Page semi-protected

Dominion Voting Systems

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Dominion Voting Systems Corporation
Private
IndustryElectronic voting hardware
Founded2002; 18 years ago (2002)
Founders
  • James Hoover
  • John Poulos
Headquarters
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Denver, Colorado, US
OwnerManagement
Staple Street Capital
Subsidiaries
Websitedominionvoting.com

Dominion Voting Systems Corporation is a company that sells electronic voting hardware and software, including voting machines and tabulators, in the United States and Canada.[1] The company's headquarters are in Toronto, Ontario, and Denver, Colorado.[2] It develops software in-house in offices in the United States, Canada, and Serbia.[3]

Dominion produces electronic voting machines, which allow voters to cast their vote electronically, as well as optical scanning devices to tabulate paper ballots.[4][5] Dominion voting machines have been utilized in countries around the world, primarily in Canada and the United States. Dominion systems are employed in Canada's major party leadership elections, and they are also used across the nation in local and municipal elections. Dominion products have been increasingly utilized in the United States in recent years. The company drew extensive attention during the United States presidential election of 2020, when devices manufactured by Dominion were used to process votes in twenty-eight states, including the swing states of Wisconsin and Georgia.[6]

After President Donald Trump was defeated by President-elect Joe Biden in the 2020 election, Trump and various surrogates promoted conspiracy theories about Dominion, alleging that the company was part of an international cabal to steal the election from Trump, and that it used its voting machines to transfer millions of votes from Trump to Biden.[7][8][9] There is no evidence supporting these claims, which have been debunked by various groups including election technology experts, government and voting industry officials, and the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA).[7][8][9] These conspiracy theories were further discredited by a hand recount of the ballots cast in the 2020 presidential election in Georgia; the hand recount found that Dominion voting machines had accurately tabulated votes, that any error in the initial tabulation was human error, and that Biden had defeated Trump in the battleground state.[10]

Company

A Dominion ImageCast precinct-count optical-scan voting machine, mounted on a collapsible ballot box made by ElectionSource.

Dominion Voting Systems Corporation was founded in 2002 in Toronto, Ontario, Canada, by John Poulos and James Hoover.[11] The company develops proprietary software in-house and sells electronic voting hardware and software, including voting machines and tabulators, in the United States and Canada.[3] The company maintains headquarters in Toronto and in Denver, Colorado.[2]

Acquisitions

In May 2010, Dominion acquired Premier Election Solutions (formerly Diebold Election Systems, Inc.) from Election Systems & Software (ES&S). ES&S had just acquired Premier from Diebold and was required to sell off Premier by the United States Department of Justice for anti-trust concerns.[12] In June 2010, Dominion acquired Sequoia Voting Systems.[13]

In 2018, Dominion was acquired by its management and Staple Street Capital, a private equity firm.[14][15]

Officers

Poulos, President and CEO of Dominion, has a BS in electrical engineering from the University of Toronto and an MBA from INSEAD.[16] Hoover, Vice President, has an MS in mechanical engineering from the University of Alberta.[17]

Equipment

Dominion Voting Systems (DVS) sells electronic voting systems hardware and software, including voting machines and tabulators, in the United States and Canada.[1] This equipment includes the DVS ImageCast Evolution (ICE), ImageCast X (ICX), and ImageCast Central (ICC).

ImageCast Evolution is an optical scan tabulator designed for use in voting precincts that scans and tabulates marked paper ballots. The ICE will also mark ballots for voters with disabilities using an attached accessibility device that enables all voters to cast votes with paper ballots on the same machine. When a marked paper ballot is inserted, the tabulator screen display messagess indicating whether the ballot has been successfully input. Causes of rejection include a blank ballot, an overvoted ballot, and unclear marks. After the polls close, results from the encrypted memory cards of each ICE tabulator can be transferred and uploaded to the central system to tally and report the results.[18]

