Lawyer jokes, which pre-date Shakespeare's era, are commonly told by those outside the profession as an expression of contempt, scorn and derision. They serve as a form of social commentary or satire reflecting the cultural perception of lawyers.
The first thing we do, let's kill all the lawyers
A Fox may steal your hens, sir
A Whore your health and pence, sir
Your daughter rob your chest, sir
Your wife may steal your rest, sir
A thief your goods and plate
But this is all but picking
With rest, pence, chest and chicken
It ever was decreed, sir
If Lawyer's Hand is fee'd, sir
He steals your whole estate: 72
In the modern era, many complaints about lawyers fall into five general categories:
- abuse of litigation in various ways, including using dilatory tactics and false evidence and making frivolous arguments to the courts
- preparation of false documentation, such as false deeds, contracts, or wills
- deceiving clients and other persons and misappropriating property
- procrastination in dealings with clients
- charging excessive fees
A recurring theme, historically and today, is that of exorbitant legal fees consuming the entire value of property at stake in an estate or a dispute:
How many lawyers does it take to change a light bulb?
How many can you afford?
It takes only one lawyer to change your lightbulb to his lightbulb.: 70
The tale of the freshly-acquitted horse thief pleading that the judge issue an arrest warrant for "that dirty lawyer of mine" because "Your honour, you see, I didn't have the money to pay his fee, so he went and took the horse I stole" is often modernised to "he went and took the car I stole" with little or nothing else changed.
While telling an ethnic joke risks the label of racism, lawyers are perceived as a highly privileged class, seemingly accountable only to other lawyers; the Bar Association, the judges, even many of the politicians and legislators are their fellow lawyers who inevitably give them free rein. After all, one does not choose one's ethnicity but may choose whether to pursue a career in law.
Of those of all the professions, lawyer jokes are often the most blunt and to the point:
What is the difference between a catfish and a lawyer?
One is a scum-sucking, bottom-feeding scavenger. The other is just a fish.
Why don't sharks eat lawyers?
Often told is the anecdote where a wealthy lawyer, solicited for a charitable donation, replies "Do you realise my mother is dying of a long-term illness and has medical bills several times her income? Did you know that my brother, a disabled veteran, is blind and in a wheelchair? Do you understand my sister is widowed and penniless with three dependent children? Well, since I don't give any money to them, why should I give any to you?"
Lawyer: "I have some good news for you"
Client: "What good news? You lost my case, I was convicted of a murder I did not commit and was sentenced to die in the electric chair."
Lawyer: "That's all true, but I got the voltage lowered."
Other anecdotes are based on logical fallacy, such as a lawyer defending a client on trial for killing his parents: "Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, I appeal to your basic decency to take mercy on this poor, defenceless orphan!"
Occasionally, lawyers themselves use self-deprecating humour about lawyers or the legal profession in an attempt to add levity to otherwise bland topics. Lawyers giving a talk, especially to the profession, often employ jokes as icebreakers.
A common theme in lawyer jokes is to present a lawyer or law firm, particularly in parody settings, with a gag name such as the commonly used "Dewey, Cheatem & Howe" (a pun on a phrase such as "Do we cheat 'em? And how!"). The gag name pokes fun at the perceived propensity of legal professionals to take advantage of their clients. This gag name is also used more broadly as a placeholder for any hypothetical law firm. In this variation, the second name often varies somewhat with regards to spelling (Cheetem, Cheater, Cheethem, Cheatham, etc.), but also to the word upon which it is based (Screwum, Burnham, etc.).
A popular poster for The Three Stooges features the Stooges as bumbling members of such a firm, with the actual episode using the name "Dewey, Burnham, and Howe". The 2012 Three Stooges film uses this example, among similar ones such as proctologists "Proba, Keister, and Wince" and divorce lawyers "Ditcher, Quick, and Hyde." In the film Heavenly Daze, Moe and Larry deal with a crooked attorney named "I. Fleecem" (I fleece 'em). Catherine O'Hara used the phrase in the premiere 1986 edition of HBO's telethon "Comic Relief", and Soupy Sales claimed that it was the name of his law firm in 1972. Tom and Ray Magliozzi, of NPR's Car Talk radio program, named their business corporation "Dewey, Cheetham & Howe". In 2001, a banker in Texas, who had experience coming up with gag names for staff training, reported a cashier's check to the FBI when he noticed it was payable to "Howe" or "Howie Dewey Cheatham", leading to the client's conviction for money laundering and fraud.
