Some of this article's listed sources may not be reliable. (December 2018) (Learn how and when to remove this template message)
|Paradigms and models|
|Methodologies and frameworks|
|Standards and Bodies of Knowledge|
DevOps failed verification] that combines software development (Dev) and information technology operations (Ops) to shorten the systems development life cycle while delivering features, fixes, and updates frequently in close alignment with business objectives.[
- 1 Definition
- 2 History
- 3 Toolchains
- 4 Relationship to other approaches
- 5 Goals
- 6 Criticism
- 7 Cultural change
- 8 Deployment
- 9 Adoption
- 10 See also
- 11 Notes
- 12 References
- 13 Further reading
From an academic perspective, Len Bass, Ingo Weber, and Liming Zhu—three computer science researchers from the CSIRO and the Software Engineering Institute—suggested defining DevOps as "a set of practices intended to reduce the time between committing a change to a system and the change being placed into normal production, while ensuring high quality".
This section may lend undue weight to certain ideas, incidents, or controversies. (December 2018) (Learn how and when to remove this template message)
Some of this section's listed sources may not be reliable. (December 2018) (Learn how and when to remove this template message)
As DevOps is intended to be a cross-functional mode of working, those that practice the methodology use different sets of tools—referred to as "toolchains"—rather than a single one. These toolchains are expected to fit into one or more of the following categories, reflective of key aspects of the development and delivery process:[unreliable source?][unreliable source?]
- Coding – code development and review, source code management tools, code merging
- Building – continuous integration tools, build status
- Testing – continuous testing tools that provide feedback on business risks
- Packaging – artifact repository, application pre-deployment staging
- Releasing – change management, release approvals, release automation
- Configuring – infrastructure configuration and management, infrastructure as code tools
- Monitoring – applications performance monitoring, end-user experience
There are different interpretations of these toolchains (e.g. Plan, Create, Verify, Package, Release, Configure, and Monitor).
Some categories are more essential in a DevOps toolchain than others; especially continuous integration (e.g. Jenkins) and infrastructure as code (e.g. Puppet).[unreliable source?][unreliable source?]
Relationship to other approaches
Agile and DevOps both often utilize practices such as automated build and test, continuous integration, and continuous delivery.[unreliable source?] Agile can be viewed as addressing communication gaps between customers and developers, while DevOps addresses gaps between developers and IT operations / infrastructure.[unreliable source?] Also, DevOps has focus on the deployment of developed software, whether it is developed via Agile or other methodologies.[unreliable source?]
ArchOps presents an extension for DevOps practice, starting from software architecture artifacts, instead of source code, for operation deployment.. ArchOps states that architectural models are first-class entities in software development, deployment, and operations.
While continuous delivery is focused on automating the processes in software delivery, DevOps also focuses on the organization change to support great collaboration between the many functions involved.
DevOps and continuous delivery share a common background in agile methods and lean thinking: small and frequent changes with focused value to the end customer.[unreliable source?] They are well communicated and collaborated internally, thus helping achieve faster time to market, with reduced risks.
The application of continuous delivery and DevOps to data analytics has been termed DataOps. DataOps seeks to integrate data engineering, data integration, data quality, data security, and data privacy with operations.[unreliable source?] It applies principles from DevOps, Agile Development and the statistical process control, used in lean manufacturing, to improve the cycle time of extracting value from data analytics.[unreliable source?]
Site reliability engineering
In 2003, Google developed site reliability engineering (SRE), an approach for releasing new features continuously into large-scale high-availability systems while maintaining high-quality end user experience. While SRE predates the development of DevOps, they are generally viewed as being related to each other.[unreliable source?] Some aspects of DevOps have taken a similar approach.[unreliable source?]
This section needs expansion. You can help by adding to it. (June 2018)
The goals of DevOps span the entire delivery pipeline. They include:
- Improved deployment frequency;
- Faster time to market;
- Lower failure rate of new releases;
- Shortened lead time between fixes;
- Faster mean time to recovery (in the event of a new release crashing or otherwise disabling the current system).
Simple processes become increasingly programmable and dynamic, using a DevOps approach.[unreliable source?] DevOps aims to maximize the predictability, efficiency, security, and maintainability of operational processes. Very often, automation supports this objective.
