Drug Recognition Expert

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

A Drug Recognition Expert (DRE) is a law enforcement officer trained to identify people whose driving is impaired by drugs other than, or in addition to, alcohol . All DREs follow the same 12 step procedure called a Drug Influence Evaluation (DIE), to determine which category of drugs is causing the driver to be impaired.[1]

If a DRE determines that a driver was too impaired to operate a vehicle in a safe manner, they will look for indications of the drug(s) suspected, by the common perceivable effects the drugs have on the human body.[2] There are seven categories of classifications a DRE is looking for, including; central nervous system depressants (benzodiazepines), CNS stimulants (methamphetamine), dissociative anesthetics (PCP), cannabis, hallucinogens (mushrooms), inhalants (glue), and narcotic analgesics (opiates).[2]

DREs often testify in court, where the term "expert" has important legal implications. Some jurisdictions do not allow the term Drug Recognition Expert. In these jurisdictions DREs are called Drug Recognition Evaluators, or Drug Recognition Technicians.

The acronym 'DRE' has been used to refer not just to the DRE officers, but also to the examination they perform, the "Drug Recognition Examination", or "Drug Recognition Evaluation." The confluence of acronyms leads to confusion, and the IACP now calls the evaluation done by DRE officers the "Drug Influence Evaluation", DIE.

DIEs were developed by police officers from the Los Angeles Police Department in the early 1970s. The officers' drug recognition methods were officially recognized by the LAPD management in 1979, and adopted by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration in the early 1980s.

As of 2005, approximately 6,000 police officers are certified as Drug Recognition Experts. Certification is issued by the International Association of Chiefs of Police (IACP).[3] To remain certified and in good standing, DREs must track their evaluations and enter the results into an online database.

The credibility of methods used by DREs has been questioned as unreliable and subjective. DRE testimony is not accepted in all jurisdictions.[4]

DRE training[edit]

DRE training and certification standards are defined by the International Association of Chiefs of Police [5] Training is available only to "a person ... in the employ and under the direct control of [2] a public criminal justice agency involved in the enforcement of criminal or traffic safety laws[1] or an institution involved in providing training services to officers of law enforcement agencies.".[6] IACP standards require DREs training to be done using an official Student Manual. This manual.[7] is widely cited in court as defining standards for the performance of a Drug Influence Evaluation.

12-Step DRE process[edit]

A DIE involves the following 12 steps (a detailed description for each step is given at the DECP.org[8])

  1. Breath Alcohol Test: The arresting officer reviews the subject's breath alcohol concentration (BrAC) test results and determines if the subject's apparent impairment is consistent with the subject's BrAC. If so, the officer will not normally call a DRE. If the impairment is not explained by the BrAC, the officer requests a DRE evaluation.
  2. Interview of the Arresting Officer
  3. Preliminary Examination and First Pulse
  4. Eye Examinations
  5. Divided Attention Psychophysical Tests
  6. Vital Signs and Second Pulse
  7. Dark Room Examinations
  8. Examination for Muscle Tone
  9. Check for Injection Sites and Third Pulse
  10. Subject's Statements and Other Observations
  11. Analysis and Opinions of the Evaluator
  12. Toxicological Examination : After completing the evaluation, the DRE normally requests a urine, blood and/or saliva sample from the subject for a toxicology lab analysis.

Scientific validation[edit]

The DIE testing done by DRE officers is said to be scientific. This claim is critical to the admission of DRE expert testimony in criminal trials. The DRE Student Manual identifies three scientific studies as being those that validate DRE testing.[9] These studies are: Bigelow 1985 (aka the Johns Hopkins study);[10] Compton 1986 (aka the LAPD-173 study);[11] and Adler 1994 (aka the Arizona DRE Validation Study).[12] Other studies have called into question the scientific validity of DRE methods.[13] Some courts have held that DRE evidence is not admissible under the rules of evidence. In USA, the presiding judge can decide on a case-by-case basis (as of 2017).[14]


In 2017, the Supreme Court of Canada held that the DRE is an "expert for purposes of administering the 12-step evaluation and determining whether [a defendant] was driving while impaired for the purpose of requiring further testing (emphasis added).... The DRE's expertise is not in the scientific foundation of the test but in the administration of the test itself." [15]

See also[edit]


  1. ^ a b Seiders, Gregory T. "Call in the Experts: The Drug Recognition Expert Protocol and Its Role In Effectively Prosecuting Drugged Drivers." Widener Law Journal 26.2 (2017): 229-275.
  2. ^ a b c Page, Thomas. "Drug Recognition Experts Combating Drugged Driving". 4 April 2017. Web. 16 July 2017.
  3. ^ http://www.theiacp.org/
  4. ^ "SGI training more drug recognition experts, despite concerns testing is 'highly subjective' | CBC News".
  5. ^ International Standards of the Drug Evaluation and Classification Program "Archived copy" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2013-12-02. Retrieved 2013-11-15.CS1 maint: Archived copy as title (link)
  6. ^ International Standards of the DECP §1.1
  7. ^ NHTSA: Drug Evaluation and classification training: the Drug Recognition Expert School. Washington, D.C.: National Traffic Highway Safety Administration;2010. DOT HS172A R01/10.
  8. ^ "12 Step Process – IACP DECP Multisite". www.decp.org. Retrieved 2016-10-14.
  9. ^ NHTSA: Drug Evaluation and Classification Training: the Drug Recognition Expert School. Washington, D.C.: NHTSA 2010. DOT HS172A R01/10, Session III, page 4ff
  10. ^ Bigelow GE, et al. Identifying Types of Drug Intoxication: Laboratory Evaluation of the Subject Examination Procedure. Washington, D.C.: NHTSA 1985, DOT HS 806
  11. ^ Compton RP. Field Evaluation of the Los Angeles Police Department Drug Detection Program. Washington, D.C.: NHTSA1986. DOT HS 807 012;
  12. ^ Adler EV, Burns M: Drug Recognition Expert (DRE) Validation Study. Phoenix: Arizona Governor's Office of Highway Safety; 1994.
  13. ^ Standardized Field Sobriety Tests: A Review of Scientific and Legal Issues
  14. ^ "DRE Drug Evaluations: Are the Opinions of Police Admissible in Court?".
  15. ^ R. v. Bingley, [2017 1 SCR 170, 2017 SCC 12] (CanLII), retrieved on 2018-05-28, xref. ¶ 33.

External links[edit]