From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Deoxyribozymes, also called DNA enzymes, DNAzymes, or catalytic DNA, are DNA oligonucleotides that are capable of catalyzing specific chemical reactions, similar to the action of other biological enzymes, such as proteins or ribozymes (enzymes composed of RNA).[1] However, in contrast to the abundance of protein enzymes in biological systems and the discovery of biological ribozymes in the 1980s,[2][3] there are no known naturally occurring deoxyribozymes.[4] Deoxyribozymes should not be confused with DNA aptamers which are oligonucleotides that selectively bind a target ligand, but do not catalyze a subsequent chemical reaction.

With the exception of ribozymes, nucleic acid molecules within cells primarily serve as storage of genetic information due to its ability to form complementary base pairs, which allows for high-fidelity copying and transfer of genetic information. In contrast, nucleic acid molecules are more limited in their catalytic ability, in comparison to protein enzymes, to just three types of interactions: hydrogen bonding, pi stacking, and metal-ion coordination. This is due to the limited number of functional groups of the nucleic acid monomers: while proteins are built from up to twenty different amino acids with various functional groups, nucleic acids are built from just four chemically similar nucleobases. In addition, DNA lacks the 2'-hydroxyl group found in RNA which limits the catalytic competency of deoxyribozymes even in comparison to ribozymes.[5]

In addition to the inherent inferiority of DNA catalytic activity, the apparent lack of naturally occurring deoxyribozymes may also be due to the primarily double-stranded conformation of DNA in biological systems which would limit its physical flexibility and ability to form tertiary structures, and so would drastically limit the ability of double-stranded DNA to act as a catalyst;[5] though there are a few known instances of biological single-stranded DNA such as multicopy single-stranded DNA (msDNA), certain viral genomes, and the replication fork formed during DNA replication. Further structural differences between DNA and RNA may also play a role in the lack of biological deoxyribozymes, such as the additional methyl group of the DNA base thymidine compared to the RNA base uracil or the tendency of DNA to adopt the B-form helix while RNA tends to adopt the A-form helix.[1] However, it has also been shown that DNA can form structures that RNA cannot, which suggests that, though there are differences in structures that each can form, neither is inherently more or less catalytic due to their possible structural motifs.[1]



The trans-form (two separate strands) of the 17E DNAzyme. Most ribonuclease DNAzymes have a similar form, consisting of a separate enzyme strand (blue/cyan) and substrate strand (black). Two arms of complementary bases flank the catalytic core (cyan) on the enzyme strand and the single ribonucleotide (red) on the substrate strand. The arrow shows the ribonucleotide cleavage site.

The most abundant class of deoxyribozymes are ribonucleases, which catalyze the cleavage of a ribonucleotide phosphodiester bond through a transesterification reaction, forming a 2'3'-cyclic phosphate terminus and a 5'-hydroxyl terminus.[5][6] Ribonuclease deoxyribozymes typically undergo selection as long, single-stranded oligonucleotides which contain a single ribonucleotide base to act as the cleavage site. Once sequenced, this single-stranded "cis"-form of the deoxyribozyme can be converted to the two-stranded "trans"-form by separating the substrate domain (containing the ribonucleotide cleavage site) and the enzyme domain (containing the catalytic core) into separate strands which can hybridize through two flanking arms consisting of complementary base pairs.

