This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these template messages)
|Part of a series on|
DevOps is a set of practices that combines software development (Dev) and IT operations (Ops). It aims to shorten the systems development life cycle and provide continuous delivery with high software quality. DevOps is complementary with Agile software development; several DevOps aspects came from the Agile methodology.
Other than it being a cross-functional combination (and a portmanteau too) of the terms and concepts for "development" and "operations," academics and practitioners have not developed a universal definition for the term "DevOps".[a][b][c][d] Most often, DevOps is characterized by key principles: shared ownership, workflow automation, and rapid feedback.
From an academic perspective, Len Bass, Ingo Weber, and Liming Zhu—three computer science researchers from the CSIRO and the Software Engineering Institute—suggested defining DevOps as "a set of practices intended to reduce the time between committing a change to a system and the change being placed into normal production, while ensuring high quality".
However, the term is used in multiple contexts. At its most successful, DevOps is a combination of specific practices, culture change, and tools.
This section may lend undue weight to certain ideas, incidents, or controversies. (December 2018)
In 2009, the first conference named devopsdays was held in Ghent, Belgium. The conference was founded by Belgian consultant, project manager and agile practitioner Patrick Debois.[who?] The conference has now spread to other countries.
As of 2014, the annual State of DevOps report was published by Nicole Forsgren, Gene Kim, Jez Humble and others. They stated that the adoption of DevOps was accelerating.  Also in 2014, Lisa Crispin and Janet Gregory wrote the book More Agile Testing, containing a chapter on testing and DevOps.
In 2016 the DORA metrics for throughput (deployment frequency, lead time for changes), and stability (mean time to recover, change failure rate) where published in the State of DevOps report.
As DevOps is intended to be a cross-functional mode of working, those who practice the methodology use different sets of tools—referred to as "toolchains"—rather than a single one. These toolchains are expected to fit into one or more of the following categories, reflective of key aspects of the development and delivery process.
- Coding – code development and review, source code management tools, code merging.
- Building – continuous integration tools, build status.
- Testing – continuous testing tools that provide quick and timely feedback on business risks.
- Packaging – artifact repository, application pre-deployment staging.
- Releasing – change management, release approvals, release automation.
- Configuring – infrastructure configuration and management, infrastructure as code tools.
- Monitoring – applications performance monitoring, end-user experience.
Relationship to other approaches
Many of the ideas fundamental to DevOps practices are inspired by, or mirror, other well known practices such as Lean and Deming's Plan-Do-Check-Act cycle, through to The Toyota Way and the Agile approach of breaking down components and batch sizes. Contrary to the "top-down" proscriptive approach and rigid framework of ITIL in the 1990s, DevOps is "bottom-up" and a flexible practice, created by software engineers, with software engineer needs in mind.
The motivations for what has become modern DevOps and several standard DevOps practices such as automated build and test, continuous integration, and continuous delivery originated in the Agile world, which dates (informally) to the 1990s, and formally to 2001. Agile development teams using methods such as Extreme Programming couldn't "satisfy the customer through early and continuous delivery of valuable software" unless they subsumed the operations / infrastructure responsibilities associated with their applications, many of which they automated. Because Scrum emerged as the dominant Agile framework in the early 2000s and it omitted the engineering practices that were part of many Agile teams, the movement to automate operations / infrastructure functions splintered from Agile and expanded into what has become modern DevOps. Today, DevOps focuses on the deployment of developed software, whether it is developed via Agile or other methodologies.
ArchOps presents an extension for DevOps practice, starting from software architecture artifacts, instead of source code, for operation deployment. ArchOps states that architectural models are first-class entities in software development, deployment, and operations.
Automation is a core principle for achieving DevOps success and CI/CD is a critical component.
CI/CD consists of continuous integration (CI) and continuous delivery (CD), or continuous deployment (CD). Used together, the three processes automate build, testing, and deployment so DevOps teams can ship code changes faster and more reliably. When referring to CI/CD, the “CD” being referenced is usually continuous delivery, not continuous deployment. Continuous delivery and other CI/CD processes are focused on automating software delivery tasks, while DevOps also focuses on the organizational change to support great collaboration between the many functions involved. Both share a common background in agile methods and lean thinking, prioritizing small and frequent changes with focused value to the end customer. This ensures two things: Software is always in a releasable state throughout its lifecycle, which makes it cheaper and less risky to deliver the software.
