|Vacuum||1 (by definition)|
|Air||58986 ± 1.000000500.000
(at STP, for 0.9 MHz),
|Silicon dioxide||3.9 |
|Sapphire||8.9–11.1 (anisotropic) |
|Pyrex (Glass)||4.7 (3.7–10)|
|Silicon nitride||7-8 (polycrystalline, 1 MHz)|
|Ammonia||26, 22, 20, 17
(−80, −40, 0, 20 °C)
|Glycerol||41.2, 47, 42.5
(0, 20, 25 °C)
|Water||88, 80.1, 55.3, 34.5
(0, 20, 100, 200 °C)
for visible light: 1.77
|Hydrofluoric acid||175, 134, 111, 83.6
-73 °C, -42 °C, -27 °C, 0 °C),
|Hydrazine||52.0 (20 °C),|
|Formamide||84.0 (20 °C)|
|Hydrogen peroxide||128 aq–60
|Barium strontium titanate||500|
|Lead zirconate titanate||500–6000|
|Conjugated polymers||1.8–6 up to 100,000|
|Calcium copper titanate||>250,000|
Permittivity is a material property that affects the Coulomb force between two point charges in the material. Relative permittivity is the factor by which the electric field between the charges is decreased relative to vacuum.
Likewise, relative permittivity is the ratio of the capacitance of a capacitor using that material as a dielectric, compared to a similar capacitor that has vacuum as its dielectric. Relative permittivity is also commonly known as dielectric constant, a term deprecated in physics and engineering as well as in chemistry.
Relative permittivity is typically denoted as εr(ω) (sometimes κ or K) and is defined as
The relative permittivity of a medium is related to its electric susceptibility, χe, as εr(ω) = 1 + χe.
In anisotropic media (such as non cubic crystals) the relative permittivity is a second rank tensor.
The relative permittivity of a material for a frequency of zero is known as its static relative permittivity.
The historical term for the relative permittivity is dielectric constant. It is still commonly used, but has been deprecated by standards organizations, because of its ambiguity, as some older authors used it for the absolute permittivity ε. The permittivity may be quoted either as a static property or as a frequency-dependent variant. It has also been used to refer to only the real component ε'r of the complex-valued relative permittivity.
In the causal theory of waves, permittivity is a complex quantity. The imaginary part corresponds to a phase shift of the polarization P relative to E and leads to the attenuation of electromagnetic waves passing through the medium. By definition, the linear relative permittivity of vacuum is equal to 1, that is ε = ε0, although there are theoretical nonlinear quantum effects in vacuum that exist at high field strengths.
The relative static permittivity, εr, can be measured for static electric fields as follows: first the capacitance of a test capacitor, C0, is measured with vacuum between its plates. Then, using the same capacitor and distance between its plates, the capacitance Cx with a dielectric between the plates is measured. The relative dielectric constant can be then calculated as
For time-variant electromagnetic fields, this quantity becomes frequency-dependent. An indirect technique to calculate εr is conversion of radio frequency S-parameter measurement results. A description of frequently used S-parameter conversions for determination of the frequency-dependent εr of dielectrics can be found in this bibliographic source. Alternatively, resonance based effects may be employed at fixed frequencies.
The relative permittivity is an essential piece of information when designing capacitors, and in other circumstances where a material might be expected to introduce capacitance into a circuit. If a material with a high relative permittivity is placed in an electric field, the magnitude of that field will be measurably reduced within the volume of the dielectric. This fact is commonly used to increase the capacitance of a particular capacitor design. The layers beneath etched conductors in printed circuit boards (PCBs) also act as dielectrics.
Dielectrics are used in RF transmission lines. In a coaxial cable, polyethylene can be used between the center conductor and outside shield. It can also be placed inside waveguides to form filters. Optical fibers are examples of dielectric waveguides. They consist of dielectric materials that are purposely doped with impurities so as to control the precise value of εr within the cross-section. This controls the refractive index of the material and therefore also the optical modes of transmission. However, in these cases it is technically the relative permittivity that matters, as they are not operated in the electrostatic limit.
The relative permittivity of air changes with temperature, humidity, and barometric pressure. Sensors can be constructed to detect changes in capacitance caused by changes in the relative permittivity. Most of this change is due to effects of temperature and humidity as the barometric pressure is fairly stable. Using the capacitance change, along with the measured temperature, the relative humidity can be obtained using engineering formulas.
The relative static permittivity of a solvent is a relative measure of its chemical polarity. For example, water is very polar, and has a dielectric constant of 80.10 at 20 °C while n-hexane is non-polar, and has a dielectric constant of 1.89 at 20 °C. This information is important when designing separation, sample preparation and chromatography techniques in analytical chemistry.
The correlation should, however, be treated with caution. For instance, dichloromethane has a value of εr of 9.08 (20 °C) and is rather poorly soluble in water (13 g/L or 9.8 mL/L at 20 °C); at the same time, tetrahydrofuran has its εr = 7.52 at 22 °C, but it is completely miscible with water. In the case tetrahydrofuran, the oxygen atom can act as a hydrogen bond acceptor; where as dichloromethane cannot form hydrogen bonds with water.