The first known deoxyribozyme was a ribonuclease, discovered in 1994 by Ronald Breaker while a postdoctoral fellow in the laboratory of Gerald Joyce at the Scripps Research Institute.[7] This deoxyribozyme, later named GR-5,[8] catalyzes the Pb2+-dependent cleavage of a single ribonucleotide phosphoester at a rate that is more than 100-fold compared to the uncatalyzed reaction.[7] Subsequently, additional RNA-cleaving deoxyribozymes that incorporate different metal cofactors were developed, including the Mg2+-dependent E2 deoxyribozyme[9] and the Ca2+-dependent Mg5 deoxyribozyme.[10] These first deoxyribozymes were unable to catalyze a full RNA substrate strand, but by incorporating the full RNA substrate strand into the selection process, deoxyribozymes which functioned with substrates consisting of either full RNA or full DNA with a single RNA base were both able to be utilized.[11] The first of these more versatile deoxyribozymes, 8-17 and 10-23, are currently the most widely studied deoxyribozymes. In fact, many subsequently discovered deoxyribozymes were found to contain the same catalytic core motif as 8-17, including the previously discovered Mg5, suggesting that this motif represents the "simplest solution for the RNA cleavage problem."[6][12]

Other notable deoxyribozyme ribonucleases are those that are highly selective for a certain cofactor. Among this group are the metal selective deoxyribozymes such as Pb2+-specific 17E,[13] UO22+-specific 39E,[14] and Na+-specific A43.[15]

RNA ligases[edit]

Of particular interest are DNA ligases.[5] These molecules have demonstrated remarkable chemoselectivity in RNA branching reactions. Although each repeating unit in a RNA strand owns a free hydroxyl group, the DNA ligase takes just one of them as a branching starting point. An accomplishment unattainable with traditional organic chemistry.

Other reactions[edit]

Many other deoxyribozymes have since been developed that catalyze DNA phosphorylation, DNA adenylation, DNA deglycosylation, porphyrin metalation, thymine dimer photoreversion[16] and DNA cleavage.


in vitro selection[edit]

Because there are no known naturally occurring deoxyribozymes, most known deoxyribozyme sequences have been discovered through a high-throughput in vitro selection technique, similar to SELEX.[17][18] in vitro selection utilizes a "pool" of a large number of random DNA sequences (typically 1014–1015 unique strands) that can be screened for a specific catalytic activity. The pool is synthesized through solid phase synthesis such that each strand has two constant regions (primer binding sites for PCR amplification) flanking a random region of a certain length, typically 25–50 bases long. Thus the total number of unique strands, called the sequence space, is 4N where N denotes the number of bases in the random region. Because 425 ≈ 1015, there is no practical reason to choose random regions of less than 25 bases in length, while going above this number of bases means that the total sequence space cannot be surveyed. However, since there are likely many potential candidates for a given catalytic reaction within the sequence space, random regions of 50 and even higher have successfully yielded catalytic deoxyribozymes.[18]

The pool is first subjected to a selection step, during which the catalytic strands are separated from the non-catalytic strands. The exact separation method will depend on the reaction being catalyzed. As an example, the separation step for ribonucleotide cleavage often utilizes affinity chromatography, in which a biological tag attached to each DNA strand is removed from any catalytically active strands via cleavage of a ribonucleotide base. This allows the catalytic strands to be separated by a column that specifically binds the tag, since the non-active strands will remain bound to the column while the active strands (which no longer possess the tag) flow through. A common set-up for this is a biotin tag with a streptavidin affinity column.[17][18] Gel electrophoresis based separation can also be used in which the change in molecular weight of strands upon the cleavage reaction is enough to cause a shift in the location of the reactive strands on the gel.[18] After the selection step, the reactive pool is amplified via Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) to regenerate and amplifiy the reactive strands, and the process is repeated until a pool of sufficient reactivity is obtained. Multiple rounds of selection are required because some non-catalytic strands will inevitably make it through any single selection step. Usually 4–10 rounds are required for unambiguous catalytic activity,[6] though more rounds are often necessary for more stringent catalytic conditions. After a sufficient number of rounds, the final pool is sequenced and the individual strands are tested for their catalytic activity.[18]

Deoxyribozymes obtained through in vitro selection will be optimized for the conditions during the selection, such as salt concentration, pH, and the presence of cofactors. Because of this, catalytic activity only in the presence of specific cofactors or other conditions can be achieved using positive selection steps, as well as negative selection steps against other undesired conditions.

in vitro evolution[edit]

A similar method of obtaining new deoxyribozymes is through in vitro evolution. Though this term is often used interchangeably with in vitro selection, in vitro evolution more appropriately refers to a slightly different procedure in which the initial oligonucleotide pool is genetically altered over subsequent rounds through genetic recombination or through point mutations.[17][18] For point mutations, the pool can be amplified using error-prone PCR to produce many different strands of various random, single mutations. As with in vitro selection, the evolved strands with increased activity will tend to dominate the pool after multiple selection steps, and once a sufficient catalytic activity is reached, the pool can be sequenced to identify the most active strands.

