driven revenue streams, and so newspapers have been forced to curtail their overhead while simultaneously trying to entice new users.[56] With revenues plummeting, many newspapers have slashed news bureaus and journalists, while still attempting to publish compelling content — much of it more interactive,[57] more lifestyle-driven and more celebrity-conscious.

In response to falling ad revenues and plunging circulation, many newspapers have cut staff as well as editorial content, and in a vicious cycle, those cuts often spur more and deeper circulation declines—triggering more loss of ad revenues. "No industry can cut its way to future success," says industry analyst John Morton. "At some point the business must improve."[6]

Overall, in the United States, average operating profit margins for newspapers remain at 11%.[58] But that figure is falling rapidly, and in many cases is inadequate to service the debt that some newspaper companies took on during better times.[46] And while circulation has dropped 2% annually for years, that decline has accelerated.[59]

The circulation decline, coupled with a 23% drop in 2008 newspaper ad revenues, have proven a double whammy for some newspaper chains.[32] Combined with the current recession, the cloudy outlook for future profits has meant that many newspapers put on the block have been unable to find buyers, who remain concerned with increasing competition, dwindling profits and a business model that seems increasingly antiquated.[60]

"As succeeding generations grow up with the Web and lose the habit of reading print", noted Columbia Journalism Review in 2007, "it seems improbable that newspapers can survive with a cost structure at least 50% higher than their nimbler and cheaper Internet competitors."[61] The problem facing newspapers is generational: while in 2005 an estimated 70% of older Americans read a newspaper daily, fewer than 20% of younger Americans did.[62]

"It is the fundamental problem facing the industry," writes newspaper analyst Morton. "It's probably not going away. And no one has figured a way out."[62]

By 2016 social media sites were overtaking television as a source for news for young people and news organisations have become increasingly reliant on social media platforms for generating traffic. A report by Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism described how a 'second wave of disruption' had hit news organisations,[10] with publishers such as The Economist having to employ large social media teams to optimise their posts and maximise traffic.[11] Major publishers such as Le Monde and Vogue increasingly use advanced artificial intelligence (AI) technology to post stories more effectively and generate higher volumes of traffic.[12]

Decline in Readership[edit]

Due to the growth of digital technologies, traditional print publishing industries, including books, magazines, and newspapers have experienced a decrease in their readership. According to Barry Hollander, it is difficult to overstate the overall percentage in decline print readership, but it is a fact that socio- demographic factors affects it. “Decreasing generational replacement of the print publication habit, age, income, and education, have been identified as key to understanding the decline in newspaper readership”[63] . With each generation, fewer and fewer young adults continue with the tradition of adopting the local or nearby newspapers into their home and into their print readership routine.

According to Kathryn Cook and Micah Issitt, declining newspaper readership has been linked to the increasing popularity of internet sources, along with a growing number of smartphones and tablets. Most e-readers have access to books, magazines and newspapers, either through wi-fi or phone connections. The portability and accessibility of E-reader sources has been suggested as the reason for further decrease in the consumption of printed newspapers. In March 2011, Nobel Prize winner Toni Morrison expressed concern that new technologies would only serve to increase America’s literacy divide[64].

Financial strategies[edit]

While newspaper companies continue to produce much of the award-winning journalism, consumers of that journalism are less willing to pay for it in a world where information on the Web is plentiful and free. Plans for Web-based subscription services have largely faltered, with the exception of financial outlets like The Wall Street Journal, which have been able to generate substantial revenues from subscribers whose subscriptions are often underwritten by corporate employers. (Subscriptions to the Journal's paid Web site were up 7% in 2008.) Some general-interest newspapers, even high-profile papers like The New York Times, were forced to experiment with their initial paid Internet subscription models. Times Select, the Times' initial pay service, lasted exactly two years before the company abandoned it.[65] However, they later brought back paid services and now allow visitors only 10 free articles per month before requiring them to purchase a subscription.[66]