ImageCast X is described as an accessible ballot-marking device that allows a voter to use various methods to input their choices. An activation card is required for use, which is provided by a poll worker. The machine has audio capability for up to ten languages, as required by the U.S. Department of Justice, and includes a 19" full-color screen for visual operation, audio and visual marking interfaces and Audio-Tactile Interface (ATI). ATI is a hand-held controller that coordinates with headphones and connects directly to the ICE. During the voting process, the machine generates a marked paper ballot that serves as the official ballot record. The display can be adjusted with contrast and zoom functions that automatically reset at the end of the session. The ATI device has raised keys with tactile function, includes the headphone jack and a T-coil coupling, and has a T4 rating for interference. It uses light pressure switches and may be equipped with a pneumatic switch, commonly known as "sip-n-puff", or a set of paddles.[18]

ImageCast Central uses commercial off-the-shelf Canon DR-X10C or Canon DR-G1130 scanners at a central tabulation location to scan vote-by-mail and post-voting ballots like provisional ballots, ballots requiring duplication and ballots scanned into multi-precinct ICE tabulators. The results are dropped into a folder located on the server where they can be accessed by the Adjudication Client software.[19]

Software

DVS voting machines operate using a suite of proprietary software applications, including Election Management System, Adjudication Client, and Mobile Ballot Printing. The software allows for various settings, including cumulative voting, where voters can apply multiple votes on one or more candidates, and ranked-order voting, where voters rank candidates in order of choice and the system shifts votes as candidates are eliminated.[20]

The Election Management System (EMS) includes a set of applications that handle pre- and post-voting activities, including ballot layout, programming media for voting equipment, generation of audio files, importing results data, and accumulating and reporting results.[19]

Adjudication Client is a software application with administrative and ballot inspection roles. It allows a jurisdiction to resolve problems in a ballot on screen that would normally be rejected to be remade or hand counted because of one or more exceptional conditions like a blank ballot, write-ins, over-votes, marginal marks and under-votes. The application configures user accounts, reasons for exception, batch management and report generation, which in some jurisdictions must be performed by an administrator directly on a server. Ballot inspection allows users to review ballots with exceptional conditions and either accept or resolve the ballot according to state laws. Each adjudicated ballot is marked with the username of the poll worker who made the change.[19]

Mobile Ballot Printing operates in conjunction with the EMS, which creates printable ballot images in .pdf format including tints and watermarks. The image is exported to a laptop and then printed on blank paper to provide a ballot record. After configuration and setup are complete, the laptop only contains geopolitical information and no voter data. The system will also generate reports in Excel, Word and .pdf format, including total number of ballots printed and ballot style.[19]

Reliability

After questions about the reliability of the company's systems surfaced during the 2020 US general election, Edward Perez, an election technology expert at the OSET Institute, stated, "Many of the claims being asserted about Dominion and questionable voting technology is misinformation at best and, in many cases, they're outright disinformation."[21]

Texas rejected use of ballot counting software from Dominion Voting Systems three times, according to a report from the Secretary of State's office dated January 2020. According to the report, issued by Deputy Secretary of State José Esparza, "Specifically, the examiner reports raise concerns about whether the Democracy Suite 5.5-A system is suitable for its intended purpose; operates efficiently and accurately; and is safe from fraudulent or unauthorized manipulation."[22]

Operations

United States

Dominion is the second-largest seller of voting machines in the United States.[23] In 2016, its machines served 70 million voters in 1,600 jurisdictions.[24] In 2019, the state of Georgia selected Dominion Voting Systems to provide its new statewide voting system beginning in 2020.[25]

In total, 28 states used Dominion voting machines to tabulate their votes during the 2020 United States presidential election, including most of the swing states.[6] Dominion's role in this regard led supporters of President Donald Trump to promote conspiracy theory's about the company's voting machines, following Trump's defeat to Joe Biden in the election.

