Digital radiography

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Digital radiography is a form of X-ray imaging, where digital X-ray sensors are used instead of traditional photographic film. Advantages include time efficiency through bypassing chemical processing and the ability to digitally transfer and enhance images. Also, less radiation can be used to produce an image of similar contrast to conventional radiography.

Instead of X-ray film, digital radiography uses a digital image capture device. This gives advantages of immediate image preview and availability; elimination of costly film processing steps; a wider dynamic range, which makes it more forgiving for over- and under-exposure; as well as the ability to apply special image processing techniques that enhance overall display quality of the image.


Flat panel detectors[edit]

Main article: Flat panel detector
Flat panel detector used in digital radiography

Flat panel detectors (FPDs) are the most common kind of direct digital detectors.[1] They are classified in two main categories:

1. Indirect FPDs Amorphous silicon (a-Si) is the most common material of commercial FPDs. Combining a-Si detectors with a scintillator in the detector’s outer layer, which is made from caesium iodide (CsI) or gadolinium oxysulfide (Gd2O2S), converts X-rays to light. Because of this conversion the a-Si detector is considered an indirect imaging device. The light is channeled through the a-Si photodiode layer where it is converted to a digital output signal. The digital signal is then read out by thin film transistors (TFTs) or fiber-coupled CCDs.[2]

2. Direct FPDs. Amorphous selenium (a-Se) FPDs are known as “direct” detectors because X-ray photons are converted directly into charge. The outer layer of the flat panel in this design is typically a high-voltage bias electrode. X-ray photons create electron-hole pairs in a-Se, and the transit of these electrons and holes depends on the potential of the bias voltage charge. As the holes are replaced with electrons, the resultant charge pattern in the selenium layer is read out by a TFT array, active matrix array, electrometer probes or microplasma line addressing.[2][3]

Other direct digital detectors[edit]

Detectors based on CMOS and charge coupled device (CCD) have also been developed, but despite lower costs compared to FPDs of some systems, bulky designs and worse image quality have precluded widespread adoption.[4]

A high-density line-scan solid state detector is composed of a photostimulable barium fluorobromide doped with europium (BaFBr:Eu) or caesium bromide (CsBr) phosphor. The phosphor detector records the X-ray energy during exposure and is scanned by a laser diode to excite the stored energy which is released and read out by a digital image capture array of a CCD.

Computed Radiography[edit]

Computed radiography (CR), or Photostimulable phosphor (PSP) plate-based radiography, resembles the old analogue system of a light sensitive film sandwiched between two x-ray sensitive screens, the difference being the analogue film has been replaced by an imaging plate with photostimulable phosphor (PSP), which records the image to be read by an image reading device, which transfers the image usually to a Picture archiving and communication system (PACS).[5]

After X-ray exposure the plate (sheet) is placed in a special scanner where the latent image is retrieved point by point and digitized, using laser light scanning. The digitized images are stored and displayed on the computer screen.[6] The method is not much faster than film processing and the resolution and sensitivity performances are contested, however it eliminates much of the cost and complexity of film developing facilities.[7] CR has been described as having an advantage of fitting within any pre-existing equipment without modification because it replaces the existing film; however, it includes extra costs for the scanner and replacement of scratched plates.

Initially phosphor plate radiography was the system of choice; early DR systems were prohibitively expensive (each cassette costs £40-£50K), and as the 'technology was being taken to the patient', prone to damage.[8] Since there is no physical printout, and after the readout process a digital image is obtained, CR has been known as an indirect digital technology, bridging the gap between x-ray film and fully digital detectors.[9][10]

Industrial usage of digital radiograpy[edit]


EOD training and material testing. A 105 mm shell is radiographied with battery powered portable X-ray generator and flat panel detector.

Digital Radiography (DR) has existed in various forms (for example, CCD and amorphous Silicon imagers) in the security X-ray inspection field for over 20 years and has largely replaced the use of film for inspection X-rays in the Security and NDT fields.[11] DR has opened a window of opportunity for the security NDT industry due to several key advantages including excellent image quality, high POD, portability, environmental friendliness and immediate imaging.[12]


In the early 1960s, while developing compact, lightweight, portable equipment for the onboard nondestructive testing (NDT) of naval aircraft, Frederick G. Weighart[13][14] and James F. McNulty (U.S. radio engineer)[15] at Automation Industries, Inc., then, in El Segundo, California co-invented the apparatus, which produced the world’s first image to be digitally generated with x-rays. Square wave signals were detected on the fluorescent screen of a fluoroscope to create the image.

Timeline of developments[edit]

  • 1987 – RVG (radiovisiography), Trophy Radiology (France) introduced the world's first intraoral X-rays imaging sensor. Trophy Radiology patented it under the restricted name radiovisiography (other companies use the phrase digital radiography) and continues to produce intraoral sensors today under the Carestream Dental name, which is used under license by Carestream Health. Carestream Dental has released a wireless version of their RVG intraoral sensor named the RVG 6500.
  • 1992 – Sens-a-Ray of Regam Medical System AB (Sundsvall, Sweden) is introduced. The company went out of business and their technology was purchased by Dent-X, recently renamed to ImageWorks (USA). First distributor in North America was Video Dental Concepts 1992
  • 1993 – VisualX of Gendex-Italy (subsidiary of USA company).
  • 1994 – CDR of Schick Technologies, USA. Schick were the first company to offer three film-like sizes of sensor, as well providing the significant breakthroughs of CMOS-APS technology (1998), USB connectivity (1999), the first sensors without cables (2003) and the first sensors with replaceable cables (2008). They launched their second generation of CMOS-APS chips in 2009. Schick merged with Sirona (Germany) in 2006 and is now part of Sirona Dental Systems, LLC.
  • 1995 – SIDEXIS of Sirona, DEXIS of ProVison Dental Systems, Inc. (renamed DEXIS, LLC following its acquisition by Danaher Corp.), DIGORA (PSP solution) of Soredex (Finland)
  • 2011 - Sodium Dental (Sodium Systems llc) were the first to offer digital intraoral x-ray sensor repair to dental practitioners and dental equipment companies.

