Delta Air Lines Flight 723

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Delta Air Lines Flight 723
Delta Air Lines DC-9-32; N3337L, December 1980 BCX (5127243088).jpg
A Delta Air Lines McDonnell Douglas DC-9-30, similar to the one involved.
Accident summary
Date July 31, 1973
Summary Controlled flight into terrain
Site Boston, Massachusetts, Logan International Airport
42°20′59″N 071°00′45″W / 42.34972°N 71.01250°W / 42.34972; -71.01250Coordinates: 42°20′59″N 071°00′45″W / 42.34972°N 71.01250°W / 42.34972; -71.01250
Passengers 83
Crew 6
Fatalities 89 (all) (includes one death 5 months later)
Survivors 0 (initially 2, died later)
Aircraft type McDonnell Douglas DC-9-31
Operator Delta Air Lines
Registration N975NE
Flight origin Burlington International Airport, Burlington, Vermont
Stopover Manchester Airport, Manchester, New Hampshire
Destination Logan International Airport, Boston, Massachusetts

Delta Air Lines Flight 723 was a Douglas DC-9 twin-engine jetliner, operating as a scheduled domestic passenger flight from Burlington, Vermont to Logan International Airport in Boston, Massachusetts, with an intermediate stop in Manchester, New Hampshire.[1] On July 31, 1973 at 11:08AM, while on an ILS instrument approach into Logan in low clouds and fog, the aircraft descended below the glidepath, struck a seawall with a landing gear and crashed, killing all but two of its 89 occupants. Both survivors later died of their injuries.

Aircraft and crew[edit]

The DC-9-31, registration N975NE,[2] serial number 47075, was manufactured in September 1967 and had 14,639 flight hours at the time of the accident. The jetliner was one of the aircraft that Delta Air Lines acquired in their 1972 merger with Northeast Airlines, to whom the aircraft was originally delivered. The flight crew consisted of Captain John Streil (49) and First Officer Sidney Burrill (31). Captain Streil, a highly experienced pilot, had accumulated roughly 14,800 flight hours throughout his flying career. He had 17 years' experience as pilot-in-command and had been flying DC-9s since 1970, with 1,457 hours logged in them. First Officer Burrill was also an experienced airman, with just under 7,000 flight hours. Occupying the cockpit jumpseat was a third pilot, Joseph Burrell (52), who was in training and was not yet qualified on the DC-9.[3]

Accident sequence[edit]

Delta Flight 723 final approach (plan view) from NTSB report; actual path flown (red) is shown in relation to nominal localizer path (blue); outer marker is shown as blue dot; flight direction is from left to right.

The aircraft, flying at 3,000 feet (910 m), had been vectored by Boston's approach control to intercept the final approach course to the ILS runway 4R approach at a 45 degree angle,[4] about 2 nautical miles (3.7 km) outside the outer marker.[5] As it was later revealed, the controller was busy handling a potential collision conflict between two other aircraft, and therefore neglected to clear Flight 723 for the approach. The flight crew had to ask the controller for approach clearance, which was immediately given, but by that time — more than a minute after the intercept vector had been issued — they were high and fast and almost over the outer marker. The flight crew subsequently failed to stabilize the aircraft's descent rate and airspeed, descended below the glideslope and drifted away from the localizer course, hitting a seawall about 165 feet (50 m) to the right of the extended runway centerline, about 3,000 feet (910 m) short of the runway's displaced threshold. The aircraft was destroyed, killing 87 of its 89 occupants. One of the two survivors died after two hours, and the other, Leopold Chouinard, died of burn injuries on December 11, 1973;[6] Chouinard is not listed as a Delta 723 fatality due to language in the Code of Federal Regulations[7] that defines a fatality as taking place within 30 days of the accident.[8]

The weather conditions at the time of the crash were partial obscuration and fog, with a ceiling of 400 feet (120 m), 1/2 mile visibility and light winds. Runway visual range (RVR) was 1,400 to 6,000 feet (430 to 1,830 m).[5]


Flight 723 descent profile, showing actual glide path flown (red), vs. nominal glideslope (blue), leading to crash point.

The NTSB investigated the accident and was able to retrieve both the CVR and FDR. The investigators concluded that, based on the retrieved flight data and simulations, the flight crew very likely operated the flight director improperly, inadvertently switching it into a "go around" mode during the final approach, instead of the appropriate approach mode. This caused confusion and additional pressure, and contributed to the unstablized approach and deviation from the glide path.[1] According to the CVR, no altitude callouts were made by the crew during the final approach, as the aircraft descended below the glideslope and decision height, until it struck the seawall and crashed.[5]

The board determined the following Probable Cause for the accident:[5]

...the failure of the flightcrew to monitor altitude and to recognize passage of the aircraft through the approach decision height during an unstabilized precision approach conducted in rapidly changing meteorological conditions. The unstabilized nature of the approach was due initially to the aircraft's passing the outer marker above the glide slope at an excessive airspeed and thereafter compounded by the flightcrew's preoccupation with the questionable information presented by the flight director system. The poor positioning of the flight for the approach was in part the result of nonstandard air traffic control services.

See also[edit]

Asiana Airlines Flight 214, an incident where the plane struck a seawall after descending under the glidepath on landing.

China Airlines Flight 140, an incident caused by inadvertent switching the aircraft into a Go-Around mode on final approach.


  1. ^ a b "ASN accident record". ASN. Retrieved 2009-07-14. 
  2. ^ "FAA Registry (N975NE)". Federal Aviation Administration. 
  3. ^
  4. ^ According to the NTSB report, 30 degree is the normal recommended maximum ILS intercept angle near the outer marker.
  5. ^ a b c d "NTSB final report" (PDF). U.S. Department of Transportation, NTSB. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2008-02-28. Retrieved 2009-07-14. 
  6. ^ Struggle of Leopold Chouinard at
  7. ^ 49 C.F.R. 830.2
  8. ^ "LAX Runway Collision". Retrieved on December 16, 2009.

External links[edit]