The term can be used in a mildly derogatory sense, but in common usage today is simply pre-arranged questions from a friendly audience member. Often, the question has been written by the Minister or their staff rather than by the questioner, and is used to give the Minister a chance to promote themselves or the work of the Government, or to criticise the opposition party's policies, to raise the profile of the backbench Member asking the question, or to consume the time available for questioning and thereby avoid tougher questions. It is a common and widely accepted tactic during Question Time in the House of Representatives and the Senate.
While it is rare, it would be possible for a backbencher on the Government side of the house to ask a member of the Government a question without it being regarded as a Dorothy Dixer. Such a question would be one that the Minister had not planted and was not aware of in advance.
It is common for "Dorothy Dixers" to end in the question: "Is the Minister aware of any alternative policies?" This enables the responding Minister to launch into extended criticism of the Opposition and their policy on the question's subject matter, which may include a pre-planned speech intended as a character assassination of an opposition member, while still remaining technically relevant to the question as asked as Standing orders require. These questions or the answers to them are often based upon, refer to, or build upon, party line propaganda written earlier in the day by ideologically friendly members of the news media.
The term references American advice columnist Dorothy Dix's reputed practice of making up her own questions to allow her to publish more interesting answers. "Dorothy Dixer" has been used in Australian politics since the 1950s, and has become increasingly common in everyday usage, although the term is now frequently shortened to "Dixer". However, the term is virtually unknown in other countries where Dix's column was equally popular.
In 2015, the Parliament of Victoria abolished Dorothy Dixers, replacing them instead with ministers' statements, where ministers are granted up to two minutes during question time to advise parliament on new government initiatives, projects and achievements.
A growing number of questions are of the 'Dorothy-Dix' type (from the government backbench) and attempts to win political points (from both sides of the house).
It is common practice for a minister to have a government backbencher ask a pre-arranged question which can be answered in such a way as to praise the government or exploit a weakness in the Opposition. Such 'Dorothy Dix' questions (after the syndicated 'advice' column which once appeared in popular magazines), are in effect occasions for ministers' speeches, rather than for parliamentary criticism of the executive.
- "Dorothy Dix question or Dorothy Dixer". Parliamentary glossary. Parliamentary Education Office (Commonwealth Parliament of Australia). Archived from the original on 17 May 2013. Retrieved 22 August 2013.
- "Tony Burke vows to 'fix' parliament as crossbench demands reform". the Guardian. 2022-05-24. Retrieved 2022-05-25.
- Richards, Kel (2013). Kel Richards' Dictionary of Phrase and Fable. UNSW Press. p. 80. ISBN 978-1-74224-112-8. Retrieved 22 August 2013.
- "Victoria to ban Dorothy Dixers". Nine News. Retrieved 19 October 2021.
- "Vic parliament to scrap Dorothy Dixers". SBS News. Special Broadcasting Service. Retrieved 19 October 2021.
- Willingham, Richard. "Victoria Parliament's Dorothy Dixers set to be dumped". The Age. Fairfax Media. Retrieved 19 October 2021.
- Jaensch, Dean (1984). An Introduction to Australian Politics (2nd ed.). Melbourne: Longman Cheshire. p. 231. ISBN 0-582-68475-7.
- Aitken, Don; Jinks, Brian (1985). Australian Political Institutions (3rd ed.). South Melbourne: Pitman Publishing. p. 67. ISBN 0-85896-156-3.