Drum line (shark control)
A drum line is an unmanned aquatic trap used to lure and capture large sharks using baited hooks. They are typically deployed near popular swimming beaches with the intention of reducing the number of sharks in the vicinity and therefore the probability of shark attack. Drum lines are often used in association with shark nets, used to offer further protection by enclosing designated swimming areas. The combination of drum lines and shark nets has been successful in reducing shark attacks in the areas where they are installed. Since the shark nets and drum lines have been put into use (in the 1960s) there has only been one death caused by a shark attack on a protected beach. In January 2014, drum lines were introduced in Western Australia to catch and kill potentially hazardous sharks. The topic of shark culling became an international controversy and sparked public demonstrations and vocal opposition, particularly from environmentalists, animal welfare advocates and ocean activists.
The drum line consists of a floating drum (a barrel) with two lines attached to it. One line is attached to an anchor on the sea floor, while the other features a large baited shark hook. The drum is filled with a rigid polyurethane foam, which keeps it buoyant and prevents it from being stolen for use as a storage vessel. To attract sharks, the hooks are baited with red mullet and false jacopever. Since the objective of the drum line is to prevent sharks from approaching popular beaches (and not to attract them) only about 500 grams of bait is added to each hook. Thus only sharks from the immediate vicinity are attracted to the baits.
Drum lines were deployed to prevent shark attacks in Queensland, Australia in 1962. They continue to be used in Queensland, and continue to kill sharks (and also kill by-catch species such as dolphins). They were then used by KwaZulu-Natal (South Africa) and have been killing sharks there for the past 50 years. They were used intermittently in Western Australia in an "imminent threat" policy, having previously been used there for 4 months in 2014. However the use of drum lines ceased in March 2017 following a change in the state government. Since 2014 Réunion Island has used drum lines in conjunction with shark barriers.
Permanent or semipermanent deployment of shark-fishing gear off high-use beaches (which includes drum lines) have been claimed to be successful in reducing the incidence of shark attack at the protected beaches, though this assertion has been disputed. While shark nets and drum lines share the same purpose, drum lines are more effective at targeting the three sharks that are considered most dangerous to swimmers: the bull shark, tiger shark and great white shark. Drum Lines physically attract sharks from within the immediate vicinity using bait while shark nets allow the sharks to swim over or around them. The bycatch, or unintended catch, of drum lines is considerably less than that of shark nets.
|Recife, Brazil data, October 2007 to December 2011|
|Spotted eagle ray||4||100%|
|Caribbean reef shark||1||0%|
|Atlantic goliath grouper||13||100%|
|Brazilian sharpnose shark||1||0%|
Using drum lines to kill sharks negatively affects the marine ecosystem. The Australian Marine Conservation Society said, "the ecological cost of drum lines is high, with 97% of sharks caught [in Queensland] since 2001 considered to be at some level of conservation risk."
Drum lines are responsible for bycatch. During a shark attack mitigation program off Recife, Brazil over a 4-year period (October 2007 to December 2011) the total sharks caught, as well as bycatch and the percentage released alive is shown in the table to the right.
During the same period in Recife, 44 potentially aggressive sharks were also hooked, including 34 tiger sharks and 4 bull sharks. The overall survival rate of potentially aggressive sharks was 72% (relocated and released). Out of all the animals caught, 22.7% of them died. Unlike in Queensland, the objective of the Recife program was to relocate potentially aggressive sharks.
The combination of drum lines and shark nets do not directly lead to extinction, but they also may not give the population room to recover from being endangered of extinction.
Bycatch from drum lines is minor compared to bycatch from other human activities. For example, "Australia’s commercial shark fishing industry is taking over 1200 tonne of shark out of our various fisheries each year: everything from gummy shark to mako, and very likely a few white sharks as well. The New South Wales prawn trawling industry alone results in 64 tonne of shark as bycatch each year. Six percent of what’s caught in the tuna longline fisheries in northern Australia is shark."
Drum lines have been claimed to be an ineffective strategy to keep people safe, while simultaneously killing thousands of sharks and other wildlife in the marine ecosystem. Western Australia Fisheries Minister Dave Kelly said "there is currently no scientific evidence to show that drumlines reduce the risk of a [shark] attack".