- Galanter, Marc (2006). Lowering the Bar: Lawyer Jokes and Legal Culture. University of Wisconsin Press. ISBN 978-0-299-21354-1.
- Kornstein, Daniel (2005). Kill all the lawyers?: Shakespeare's legal appeal. University of Nebraska Press. p. 22. ISBN 978-0803278219.
- Erin Barrett; Jack Mingo (Jan 31, 2002), Dracula was a Lawyer: Hundreds of Fascinating Facts from the World of Law, Conari Press, ISBN 9781573247184
- Hazard, Geoffrey C.; Dondi, Angelo (2004). Legal Ethics: A Comparative Study. Stanford University Press. p. 60. ISBN 978-0-8047-4882-7.
- Alley, Ken (2000-07-11). The Encyclopedia of Wit, Humor, and Wisdom: The Big Book of Little Anecdotes. iUniverse. p. 310. ISBN 978-1-4620-9229-1.
- Callaway, Robert W. (2004-12-01). Party Jokes. AuthorHouse. p. 12. ISBN 978-1-4208-1401-9.
- Motley, Michael T., ed. (2008). Studies in applied interpersonal communication. Los Angeles: SAGE. p. 236. ISBN 978-1-4129-9030-1. OCLC 738380488.
- Peter Hay (1989), The book of legal anecdotes, Barnes & Noble, ISBN 9780880299763
- Laughter Ever After Ministryof Good Humor. Chalice Press. p. 68. ISBN 978-0-8272-2145-1.
- Wallwork, Adrian (2017-12-14). Jokes: Have a Laugh and Improve Your English. Springer. p. 67. ISBN 978-3-319-67247-2.
- John Capps; Donald Capps (15 September 2009). You've Got To Be Kidding!: How Jokes Can Help You Think. John Wiley & Sons. p. 55. ISBN 978-1-4051-9665-9.
- Gerald P. Koocher, Patricia Keith-Spiegel (1998). Ethics in psychology: professional standards and cases. Oxford University Press. p. 108. ISBN 978-0-19-509201-1.
- Jackson, William J. (18 December 2014). American Tricksters: Thoughts on the Shadow Side of a Culture's Psyche. Wipf and Stock. p. 116. ISBN 978-1-62564-790-0. Retrieved 12 January 2023.
- "The Fullname Citation Style". Harvard University. Retrieved 2010-03-09.
- "LaTeX letter using "appmhead" styles". University of Colorado Boulder. Archived from the original on 2010-06-11. Retrieved 2010-03-09.
- "Math 103, Fall 2009, questions for final exam televised review, with solutions" (PDF). Rutgers University. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2010-07-02. Retrieved 2010-03-09.
- "Meet Your Clients - Consumer Protection - Fall 2002" (PDF). Georgia State University. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2009-11-15. Retrieved 2010-03-09.
- "Research Memo Assignment". Louisiana State University. Retrieved 2010-03-10.
- "A Three Pattern with a Twist!". The Three Stooges. January 9, 2015.
- "- YouTube". www.youtube.com. Archived from the original on 2020-09-04.
- "Clipped From Chicago Tribune". January 7, 1972. p. 39 – via newspapers.com.
- "The History of Car Talk". Car Talk (cartalk.com). Retrieved 2010-03-09.
- Adams, Noah (2001-08-31). "Howe, Dewey, Cheatem". All Things Considered. NPR. Retrieved 12 January 2023.
- Jennings, Diane (30 August 2001). "No Stooges Need Apply: A Gag Trips Up Fraud". The Washington Post. Retrieved 12 January 2023.