Today there are many other products available under a lot of different names (rebranding is quite usual for this type of product).

Developments in digital panoramic systems[edit]

DXIS - real time display
  • 1995 – DXIS, the first dental digital panoramic X-rays system available on the market, created by Catalin Stoichita at Signet (France). DXIS targeted to retrofit all the panoramic models.
  • 1997 – SIDEXIS, of Siemens (currently Sirona, Germany) offered for Ortophos Plus panoramic unit, DigiPan of Trophy Radiology (France) offered for the OP100 panoramic made by Instrumentarium (Finland).
  • 1998–2004 – many panoramic manufacturers offered their own digital system.
  • 2005 – SCAN300FP, of 'Ajat' (Finland) is the latest innovation offered. It shows the feature to acquire many hundreds of mega bytes of image information at high frame rate and to reconstruct the panoramic layer by intensive post acquisition computing like a computed tomography. The main advantage is the ability to reconstruct focused differently. The drawback is the low signal/noise ratio of primary information which involves much software work for correction. Also the ability to reconstruct various layers raises the importance of the geometrical distortions already high in dental panoramic radiography. Since 2008 the SCAN300FP system is available in Ajat ART PLUS and ART PLUS C system.

See also[edit]


  1. ^ Neitzel, U. (17 May 2005). "Status and prospects of digital detector technology for CR and DR". Radiation Protection Dosimetry. 114 (1-3): 32–38. doi:10.1093/rpd/nch532. PMID 15933078. 
  2. ^ a b Lança, Luís; Silva, Augusto (2013). "Digital Radiography Detectors: A Technical Overview". Digital imaging systems for plain radiography. New York: Springer. pp. 14–17. doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-5067-2_2. ISBN 978-1-4614-5066-5. 
  3. ^ Ristić, Goran S (2013). "The digital flat-panel X-Ray detectors" (PDF). Third conference on medical physics and biomedical engineering, 18-19 Oct 2013. Skopje (Macedonia, The Former Yugoslav Republic of). 45 (10): 65–71. 
  4. ^ Verma, BS; Indrajit, IK (2008). "Impact of computers in radiography: The advent of digital radiography, Part-2". Indian Journal of Radiology and Imaging. 18 (3): 204. doi:10.4103/0971-3026.41828. PMC 2747436Freely accessible. 
  5. ^ Benjamin S (2010). "Phosphor plate radiography: an integral component of the filmless practice". Dent Today. 29 (11): 89. PMID 21133024. 
  6. ^ Rowlands, JA (7 December 2002). "The physics of computed radiography.". Physics in medicine and biology. 47 (23): R123–66. PMID 12502037. 
  7. ^ Rahoma, Usama Ali; Chundi, Pavan Kumar (2012). "Economic Evaluation of Conventional Radiography with Film and Computed Radiography: Applied at BMC". Advances in Computed Tomography. 01 (03): 23–29. doi:10.4236/act.2012.13006. 
  8. ^ Freiherr, Greg (6 November 2014). "The Eclectic History of Medical Imaging". Imaging Technology News. 
  9. ^ Allisy-Roberts, Penelope; Williams, Jerry R. Farr's Physics for Medical Imaging. Elsevier Health Sciences. p. 86. ISBN 0702028444. 
  10. ^ Holmes, Ken; Elkington, Marcus; Harris, Phil. Clark's Essential Physics in Imaging for Radiographers. CRC Press. p. 83. ISBN 9781444165036. 
  11. ^ Mery, Domingo. Computer Vision for X-Ray Testing: Imaging, Systems, Image Databases, and Algorithms. Springer. p. 2. ISBN 9783319207476. 
  12. ^ "A Review of Digital Radiography in the Service of Aerospace". Vidisco. Retrieved 2012-09-27. 
  13. ^ U.S. Patent 3,277,302, titled “X-Ray Apparatus Having Means for Supplying An Alternating Square Wave Voltage to the X-Ray Tube”, granted to Weighart on October 4, 1964, showing its patent application date as May 10, 1963 and at lines 1-6 of its column 4, also, noting James F. McNulty’s earlier filed co-pending application for an essential component of invention
  14. ^ U.S. Patent 3,482,093, see also this patent, titled "Flouroscopy", referencing US Patent 3277302 to Weighart and detailing the flouroscopy procedure used for nondestructing testing.
  15. ^ U.S. Patent 3,289,000, titled “Means for Separately Controlling the Filament Current and Voltage on a X-Ray Tube”, granted to McNulty on November 29, 1966 and showing its patent application date as March 5, 1963