The ongoing killing of sharks in Queensland (under a "shark control" program) has been criticized. This program has been called a cull. From 1962 to the present, the government of Queensland has targeted and killed sharks in large numbers by using drum lines — this program has also killed large numbers of other animals such as dolphins; it has also killed endangered hammerhead sharks. Queensland currently operates the largest shark culling program in Australia. In the first 11 months of 2013, 633 sharks were captured in Queensland — more than 95% of those sharks were killed. From 2013 to 2014, 667 sharks were killed in Queensland's "shark control" program, including great white sharks and critically-endangered grey nurse sharks. From 2014 to 2015, 621 sharks were killed in Queensland. From 2017 to 2018, 218 sharks were killed, including 75 tiger sharks and 41 bull sharks. From 2001 to 2018, a total of 10,480 sharks were killed on lethal drum lines in Queensland.
On Réunion regular operation of SMART (Shark-Management-Alert-in-Real-Time) drum lines began in August 2015 and they are used in conjunction with bottom long lines. A smart drum line is based on the traditional drum line design, but it includes technology that can alert rangers to the capture of marine life, who can then attend the device if sea conditions permit. In Reunion, fishermen usually attend the drum lines within 90 minutes of an alert and 90 per cent of animals caught on the hooks survive. There are now around 15 of these smart-drumlines along the coast of Réunion Island.
In December 2016 the NSW State government commenced a trial of smart drumlines, as part of a expansion of shark attack mitigation strategies along the NSW North coast. Twenty five drumlines were deployed at Ballina and Evans Head beaches (15 off Ballina; 10 off Evans Head). Once a target shark is caught it is tagged with a transmitter, relocated approximately 1km offshore and released. Non-targeted animals are immediately released. In addition, the tagged sharks provide an alert to the community if they pass within range of a series of listening stations located along the coast. In the first six months of the trial 36 target sharks (31 great white, 3 tiger, and 2 bull sharks) were caught with 35 (97%) successfully relocated. The trial has been effective in reducing shark attacks and in the 2017-18 summer the trial was expanded to 100 smart drumlines in six NSW regions.
Prior to 2014, drum lines were only utilised on Australia's eastern coast and in South Africa where the numbers of attacks reduced dramatically. In 2014, the Western Australian government reacted to the loss of seven human lives in the years 2010-2013 and installed drum lines along around 200 km of its 20,000 km (12,000 mi) long coastline (around 1%). The policy has been the subject of national and international protests, coming under fire from marine conservationists and animal welfare advocates and their supporters. The policy is commonly referred to as the Western Australian shark cull. Following a change in the West Australian state government in March 2017, the newly elected Premier Mark McGowan and Fisheries Minister David Kelly have stated that they do not support the previous governments' catch and kill policy.
Drum lines have been criticized on animal rights grounds, not only for their negative effect on the environment and killing of endangered species, but also for their non-scientific and speciesist approach.
A number of people opposed to the Queensland's shark-killing program have sabotaged various drum lines throughout Queensland to save sharks, despite the risk of being fined.
The current shark-killing program in Queensland has been criticized by environmentalists, conservationists, and animal rights advocates — they say Queensland's shark-killing program is unethical and harms the marine ecosystem. Queensland's shark-killing program has been called "outdated, cruel and ineffective". The government of Queensland currently kills sharks in the Great Barrier Reef using 173 lethal drum lines; in 2018, Humane Society International filed a lawsuit (court challenge) requesting that the drum lines be removed there.
- Richard Shears (28 October 2009). "Great White Shark bitten nearly in half by an even BIGGER monster". Daily Mail.com.
- "A Report on the Queensland Shark Safety Program" (PDF). State of Queensland. March 2006. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2014-01-23. Retrieved 2016-11-26.
- "Shark Nets, Drumlines, and Safe Swimming". KwaZulu Natal Sharks Board. Archived from the original on 2014-01-28.
- Commonwealth of Australia (December 2017). "Senate Report:Shark mitigation and deterrent measures" (PDF): 77. Retrieved 25 March 2018.
- "Sharks - Marine Science Australia". Ausmarinescience.com. Retrieved 2016-12-01.
- "Queensland | Overview". Seashepherd.org.au. Retrieved 2016-12-01.
- Calla Wahlquist (12 February 2015). "Western Australia's 'serious threat' shark policy condemned by Senate". The Guardian. Retrieved 2016-12-01.