2020 election controversy

Following the 2020 United States presidential election, Donald Trump and some other right-wing personalities amplified the hoax originated by the proponents of the far-right QAnon conspiracy theory that Dominion Voting Systems had been compromised, resulting in millions of votes intended for Trump either being deleted or going to rival Joe Biden.[8][9][7] Trump was citing the pro-Trump OANN media outlet, which itself claimed to cite a report from Edison Research, an election monitoring group.[26] Edison Research said that they did not write such a report, and that they "have no evidence of any voter fraud."[26]

Trump and others also made unsubstantiated claims that Dominion had close ties to the Clinton family or other Democrats.[27] There is no evidence for any of these claims, which have been debunked by various groups including election technology experts, government and voting industry officials, and CISA.[7][9] On November 12, 2020, CISA released a statement that confirmed "there is no evidence that any voting system deleted or lost votes, changed votes or was in any way compromised." The statement was signed by various government and voting industry officials including the presidents of the National Association of State Election Directors and the National Association of Secretaries of State.[9]

Trump's personal attorney Rudy Giuliani made several false assertions about Dominion, including that its voting machines used software developed by a competitor, Smartmatic, which he claimed actually owned Dominion, and which he said was founded by the former socialist Venezuelan leader Hugo Chávez. Giuliani also falsely asserted that Dominion voting machines sent their voting data to Smartmatic at foreign locations and that it is a "radical-left" company with connections to antifa.[28][29]

In a related hoax, Dennis Montgomery, a software designer with a history of making dubious claims,[30] asserted that a government supercomputer program was used to switch votes from Trump to Biden on voting machines.[30] Trump attorney Sidney Powell promoted the allegations on Lou Dobbs's Fox Business program two days after the election, and again two days later on Maria Bartiromo's program, claiming to have "evidence that that is exactly what happened." Christopher Krebs, the director of the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, characterized the claim as "nonsense" and a "hoax."[30][31] Asserting that Krebs's analysis was "highly inaccurate, in that there were massive improprieties and fraud," Trump fired him by tweet days later.[32]

Powell also asserted she had an affidavit from a former Venezuelan military official, a portion of which she posted on Twitter without a name or signature, who asserted that Dominion voting machines would print a paper ballot showing who a voter had selected, but change the vote inside the machine. Apparently speaking about the ICE machine, one source responded that this was incorrect, and that Dominion voting machines are only a "ballot marking device" system in which the voter deposits their printed ballot into a box for counting.[33]

Canada

Dominion Voting Systems is Canada's largest election system provider.[citation needed] Its systems are deployed nationwide, though it has never been used in a federal election.[34] Currently, Dominion provides optical scan paper ballot tabulation systems for provincial elections, including Ontario and New Brunswick. Dominion also provides ballot tabulation and voting systems for Canada's major party leadership elections, including those of the Liberal Party of Canada, the Conservative Party of Canada, and the Progressive Conservative Party of Ontario.[35][36][37]

Ontario was the first Canadian province to use Dominion's tabulator machines in select municipalities in the 2006 municipal elections.[38] New Brunswick used Dominion's 763 tabulator machines in the 2014 provincial elections.[39] There were some problems with the reporting of tabulator counts after the election, and at 10:45 p.m. Elections New Brunswick officially suspended the results reporting count with 17 ridings still undeclared.[40] The Progressive Conservatives and the People's Alliance of New Brunswick called for a hand count of all ballots. Recounts were held in 7 of 49 ridings and the results were upheld with variations of 1–3 votes per candidate per riding.[41] This delay in results reporting was caused by an off-the-shelf software application unrelated to Dominion.[42]

In June 2018, Elections Ontario used Dominion's tabulator machines for the provincial election and deployed them at 50 percent of polling stations.[43][44]