The initial pool for in vitro evolution can be derived from a narrowed subset of sequence space, such as a certain round of an in vitro selection experiment, which is sometimes also called in vitro reselection.[18] The initial pool can also be derived from amplification of a single oligonucleotide strand. As an example of the latter, a recent study showed that a functional deoxyribozyme can be selected through in vitro evolution of a non-catalytic oligonucleotide precursor strand. An arbitrarily chosen DNA fragment derived from the mRNA transcript of bovine serum albumin was evolved through random point mutations over 25 rounds of selection. Through deep sequencing analysis of various pool generations, the evolution of the most catalytic deoxyribozyme strand could be tracked through each subsequent single mutation.[19] This first successful evolution of catalytic DNA from a non-catalytic precursor could provide support for the RNA World hypothesis. In another recent study, an RNA ligase ribozyme was converted into a deoxyribozyme through in vitro evolution of the inactive deoxyribo-analog of the ribozyme. The new RNA ligase deoxyribozyme contained just twelve point mutations, two of which had no effect on activity, and had a catalytic efficiency of approximately 1/10 of the original ribozyme, though the researches hypothesized that the activity could be further increased through further selection.[20] This first evidence for transfer of function between different nucleic acids could provide support for various pre-RNA World hypotheses.

"True" catalysis?[edit]

Because most deoxyribozymes suffer from product inhibition and thus exhibit single-turnover behavior, it is sometimes argued that deoxyribozymes do not exhibit "true" catalytic behavior since they cannot undergo multiple-turnover catalysis like most biological enzymes. However, the general definition of a catalyst requires only that the substance speeds up the rate of a chemical reaction without being consumed by the reaction (i.e. it is not permanently chemically altered and can be recycled). Thus, by this definition, single-turnover deoxyribozymes are indeed catalysts.[5] Furthermore, many endogenous enzymes (both proteins and ribozymes) also exhibit single-turnover behavior,[5] and so the exclusion of deoxyribozymes from the rank of "catalyst" simply because it does not feature multiple-turnover behavior seems unjustified.


Although the discovery of RNA enzymes predates that of DNA enzymes the latter have some distinct advantages. DNA has better cost-effectiveness and DNA can be made with longer sequence length and can be made with higher purity in Solid-phase synthesis.


DNAzymes have found practical use in metal biosensors.[21]

Asymmetric synthesis[edit]

Chirality is another property that a DNAzyme can exploit. DNA occurs in nature as a right-handed double helix and in asymmetric synthesis a chiral catalyst is a valuable tool in the synthesis of chiral molecules from an achiral source. In one application an artificial DNA catalyst was prepared by attaching a copper ion to it through a spacer.[22] The copper - DNA complex catalysed a Diels-Alder reaction in water between cyclopentadiene and an aza chalcone. The reaction products (endo and exo) were found to be present in an enantiomeric excess of 50%. Later it was found that an enantiomeric excess of 99% could be induced, and that both the rate and the enantioselectivity were related to the DNA sequence.