DevOps integration targets product delivery, continuous testing, quality testing, feature development, and maintenance releases in order to improve reliability and security and provide faster development and deployment cycles. Many of the ideas (and people) involved in DevOps came from the enterprise systems management and agile software development movements.[unreliable source?]
Companies failed verification] have reported significant benefits, including: significantly shorter time to market, improved customer satisfaction, better product quality, more reliable releases, improved productivity and efficiency, and the increased ability to build the right product by fast experimentation.[
There is a lack of evidence in academic literature on the effectiveness of DevOps.[e]
A similar absence exists in practice. F5 Networks, for example, found that only one in five surveyed IT professionals thought that DevOps had a strategic impact on their organization despite rise in usage. The same study found that only 17% of those surveyed identified DevOps as key, well below software as a service (42%), big data (41%), and public cloud infrastructure as a service (39%).
DevOps initiatives can create cultural changes in companies  by transforming the way operations, developers, and testers collaborate during the development and delivery processes. Getting these groups to work cohesively is a critical challenge in enterprise DevOps adoption.
DevOps as a job title
This section contains information of unclear or questionable importance or relevance to the article's subject matter. (March 2019) (Learn how and when to remove this template message)
- Cattle not Pets: the paradigm of disposable server infrastructure.
- 10 deployments per day: the story of Flickr adopting DevOps.
Building a DevOps culture
DevOps principles demand strong interdepartmental communication. Team-building and other employee engagement activities are often used to create an environment that fosters this communication and cultural change within an organization. Team–building activities can include board games, trust activities, and employee engagement seminars.[unreliable source?]
Companies with very frequent releases may require knowledge on DevOps. For example, the company that operates image hosting website Flickr developed a DevOps approach to support ten deployments a day. Daily deployment cycle would be much higher at organizations producing multi-focus or multi-function applications. Daily deployment is referred to as continuous deployment[unreliable source?] or continuous delivery [unreliable source?] and has been associated with the lean startup methodology.[unreliable source?] Professional associations and blogs posts have formed on the topic since 2009.[unreliable source?][unreliable source?]
Architecturally significant requirements
To practice DevOps effectively, software applications have to meet a set of architecturally significant requirements (ASRs), such as: deployability, modifiability, testability, and monitorability. These ASRs require a high priority and cannot be traded off lightly.
Although in principle it is possible to practice DevOps with any architectural style, the microservices architectural style is becoming the standard for building continuously deployed systems. Small size service allows the architecture of an individual service to emerge through continuous refactoring, hence reducing the need for a big upfront design , allows for releasing the software early and continuously.
DevOps automation can be achieved by repackaging platforms, systems, and applications into reusable building blocks through the use of technologies such as virtual machines and containerization.[unreliable source?]
Implementation of DevOps automation in the IT-organization is heavily dependent on tools, [unreliable source?]which are  to cover different areas of the systems development lifecycle (SDLC):
- Infrastructure as code — Ansible, Terraform, Puppet, Chef
- CI/CD — Jenkins, TeamCity, Shippable, Bamboo, Azure DevOps
- Test automation — Selenium, Cucumber, Apache JMeter
- Containerization — Docker, Rocket, Unik
- Orchestration — Kubernetes, Swarm, Mesos
- Deployment — Elastic Beanstalk, Octopus, Vamp
- Measurement — NewRelic, Kibana, Datadog, DynaTrace
- ChatOps — Hubot, Lita, Cog
Some articles in the DevOps literature assume or recommend significant participation in DevOps initiatives from outside an organization's IT department, e.g.: "DevOps is just the agile principle, taken to the full enterprise."[unreliable source?]
A survey published in January 2016 by the SaaS cloud-computing company RightScale, DevOps adoption increased from 66 percent in 2015 to 74 percent in 2016. And among larger enterprise organizations, DevOps adoption is even higher – 81 percent.[unreliable source?]
Adoption of DevOps is being driven by many factors – including:
- Use of agile and other development processes and methods;
- Demand for an increased rate of production releases – from application and business unit stakeholders;
- Wide availability of virtualized[unreliable source?] and cloud infrastructure – from internal and external providers;
- Increased usage of data center automation[unreliable source?] and configuration management tools;
- Increased focus on test automation[unreliable source?] and continuous integration methods;
- A critical mass of publicly-available best practices.