Within the industry, there is little consensus on the best strategy for survival. Some pin their hopes on new technologies such as e-paper or radical revisions of the newspaper, such as Daily Me;[67] others, like a recent cover story in Time magazine, have advocated a system that includes both subscriptions as well as micro-payments for individual stories.[68][69]

Some newspaper analysts believe the wisest move is embracing the Internet, and exploiting the considerable brand value and consumer trust that newspapers have built over decades. But revenues from online editions have come nowhere near matching previous print income from circulation and advertising sales, since they get only about one-tenth to one-twentieth the revenue for a Web reader that they do for a print reader;[70] many struggle to maintain their previous levels of reporting amidst eroding profits.[71]

With profits falling, many newspapers have cut back on their most expensive reporting projects — overseas bureaus and investigative journalism.[72] Some investigative projects often take months, with their payoff uncertain. In the past, larger newspapers often devoted a portion of their editorial budget to such efforts, but with ad dollars drying up, many papers are looking closer at the productivity of individual reporters, and judging speculative investments in investigative reports as non-essential.[73]

Some advocates have suggested that instead of investigative reports funded by newspapers, that non-profit foundations pick up the slack. The new non-profit ProPublica, a $10-million-a-year foundation devoted solely to investigative reporting and overseen by former Wall Street Journal editor Paul Steiger, for instance, hopes that its 18 reporters will be able to release their investigative reports free, courtesy of partnerships with such outlets as The New York Times, The Atlantic and 60 Minutes. The Huffington Post also announced that it would set aside funds for investigative reporting.[74] Other industry observers are now clamoring for government subsidies to the newspaper industry.[75]

Observers point out that the reliability and accountability of newspapers is being replaced by a sea of anonymous bloggers, many with uncertain credentials and points of view. Where once the reader of a daily newspaper might consume reporting, for instance, by an established Cairo bureau chief for a major newspaper, today that same reader might be directed by a search engine to an anonymous blogger with cloudy allegiances, training or ability.[76]

Crisis[edit]

US Newspaper Advertising Revenue
Newspaper Association of America published data [77]
Number of newspapers in the United States [78]

Ironically, these dilemmas facing the newspaper industry come as its product has never been more sought-after. "The peculiar fact about the current crisis", writes The New Yorker's economics writer James Surowiecki, "is that even as big papers have become less profitable they've arguably become more popular."[79]

As the demand for news has exploded, so have consumers of the output of newspapers. Both nytimes.com and washingtonpost.com, for instance, rank among the top 20 global news sites.[62] But those consumers are now reading newspapers online for free, and although newspapers have been able to convert some of that viewership into ad dollars, it is a trickle compared to previous sources. At most newspapers, Web advertising accounts for only 10–15% of revenues.[32]

Some observers have compared the dilemma to that faced by the music industry. "What's going on in the news business is a lot like what's happening with music," said editor Paul Steiger, a 43-year journalism veteran, who further added that free distribution of content through the Internet has caused "a total collapse of the business model".[73]

The revenue streams that newspapers counted on to subsidize their product have changed irrevocably: in 2008, according to a study by the Pew Research Center, more people in the United States got their news for free on the Internet than paid for it by buying a newspaper or magazine. "With newspapers entering bankruptcy even as their audience grows, the threat is not just to the companies that own them, but also the news itself," observed writer David Carr of The New York Times in a January 2009 column.[80]

Outlook[edit]

In 2016, for the third year in a row, the CareerCast survey of the best and worst jobs in the U.S. reports that a newspaper reporter is the worst career. It pointed to fewer job prospects because of publications closing down, and declining ad revenue providing less money for salaries. Being an over the air broadcaster was the third worst, and advertising sales is in the bottom 10. Average annual salary for print journalists is $37,200.[81]

Depending on location and circumstances, each specific newspaper will face varied threats and changes. In some cases, new owners have increased their reliance on print, not trying to rely a lot more on digital services. However, in most cases, there is an attempt to find new revenue sources online that are less based on print sales. How much further ad sales will decline cannot be predicted with accuracy.

