A dental dam or rubber dam (sometimes termed "Kofferdam"—from German), designed in the United States in 1864 by Sanford Christie Barnum, is a thin, 6-inch (150 mm) square sheet, usually latex or nitrile, used in dentistry to isolate the operative site (one or more teeth) from the rest of the mouth. It is used mainly in endodontic, fixed prosthodontic (crowns, bridges) and general restorative treatments. Its purpose is both to prevent saliva interfering with the dental work (e.g. contamination of oral micro-organisms during root canal therapy, or to keep filling materials such as composite dry during placement and curing), and to prevent instruments and materials from being inhaled, swallowed or damaging the mouth. In dentistry, use of a rubber dam is sometimes referred to as isolation or moisture control.
The technique used to apply the dental dam is selected according to the tooth requiring treatment. Several techniques can be used including single tooth isolation, multiple tooth isolation or split dam technique. The dental dam is prepared by punching one or more holes in the dental dam sheet to enable isolation of the appropriate number of teeth required for the dental procedure. The dental dam is then applied to the tooth, anchored into place using a metal or flexible plastic clamp (chosen according to the tooth and area it will be applied to). The clamp will ideally fit snugly around the tooth along the margin of the gingiva, stabilising the dental dam and preventing contamination of the working area due to saliva ingress. Individuals may experience subjective discomfort due to the tight sensation of the dam clamp, therefore topical anaesthetic (liquid or gel) may be applied to the gingiva at the operators discretion prior to applying the dental dam.
Prior to the use of the rubber dam isolation method, many dental procedures had a high risk of contamination from saliva and bacteria infiltrating the tooth during a procedure. This can lead to the failure of the treatment being undertaken which can result in further interventions or the loss of a tooth. Dr Sanford C. Barnum was the original designer of the dental dam as a way to keep the operation site clear from saliva. It was in 1882 that Dr S. S. White improved the design further by adjusting the hole punched into the sheet. In spite of these changes, it was found to be difficult to stabilise the dam around the tooth until Dr. Delous Palmer developed the metal clamps which anchors the dam around the selected tooth. These clamps are available in various shapes and sizes which are designed to fit different tooth structures and morphology.
There are several treatments where dental dam can be applied; dental restorations, endodontic treatments including root canal therapy (RCT), fissure sealants, preparation of dental crown, dental implant and some veneer placements. There is an ongoing controversy with the use and efficacy of rubber dam among dental practitioners. Some practitioners may routinely employ its use, for others it may only be applied during selective treatments whereas many others will avoid its application altogether. Although the use of rubber dam is considered a standard of care, studies showed that a large number of dental practitioners do not utilise it during procedures. The standard is defined by reasonable standard supported with current evidence.
The set up of a rubber dam has many elements and involves the use of specific tools and accessories which usually comprises of:
- Rubber dam sheets
- Clamps or hooks
- Dam Punch
- Dental floss
Other materials that may be used to assist with the setting up of rubber dam are:
Rubber Dam Application
The dental dam sheets are predominantly made from rubber materials such as latex or nitrile and tend to be 15 cm x 15 cm in length and width. The thickness of each dam sheet is approximately between 0.14mm and 0.38mm but the size, shape, colour and material that the dam sheet is made from can vary with differing manufacturers. Most manufacturers will also make dental dam sheet alternatives that are suitable for patients with allergies to materials such as latex and some may even make alternatives that can be autoclaved.
The dental dam is anchored around the crown of the tooth using a metal clamp to seal and secure the rubber dam sheet to the tooth or teeth that are receiving treatment during the dental procedure. The clamps come in a variety of shapes and sizes which suit the anatomy of the different teeth in the mouth. Before placing the dam in the mouth dental professionals may choose to secure dental floss around the clamps, this acts as an anchor to prevent aspiration or swallowing. It can also provide a point of reference for the clinician to be able to visualise and retrieve the clamp if it dislodges from the tooth or the dam forceps.
The purpose of the rubber dam frame, is to keep the dam sheet taut around target areas; this will ensure that a clinician can work effectively on the tooth without the dam sheet obstructing vision and becoming entangled in dental instruments during the procedure. There are several types of dental dam frames which have an array of purposes. The frames are made from Stainless steel, polypropylene or other polymer plastics. Irrespective of the material the dam frame is made from, the frame will always have small pins on the outer edges which act to secure the dam sheet to the frame. The plastic dam frames are predominantly used in the case where dental radiography is planned as they are less radiodense, ensuring the frame appears radiolucent to avoid superimposition of the frame in the radiograph.