- Dyck et. al (2015) "To our knowledge, there is no uniform definition for the terms release engineering and DevOps. As a consequence, many people use their own definitions or rely on others, which results in confusion about those terms."
- Jabbari et. al (2016) "The research results of this study showed the need for a definition as individual studies do not consistently define DevOps."
- Erich et. al (2017) "We noticed that there are various gaps in the study of DevOps: There is no consensus of what concepts DevOps covers, nor how DevOps is defined."
- Erich et. al (2017) "We discovered that there exists little agreement about the characteristics of DevOps in the academic literature."
- Erich et. al (2017) "We noticed that there are various gaps in the study of DevOps: [...] There is a lack of evidence on the effectiveness of DevOps.
- Loukides, Mike (7 June 2012). "What is DevOps?".
- Dyck, Andrej; Penners, Ralf; Lichter, Horst (2015-05-19). "Towards Definitions for Release Engineering and DevOps". Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE/ACM 3rd International Workshop on Release Engineering. IEEE.
- Jabbari, Ramtin; bin Ali, Nauman; Petersen, Kai; Tanveer, Binish (May 2016). "What is DevOps?: A Systematic Mapping Study on Definitions and Practices". Proceedings of the 2016 Scientific Workshop. Association for Computing Machinery.
- Erich, F.M.A.; Amrit, C.; Daneva, M. (June 2017). "A Qualitative Study of DevOps Usage in Practice". Journal of Software: Evolution and Process. 29 (6).
- Bass, Len; Weber, Ingo; Zhu, Liming (2015). DevOps: A Software Architect's Perspective. ISBN 978-0134049847.
- "Surprise! Broad Agreement on the Definition of DevOps". 2015-05-13.
- Debois, Patrick. "Agile 2008 Toronto". Just Enough Documented Information. Retrieved 12 March 2015.
- Debois, Patrick. "DevOps Days". DevOps Days. Retrieved 31 March 2011.
- Gartner Market Trends: DevOps – Not a Market, but Tool-Centric Philosophy That supports a Continuous Delivery Value Chain (Report). Gartner. 18 February 2015.
- Edwards, Damon. "Integrating DevOps tools into a Service Delivery Platform". dev2ops.org.
- Seroter, Richard. "Exploring the ENTIRE DevOps Toolchain for (Cloud) Teams". infoq.com.
- Theakanath, Thomas (2016-02-05). "DevOps Stack on a Shoestring Budget". devops.com.
- "Stronger DevOps Culture with Puppet and Vagrant". Puppet Labs. Retrieved 22 October 2015.
- Watts, Stephen; Kidd, Chrissy (August 10, 2017). "DevOps vs Agile: What's the Difference and How Are They Related?". bmc.com. Retrieved March 1, 2019.
- "Agile Vs. DevOps: What's the difference?". guru99.com. Retrieved March 1, 2019.
- Castellanos, Camilo; Correal, Dario (15 September 2018). Executing Architectural Models for Big Data Analytics. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. 11048. pp. 364–371. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-00761-4_24. ISBN 978-3-030-00760-7.
- Humble, Jez; Farley, David (2011). Continuous Delivery: reliable software releases through build, test, and deployment automation. Pearson Education Inc. ISBN 978-0-321-60191-9.
- Hammond, Jeffrey (9 September 2011). "The Relationship between DevOps and Continuous Delivery". Forrester Research.
- Ambler, Scott W. (12 February 2014). "We need more Agile IT Now!". Dr. Dobb's the World of Software Development.
- Chen, Lianping (2015). "Continuous Delivery: Huge Benefits, but Challenges Too". IEEE Software. 32 (2): 50–54. doi:10.1109/MS.2015.27.
- Chen, Lianping (2018). Microservices: Architecting for Continuous Delivery and DevOps. The IEEE International Conference on Software Architecture (ICSA 2018). IEEE.
- "From DevOps to DataOps, By Andy Palmer - Tamr Inc". Tamr Inc. 7 May 2015. Retrieved 23 August 2017.
- DataKitchen (15 March 2017). "How to Become a Rising Star with Data Analytics". data-ops. Retrieved 23 August 2017.
- Weinberger, Matt (25 November 2014), Microsoft study finds everybody wants DevOps but Culture is a Challenge, Computerworld
- Beyer, Betsy; Jones, Chris; Petoff, Jennifer; Murphy, Niall Richard (April 2016). Site Reliability Engineering. O'Reilly Media. ISBN 978-1-4919-2909-4.
