Draft:The Subtle Lines of Truth – Rerum Initium
Submission declined on 8 December 2024 by Asilvering (talk).
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
|
Submission declined on 7 December 2024 by Theroadislong (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: Declined by Theroadislong 33 hours ago.
|
Submission declined on 6 December 2024 by Chaotic Enby (talk). This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject. Your draft shows signs of having been generated by a large language model, such as ChatGPT. Their outputs usually have multiple issues that prevent them from meeting our guidelines on writing articles. These include: Declined by Chaotic Enby 2 days ago.
|
- Comment: You need to show significant coverage in reliable sources for this book. That coverage must be independent, unlike the pay-for-review Kirkus Indie etc. asilvering (talk) 19:08, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: This gives no indication of being a notable book. Theroadislong (talk) 10:05, 7 December 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: @Asukite, WP:LOWERCASE doesn't apply to title of works (where MOS:TITLECAPS says titles of English-language works should be in title case), I am moving the draft accordingly. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 16:20, 6 December 2024 (UTC)
- Comment:
This may need to be moved to either "The subtle lines of truth - Rerum Initium" or "The subtle lines of truth - rerum initium" per WP:LOWERCASE, but I'm not certain as to how the Latin should be handled so I have not yet done so.see above - thanks ASUKITE 15:30, 6 December 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: Using in-line citations would be really beneficial. Please convert your existing references to in-line citations following the tutorial at WP:INTREFVE. qcne (talk) 14:54, 6 December 2024 (UTC)
The Subtle Lines of Truth – Rerum Initium is a 2024 philosophical and speculative novel by Italian author Simone Maggi. The work combines elements of history, philosophy, and spirituality, exploring themes of ancient civilizations, moral inquiry, and cosmic connections. It references cultural and historical contexts such as Atlantis, Egypt, and Rome, while addressing questions of human nature, existential purpose, and enlightenment.
Background
[edit]Set in 64 AD, the novel is centered on the Mediterranean region, where the protagonists undertake a symbolic and spiritual journey across ancient landmarks, including references to the lost city of Atlantis, the architectural legacy of Rome, and the mysticism of Egypt. The narrative integrates historical and symbolic elements, including descriptions of sites like the Mausoleum of Augustus and the Pantheon, while drawing connections to celestial themes, with the Milky Way serving as a recurring metaphor. The plot follows Gaius, a seeker of hidden knowledge, and his companions as they travel from Corinth to Brundisium in search of deeper truths. Through their dialogue and reflection, the story explores themes such as human ambition, the pursuit of moral ideals, and spiritual enlightenment. The narrative highlights both humanity’s potential for growth and its destructive tendencies, concluding with a broader reflection on the cosmos and the quest for higher understanding.
Critical reception
[edit]The Subtle Lines of Truth – Rerum Initium has been reviewed positively by literary critics for its thematic exploration and stylistic approach. Publishers Weekly BookLife Reviews described the novel as "a warm provocation" and "a thought-compelling exploration," noting its engagement with intellectual and spiritual themes.[1] Kirkus Reviews referred to the work as "brief yet thoughtful," commending its concise narrative and its exploration of historical mysteries.[2] Readers' Favorite praised its integration of historical, philosophical, and cosmic themes, highlighting its appeal to readers interested in reflective and intellectually engaging narratives.[3] Critics have also noted the novel’s balance of accessible prose and poetic elements, as well as its ability to encourage introspection on universal and timeless themes.
Significance
[edit]The novel has been recognized for its contribution to contemporary speculative and philosophical literature. It bridges historical and spiritual narratives with broader cosmic themes, appealing to readers interested in topics such as human purpose, ancient history, and philosophical reflection. Its inclusion in the Gale Literature Resource Center[4] and availability through international platforms reflect its reception within academic and literary contexts. The novel’s thematic scope and accessibility have drawn attention from a wide readership, with some comparisons to esoteric traditions while remaining approachable for general audiences.
References
[edit]- ^ Publishers Weekly BookLife Reviews https://booklife.com/project/the-subtle-lines-of-truth-rerum-initium-96528
- ^ Kirkus Reviews https://www.kirkusreviews.com/book-reviews/simone-maggi/the-subtle-lines-of-truth/
- ^ Readers' Favorite https://readersfavorite.com/book-review/the-subtle-lines-of-truth
- ^ Gale Literature Resource Center https://go.gale.com/ps/i.do?id=GALE%7CA813882513&sid=sitemap&v=2.1&it=r&p=LitRC&sw=w&userGroupName=anon%7E3a77abb0&aty=open-web-entry
- in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
- reliable
- secondary
- independent of the subject
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.