The dam punch is a tool used to perforate holes of various sizes into the dental dam sheet. When punching holes in the rubber dam prior to a procedure the size and spacing of the teeth to be isolated should be taken into consideration. In multi-tooth isolation, the holes should correspond to the curve of the dental arch. The rubber dam armamentarium can be set up in a variety of ways, this usually depends of clinician preference and education.
Using a rubber dam for dental procedures can prove to be very advantageous for multiple reasons. A rubber dam can provide a clean and dry operating field away from substances such as saliva and blood. This is important for dental procedures as the bonding ability of adhesives and cements is heightened in a clean and dry field away from possible contamination, in order for maximum adhesive strength between the restorative materials, dentin and enamel. If the environment is contaminated leading to poor bonding of the materials, the success and longevity of the restoration is shortened.
When using the rubber dam, it is able to isolate one or more teeth. By doing this the clinicians visibility of the tooth is greatly improved, due to the increase in contrast with the rubber dam around the tooth/teeth. Whilst at the same time it retracts the soft tissues such as the lips, tongue, cheeks, and reduces mirror fogging, allowing the clinician to focus solely on the restorative site which can lead to the procedure also being more time efficient. Even though it is commonly said rubber dam takes too much time to apply in many ways it can reduce the time needed for the procedure, as not only does it just isolate the tooth, it reduces the ability for the patient to communicate with the clinician. This is most beneficial for the over talkative patients which can sometimes hinder the efficiency of treatment and can instead allow more time for the clinician to focus on the task at hand in order for the procedure to take less time.
A Cochrane review in 2016, suggest that the use of rubber dam as an isolation method provides a chance for dental restorations to last longer. Disregarding the fact it is low quality evidence, there is still proof that over a two year period, restorations done using rubber dams versus cotton roll isolation, the rubber dam group had a lower risk of failure with a risk ratio of 0.80 compared to cotton roll isolation at 1.19.
Additionally, a rubber dam can act as an infection control barrier and reduce the risk of cross-contamination and infection. In case the patient may have a contagious disease the rubber dam decreases the chance of the splatter of microbial content if the patient were to cough or the spread of microbes being caused by the pressure from the triplex.
A rubber dam can also protect a patients airways. It does not completely eliminate the chance but decreases the possibility of the patient accidentally swallowing or inhaling restorative instruments, tooth fragments or debris.  It has happened in the past and should this occur, the patient must always be admitted into hospital as a chest x-ray is necessary in order to discover where the inhalant may be and whether it may potentially need to be removed on the operating table or not. As it has potential to be life threatening if ignored.
Not only can it be instruments or debris, chemical materials used in dental procedures such as acid etch, seals, amalgam can have harmful effects. In endodontic procedures, corrosive irrigants are contained such as sodium hypochlorite (bleach). Without the protection of a rubber dam, there is an increased risk of this chemical damaging the soft tissues of the mouth and be more harmful if swallowed. Another example is during amalgam restorations, amalgam contains the element mercury, and if ingested during the placing of amalgam can cause potentially harmful side effects if not treated. However amalgam after being placed safely, evidence does suggest the exposure to mercury is at a level non harmful and safe to the human body.
Rubber dam can also offer additional protection of the soft tissues of oral mucosa from sharp instruments, acting as a barrier between the instrument and the soft tissue. Additionally, associated with rubber dam is a caulking adhesive, caulking in definition is a material used to seal joints, in this can be used to fill in gaps between the rubber dam and gingiva as it adheres to the wet rubber dam or mucosal tissues, acting as another mode of protection.
A big issue surrounding the rubber dam is its use as part of a legal obligation. In some parts of the world, the use of a rubber dam is obligatory for procedures such as endodontic treatment. The reason for this is that if an injury was to occur or possible cross-contamination and the result could have been prevented by rubber dam, this situation is regarded as medico-legally indefensible. Meaning the clinician will not be able to defend themselves in court due to the duty of care falling under negligence of the patient.
Lastly, some patients, in fact, prefer using the rubber dam as being told and understanding the risks they instead feel more comfortable knowing they are safer with than without it as well as feeling dissociated from the noises happening around them such as the drilling. Additionally, some patients tend to be more comfortable as they may prefer the feeling of not having water and suction running within their mouths.