- "SRE vs. DevOps — a False Distinction? - DevOps.com". 18 May 2017.
- Love DevOps? Wait until you meet SRE
- "How to stay relevant in the DevOps era: A SysAdmin's survival guide".
- "What is DevOps?". NewRelic.com. Retrieved 21 October 2014.
- Nasrat, Paul. "Agile Infrastructure". InfoQ. Retrieved 31 March 2011.
- Bourne, James (23 January 2017). "New research questions strategic importance of DevOps despite rise in usage". CloudTech.
- Emerging Technology Analysis: DevOps a Culture Shift, Not a Technology (Report). Gartner.
- "Gartner IT Glossary – devops". Gartner. Retrieved 30 October 2015.
- Jones, Stephen; Noppen, Joost; Lettice, Fiona (21 July 2016). Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Quality-Aware Dev Ops - QUDOS 2016. pp. 7–11. doi:10.1145/2945408.2945410. ISBN 9781450344111.
- "Is DevOps a Title? - DevOps.com". DevOps.com. 20 March 2014. Retrieved 22 July 2017.
- "DevOps: A Job Title or a School of Thought?". Monster Career Advice. Retrieved 22 July 2017.
- "What are known useful and misleading memes in the DevOps culture?". devops.stackexchange.com. Retrieved 29 June 2017.
- Sharwood, Simon. "Are Your Servers Pets or Cattle?". The Register. Retrieved 2 July 2018.
- Walls, Mandi (15 April 2013). Building a DevOps Culture. OReilly Media. ISBN 9781449368364.
- Roach, Patrick (2015-10-08). "Dice Breakers: Using DevOps principles and nerdery to reimagine Team building". DevOps.com.
- "10+ Deploys Per Day: Dev and Ops Cooperation at Flickr". 2009-06-23.
- "SAM SIG: Applied Lean Startup Ideas: Continuous Deployment at kaChing". SVForum.
- Humble, Jez. "Why Enterprises Must Adopt Devops to Enable Continuous Delivery". Cutter IT Journal.
- "Applied Lean Startup Ideas: Continuous Deployment at kaChing". 2010-05-26.
- "DevOps Days 2009 Conference".
- Edwards, Damon. "DevOps Meetup Recap".
- Chen, Lianping (2015). Towards Architecting for Continuous Delivery. The 12th Working IEEE/IFIP Conference on Software Architecture(WICSA 2015). Montréal, Canada: IEEE. doi:10.1109/WICSA.2015.23.
- Chen, Lianping; Ali Babar, Muhammad (2014). Towards an Evidence-Based Understanding of Emergence of Architecture through Continuous Refactoring in Agile Software Development. The 11th Working IEEE/IFIP Conference on Software Architecture(WICSA 2014). IEEE. doi:10.1109/WICSA.2014.45.
- "Unleashing the Full Potential of Containerization for DevOps". Unleashing the Full Potential of Containerization for DevOps. 20 September 2017. Retrieved 20 June 2018.
- "Containers vs. virtual machines: A simplified answer to a complex question".
- "DevOps best practices: How much automation do you need?". TechBeacon. Retrieved 2018-11-14.
- "DevOps is Agile for the Rest of the Company". DevOps.com. 2015-03-04.
- Harvey, Cynthia (9 January 2017). "10 Ways DevOps is Changing the Enterprise". Datamation.
- "Virtual Infrastructure products: features comparison". Welcome to IT 2.0: Next Generation IT infrastructures.
- Ellard, Jennifer. "Bringing Order to Chaos through Data Center Automation". Information Management. SourceMedia. Archived from the original on 11 June 2010.
- "Impact of DevOps on Testing". DevOps.com. 2015-08-21.
- Davis, Jennifer; Daniels, Ryn (2016-05-30). Effective DevOps : building a culture of collaboration, affinity, and tooling at scale. Sebastopol, CA: O'Reilly. ISBN 9781491926437. OCLC 951434424.
- Gene, Kim; Debois, Patrick; Willis, John; Humble, Jez; Allspaw, John (2015-10-07). The DevOps handbook : how to create world-class agility, reliability, and security in technology organizations (First ed.). Portland, OR. ISBN 9781942788003. OCLC 907166314.