The application of continuous delivery and DevOps to data analytics has been termed DataOps. DataOps seeks to integrate data engineering, data integration, data quality, data security, and data privacy with operations. It applies principles from DevOps, Agile Development and the statistical process control, used in lean manufacturing, to improve the cycle time of extracting value from data analytics.
In 2003, Google developed site reliability engineering (SRE), an approach for releasing new features continuously into large-scale high-availability systems while maintaining high-quality end-user experience. While SRE predates the development of DevOps, they are generally viewed as being related to each other.
Toyota production system, lean thinking, kaizen
Toyota production system, also known under the acronym TPS, was the inspiration for lean thinking with its focus on continuous improvement, kaizen, flow and small batches. The Andon cord principle to create fast feedback, swarm and solve problems stems from TPS.
DevSecOps, Shifting Security Left
DevSecOps is an augmentation of DevOps to allow for security practices to be integrated into the DevOps approach. Contrary to a traditional centralized security team model, each delivery team is empowered to factor in the correct security controls into their software delivery. Security practices and testing are performed earlier in the development lifecycle, hence the term "shift left" can be used. Security is tested in three main areas: static, software composition, and dynamic.
Checking the code statically via static application security testing (SAST) is white-box testing with special focus on security. Depending on the programming language, different tools are needed to do such static code analysis. The software composition is analyzed, especially libraries and their versions are checked against vulnerability lists published by CERT and other expert groups. When giving software to clients, licenses and its match to the one of the software distributed are in focus, especially copyleft licenses. Dynamic testing is also called black-box testing. The software is tested without knowing its inner functions. In DevSecOps it is on one hand called dynamically (DAST), or penetration testing. The goal is to catch, amongst others, errors like cross-site scripting, or SQL injection early. Threat types are for example published by the open web application security project, e.g. its TOP10. On the other hand, especially with microservices interactive application testing (IAST) is helpful to check which code is executed when running automated functional tests, the focus is to detect vulnerabilities within the applications. Contrary to SAST and DAST, IAST works inside the application.
Very similar to IAST, Runtime application self-protection (RASP) runs inside the application. Its instrumentation focuses to detect attacks not in test cycles, but during productive runtime. Attacks can be either reported via monitoring and alerting, or actively blocked. RASP alerts help security information and event management (SIEM).
DevOps initiatives can create cultural changes in companies by transforming the way operations, developers, and testers collaborate during the development and delivery processes. Getting these groups to work cohesively is a critical challenge in enterprise DevOps adoption. DevOps is as much about culture, as it is about the toolchain.
Building a DevOps culture
Organizational culture is a strong predictor of IT and organizational performance. Cultural practices such as information flow, collaboration, shared responsibilities, learning from failures and new ideas are central to DevOps. Team-building and other employee engagement activities are often used to create an environment that fosters this communication and cultural change within an organization. DevOps as a service approach allows developers and operations teams to take greater control of their applications and infrastructure without hindering speed. It also transfers the onus of owning a problem on to the development team, making them much more careful in their stride.
The 2015 State of DevOps Report discovered that the top seven measures with the strongest correlation to organizational culture are:
- Organizational investment
- Team leaders' experience and effectiveness
- Continuous delivery
- The ability of different disciplines (development, operations, and infosec) to achieve win-win outcomes
- Organizational performance
- Deployment pain
- Lean management practices
Companies with very frequent releases may require knowledge on DevOps. For example, the company that operates image hosting website Flickr developed a DevOps approach to support ten deployments a day. Daily deployment cycles would be much higher at organizations producing multi-focus or multi-function applications. Daily deployment is referred to as continuous deployment
Architecturally significant requirements
To practice DevOps effectively, software applications have to meet a set of architecturally significant requirements (ASRs), such as: deployability, modifiability, testability, and monitor-ability.
Although in principle it is possible to practice DevOps with any architectural style, the microservices architectural style is becoming the standard for building continuously deployed systems. Small size service allows the architecture of an individual service to emerge through continuous refactoring,.