Ultimately, the newspaper of the future may bear little resemblance to the newsprint edition familiar to older readers.[82] It may become a hybrid, part-print and part-Internet, or perhaps eventually, as has happened with several newspapers, including the Seattle Post-Intelligencer, The Christian Science Monitor and The Ann Arbor News, Internet only.[83][84] In the meantime, the transition from the printed page to whatever comes next will likely be fraught with challenges, both for the newspaper industry and for its consumers.

"My expectation," wrote executive editor Bill Keller of The New York Times in January 2009, "is that for the foreseeable future our business will continue to be a mix of print and online journalism, with the growth online offsetting the (gradual, we hope) decline of print".[85] The paper in newspaper may go away, insist industry stalwarts, but the news will remain. "Paper is dying," said Nick Bilton, a technologist for The Times, "but it's just a device. Replacing it with pixels is a better experience."[86] On September 8, 2010, Arthur Sulzberger, Jr., Chairman and Publisher of The New York Times, told an International Newsroom Summit in London that "We will stop printing the New York Times sometime in the future, date TBD."[87]

New York University journalism professor Mitchell Stephens has called for a turn toward "wisdom journalism" that will take a more evaluative, investigative, informed, and possibly even opinionated stance.[88]

But even as pixels replace print, and as newspapers undergo wrenching surgery, necessitating deep cutbacks, reallocation of remaining reporters, and the slashing of decades-old overhead, some observers remain optimistic.[89] What emerges may be "newspapers" unrecognizable to older readers, but which may be more timely, more topical and more flexible. Less competition from other local printers will also be a major determining factor.

"Journalistic outlets will discover", wrote Michael Hirschorn in The Atlantic, "that the Web allows (okay, forces) them to concentrate on developing expertise in a narrower set of issues and interests, while helping journalists from other places and publications find new audiences."[71] The 'newspaper' of the future, say Hirschorn and others, may resemble The Huffington Post more than anything flung at today's stoops and driveways.[90][91]

Much of that experimentation may happen in the world's fastest-growing newspaper markets. "The number of newspapers and their circulation has declined the world over except in India and China," according to former CEO Olivier Fleurot of Financial Times. "The world is becoming more digital but technology has helped newspapers as much as the Internet."[92] Making those technological changes work for them, instead of against them, will decide whether newspapers remain vital — or roadkill on the information superhighway.[93]

There may be a percentage of readers that refuse to use the Internet and electronic screens, preferring hard copies. What this percentage will be, in various places and times, remains to be seen. Some readers have too much screen time already, and enjoy going back to paper and ink at times. Some ad attempts online are blocked, unlike a paper ad. The value of print advertising is that a significant percentage of the population will see the same ad, unlike specialized Internet ads.

Impact[edit]

Current Population Survey conducted an analysis between the closure of the Rocky Mountain News, the Seattle Post- Intelligencer Newspaper and a significant decline in civic engagement of citizens in Denver and Seattle. The results suggest that this decline might be attributed to the newspaper closures. “The data from the CPS indicate that civic engagement in Seattle and Denver dropped 30 % significantly from 2008 to 2009—a decline that is not consistently replicated over the same time period in other major American cities that did not lose a newspaper”[94]. Scholars argue that newspaper were fundamental for the formation of associations that were vital to citizen’s participation. According to research, newspapers include readers in the community as active members.