- Carl Meyer (2013-12-11). "Western Australia's shark culls lack bite (and science)". Theconversation.com. Retrieved 2016-12-01.
- Dudley, S.F.J.; Haestier, R.C.; Cox, K.R.; Murray, M. (1998). "Shark control: experimental fishing with baited drumlines". Marine and Freshwater Research. 49 (7): 653–661. doi:10.1071/MF98026.
- "Drumlines Frequently Asked Questions" (PDF). KwaZulu Natal Sharks Board. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2010-02-15.
- "Has Queensland really saved lives by killing thousands of sharks?". Brisbanetimes.com.au. 2014-02-21. Retrieved 2016-12-01.
- "Drumlines Capture Hundreds of Sharks in Queensland". The Australian. Retrieved 2016-12-01.
- Matt Watson (2015-08-25). "Dolphins, rays among hundreds of non-targeted animals killed on Queensland shark nets and drum lines, figures show". ABC News. Australian Broadcasting Corporation. Retrieved 2016-12-01.
- Angela Pownall (2014-06-10). "Drum lines part of life in South Africa for 50 years". The West Australian. Retrieved 2016-12-01.
- Oliver Milman (23 October 2014). "WA abandons shark culling program, but reserves right to kill again". The Guardian. Retrieved 2016-12-01.
- Jacob Kagi (12 March 2017). "WA election: Mark McGowan confronts 'enormity of task' facing Labor government". ABC News. Australian Broadcasting Corporation. Retrieved 12 May 2017.
- "Reunion Shark Nets Snatch Victory From Jaws of Ruin". The Australian. Retrieved 2016-12-01.
- Curtis; et al. (2012). "Chapter 31: Responding to the Risk of White Shark Attack – Updated Statistics, Prevention, Control, Methods and Recommendations" (PDF). In M. L. Domeier. Global Perspectives on the Biology and Life History of the White Shark. Boca Raton, FL.: CRC Press. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2016-11-22. Retrieved 27 November 2016.
- Dudley, S.F.J. (1997). "A comparison of the shark control programs of New South Wales and Queensland (Australia) and KwaZulu-Natal (South Africa)". Ocean & Coastal Management (34): 1–27. doi:10.1016/S0964-5691(96)00061-0.
- Alana Schetzer (8 May 2017). "Sharks: How a cull could ruin an ecosystem". Science Matters. University of Melbourne – via Pursuit.
- Chloe Hubbard (30 April 2017). "No Shark Cull: Why Some Surfers Don't Want to Kill Great Whites Despite Lethal Attacks". NBC News.
- McPhee, D.P. (August 2012). "Likely effectivenss of netting or other capture programs as a shark hazard mitigation strategy in Western Australia" (PDF). Fisheries Ocassional Publication. Perth, Western Australia: Department of Fisheries. 108. ISBN 978-1-921845-51-2. ISSN 1447-2058. Retrieved 2016-11-26.
- Celia (21 September 2009). "Australian Shark Control Programs Indiscriminately Catch Marine Life". Marine Science Today. Retrieved 2016-11-26.
- "2011 Annual Report". KwaZulu Natal Sharks Board. p. 21. Archived from the original on 2014-08-19. Retrieved 2018-07-26.
- Hazin, F.H.V.; Afonso, A.S. (28 November 2013). "A green strategy for shark attack mitigation off Recife, Brazil". Animal Conservation. 17: 287–296. doi:10.1111/acv.12096.
- https://www.abc.net.au/news/2015-12-23/shark-attacks-smart-drum-lines-fact-check/7030538 Fact Check: Are smart drum lines just a PR exercise? 3 March 2016. Abc.net.au. Retrieved October 21, 2018.
- https://www.seashepherd.org.au/apex-harmony/overview/alternatives.html Alternatives to drum lines and shark nets. Seashepherd.org.au. Retrieved October 21, 2018.
- https://www.wiley.com/WileyCDA/PressRelease/pressReleaseId-111168.html Humane Strategy Reduces Shark Attacks. August 4, 2014. Wiley.com. Retrieved October 21, 2018.
- https://www.economist.com/the-economist-explains/2017/10/31/drones-v-sharks Drones v Sharks. The Economist. E.A.D.W. October 31, 2017. Retrieved October 21, 2018.