It also supports consistency, reliability, and efficiency within the organization, and is usually enabled by a shared code repository or version control. As DevOps researcher Ravi Teja Yarlagadda hypothesizes, "Through DevOps, there is an assumption that all functions can be carried out, controlled, and managed in a central place using a simple code."
Automation with version control
Many organizations use version control to power DevOps automation technologies like virtual machines, containerization (or OS-level virtualization), and CI/CD. The paper DevOps: development of a toolchain in the banking domain notes that with teams of developers working on the same project, "All developers need to make changes to the same codebase and sometimes edit even the same files. For efficient working, there has to be a system that helps engineers avoid conflicts and retain the codebase history," with the Git version control system and the GitHub platform referenced as examples.
DevOps practices and adoption
DevOps practices, and their dependencies include a dependency network which connects potential benefits to an ordered chain of practices. Using this network organizations can choose a path that enables fulfillment of their goals.
Adoption of DevOps is being driven by many factors – including:
- Use of agile and other development processes and methods;
- Demand for an increased rate of production releases – from application and business unit stakeholders;
- Wide availability of virtualized and cloud infrastructure – from internal and external providers;
- Increased usage of data center automation and configuration management tools;
- Increased focus on test automation and continuous integration methods;
- A critical mass of publicly available best practices.
- Twelve-factor app
- Infrastructure as code
- Internet Application Management
- Lean software development
- Value Stream
- Dyck et. al (2015) "To our knowledge, there is no uniform definition for the terms release engineering and DevOps. As a consequence, many people use their own definitions or rely on others, which results in confusion about those terms."
- Jabbari et. al (2016) "The research results of this study showed the need for a definition as individual studies do not consistently define DevOps."
- Erich et. al (2017) "We noticed that there are various gaps in the study of DevOps: There is no consensus of what concepts DevOps covers, nor how DevOps is defined."
- Erich et. al (2017) "We discovered that there exists little agreement about the characteristics of DevOps in the academic literature."
- Loukides, Mike (7 June 2012). "What is DevOps?". O'Reilly Media.
- Dyck, Andrej; Penners, Ralf; Lichter, Horst (19 May 2015). "Towards Definitions for Release Engineering and DevOps". Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE/ACM 3rd International Workshop on Release Engineering. IEEE: 3. doi:10.1109/RELENG.2015.10. ISBN 978-1-4673-7070-7. S2CID 4659735.
- Jabbari, Ramtin; bin Ali, Nauman; Petersen, Kai; Tanveer, Binish (May 2016). "What is DevOps?: A Systematic Mapping Study on Definitions and Practices". Proceedings of the 2016 Scientific Workshop. Association for Computing Machinery.
- Erich, F.M.A.; Amrit, C.; Daneva, M. (June 2017). "A Qualitative Study of DevOps Usage in Practice". Journal of Software: Evolution and Process. 29 (6): e1885. doi:10.1002/smr.1885. S2CID 35914007.
- Bass, Len; Weber, Ingo; Zhu, Liming (2015). DevOps: A Software Architect's Perspective. ISBN 978-0134049847.
- Muñoz, Mirna; Negrete Rodríguez, Mario (April 2021). "A guidance to implement or reinforce a DevOps approach in organizations: A case study". Cite journal requires
- Chapman, M., Gatti, N: A model of a service life cycle, Proceedings of TINA '93, pp. I-205–I-215, Sep., 1993.
- Mezak, Steve (25 January 2018). "The Origins of DevOps: What's in a Name?". devops.com. Retrieved 6 May 2019.
- Debois, Patrick. "Agile 2008 Toronto". Just Enough Documented Information. Retrieved 12 March 2015.
- Debois, Patrick. "DevOps Days". DevOps Days. Retrieved 31 March 2011.
- Alana Brown; Nicole Forsgren; Jez Humble; Nigel Kersten; Gene Kim (2016). "2016 State of DevOps Report" (PDF). Puppet Labs, DORA (DevOps Research. Retrieved 6 May 2019.
- "Puppet - Alanna Brown". Puppet Labs. Retrieved 27 April 2019.
- Nicole Forsgren; Gene Kim; Nigel Kersten; Jez Humble (2014). "2014 State of DevOps Report" (PDF). Puppet Labs, IT Revolution Press and ThoughtWorks. Retrieved 27 April 2019.