Although there are many advantages of rubber dams during dental treatment there are also associated risks and disadvantages. The rubber dam can take extra time to apply; however with consistent practice and use by the dental practitioner this may not have an effect on the length of the appointment. Insufficient training and the inconvenience of application can also be a deterrent for its use and can also contribute to lost time. The cost of dental dams is an expense to the dental practice and could also be a disincentive. Although the rubber dams are inexpensive to purchase, initial costs for the armamentarium can be high.
There is a risk of rubber dam clamps breaking during application due to the chemical effects of sodium hypochlorite, an antimicrobial solution used during root canal treatments, repeated stresses of clinical use, or autoclaving, all of which can potentially weaken the material. To avoid swallowing or aspiration of broken clamps, the dental practitioner should place floss around the clamp to allow its retrieval if it snaps or springs off during a procedure.
As the dental dam clamp is placed along the gum line, this can cause some discomfort or pain (especially in a patient who does not require local anaesthesia), bleeding from the gums, damage to the periodontal ligament or abrasion of the cementum on the root of the tooth, which may cause an uneven surface on the tooth root that can retain plaque.
The dental dam is placed over the mouth, effectively blocking off the airway, which means the patient must be able to comfortably breathe through their nose. This is a problem for patients with nasal airway obstruction such as the common cold, a broken nose, adenoids, recurring sinus issues, or those who habitually breathe through their mouths. Patients can also find that communication is reduced between the dental practitioner and themselves, which may result in feelings of claustrophobia, vulnerability and anxiety. Those prone to dental phobia and individuals who have learning difficulties, disabilities or special needs may find the use of dental dams impossible and intolerable.
To an extent, the use of a dental dam may lead to visual distortion of tooth morphology since the other teeth and the rest of the mouth are hidden from view. This may lead to perforation if an access cavity is incorrectly angled during root canal therapy. For this reason, endodontists may routinely begin their access cavity before applying the dam. This will ensure the correct orientation prior to commencing removal of the blood vessels, nerve tissue and other cellular entities from the tooth.
The rubber dam, which is usually brightly coloured (blue or green), may alter the apparent colour of the tooth, which can lead to incorrect choice of shade, e.g. during placement of a dental composite during a restorative procedure. For this reason, dental practitioners should select the appropriate shade of material prior to the application of rubber dam.
As the rubber dams are primarily made of latex, patients may experience reactions which range from uncomfortable (allergic contact dermatitis, allergic contact cheilitis, allergic contact stomatitis) to life-threatening (anaphylaxis). Nitrile versions are available for those with latex allergies and adverse reactions can be avoided by patients informing dental practitioners of latex allergies prior to treatment or adverse reactions after rubber dam application.
For safer sex and to protect against sexually transmitted infections (STIs), dental dams are sometimes suggested for use as a physical barrier against the exchange of body fluids during cunnilingus and anilingus, especially for women who have sex with women. However, they are rarely used for this purpose, and there is no good evidence that their use reduces the risk of STI transmission, including the risk of infection with human immunodeficiency virus.
After lubrication with a water-based lubricant, an unpunctured dental dam may be held over the vulva or anus, allowing oral stimulation of these areas without transmission of bodily fluids or direct physical contact. Plastic cling wrap, condoms or latex gloves (cut open longitudinally) can be used for STI protection in a similar manner as a dental dam, by providing a physical barrier to cover the vaginal or anal areas during oral sex, these alternative barrier methods are more affordable and readily available than dental dams.
Dental dams were initially promoted in the 1980s in some safer sex campaigns as a barrier to prevent transmission of STIs during oral sex. They were introduced for use in some women's prisons in Canada and Australia (in NSW, ACT, WA and SA states) in the 1990s as a form of sexual barrier protection after the World Health Organization (WHO) recommended that female prisoners should have access to dental dams. Inmates have reported numerous barriers for dental dam use, including the dam being too thick, lack of availability, poor taste, and reduced sensations when used for oral sex. Dental dams are often reappropriated for other uses by prison inmates, such as hair elastics, placemats or shoelaces. They are relatively expensive and difficult to obtain outside of the prison system. Rubber dams are not manufactured, marketed, registered, tested or evaluated for their effectiveness as an STI prevention aid, and no studies currently exist on their permeability to STI pathogens.