See also

References

  1. ^ a b "Company Overview of Dominion Voting Systems Corporation". Bloomberg. June 21, 2017.
  2. ^ a b Zuidijk, Daniel; Mehrotra, Kartikay (November 17, 2020). "Trump Lashes Voting Tech Firm With Barrage of Debunked Claims". Bloomberg News. Retrieved November 22, 2020.
  3. ^ a b Thibodeau, Patrick (November 5, 2016). "One election-system vendor uses developers in Serbia". Computerworld. Archived from the original on November 15, 2020. Retrieved June 27, 2019.
  4. ^ https://verifiedvoting.org/election-system/dominion-imagecast-evolution/
  5. ^ https://verifiedvoting.org/election-system/dominion-imagecast-x/
  6. ^ a b https://www.newsweek.com/dominion-voting-systems-categorically-denies-election-tech-glitches-following-trump-accusations-1547405
  7. ^ a b c d Collins, Ben (November 13, 2020). "QAnon's Dominion voter fraud conspiracy theory reaches the president". NBC News. Archived from the original on November 15, 2020. Retrieved November 14, 2020.
  8. ^ a b c Nicas, Jack (November 11, 2020). "No, Dominion voting machines did not delete Trump votes". The New York Times. Archived from the original on November 15, 2020. Retrieved November 12, 2020.
  9. ^ a b c d e Tucker, Eric; Bajak, Frank (November 13, 2020). "Repudiating Trump, officials say election 'most secure'". The Associated Press. Archived from the original on November 15, 2020. Retrieved November 14, 2020.
  10. ^ https://www.cnbc.com/2020/11/17/georgia-says-voting-machine-audit-found-no-evidence-of-fraud-tampering.html
  11. ^ Marlow, Iain (November 2, 2009). "Selling trust in democracy". The Star. Archived from the original on November 15, 2020. Retrieved November 21, 2010.
  12. ^ "Dominion Voting Systems, Inc. Acquires Premier Election Solutions Assets From ES&S". Business Wire. May 20, 2010. Archived from the original on November 15, 2020.
  13. ^ Friedman, Brad (June 22, 2010). "EXCLUSIVE: On Heels of Diebold/Premier Purchase, Canadian eVoting Firm Dominion Also Acquires Sequoia, Lies About Chavez Ties in Announcement". HuffPost. Archived from the original on November 14, 2020. Retrieved November 19, 2020.
  14. ^ "Dominion Voting Systems". Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt. 2018.
  15. ^ Primack, Dan (November 17, 2020). "Private equity dominated the 2020 election process". Axios. Retrieved November 22, 2020.
  16. ^ "John Poulos". Dominion Voting. Archived from the original on July 4, 2010. Retrieved November 21, 2010.
  17. ^ "James Hoover". Dominion Voting. Archived from the original on July 2, 2010. Retrieved November 21, 2010.
  18. ^ a b "Dominion Voting Systems". Retrieved November 21, 2020.
  19. ^ a b c d "State of California - DOMINION VOTING SYSTEMS DEMOCRACY SUITE 5.2" (PDF). Retrieved November 22, 2020.
  20. ^ "Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Report Concerning the Examination Results of Dominion Voting Systems Democracy Suite" (PDF). Retrieved November 22, 2020.
  21. ^ Nicas, Jack (November 11, 2020). "No, Dominion voting machines did not delete Trump votes". The New York Times. Retrieved November 21, 2020.
  22. ^ Johnson, Brad (November 19, 2020). "Texas Rejected Use of Dominion Voting System Software Due to Efficiency Issues". The Texan. Retrieved November 21, 2020.
  23. ^ Wilkie, Jordan (April 23, 2019). "'They think they are above the law': the firms that own America's voting system". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the original on November 15, 2020. Retrieved July 8, 2020.
  24. ^ Ahluwalia, Simran; Caulfield, Matthew; Davidson, Leah; Diehl, Mary Margaret; Ispas, Alina; Windle, Michael (May 2016). The Business of Voting: Market Structure and Innovation in the Election Technology Industry (Report). Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania. Archived from the original on July 1, 2020. Retrieved November 14, 2020.
  25. ^ Williams, Dave (July 29, 2019). "Georgia chooses Denver company to install new statewide voting system". Atlanta Business Chronicle. Archived from the original on November 15, 2020. Retrieved November 14, 2020.
  26. ^ a b Giles, Christopher; Horton, Jake (November 17, 2020). "US election 2020: Is Trump right about Dominion machines?". BBC Reality Check. Archived from the original on November 18, 2020. Retrieved November 18, 2020.