See also[edit]

References[edit]

  1. ^ "Newspaper Execs Treading Carefully on Anti-trust Laws". Nieman Labs. May 28, 2009. Retrieved 2009-07-14.
  2. ^ "The Newspaper Economic Action Plan: A sense check". idio. June 4, 2009. Archived from the original on 2009-06-24. Retrieved 2009-07-14.
  3. ^ Fitzgerald, Mark (March 18, 2009). "How Did Newspapers Get In This Pickle?". Editor & Publisher. Retrieved 2014-01-30.
  4. ^ Seamans, Robert; Zhu, Feng (February 2014). "Responses to Entry in Multi-Sided Markets: The Impact of Craigslist on Local Newspapers" (PDF). Management Science. 60 (2): 476–493. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.306.9200. doi:10.1287/mnsc.2013.1785.
  5. ^ Plunkett, John (November 24, 2005). "Murdoch Predicts Gloomy Future for Press". The Guardian. London. Retrieved May 3, 2010.
  6. ^ a b Morton, John (October–November 2007). "Buffeted: Newspapers Are Paying the Price for Shortsighted Thinking". American Journalism Review.
  7. ^ Alterman, Eric (March 31, 2008). "Out of Print: The Death and Life of the American Newspaper". The New Yorker.
  8. ^ Baker, Russell (August 16, 2007). "Goodbye to Newspapers?". The New York Review of Books.
  9. ^ Richard Campbell, Christopher R. Martin, Bettina G. Fabos (2008). Media and Culture with 2009 Update. Macmillan. p. 307. ISBN 978-0-312-47824-7. Retrieved March 27, 2009.CS1 maint: Uses authors parameter (link)
  10. ^ a b Wakefield, Jane (15 June 2016). "Young using social media to access news". Retrieved 5 October 2017 – via www.bbc.co.uk.
  11. ^ a b Preston, Peter (31 July 2016). "Print still has a future, and Le Monde can prove it. Aux armes, citoyens!". Retrieved 5 October 2017 – via www.theguardian.com.
  12. ^ a b Smith, Mark (22 July 2016). "So you think you chose to read this article?". Retrieved 5 October 2017 – via www.bbc.co.uk.
  13. ^ "Seattle Post-Intelligencer to Go Online Only". Chicago Tribune. March 16, 2009.
  14. ^ Rogers, Paul (March 14, 2009). "Workers OK Deal in Effort to Save San Francisco Chronicle". San Jose Mercury News.
  15. ^ Lieberman, David (March 17, 2009). "Newspaper Closings Raise Fears About Industry". USA Today. Retrieved May 3, 2010.
  16. ^ Rotstein, Arthur H. (March 16, 2009). "Tucson Citizen to Close March 21". MSNBC. Associated Press.[dead link]
  17. ^ Some estimate that of the 50 largest daily newspaper in America, 19 are operating in the red.[1]
  18. ^ But despite the purchase of Diego newspaper, the deal is unlikely to stoke much private equity interest in the industry, according to The Wall Street Journal, "as the downward trends the industry faces are too challenging for most firms to want to take on". While there are a large number of newspapers for sale, "most of them have more liabilities — union contracts, for instance – than worthwhile assets," notes The Journal.[2]
  19. ^ Ovide, Shira; Adams, Russell (March 19, 2009). "San Diego Paper Lands Fire-Sale Buyer". The Wall Street Journal.
  20. ^ "More Newspaper Shake-ups Loom with Chapter 11". Associated Press. February 23, 2009. Archived from the original on February 27, 2009. "Freedom Communications Files for Bankruptcy Protection". The New York Times. September 9, 2009. Retrieved May 3, 2010.
  21. ^ While newspapers earnings have suffered, the value of newspaper franchises has suffered more. Because the equity markets attempt to price future earnings, newspaper share values have swooned because of the uncertainty of their future revenue streams.
  22. ^ Alterman, Eric (March 31, 2008). "Out of Print". The New Yorker.
  23. ^ Hennelly, William. "Newspaper Winners and Losers: McClatchy". TheStreet.com.
