Didsbury (provincial electoral district)
Members of the Legislative Assembly (MLAs)
|See Rosebud 1905-1909|
|Henry B. Atkins||Liberal||1917||1921|
|Austin Claypool||United Farmers||1921||1935|
|Edward P. Foster||Social Credit||1935||1940|
|Ernest M. Brown||Independent||1940||1944|
|Howard Hammell||Social Credit||1944||1955|
|James Lawrence Owens||Social Credit||1955||1960|
|Robert Curtis Clark||Social Credit||1960||1963|
|See Olds-Didsbury 1963-1997|
1944 general election
|1944 Alberta general election results||Turnout 69.01%|
|Social Credit||Howard Hammell||2,485||59.46%|
|Cooperative Commonwealth||R.C. Bell||728||17.42%|
|Rejected, Spoiled and Declined||Unknown|
1957 liquor plebiscite
|1957 Alberta liquor plebiscite results: Didsbury|
|Question A: Do you approve additional types of outlets for the
sale of beer, wine and spirituous liquor subject to a local vote?
|Rejected, Spoiled and Declined||34|
|6,535 Eligible Electors, Turnout 51.28%|
On October 30, 1957 a stand-alone plebiscite was held province wide in all 50 of the then current provincial electoral districts in Alberta. The government decided to consult Alberta voters to decide on liquor sales and mixed drinking after a divisive debate in the Legislature. The plebiscite was intended to deal with the growing demand for reforming antiquated liquor control laws.
The plebiscite was conducted in two parts. Question A asked in all districts, asked the voters if the sale of liquor should be expanded in Alberta, while Question B asked in a handful of districts within the corporate limits of Calgary and Edmonton asked if men and woman were allowed to drink together in establishments.
Province wide Question A of the plebiscite passed in 33 of the 50 districts while Question B passed in all five districts. Didsbury voted against the proposal by a wide margin. The voter turnout in the district was well above the province wide average of 46% with well over half the electors turning out to vote.
Official district returns were released to the public on December 31, 1957. The Social Credit government in power at the time did not considered the results binding. However the results of the vote led the government to repeal all existing liquor legislation and introduce an entirely new Liquor Act.
Municipal districts lying inside electoral districts that voted against the Plebiscite such as Didsbury were designated Local Option Zones by the Alberta Liquor Control Board and considered effective dry zones, business owners that wanted a license had to petition for a binding municipal plebiscite in order to be granted a license.
- "Didsbury Official Results 1944 Alberta general election". Alberta Heritage Foundation. Archived from the original on 2011-06-12. Retrieved 2008-06-15.
- Alberta Gazette. 53 (December 31 ed.). Government of Alberta. 1957. pp. 2,247–2,249.
- "Albertans Vote 2 to 1 For More Liquor Outlets". Vol L No 273. The Lethbridge Herald. October 31, 1957. pp. 1–2.
- "No Sudden Change In Alberta Drinking Habits Is Seen". Vol L No 267. The Lethbridge Herald. October 24, 1957. p. 1.
- "Entirely New Act On Liquor". Vol LI No 72. The Lethbridge Herald. March 5, 1968. p. 1.
- "Bill 81". Alberta Bills 12th Legislature 1st Session. Government of Alberta. 1958. p. 40.
|This Alberta-related article is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.|
|This article about a Canadian electoral district is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.|