This is even more apparent when comparing the εr values of acetic acid (6.2528) and that of iodoethane (7.6177). The large numerical value of εr is not surprising in the second case, as the iodine atom is easily polarizable; nevertheless, this does not imply that it is polar, too (electronic polarizability prevails over the orientational one in this case).
Again, similar as for absolute permittivity, relative permittivity for lossy materials can be formulated as:
in terms of a "dielectric conductivity" σ (units S/m, siemens per meter), which "sums over all the dissipative effects of the material; it may represent an actual [electrical] conductivity caused by migrating charge carriers and it may also refer to an energy loss associated with the dispersion of ε' [the real-valued permittivity]" (, p. 8). Expanding the angular frequency ω = 2πc/λ and the electric constant ε0 = 1/(µ0c2), it reduces to:
where λ is the wavelength, c is the speed of light in vacuum and κ = µ0c/2π ≈ 60.0 S−1 = 60.0 Ω is a newly introduced constant (units reciprocal of siemens, or ohms, such that σλκ = εr" remains unitless).
Permittivity is typically associated with dielectric materials, however metals are described as having an effective permittivity, with real relative permittivity equal to one. In the low-frequency region, which extends from radio frequencies to the far infrared and terahertz region, the plasma frequency of the electron gas is much greater than the electromagnetic propagation frequency, so the complex index n of a metal is practically a purely imaginary number; expressed in terms of effective relative permittivity it has a low imaginary value (loss) and a negative real-value (high conductivity).
- L. G. Hector & H. L. Schultz (1936). The Dielectric Constant of Air at Radiofrequencies. Physics. 7. pp. 133–136. doi:10.1063/1.1745374.
- Hugh D. Young; Roger A. Freedman. University Physics with Modern Physics. Addison-Wesley; 2012. ISBN 978-0-321-69686-1. p. 801.
- Paul R. Gray; Paul J. Hurst; Stephen H. Lewis; Robert G. Meyer (2009). Analysis and Design of Analog Integrated Circuits (Fifth ed.). New York: Wiley. p. 40. ISBN 978-0-470-24599-6.
- Harman, Alang Kasim; Ninomiya, Susumu; Adachi, Sadao (1994). "Optical constants of sapphire (alpha-Al2O3) single crystals". Journal of Applied Physics. 76: 8032–8036. Bibcode:1994JAP....76.8032H. doi:10.1063/1.357922.
- Toshiba Fine Ceramics ""
- Ceramic Industry: Material Properties Charts ""
- Pohl, Herbert A. (1986). "Giant polarization in high polymers". Journal of Electronic Materials. 15: 201. Bibcode:1986JEMat..15..201P. doi:10.1007/BF02659632.
- Guillemet-Fritsch, S.; Lebey, T.; Boulos, M.; Durand, B. (2006). "Dielectric properties of CaCu3Ti4O12 based multiphased ceramics". Journal of the European Ceramic Society. 26: 1245. doi:10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2005.01.055.
- IEEE Standards Board (1997). "IEEE Standard Definitions of Terms for Radio Wave Propagation". p. 6.
- Braslavsky, S.E. (2007). "Glossary of terms used in photochemistry (IUPAC recommendations 2006)" (PDF). Pure and Applied Chemistry. 79: 293–465. doi:10.1351/pac200779030293.
- Linfeng Chen & Vijay K. Varadan (2004). Microwave electronics: measurement and materials characterization. John Wiley and Sons. p. 8, eq.(1.15). doi:10.1002/0470020466. ISBN 0-470-84492-2.
- King, Ronold W. P. (1963). Fundamental Electromagnetic Theory. New York: Dover. p. 139.
- John David Jackson (1998). Classical Electrodynamics (Third ed.). New York: Wiley. p. 154. ISBN 0-471-30932-X.
- Mourou, Gerard A. (2006). "Optics in the relativistic regime". Reviews of Modern Physics. 78: 309. Bibcode:2006RvMP...78..309M. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.78.309.
- Kuek, CheeYaw. "Measurement of Dielectric Material Properties" (PDF). R&S.
- Costa, F.; Amabile, C.; Monorchio, A.; Prati, E. (2011). "Waveguide Dielectric Permittivity Measurement Technique Based on Resonant FSS Filters". IEEE Microwave and Wireless Components Letters. 21 (5): 273. doi:10.1109/LMWC.2011.2122303.
- A Low Cost Integrated Interface for Capacitive Sensors, Ali Heidary, Thesis, p. 22
- Lide, D. R., ed. (2005). CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics (86th ed.). Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press. ISBN 0-8493-0486-5.
- AE. Frisch, M. J. Frish, F. R. Clemente, G. W. Trucks. Gaussian 09 User's Reference. Gaussian, Inc.: Walligford, CT, 2009.- p. 257.
- Lourtioz, J.-M.; et al. (2005). Photonic Crystals: Towards Nanoscale Photonic Devices. Springer. ISBN 3-540-24431-X. eq.(4.6), p. 121
- Lourtioz, eq.(4.8)–(4.9), p. 122