Other uses[edit]

Other uses of DNA in chemistry are in DNA-templated synthesis, Enantioselective catalysis,[23] DNA nanowires and DNA computing.[24]

See also[edit]

External links[edit]


  1. ^ a b c Breaker, Ronald R. (May 1997). "DNA enzymes". Nature Biotechnology (PDF) 15: 427–431. doi:10.1038/nbt0597-427. PMID 9131619. 
  2. ^ Kruger, Kelly; Grabowski, Paula J.; Zaug, Arthur J.; Sands, Julie; Gottschling, Daniel E.; Cech, Thomas R. (November 1982). "Self-splicing RNA: Autoexcision and autocyclization of the ribosomal RNA intervening sequence of tetrahymena". Cell 31 (1): 147–157. doi:10.1016/0092-8674(82)90414-7. ISSN 0092-8674. Retrieved 2015-07-10. 
  3. ^ Guerrier-Takada, Cecilia; Gardiner, Katheleen; Marsh, Terry; Pace, Norman; Altman, Sidney (December 1983). "The RNA moiety of ribonuclease P is the catalytic subunit of the enzyme". Cell 35 (3, Part 2): 849–857. doi:10.1016/0092-8674(83)90117-4. ISSN 0092-8674. Retrieved 2015-07-10. 
  4. ^ Breaker, Ronald R.; Joyce, Gerald F. (2014-09-18). "The Expanding View of RNA and DNA Function". Chemistry & Biology 21 (9): 1059–1065. doi:10.1016/j.chembiol.2014.07.008. ISSN 1074-5521. Retrieved 2015-07-09. 
  5. ^ a b c d e f Silverman, Scott K. (2004). "Deoxyribozymes: DNA catalysts for bioorganic chemistry" (PDF). Org. Biomol. Chem. 2 (19): 2701–06. doi:10.1039/B411910J. ISSN 1477-0539. PMID 15455136. 
  6. ^ a b c Silverman, Scott K. (2005). "In vitro selection, characterization, and application of deoxyribozymes that cleave RNA". Nucleic Acids Research 33 (19): 6151–6163. doi:10.1093/nar/gki930. ISSN 0305-1048. PMID 16286368. Retrieved 2015-07-15. 
  7. ^ a b Breaker, Ronald R.; Joyce, Gerald F. (December 1994). "A DNA enzyme that cleaves RNA". Chem Biol. 1 (4): 223–229. doi:10.1016/1074-5521(94)90014-0. PMID 9383394. 
  8. ^ Lan, Tian; Furuya, Kimberly; Lu, Yi (2010-06-14). "A highly selective lead sensor based on a classic lead DNAzyme". Chemical Communications 46 (22): 3896–3898. doi:10.1039/B926910J. ISSN 1364-548X. Retrieved 2015-07-30. 
  9. ^ Breaker, Ronald R.; Joyce, Gerald F. (1995-01-10). "A DNA enzyme with Mg2+-dependent RNA phosphoesterase activity". Chemistry & Biology 2 (10): 655–660. doi:10.1016/1074-5521(95)90028-4. ISSN 1074-5521. PMID 9383471. Retrieved 2015-07-16. 
  10. ^ Faulhammer, Dirk; Famulok, Michael (1996-12-01). "The Ca2+ Ion as a Cofactor for a Novel RNA-Cleaving Deoxyribozyme". Angewandte Chemie International Edition in English 35 (23-24): 2837–2841. doi:10.1002/anie.199628371. ISSN 1521-3773. Retrieved 2015-07-17. 
  11. ^ Santoro, Stephen W.; Joyce, Gerald F. (1997-04-29). "A general purpose RNA-cleaving DNA enzyme". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 94 (9): 4262–4266. ISSN 0027-8424. PMID 9113977. Retrieved 2015-07-17. 
  12. ^ Cruz, Rani P. G; Withers, Johanna B; Li, Yingfu (January 2004). "Dinucleotide Junction Cleavage Versatility of 8-17 Deoxyribozyme". Chemistry & Biology 11 (1): 57–67. doi:10.1016/j.chembiol.2003.12.012. ISSN 1074-5521. PMID 15112995. Retrieved 2015-08-13. 