- "2015 State of DevOps Report" (PDF). Puppet Labs, Pwc, IT Revolution Press. 2015. Retrieved 6 May 2019.
- "More Agile Testing" (PDF). October 2014. Retrieved 6 May 2019.
- Crispin, Lisa; Gregory, Janet (October 2014). More Agile Testing. ISBN 9780133749571. Retrieved 6 May 2019.
- Gartner Market Trends: DevOps – Not a Market, but Tool-Centric Philosophy That supports a Continuous Delivery Value Chain (Report). Gartner. 18 February 2015.
- Klein, Brandon Thorin (1 May 2021). "The DevOps: A Concise Understanding to the DevOps Philosophy and Science". doi:10.2172/1785164. OSTI 1785164. S2CID 236606284. Cite journal requires
- "The History and Evolution of DevOps | Tom Geraghty". Retrieved 29 November 2020.
- "Principles behind the Agile Manifesto". agilemanifesto.org. Retrieved 6 December 2020.
- Castellanos, Camilo; Correal, Dario (15 September 2018). Executing Architectural Models for Big Data Analytics. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. 11048. pp. 364–371. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-00761-4_24. ISBN 978-3-030-00760-7.
- Humble, Jez; Farley, David (2011). Continuous Delivery: reliable software releases through build, test, and deployment automation. Pearson Education Inc. ISBN 978-0-321-60191-9.
- Chen, Lianping (2015). "Continuous Delivery: Huge Benefits, but Challenges Too". IEEE Software. 32 (2): 50–54. doi:10.1109/MS.2015.27. S2CID 1241241.
- Beyer, Betsy; Jones, Chris; Petoff, Jennifer; Murphy, Niall Richard (April 2016). Site Reliability Engineering. O'Reilly Media. ISBN 978-1-4919-2909-4.
- Analyzing the DNA of DevOps, Brent Aaron Reed, Willy Schaub, 2018-11-14.
- The DevOps Handbook: How to Create World-Class Agility, Reliability, and Security in Technology Organizations, Gene Kim, Patrick Debois, John Willis, Jezz Humble, 2016
- OWASP TOP10, Open web application security project, accessed 2021-11-25.
- Emerging Technology Analysis: DevOps a Culture Shift, Not a Technology (Report). Gartner.
- "Gartner IT Glossary – devops". Gartner. Retrieved 30 October 2015.
- Jones, Stephen; Noppen, Joost; Lettice, Fiona (21 July 2016). Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Quality-Aware Dev Ops - QUDOS 2016 (PDF). pp. 7–11. doi:10.1145/2945408.2945410. ISBN 9781450344111. S2CID 515140.
- Mandi Walls (25 September 2015). "Building a DevOps culture". O'Reilly.
- Chen, Lianping; Ali Babar, Muhammad (2014). "Towards an Evidence-Based Understanding of Emergence of Architecture through Continuous Refactoring in Agile Software Development". The 11th Working IEEE/IFIP Conference on Software Architecture(WICSA 2014). IEEE. doi:10.1109/WICSA.2014.45.
- Teja Yarlagadda, Ravi (9 March 2021). "DevOps and Its Practices". SSRN 3798877.
- Morisio, Maurizio (16 April 2021). DevOps: development of a toolchain in the banking domain. Politecnico di Torino (laurea). Retrieved 16 August 2021.
- Davis, Jennifer; Daniels, Ryn (30 May 2016). Effective DevOps : building a culture of collaboration, affinity, and tooling at scale. Sebastopol, CA: O'Reilly. ISBN 9781491926437. OCLC 951434424.
- Kim, Gene; Debois, Patrick; Willis, John; Humble, Jez; Allspaw, John (7 October 2015). The DevOps handbook : how to create world-class agility, reliability, and security in technology organizations (First ed.). Portland, OR. ISBN 9781942788003. OCLC 907166314.
- Forsgren, Nicole; Humble, Jez; Kim, Gene (27 March 2018). Accelerate: The Science of Lean Software and DevOps: Building and Scaling High Performing Technology Organizations (First ed.). IT Revolution Press. ISBN 9781942788331.