  24. ^ "McClatchy Receives Compliance Notice From NYSE" (Press release). McClatchy. September 4, 2009. Archived from the original on 2012-09-07. Retrieved 2009-09-12.
  25. ^ With three large newspaper chains having been booted out of the New York Stock Exchange, the figure would be higher except that the Exchange eased its listing requirements temporarily because of the global financial crisis.[3][dead link]
  26. ^ Financial returns on newspaper stocks have been dismal for a decade. An investor who put $100 into the Standard and Poor's 500 Index would have had $89 by December 2008 — a similar investment of $100 in group of the largest newspaper company stocks would have yielded just $18 by year end 2008.[4][dead link]
  27. ^ "Pearson 2008 Profit Up — No Thanks to 'Financial Times'". Editor & Publisher. March 2, 2009. Archived from the original on May 24, 2011.
  28. ^ a b McLennan, Douglas; Miles, Jack (March 21, 2018). "A once unimaginable scenario:No more newspapers". Washington Post. Retrieved December 15, 2108. Check date values in: |accessdate= (help)
  29. ^ Jasper Jackson (November 27, 2018). "How new media firms such as Vice and BuzzFeed are losing their gloss". New Statesman. Retrieved January 15, 2019.
  30. ^ Template:Url=https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2018/12/post-advertising-future-media/578917/
  31. ^ Pew Research Center (June 13, 2018). "http://www.journalism.org/fact-sheet/newspapers/". Journalism.com. External link in |title= (help); Missing or empty |url= (help)
  32. ^ a b c Fitzgerald, Mark (March 24, 2009). "Senate Bill Would Allow Tax-Exempt Status for Newspapers". Editor & Publisher. Archived from the original on 2014-02-03. Retrieved 2014-01-30.
  33. ^ The bill would exempt from taxes newspapers income from advertising and subscriptions. and money spent on news gathering would be tax deductible. So far the bill has only Senator Ben Cardin as sponsor.[5]
  34. ^ Edmonds, Rick. "A Morning-After Take on the Nonprofit Newspaper Bill". PoynterOnline. The Poynter Institute for Media Studies. Archived from the original on 2009-03-27. Retrieved 2009-03-25.
  35. ^ Elaine C. Kamarck and Ashley Gabriele, "The news today: 7 trends in old and new media" Center for Effective Public Management at Brookings, November 10, 2015
  36. ^ "Independent to cease as print edition". BBC News. 12 February 2016. Retrieved 30 March 2018.
  37. ^ "UK Daily Mail group to cut 1,000 jobs". The Sydney Morning Herald. 23 March 2009.
  38. ^ "Journalism Job Losses: Tracking Cuts Across the Industry". journalism.co.uk. Archived from the original on 2009-04-08. Retrieved 2009-03-23.
  39. ^ "Who Killed the Newspaper?". The Economist. April 24, 2006.
  40. ^ In the United States in February 2009, the annual American Society of News Editors announced they were cancelling their annual convention due to the industry meltdown. In making the announcement, ASNE President Charlotte Hall, editor of Orlando Sentinel said, "this is an industry in crisis." The only previous cancellation of an ASNE annual convention since the group's creation in 1923 was in 1945. Since 1945 the industry has weathered 10 national economic recessions.[6] Archived 2009-03-05 at the Wayback Machine[7]
  41. ^ "Newspapers Focus on Print & Advertising Revenue in Difficult Times". Paris, France: World Association of Newspapers. February 2009.
  42. ^ In an interesting twist, the Newspaper Association of America, a member of the World Association of Newspapers but representing 90% of American newspaper publishers, declined to endorse the WAN objections to the Google-Yahoo pact.
  43. ^ Helft, Miguel (September 15, 2008). "Newspapers Worldwide (Minus U.S.) Oppose Google-Yahoo Deal". The New York Times. Retrieved May 3, 2010.