  13. ^ Li, Jing; Lu, Yi (2000-10-01). "A Highly Sensitive and Selective Catalytic DNA Biosensor for Lead Ions". Journal of the American Chemical Society 122 (42): 10466–10467. doi:10.1021/ja0021316. ISSN 0002-7863. Retrieved 2015-05-17. 
  14. ^ Wu, Peiwen; Hwang, Kevin; Lan, Tian; Lu, Yi (2013-04-10). "A DNAzyme-Gold Nanoparticle Probe for Uranyl Ion in Living Cells". Journal of the American Chemical Society 135 (14): 5254–5257. doi:10.1021/ja400150v. ISSN 0002-7863. PMID 23531046. Retrieved 2015-03-05. 
  15. ^ Torabi, Seyed-Fakhreddin; Wu, Peiwen; McGhee, Claire E.; Chen, Lu; Hwang, Kevin; Zheng, Nan; Cheng, Jianjun; Lu, Yi (2015-05-12). "In vitro selection of a sodium-specific DNAzyme and its application in intracellular sensing". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 112 (19): 5903–5908. doi:10.1073/pnas.1420361112. ISSN 0027-8424. PMID 25918425. Retrieved 2015-05-17. 
  16. ^ Daniel J.-F. Chinnapen; Dipankar Sen (Jan 6, 2004). "A deoxyribozyme that harnesses light to repair thymine dimers in DNA.". US National Library of Medicine: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 
  17. ^ a b c Joyce, Gerald F. (2004). "Directed Evolution of Nucleic Acid Enzymes". Annual Review of Biochemistry 73 (1): 791–836. doi:10.1146/annurev.biochem.73.011303.073717. PMID 15189159. Retrieved 2015-07-27. 
  18. ^ a b c d e f g Silverman, Scott K. (2008-07-23). "Catalytic DNA (deoxyribozymes) for synthetic applications—current abilities and future prospects". Chemical Communications (30): 3467–3485. doi:10.1039/B807292M. ISSN 1364-548X. Retrieved 2015-07-27. 
  19. ^ Gysbers, Rachel; Tram, Kha; Gu, Jimmy; Li, Yingfu (2015-06-19). "Evolution of an Enzyme from a Noncatalytic Nucleic Acid Sequence". Scientific Reports 5. doi:10.1038/srep11405. PMID 26091540. Retrieved 2015-07-15. 
  20. ^ Paul, Natasha; Springsteen, Greg; Joyce, Gerald F. (March 2006). "Conversion of a Ribozyme to a Deoxyribozyme through In Vitro Evolution". Chemistry & Biology 13 (3): 329–338. doi:10.1016/j.chembiol.2006.01.007. ISSN 1074-5521. PMID 16638538. Retrieved 2015-07-20. 
  21. ^ Juewen Liu; Yi Lu (2004). "Optimization of a Pb2+-Directed Gold Nanoparticle/DNAzyme Assembly and Its Application as a Colorimetric Biosensor for Pb2+". Chem. Mater. 16 (17): 3231–38. doi:10.1021/cm049453j. 
  22. ^ Gerard Roelfes; Ben L. Feringa (2005). "DNA-Based Asymmetric Catalysis". Angewandte Chemie International Edition 44 (21): 3230–2. doi:10.1002/anie.200500298. PMID 15844122. 
  23. ^ García-Fernández, Almudena; Roelfez, Gerard (2012). "Chapter 9. Enantioselective catalysis at the DNA Scaffold". In Astrid Sigel, Helmut Sigel and Roland K. O. Sigel. Interplay between Metal Ions and Nucleic Acids. Metal Ions in Life Sciences 10. Springer. pp. 249–268. doi:10.1007/978-94-007-2172-2_9. 
  24. ^ Yoshihiro Ito; Eiichiro Fukusaki (2004). "DNA as a ‘Nanomaterial’" (PDF). Journal of Molecular Catalysis B: Enzymatic 28 (4-6): 155–166. doi:10.1016/j.molcatb.2004.01.016.