Yolngu

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
  (Redirected from Djinba)
Jump to: navigation, search
Yolngu
Yolŋu
Regions with significant populations
Australia
Languages
Yolŋu Matha (Dhaŋu-Djaŋu, Nhaŋu, Dhuwal, Ritharŋu, Djinaŋ, Djinba), Australian English, Yolngu Sign Language
Religion
Traditional religions, Christianity
Related ethnic groups
Australian Aborigines

The Yolngu or Yolŋu (IPA: [ˈjoːlŋʊ]) are an aggregation of indigenous Australian people inhabiting north-eastern Arnhem Land in the Northern Territory of Australia. Yolngu means "person" in the Yolŋu languages. The term Murngin was formerly used by some anthropologists for the Yolngu.[1]

Name[edit]

The ethnonym Murrgin gained currency after its extensive use in a book by the American anthropologist W. Lloyd Warner,[2] whose study of the Yolngu, A Black Civilization: a Social Study of an Australian Tribe (1937) quickly assumed the status of an ethnographical classic, considered by R. Lauriston Sharp the 'first adequately rounded out descriptive picture of an Australian aboriginal community.'[3] Norman Tindale was dismissive of the term, regarding it, like the term Kurnai, as 'artificial,' having been arbitrarily applied to a large number of peoples of northeastern Australia. The proper transliteration of the word was, in any case, Muraŋin, meaning 'shovel-nosed spear folk', an expression appropriate to western[4] peripheral tribes, such as the Rembarrnga of the general area Warner described.[a] For Tindale, following recent linguistic studies, the eastern Arnhem Land tribes constituting the Yolgnu lacked the standard tribal structures evidenced elsewhere in abvoriginal Australia, in comprising several distinct socio-linguistic realities in an otherwise integral cultural continuum.[6] He classified these as the Yan-nhaŋu, Djinang, Djinba, Djaŋu, Dangu, Rembarrnga, Ritharngu, Dhuwal and the Dhuwala.

People[edit]

Yolngu comprise several distinct groups, differentiated by the languages and dialects they speak, but generally sharing overall similarities in the ritual life and hunter-gathering economic and cultural lifestyles in the territory of eastern Arnhem land. Formerly ethnographers studying the Yolngu applied the ostensibly universal, but retrospectively nineteenth century, concepts of tribe, horde and phratry to classify and sort out into separate identities the units forming the Yolngu ethnocultural mosaic. After the work of Ian Keen in particular, such taxonomic terminology is increasingly seen as problematical, and inadequate because of its eurocentric assumptions.[7] Specialists are undecided, for example, whether the languages spoken by the Yolngu amount to five or eight, and one survey arrived at eleven distinct 'dialect' groups.[8]

Language[edit]

Yolngu speak a dozen languages classified under the general heading of Yolngu Matha. English can be anywhere from a third to a tenth language for Yolŋu.

Kinship system[edit]

Yolŋu groups are connected by a complex kinship system (gurruṯu). This system governs fundamental aspects of Yolŋu life, including responsibilities for ceremony and marriage rules. Polygamy is a normal part of Yolgnu life:one man was known to have 29 wives, a record exceed only by polygamous arrangements among the Tiwi.[9]

Yolŋu societies are generally[b] described in terms of a division of two exogamous patrimoieties: Dhuwa and Yirritja. Each of these is represented by people of a number of different groups, each of which have their own lands, languages, totems and philosophies.[11]

Moiety Clan groups
Yirritja Gumatj, Gupapuyŋu, Wangurri, Ritharrngu, Mangalili, Munyuku, Maḏarrpa,

Warramiri, Dhalwaŋu, Liyalanmirri, Mäḻarra, Gamalaŋga, Gorryindi.

Dhuwa Rirratjiŋu, Gälpu, Golumala, Marrakulu, Marraŋu, Djapu, Ḏatiwuy,

Ŋaymil, Djarrwark, Djambarrpuyŋu.