  27. ^ Swenson, Ali (November 10, 2020). "Posts falsify ties between election tech firm and Democrats". The Associated Press. Archived from the original on November 15, 2020. Retrieved November 12, 2020.
  28. ^ Kessler, Glenn (November 16, 2020). "Giuliani's fantasy parade of false voter-fraud claims". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on November 16, 2020. Retrieved November 16, 2020.
  29. ^ "Did a Dominion Voting Systems Employee Brag About Rigging the Election Against Trump?". Snopes.com. Retrieved November 21, 2020.
  30. ^ a b c Fichera, Angelo; Spencer, Saranac Hale (November 13, 2020). "Bogus Theory Claims Supercomputer Switched Votes in Election". FactCheck.org. Archived from the original on November 15, 2020. Retrieved November 14, 2020.
  31. ^ Bump, Philip (November 12, 2020). "Trump grasps at a new set of straws: Computers rigged his election loss". The Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Archived from the original on November 15, 2020. Retrieved November 15, 2020.
  32. ^ Collins, Kaitlan; LeBlanc, Paul (November 17, 2020). "Trump fires director of Homeland Security agency who had rejected President's election conspiracy theories". CNN. Archived from the original on November 18, 2020. Retrieved November 17, 2020.
  33. ^ Qiu, Linda (November 19, 2020). "How Sidney Powell inaccurately cited Venezuela's elections as evidence of U.S. fraud". Archived from the original on November 19, 2020. Retrieved November 20, 2020 – via NYTimes.com.
  34. ^ Tasker, John Paul (November 18, 2020). "Toronto company finds itself at the centre of Trump's unfounded vote fraud allegations". CBC. Archived from the original on November 19, 2020. Retrieved November 19, 2020.
  35. ^ Hannay, Chris (April 13, 2013). "Liberals await results from new leadership voting system". The Globe and Mail. Archived from the original on November 15, 2020.
  36. ^ Nanji, Sabrina (February 24, 2018). "He's a Green backer voting in the Ontario PC race. Should we care?". Toronto Star. Archived from the original on November 15, 2020. Retrieved November 14, 2020.
  37. ^ Grenier, Éric (June 1, 2017). "How 66 voters could have cost Maxime Bernier the Conservative leadership". CBC News. Archived from the original on November 15, 2020. Retrieved November 14, 2020.
  38. ^ Goodman, Nicole; Pammett, Jon H.; DeBardeleben, Joan. "Internet Voting: The Canadian Municipal Experience". Canadian Parliamentary Review. 33 (3): 16. 2010 CanLIIDocs 255. Like Markham, Peterborough chose to use remote Internet voting for a five-day period in its advance polls and introduced vote tabulators into all polling stations on election day. City officials awarded the electronic election contract to a Toronto-based company, Dominion Voting Systems, for a total cost of $180,400, including the rental fee for the tabulators.
  39. ^ Cave, Rachel (April 18, 2016). "Elections NB testing hundreds of tabulators for municipal elections". CBC News. Archived from the original on November 15, 2020.
  40. ^ "Liberals win majority in N.B. election amid vote-counting problems". CTV News Atlantic. The Canadian Press. September 23, 2014. Archived from the original on November 15, 2020. Retrieved September 23, 2014.
  41. ^ Chief Electoral Officer; Elections New Brunswick. Thirty-Eighth General Election - September 22, 2014 (PDF) (Report). p. xii. Archived (PDF) from the original on September 12, 2020. Retrieved November 19, 2020. Out of the seven electoral districts, 11 candidates saw a slight change in their votes (ranging from 1 to 3 votes), while 25 other candidates saw no change.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  42. ^ "Elections NB to blame for delayed results, tabulator company says". CBC News. September 29, 2014. Archived from the original on November 15, 2020. Retrieved November 14, 2020.
  43. ^ Yun, Tom (June 7, 2018). "Ontario's experiment with vote-counting machines could change elections to come". Macleans. Archived from the original on November 15, 2020. Retrieved June 21, 2018.
  44. ^ Reevely, David (June 7, 2018). "Elections Ontario has 'utmost confidence' in new vote-counting machines but also has backup plan". Ottawa Citizen. Archived from the original on November 15, 2020. Retrieved January 27, 2019.

External links