can be solved, for example, by rewriting it as a matrix equation where matrices and contain the vectors and in their respective columns. Given that there exists a unique solution, it is given by
Solutions can also be described in the case that the equations are over or under determined.
What makes the direct linear transformation problem distinct from the above standard case is the fact that the left and right sides of the defining equation can differ by an unknown multiplicative factor which is dependent on k. As a consequence, cannot be computed as in the standard case. Instead, the similarity relations are rewritten as proper linear homogeneous equations which then can be solved by a standard method. The combination of rewriting the similarity equations as homogeneous linear equations and solving them by standard methods is referred to as a direct linear transformation algorithm or DLT algorithm. DLT is attributed to Ivan Sutherland.
Suppose that . Let and be two known vectors, and we want to find the matrix such that
where is the unknown scalar factor related to equation k.
To get rid of the unknown scalars and obtain homogeneous equations, define the anti-symmetric matrix
and multiply both sides of the equation with from the left
Since the following homogeneous equations, which no longer contain the unknown scalars, are at hand
In order to solve from this set of equations, consider the elements of the vectors and and matrix :
, , and
and the above homogeneous equation becomes
This can also be written in the matrix form:
where and both are 6-dimensional vectors defined as
So far, we have 1 equation and 6 unknowns. A set of homogeneous equations can be written in the matrix form
where is a matrix which holds the known vectors in its rows. The unknown can be determined, for example, by a singular value decomposition of ; is a right singular vector of corresponding to a singular value that equals zero. Once has been determined, the elements of matrix can rearranged from vector . Notice that the scaling of or is not important (except that it must be non-zero) since the defining equations already allow for unknown scaling.
In practice the vectors and may contain noise which means that the similarity equations are only approximately valid. As a consequence, there may not be a vector which solves the homogeneous equation exactly. In these cases, a total least squares solution can be used by choosing as a right singular vector corresponding to the smallest singular value of
The above example has and , but the general strategy for rewriting the similarity relations into homogeneous linear equations can be generalized to arbitrary dimensions for both and
If and the previous expressions can still lead to an equation
where now is Each k provides one equation in the unknown elements of and together these equations can be written for the known matrix and unknown 2q-dimensional vector This vector can be found in a similar way as before.
In the most general case and . The main difference compared to previously is that the matrix now is and anti-symmetric. When the space of such matrices is no longer one-dimensional, it is of dimension
This means that each value of k provides M homogeneous equations of the type
for and for
where is a M-dimensional basis of the space of anti-symmetric matrices.
Each value of k provides three homogeneous linear equations in the unknown elements of . However, since has rank = 2, at most two equations are linearly independent. In practice, therefore, it is common to only use two of the three matrices , for example, for m=1, 2. However, the linear dependency between the equations is dependent on , which means that in unlucky cases it would have been better to choose, for example, m=2,3. As a consequence, if the number of equations is not a concern, it may be better to use all three equations when the matrix is constructed.
The linear dependence between the resulting homogeneous linear equations is a general concern for the case p > 2 and has to be dealt with either by reducing the set of anti-symmetric matrices or by allowing to become larger than necessary for determining
^Abdel-Aziz, Y.I.; Karara, H.M. (2015-02-01). "Direct Linear Transformation from Comparator Coordinates into Object Space Coordinates in Close-Range Photogrammetry". Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing. American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing. 81 (2): 103–107. doi:10.14358/pers.81.2.103. ISSN0099-1112.
^Sutherland, Ivan E. (April 1974), "Three-dimensional data input by tablet", Proceedings of the IEEE, 62 (4): 453–461, doi:10.1109/PROC.1974.9449
Richard Hartley and Andrew Zisserman (2003). Multiple View Geometry in computer vision. Cambridge University Press. ISBN978-0-521-54051-3.