Desert (particle physics)
| This article needs additional citations for verification. (April 2015) (Learn how and when to remove this template message) |
In the Grand Unified Theory of particle physics, the desert refers to a theorized gap in energy scales, between the TeV scale[clarification needed] and the GUT scale, in which no interactions appear.
It can also be described as a gap in the lengths involved, with no new physics below 10−18 m (the currently probed length scale) and above 10−31 m (the GUT length scale).
The idea of the desert was motivated by the observation of approximate, order of magnitude, gauge coupling unification at the GUT scale.[further explanation needed] Adding interactions at an intermediate scale generically disrupts[why?] the gauge coupling unification.
Contents
Standard model particles[edit]
All the Standard Model particles were discovered below the energy scale of approximately 1012 eV.
| This section needs expansion. You can help by adding to it. (May 2017) |
The desert[edit]
Above these energies, desert theories[which?] predict there are no particles to be discovered until reaching the scale of approximately 1025 eV[why?].
The desert theory is attractive[according to whom?] because, in such a scenario, measurements of TeV scale physics at the LHC and the near-future ILC will allow extrapolation all the way up to the GUT scale. The downside of the particle desert is that experimental physics will simply have nothing more fundamental to discover, over a very long period of time, which, depending on the rate of increase in experiment energies, might span centuries, millennia or more. Presumably, even if the energy achieved in the LHC, ~ 1013 eV, were increased by up to 12 orders of magnitude, this would only result in producing more copious amounts of the particles known today, with no underlying structure being probed. The aforementioned timespan might be shortened by observing the GUT scale through a radical development in accelerator physics, or by a non-accelerator observational technology, such as examining tremendously high energy cosmic ray events, or another, yet undeveloped technology.
Alternatives to the desert exhibit particles and interactions unfolding with every few orders of magnitude increase in the energy scale.
MSSM Desert[edit]
With the Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model, adjustment of parameters can make this unification exact[further explanation needed]. This unification is not unique.
| This section needs expansion. You can help by adding to it. (May 2017) |
Mirror matter desert[edit]
Scenarios like the Katoptron model can also lead to exact unification after a similar energetic desert. If neutrino masses are due to a seesaw mechanism, the seesaw scale should lie within the desert.[why?]
| This section needs expansion. You can help by adding to it. (May 2017) |
External links[edit]
- Wolchover, Natalie (9 August 2016). "What No New Particles Means for Physics". Quanta Magazine. Simons Foundation. Retrieved 19 December 2016.
- Dimopoulos, Savas (1990). "LHC, SSC and the universe". Physics Letters B. 246 (3–4): 347. Bibcode:1990PhLB..246..347D. doi:10.1016/0370-2693(90)90612-A.
- Kawamura, Yoshiharu; Kinami, Teppei; Miura, Takashi (2009). "Superparticle sum rules in the presence of hidden sector dynamics". Journal of High Energy Physics. 2009 (01): 064. Bibcode:2009JHEP...01..064K. arXiv:0810.3965
. doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2009/01/064
.