  44. ^ "Newspapers see sales and ad revenue climb". The Local, Sweden's News in English. June 2, 2008.
  45. ^ Google's CEO Eric Schmidt recently revealed that the company had considered, but then abandoned, the thought of purchasing a newspaper itself or using its charitable arm to support news businesses seeking non-profit status. [8]
  46. ^ a b Saba, Jennifer (March 16, 2009). "Specifics on Newspapers from 'State of News Media' Report". Editor & Publisher. Archived from the original on March 20, 2009. Retrieved 2009-03-17.
  47. ^ "The Daily Me, Nicholas Kristof". The New York Times. March 18, 2009. Retrieved May 3, 2010.
  48. ^ "Not Just Another Column About Blogging: What Newspaper History Says About Newspaper Future, Jack Shafer, Salon, January 26, 2006, salon.com".
  49. ^ Ratner, Andrew (March 17, 2009). "'Wikipedia Revolution' United Users on Internet". The Baltimore Sun.[dead link]
  50. ^ Alistair Dawber (October 10, 2009). "Murdoch Blasts Search Engine 'Kleptomaniacs'". The Independent. London. Retrieved May 3, 2010.
  51. ^ Terdiman, Daniel (March 13, 2009). "News Has a Bright Future, Author Says". CNET News.
  52. ^ "Abandoning the News, Carnegie Reporter, Carnegie Corporation of New York, carnegie.org". Archived from the original on 2014-02-03. Retrieved 2014-01-30.
  53. ^ "Net to Newspapers: Drop Dead". BusinessWeek. July 4, 2005.
  54. ^ Myers, Jack (October 27, 2008). "Is There a Future for Newspapers?". The Huffington Post.
  55. ^ Mullaney, Tim (March 10, 2009). "Google Executive, N.Y. Times Wrestle in New Jersey for Local Ads". Bloomberg.com.
  56. ^ "Economy 'Threatens' News Accuracy". BBC News. February 9, 2009.
  57. ^ Ahrens, Frank (December 4, 2006). "A Newspaper Chain Sees Its Future, And It's Online and Hyper-Local". The Washington Post.
  58. ^ The troubles in the U.S. newspaper market, while acute, aren't universal. Large newspapers are suffering more than small. "The great majority of America's 1200 daily newspapers are doing pretty well," notes Editor & Publisher editor Mark Fitzgerald. "Even some of the big papers in the most troubled chains are still churning out profit margins in the high teens. That's three or four times the margins of ExxonMobil.[9][dead link]
  59. ^ Perez-Pena, Richard (October 27, 2008). "Newspaper Circulation Continues to Decline Rapidly". The New York Times.
  60. ^ Gunther, Marc (July 26, 2007). "Can the Washington Post Survive?". Fortune.
  61. ^ Kuttner, Robert (March–April 2007). "The Race". Columbia Journalism Review.
  62. ^ a b c Massing, Michael (December 1, 2005). "The End of News?". The New York Review of Books.
  63. ^ Hollander, Barry; Krugman, Dean; Reichert, Tom; Avant, Adam. "The E-Reader as Replacement for the Print Newspaper". SpringerLink. Retrieved 29 March 2019.
  64. ^ Cook, Kathryn; Issitt, Micah. "Decline of Reading: An Overview". Palm Beach State College. Retrieved 29 March 2019.
  65. ^ Perez-Pena, Richard (September 18, 2007). "Times to Stop Charging for Parts of Its Web Site". The New York Times. Retrieved 2009-03-18.
  66. ^ "Can I get a subscription to NYTimes.com only?". The New York Times.
  67. ^ Kristof, Nicholas D. (March 18, 2009). "The Daily Me". The New York Times.
  68. ^ Isaacson, Walter (February 5, 2009). "How to Save Your Newspaper". Time. Retrieved 2009-03-18.
  69. ^ Thomas, Owen (February 5, 2009). "How Not to Save Newspapers". ValleyWag, Gawker.com. Archived from the original on 2009-04-07.
  70. ^ Shafer, Jack (November 30, 2006). "Chronicle of the Newspaper Death Foretold". Slate.
  71. ^ a b Hirschorn, Michael (January–February 2009). "End Times". The Atlantic.