- Elderton, R. J. (1971-02-01). "A modern approach to the use of rubber dam--1". The Dental Practitioner and Dental Record. 21 (6): 187–193. ISSN 0011-8729. PMID 5278933.
- Luca Martinelli, The rubber dam technique, Academia.
- "What's a dental dam?". www.plannedparenthood.org. Retrieved 2019-07-05.
- Hegde, Mithra; Hegde, Priyadarshini; Hegde, Ashwith (2014). "Rubber Dam isolation for Endodontic treatment in difficult clinical situations". Research and Reviews: Journal of Dental Sciences. 2: 12–18.
- Madrati, Ahmed; Abid, S; Tamimi, F; Ezzi, A; sammani, A; Shaar, M; Zafar, M (September 2018). "Dental-Dam for Infection Control and Patient Safety during Clinical Endodontic Treatment: Preferences of Dental Patients". The International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 15 (9): 2012. doi:10.3390/ijerph15092012. PMC 6165332. PMID 30223521.
- Martinelli, Luca. "THE RUBBER DAM TECHNIQUE". Academia. Retrieved 6 June 2019.
- Feierabend, SA; Matt, J; Klaiber,B (2011). "comparison of conventional and rubber dam systems in dental practice". Operative Dentistry. 36 (3): 243–250. doi:10.2341/09-283-C. PMID 21740241.
- Yen, P; Huang, S; Chi, S (November 2014). "The Effect of Rubber Dam Usage on the Survival Rate of Teeth Receiving Initial Root Canal Treatment: A Nationwide Population-based Study". Journal of Endodontics. 40 (11): 1733–1737. doi:10.1016/jjoen201407007 (inactive 2019-07-14).
- "OraSeal™ - Ultradent Products, Inc". www.ultradent.com. Retrieved 21 June 2019.
- Duggal, Monty; Cameron, Angus; Toumba, Jack (2012-11-28). Paediatric dentistry at a glance. Wiley-Blackwell. p. 22. ISBN 978-1-444-33676-4. Retrieved 8 May 2019.
- Martinelli, Luca. "The Rubber Dam Technique". Academia. Retrieved 8 May 2019.
- Scheller-Sheridan, Carmen (2013-05-20). Basic guide to dental instruments (2nd ed.). Wiley-Blackwell. ISBN 9781118713587. Retrieved 9 May 2019.
- Wang, Yan; Li, Chunjie; Yuan, He; Wong, May CM; Zou, Jing; Shi, Zongdao; Zhou, Xuedong (2016-09-20). "Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews". Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 9: CD009858. doi:10.1002/14651858.cd009858.pub2. PMC 6457832. PMID 27648846.
- Cochran, M. A.; Miller, C. H.; Sheldrake, M. A. (1989-07-01). "The efficacy of the rubber dam as a barrier to the spread of microorganisms during dental treatment". Journal of the American Dental Association. 119 (1): 141–144. doi:10.14219/jada.archive.1989.0131. ISSN 0002-8177. PMID 2760346.
- Reid JS, Callis PD, Patterson CJ (1991). Rubber Dam in Clinical Practice (1st ed.). London: Quintessence Publishing.
- Wang, Yan; Li, Chunjie; Yuan, He; Wong, May CM; Zou, Jing; Shi, Zongdao; Zhou, Xuedong (2016-09-20). "Rubber dam isolation for restorative treatment in dental patients". Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 9: CD009858. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD009858.pub2. ISSN 1465-1858. PMID 27648846.
- Harrel, Stephen K.; Molinari, John (2004-04-01). "Aerosols and splatter in dentistry: a brief review of the literature and infection control implications". Journal of the American Dental Association. 135 (4): 429–437. doi:10.14219/jada.archive.2004.0207. ISSN 0002-8177. PMID 15127864.
- Tiwana, Karen K.; Morton, Teresa; Tiwana, Paul S. (2004-09-01). "Aspiration and ingestion in dental practice: a 10-year institutional review". Journal of the American Dental Association. 135 (9): 1287–1291. doi:10.14219/jada.archive.2004.0404. ISSN 0002-8177. PMID 15493393.
- Cohen, S.; Schwartz, S. (1987-04-01). "Endodontic complications and the law". Journal of Endodontics. 13 (4): 191–197. doi:10.1016/S0099-2399(87)80139-5. ISSN 0099-2399. PMID 3471843.
