In the study of graphs and networks, the degree of a node in a network is the number of connections it has to other nodes and the degree distribution is the probability distribution of these degrees over the whole network.
The degree of a node in a network (sometimes referred to incorrectly as the connectivity) is the number of connections or edges the node has to other nodes. If a network is directed, meaning that edges point in one direction from one node to another node, then nodes have two different degrees, the in-degree, which is the number of incoming edges, and the out-degree, which is the number of outgoing edges.
The degree distribution P(k) of a network is then defined to be the fraction of nodes in the network with degree k. Thus if there are n nodes in total in a network and nk of them have degree k, we have P(k) = nk/n.
The same information is also sometimes presented in the form of a cumulative degree distribution, the fraction of nodes with degree smaller than k, or even the complementary cumulative degree distribution, the fraction of nodes with degree greater than or equal to k (1 - C if one considers C as the cumulative degree distribution; i.e. the complement of C).
Observed degree distributions
The degree distribution is very important in studying both real networks, such as the Internet and social networks, and theoretical networks. The simplest network model, for example, the (Bernoulli) random graph, in which each of n nodes is connected (or not) with independent probability p (or 1 − p), has a binomial distribution of degrees k:
(or Poisson in the limit of large n). Most networks in the real world, however, have degree distributions very different from this. Most are highly right-skewed, meaning that a large majority of nodes have low degree but a small number, known as "hubs", have high degree. Some networks, notably the Internet, the world wide web, and some social networks are found to have degree distributions that approximately follow a power law: P(k) ~ k−γ, where γ is a constant. Such networks are called scale-free networks and have attracted particular attention for their structural and dynamical properties.</ref>
- Barabási, Albert-László; Albert, Réka (1999-10-15). "Emergence of Scaling in Random Networks". Science. American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). 286 (5439): 509–512. doi:10.1126/science.286.5439.509. ISSN 0036-8075.
- Albert, Réka; Barabási, Albert-László (2000-12-11). "Topology of Evolving Networks: Local Events and Universality". Physical Review Letters. American Physical Society (APS). 85 (24): 5234–5237. doi:10.1103/physrevlett.85.5234. ISSN 0031-9007.
- Dorogovtsev, S. N.; Mendes, J. F. F.; Samukhin, A. N. (2001-05-21). "Size-dependent degree distribution of a scale-free growing network". Physical Review E. American Physical Society (APS). 63 (6): 062101. arXiv:cond-mat/0011115. doi:10.1103/physreve.63.062101. ISSN 1063-651X.
- Pachon, Angelica; Sacerdote, Laura; Yang, Shuyi (2018). "Scale-free behavior of networks with the copresence of preferential and uniform attachment rules". Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena. arXiv:1704.08597. Bibcode:2018PhyD..371....1P. doi:10.1016/j.physd.2018.01.005.
- Albert, R.; Barabasi, A.-L. (2002). "Statistical mechanics of complex networks". Reviews of Modern Physics. 74: 47–97. arXiv:cond-mat/0106096. Bibcode:2002RvMP...74...47A. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.74.47.
- Dorogovtsev, S.; Mendes, J. F. F. (2002). "Evolution of networks". Advances in Physics. 51 (4): 1079–1187. arXiv:cond-mat/0106144. Bibcode:2002AdPhy..51.1079D. doi:10.1080/00018730110112519.
- Newman, M. E. J. (2003). "The structure and function of complex networks". SIAM Review. 45 (2): 167–256. arXiv:cond-mat/0303516. Bibcode:2003SIAMR..45..167N. doi:10.1137/S003614450342480.[permanent dead link]
- Shlomo Havlin & Reuven Cohen (2010). Complex Networks: Structure, Robustness and Function. Cambridge University Press.