- https://zslpublications.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/acv.12096 Zslpublications.onlinelibrary.wiley.com. A green strategy for shark attack mitigation off Recife, Brazil. F. H. V. Hazin & A. S. Afonso.
- 462 bycatch
- "Shark Culling". marineconservation.org.au. Archived from the original on 2018-10-02. Retrieved September 28, 2018.
- "Do the nets and drumlines really have a measurable impact on shark populations?". removethenets.com. 2 May 2009. Archived from the original on 2009-06-11. Retrieved 2010-02-10.
- "Nick Carroll: the facts about shark nets". Newcastle Herald. 2016-11-08. Retrieved 2016-11-26.
- "Dolphins take the bait from drumline on the Gold Coast". YouTube. 29 January 2014.
- Phillips, Jack (September 4, 2018). "Video: Endangered Hammerhead Sharks Dead on Drum Line in Great Barrier Reef". ntd.tv. Archived from the original on 2018-09-19. Retrieved September 18, 2018.
- Mackenzie, Bruce (August 4, 2018). "Sydney Shark Nets Set to Stay Despite Drumline Success". swellnet.com. Archived from the original on 2018-09-21. Retrieved September 28, 2018.
- "About the Campaign:Sea Shepherd Working Together With The Community To Establish Sustainable Solutions To Shark Bite Incidents". seashepherd.org.au. Archived from the original on 2018-04-08. Retrieved September 28, 2018.
- Forrest, Alice. "Shark Nets in Australia – What Are They and How Do They Work?". sealifetrust.org. Retrieved September 18, 2018.
- "Can governments protect people from killer sharks?". ABC News. 2013-12-22. Retrieved 2018-09-27.
- Burke, Gail (August 21, 2015). "621 Sharks Killed Off Queensland Coast Through Control Program". abc.net.au. Archived from the original on 2015-09-23. Retrieved September 29, 2018.
- Donaghey, Kathleen (September 25, 2018). "Whitsunday Locals Resist Shark Culls After Two Attacks". thenewdaily.com. Archived from the original on 2018-10-02. Retrieved September 29, 2018.
- "Queensland Government Kills Sharks, Faces Court Challenge". maritime-exeecutive.com. September 4, 2018. Archived from the original on 2018-09-04. Retrieved September 29, 2018.
- "SMART Drumlines". NSW Department of Primary Industries. NSW Government. Retrieved 18 April 2018.
- "Fact Check: Are smart drum lines just a PR exercise?". ABC News. Australian Broadcasting Corporation. 2 March 2016. Retrieved 2016-11-26.
- Andy Guinand (9 August 2016). "Innovative solutions for a global interest". Forbidden ocean in Réunion Island. Ocean71 Magazine. Retrieved 2016-11-26.
- "North Coast Shark Net Trial: Summary". NSW Department of Primary Industry. NSW Government. Retrieved 23 March 2018.
- "SMART Drumlines: Frequently asked Questions" (PDF). NSW Department of Primary Industries. NSW Government. Retrieved 18 April 2018.
- Miles Godfrey (1 September 2017). "Shark nets will return to NSW's north coast beaches". Tweed Daily News. Retrieved 23 March 2018.
- Vucovic, Dom (17 March 2018). "SMART drumlines catching great white sharks and protecting swimmers, researchers say". ABC News. Australian Broadcasting Commission. Retrieved 21 April 2018.
- "Sharks to be caught on SMART drum lines off WA's South West after Labor U-turn". ABC News. 14 August 2018. Retrieved 14 August 2018.
- "Shark strategy: baited drum lines and killing zones near popular beaches after fatal attacks". ABC News. Australian Broadcasting Corporation. 10 December 2013.
- "Coastline Lengths". Education. Commonwealth of Australia. November 18, 2010. Archived from the original on 2011-01-22. Retrieved 2008-10-27.
- Daniel Mercer (19 April 2017). "Premier Mark McGowan's shark plan not enough to protect us". The West Australian. Retrieved 13 May 2017.
- Bill Hoffman (2014-05-16). "Beachgoers sabotaging shark bait hooks on Coast". Sunshine Coast Daily. Retrieved 2016-12-01.
- Morris, Jessica (December 8, 2016). "Shark Nets – Death Traps For Marine Animals". hsi.org.au. Archived from the original on 2018-10-02. Retrieved September 28, 2018.