A Yirritja person must always marry a Dhuwa person and vice versa. If a man or woman is Dhuwa, their mother will be Yirritja.

Kinship relations are also mapped onto the lands owned by the Yolngu through their hereditary estates – so almost everything is either Yirritja or Dhuwa – every fish, stone, river, etc., belongs to one or the other moiety. A few items are wakinŋu (without moiety).

Avoidance relationships[edit]

As with nearly all Aboriginal groups, avoidance relationships exist in Yolngu culture between certain relations. The two main avoidance relationships are:

son-in-law – mother-in-law
brother – sister

Brother–sister avoidance called mirriri normally begins after initiation. In avoidance relationships, people don't speak directly or look at one another, and try to avoid being in too close proximity with each other. People are avoided, but respected.

Yolŋu law[edit]

The word for 'law' in Yolgnu is rom.[12] The complete system of Yolngu customary law is known as Ngarra,[13] or as the Maḏayin.[14] Maḏayin embodies the rights of the owners of the law, or citizens (rom watangu walal) who have the rights and responsibilities for this embodiment of law. Maḏayin includes all the people's law (rom); the instruments and objects that encode and symbolise the law (Maḏayin girri'); oral dictates; names and song cycles; and the holy, restricted places (dhuyu ṉuŋgat wäŋa) that are used in the maintenance, education and development of law.

Yolngu use hollow logs in traditional burial rituals. They are also an important "canvas" for their art, Aboriginal Memorial, NGA

This law covers the ownership of land and waters, the resources on or within these lands and waters.[15] It regulates and controls production and trade and the moral, social and religious law including laws for the conservation and the farming of plants and aquatic life.

Yolŋu believe that living out their life according to Maḏayin is right and civilised. The Maḏayin creates a state of Magaya, which is a state of peace, freedom from hostilities and true justice for all.[16]

Yolŋu seasons[edit]

Yolŋu identify six distinct seasons: Mirdawarr, Dhaarratharramirri, Rarranhdharr, Worlmamirri, Baarra'mirri and Gurnmul or Waltjarnmirri.

History[edit]

Macassan contact[edit]

Yolŋu engaged in extensive trade annually with Macassan fishermen at least two centuries before contact with Europeans. They made yearly visits to harvest trepang and pearls, paying Yolŋu in kind with goods such as knives, metal, canoes, tobacco and pipes. In 1906, the South Australian Government did not renew the Macassans' permit to harvest trepan, and the disruption causes economic losses for the regional Yolgnu economy.

Yolŋu oral histories and the Djanggawul myths preserve accounts of a Baijini people, who are said to have preceded the Macassans. These Baijini have been variously interpreted by modern researchers as a different group of (presumably, Southeast Asian) visitors to Australia who may have visited Arnhem Land before the Macassans,[17] as a mythological reflection of the experiences of some Yolŋu people who have travelled to Sulawesi with the Macassans and came back,[18] or perhaps as traders from China.[19]

Yolŋu also had well established trade routes within Australia, extending to Central Australian clans and other Aboriginal countries. They did not manufacture boomerangs themselves but obtained these via trade from Central Australia.[20] This contact was maintained through use of message sticks, as well as mailmen – with some men walking several hundred kilometres in their work to send messages and relay orders between tribes.

European contact[edit]

Yolŋu had known about Europeans before the arrival of British in Australia through their contact with Macassan traders, which probably began around the sixteenth century. Their word for European, Balanda, is derived from "Hollander" (Dutch person).