- Kremers, L.; Halbach, S.; Willruth, H.; Mehl, A.; Welzl, G.; Wack, F. X.; Hickel, R.; Greim, H. (1999-06-01). "Effect of rubber dam on mercury exposure during amalgam removal". European Journal of Oral Sciences. 107 (3): 202–207. doi:10.1046/j.0909-8836.1999.eos1070307.x. ISSN 0909-8836. PMID 10424384.
- Halbach, S.; Vogt, S.; Köhler, W.; Felgenhauer, N.; Welzl, G.; Kremers, L.; Zilker, T.; Melchart, D. (2008-05-01). "Blood and urine mercury levels in adult amalgam patients of a randomized controlled trial: interaction of Hg species in erythrocytes" (PDF). Environmental Research. 107 (1): 69–78. Bibcode:2008ER....107...69H. doi:10.1016/j.envres.2007.07.005. ISSN 0013-9351. PMID 17767927.
- "OraSeal*". CLINICAL RESEARCH DENTAL. Retrieved 2018-05-27.
- Stewardson, D. A.; McHugh, E. S. (2002-10-01). "Patients' attitudes to rubber dam". International Endodontic Journal. 35 (10): 812–819. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2591.2002.00571.x. ISSN 0143-2885. PMID 12406374.
- Hill, Edward E.; Rubel, Barry S. (2008-10-01). "Do dental educators need to improve their approach to teaching rubber dam use?". Journal of Dental Education. 72 (10): 1177–1181. ISSN 0022-0337. PMID 18923098.
- Chhabra, Mudrika; Greenwell, Ann L (2018). "Effect of Repeated Sterilization on the Tensile Strength of Rubber Dam Clamps". Pediatric Dentistry. 40 (3): 220–223. PMID 29793571.
- Sutton, J.; Saunders, W. P. (1996-09-01). "Effect of various irrigant and autoclaving regimes on the fracture resistance of rubber dam clamps". International Endodontic Journal. 29 (5): 335–343. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2591.1996.tb01394.x. ISSN 0143-2885. PMID 9206417.
- Wakabayashi, Hajime; Ochi, Kouichi; Tachibana, Hitoshi; Matsumoto, Koukichi (1986). "A clinical technique for the retention of a rubber dam clamp". Journal of Endodontics. 12 (9): 422–4. doi:10.1016/S0099-2399(86)80078-4. PMID 3463649.
- Soldani, Francesca; Foley, Jennifer (Jan 2007). "An assessment of rubber dam usage amongst specialists in paediatric dentistry practising within the UK". International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry. 17 (1).
- Richters, J; Prestage, G; Schneider, K; Clayton, S (Jun 2010). "Do women use dental dams? Safer sex practices of lesbians and other women who have sex with women". Sexual Health. 7 (2): 165–9. doi:10.1071/SH09072. PMID 20465981.
- Yap, L; Richters, J; Butler, T; Schneider, K; Kirkwood, K; Donovan, B (Jun 2010). "Sexual practices and dental dam use among women prisoners--a mixed methods study". Sexual Health. 7 (2): 170–6. doi:10.1071/SH09138. PMID 20465982.
- Jonathan Zenilman, Mohsen Shahmanesh (2012). Sexually transmitted infections : diagnosis, management, and treatment. Sudbury, Mass.: Jones & Bartlett Learning. p. 330. ISBN 9780763786755.
- Yap, L; Richters, J; Butler, T; Schneider, K; Kirkwood, K; Donovan, B (June 2010). "Sexual practices and dental dam use among women prisoners - a mixed methods study". Sexual Health. 7 (2): 170–6. doi:10.1071/SH09138. PMID 20465982.
- "Dental Dam Use". www.cdc.gov. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Retrieved 2018-09-18.
- Stevens, P; Hall, J (July 2001). "Do women use dental dams? Safer sex practices of lesbians and other women who have sex with women". Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic & Neonatal Nursing. 30 (4): 439–447. doi:10.1111/j.1552-6909.2001.tb01563.x.
- Richters, J; Clayton, S (June 2010). "The practical and symbolic purpose of dental dams in lesbian safer sex promotion". Sexual Health. 7 (2): 103–106. doi:10.1071/SH09073.