  72. ^ Hunt, Albert R. (March 22, 2009). "Letter from Washington: A Vibrant Democracy Requires Newspapers". International Herald Tribune. Bloomberg News. Archived from the original on March 26, 2009.
  73. ^ a b Cruz, Gilbert (July 9, 2008). "The Nightly News, Not for Profit". Time. Retrieved May 3, 2010.
  74. ^ "Huffington Plans Investigative Journalism Venture", David Bauder, The Washington Post, March 29, 2009[dead link]
  75. ^ Nichols, John; Robert W. McChensey (March 18, 2009). "The Death and Life of Great American Newspapers". The Nation.
  76. ^ In response to charges of lack of credentials or unverified reporting, bloggers often point to their role in examining the reporting of The New York Times reporter Judith Miller, whose early reporting on the events leading to the war in Iraq went largely unchallenged in mainstream media. "In the run up to the Iraq war", says Arianna Huffington of the eponymous The Huffington Post, "many in the mainstream media , including The New York Times, lost their veneer of unassailable trustworthiness for many readers and viewers, and it became clear that new media sources could be trusted — and indeed are often much quicker a correcting mistakes than old media sources." [10]
  77. ^ "Trends & Numbers". Newspaper Association of America. 14 March 2012. Archived from the original on 18 September 2012. Retrieved 18 September 2012.
  78. ^ Branch, Company Statistics Division, Economic Census. "Statistics of U.S. Businesses 2012 Historical Data Page". census.gov. Retrieved 2016-04-01.[permanent dead link]
  79. ^ Surowiecki, James (December 22, 2008). "News You Can Lose". The New Yorker.
  80. ^ Isaacson, Walter (February 5, 2009). "How to Save Your Newspaper". Time.
  81. ^ See "Newspaper reporter rated worst job in America", FOX5NY, 14 April, 2000
  82. ^ Nordenson, Bree (November–December 2008). "Overload!, Journalism's Battle for Relevance in an Age of Too Much Information". Columbia Journalism Review.
  83. ^ Richman, Dan; James, Andrea (March 17, 2009). "Seattle P-I to Publish Last Edition Tuesday". Seattle Post-Intelligencer.
  84. ^ Perez-Pena, Richard (March 23, 2009). "4 Michigan Markets Will Lose Daily Newspapers, As Ailing Industry Tries to Cope". The New York Times.
  85. ^ "Talk to the Newsroom: Executive Editor". The New York Times. January 28, 2009. Retrieved May 3, 2010.
  86. ^ Singel, Ryan (March 10, 2009). "Times Techie Envisions The Future of News". Wired Magazine, blog.wired.com.
  87. ^ Shea, Danny (September 10, 2010). "Arthur Sulzberger: 'We Will Stop Printing The New York Times Sometime In The Future'". The Huffington Post. Retrieved 2010-09-10.
  88. ^ Mitchell Stephens, Beyond News: The Future of Journalism (Columbia University Press; 2014)
  89. ^ Even as some large newspapers for sale in the United States have been unable to find buyers, the market for smaller community newspapers, which have faced less online competition, has held up better.[11] In general, smaller newspapers are worth more in relative terms than large papers. "A newspaper in small-to-medium markets tends to be worth more on a relative basis than a big–city paper," notes longtime newspaper analyst John Morton. "Big cities tend to have more media outlets competing for advertising, and big–city newspapers are more likely to have onerous union contracts." [12]
  90. ^ "Minnpost.com".
  91. ^ Jensen, Elizabeth (March 22, 2009). "A Web Site's For-Profit Approach to World News". The New York Times.
  92. ^ "'Newspapers have bright future'". The Times of India. March 24, 2005.
  93. ^ Kamiya, Gary (February 17, 2009). "The Death of the News". Salon.
  94. ^ Shaker, Lee. "Dead Newspapers and Citizens' Civic Engagement". Taylor&Francis Online. Retrieved 5 April 2019.

Further reading[edit]

External links[edit]