Nineteenth century[edit]

In 1883, the explorer David Lindsay was the first colonial white to penetrate Yolgnu lands for the purposes of making a survey of its resources and prospects. He trekked along the Goyder River to reach the Arafura Swamp on the western fringe of Wagilak land.[21] Two years later the first colonial initiative to try and open up Arnhem Land for cattle grazing began, when herds driven over from Queensland were pastured around Florida Station. A violent series of battles ensued, resulting in a severe depopulation of Yolgnu in this south-western area of their territory, but the stiffness of resistancer virtually ended efforts by the intruding balanda to take over further territory, and efforts at settlement ground to a halt.[22]

Twentieth century[edit]

Early into the turn of the 20th century, Yolgnu oral history relates, punitive expeditions were launched into their territories.[23] The first mission to Yolngu country was set up at Milingimbi Island in 1922. The island is the traditional home of the Yan-nhaŋu. Beginning in 1932, over two years, three incidents of killing outsiders caused problems for the Yolgnu. In 1932 some Japanese trepangers were speared by Yolŋu men, in what became known as the Caledon Bay crisis, after their mothers had been allegedly raped by the Japanese.[citation needed] Two whites, Fagan and Traynor, were killed near Woodah Island the following year, and soon after Constable McColl was speared on that island. Only the intervention of missionaries, who had a foothold on the fringes of this area, and of the anthropologist Donald Thomson, averted an official reprisal designed to 'teach the wild blacks a lesson.'[23]

Several Yolŋu were imprisoned in Fannie Bay Gaol in present-day Darwin.

However, Donald Thomson, a young anthropologist, was able to avert this by going to live with the Yolŋu and ascertaining the facts of the case (the prisoners were released as a result of a legal oversight).

Thomson lived with the Yolŋu for several years and made some photographic and written records of their way of life at that time. These have become important[citation needed] historical documents for both Yolŋu and European Australians.

In 1935, as a result of this publicity, a Methodist mission opened in Arnhem Land.

In 1941, during World War II, Donald Thomson persuaded the Australian Army to establish a Special Reconnaissance Unit (NTSRU) of Yolŋu men to help repel Japanese raids on Australia's northern coastline (this was top secret at the time). Yolŋu made contact with Australian and US servicemen, although Thomson was keen to prevent this (it is believed this is where petrol sniffing began for Aboriginal Australians[citation needed]). Thomson relates how the soldiers would often try to obtain Yolŋu spears as mementos. These spears were vital to Yolŋu livelihood, and took several days to make and forge.

More recently, Yolngu have seen the imposition of large mines on their tribal lands at Nhulunbuy.

Yolngu in politics[edit]

Since the 1960s Yolngu leaders have been conspicuous in the struggle for Aboriginal land rights.

In 1963, provoked by a unilateral government decision to excise a part of their land for a bauxite mine, Yolngu at Yirrkala sent to the Australian House of Representatives a petition on bark. The bark petition attracted national and international attention and now hangs in Parliament House, Canberra as a testament to the Yolngu role in the birth of the land rights movement.

When the politicians demonstrated they would not change their minds, the Yolngu of Yirrkala took their grievances to the courts in 1971, in the case of Milirrpum v Nabalco Pty Ltd, the Gove land rights case. Yolngu lost the case because Australian courts were still bound to follow the terra nullius principle, which did not allow for the recognition of any "prior rights" to land to Indigenous people at the time of colonisation. However, the Judge did acknowledge the claimants' ritual and economic use of the land and that they had an established system of law, paving the way for future Aboriginal Land Rights in Australia.

The song "Treaty", by Yothu Yindi, which became an international hit in 1989, arose as a remonstration over the tardiness of the Hawke government in enacting promises to deal with Aboriginal land rights, and made a powerful pleas for respect for Yolngu culture, territory and Law.[24]

Yolngu arts[edit]

Yolngu artists and performers have been at the forefront of global recognition of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander culture. Yolngu traditional dancers and musicians have performed widely throughout the world and retain a germinal influence, through the patronage of the Munyarryun and Marika families in particular, on contemporary performance troupes such as Bangarra Dance Theatre.[25]

Yolngu visual art[edit]

Before the emergence of the Western Desert art movement, the most well-known Aboriginal art was the Yolngu style of fine cross-hatching paintings on bark. The hollow logs (larrakitj) used in Arnhem Land burial practices serve an important spiritual purpose and are also important canvases for Yolngu art. David Malangi Daymirringu's bark depiction of Manharrnju clan mourning rites of the clan, from a private collection, was copied and featured on the original Australian 1 dollar note. When the copyright violation came to light the Australian government, through the direct agency of H. C. Coombs, hastened to remunerate the artist.[26]

Yolngu are also weavers. They weave dyed pandanus leaves into baskets. Necklaces are also made from beads made of seeds, fish vertebrae or shells. Colours are often important in determining where artwork comes from and which clan or family group created it. Some designs are the insignia of particular families and clans.

Yolngu music[edit]

The Yothu Yindi band, especially after its song "Treaty", performed the most popular indigenous music since Jimmy Little's Royal Telephone (1963) became Australia's most successful contemporary indigenous music group, and performed throughout the world. Their work has elicited serious musicological analysis.[27]

Arnhem Land is the home of the yidaki, which Europeans have named the didgeridoo. Yolngu are both players and craftsmen of the yidaki. It can only be[clarification needed] played by certain men, and traditionally there are strict protocols around its use.

Geoffrey Gurrumul Yunupingu (1971–2017) was a famous Yolngu singer.

Prominent Yolngu[edit]

Politicians[edit]

Films about Yolngu[edit]

Garma festival[edit]

Every year, Yolngu come together to celebrate their culture at the Garma Festival of Traditional Cultures. Non-Yolngu are welcome to attend the festival and learn about Yolngu traditions and Law. The Yothu Yindi Foundation oversees this festival.

Yolngu ethnographic studies[edit]

A Deakin University study investigated Aboriginal knowledge systems in reaction to what the authors regarded as Western ethnocentrism in science studies. They argue that Yolngu culture is a system of knowledge different in many ways from that of Western culture, and may be broadly described as viewing the world as a related whole rather than as a collection of objects. Singing the Land, Signing the Land, by Watson and Chambers, explores the relationship between Yolngu and Western knowledge by using the Yolngu idea of ganma, which metaphorically describes two streams, one coming from the land (Yolngu knowledge) and one from the sea (Western knowledge) engulfing each other so that "the forces of the streams combine and lead to deeper understanding and truth."

See also[edit]

Notes[edit]

  1. ^ The word, used as an exonym by other tribes, referred to Arnhem Land tribes that had a reputation for aggressive behavior because they had managed to manufacture iron-bladed spears from metal cut from abandoned Caledon Bay water tanks.[5]
  2. ^ There are complications in the schematic models often adopted in ethnography to analyse kinship. The reader may consult two papers by Ian Keen for details[7][10]

Citations[edit]

  1. ^ Keen 2005, p. 80.
  2. ^ Tindale 1974, p. 141.
  3. ^ Sharp 1939, p. 150.
  4. ^ Tindale 1974, p. 224.
  5. ^ Tindale 1974, pp. 141–142.
  6. ^ Tindale 1974, p. 141,157.
  7. ^ a b Keen 1995, pp. 502–527.
  8. ^ Bauer 2014, pp. 43–44.
  9. ^ Keen 1982, p. 620.
  10. ^ Keen 2000, pp. 419-436.
  11. ^ Morphy 2008b, pp. 1–13.
  12. ^ Christie 2007, p. 157,n.1.
  13. ^ Gaymarani 2011, p. 285.
  14. ^ Kelly 2014, p. 33.
  15. ^ Gaymarani 2011, pp. 286–287.
  16. ^ Williams 1986, pp. ?.
  17. ^ Berndt 2005, p. 55.
  18. ^ Swain 1993, p. 170.
  19. ^ Needham, Wang & Lu 1971, p. 538.
  20. ^ Thomson & Peterson 2005, p. ?.
  21. ^ White 2016, p. 323.
  22. ^ Morphy 2008, p. 117 ?
  23. ^ a b Morphy 2008, p. 118 ?
  24. ^ Corn 2009, p. 42.
  25. ^ Verghis 2014.
  26. ^ Evans 2016.
  27. ^ Stubington & Dunbar-Hall 1994, p. 243-259.

Sources[edit]

Further reading[edit]