Dyakonov surface waves

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

In 1988, the Russian Soviet physicist Mikhail (Michel) I. Dyakonov theoretically predicted a new class of surface electromagnetic waves, now called Dyakonov surface waves (DSWs).[1] Unlike other types of acoustic and electromagnetic surface waves, the DSW's existence is due to the difference in symmetry of materials forming the interface. He considered the interface between an isotropic transmitting medium and an anisotropic uniaxial crystal, and showed that under certain conditions waves localized at the interface should exist. Later, similar waves were predicted to exist at the interface between two identical uniaxial crystals with different orientations.[2] The previously known electromagnetic surface waves, surface plasmons and surface plasmon polaritons, exist under the condition that the permittivity of one of the materials forming the interface is negative, while the other one is positive (for example, this is the case for the air/metal interface below the plasma frequency). In contrast, the DSW can propagate when both materials are transparent; hence they are virtually lossless, which is their most fascinating property.

In recent years, the significance and potential of the DSW have attracted the attention of many researchers: a change of the constitutive properties of one or both of the two partnering materials – due to, say, infiltration by any chemical or biological agent – could measurably change the characteristics of the wave. Consequently, numerous potential applications are envisaged, including devices for integrated optics, chemical and biological surface sensing, etc.[3] However, it is not easy to satisfy the necessary conditions for the DSW, and because of this the first proof-of-principle experimental observation of DSW[4] was reported only 20 years after the original prediction.

A large number of theoretical work appeared dealing with various aspects of this phenomenon, see the detailed review.[5] In particular, DSW propagation at magnetic interfaces,[6] in left-handed materials,[7] in electro-optical,[8][9] and chiral[10] materials was studied. Resonant transmission due to DSW in structures using prisms was predicted,[11] and combination and interaction between DSW and surface plasmons (Dyakonov plasmons)[12][13][14] was studied.

Physical properties[edit]

The simplest configuration considered in Ref. 1 consists of an interface between an isotropic material with permittivity ε and a uniaxial crystal with permittivities εo and εe for the ordinary and the extraordinary waves respectively. The crystal C axis is parallel to the interface. For this configuration, the DSW can propagate along the interface within certain angular intervals with respect to the C axis, provided that the condition of εe > ε > εo is satisfied. Thus DSW are supported by interfaces with positive birefringent crystals only (εe > εo). The angular interval is defined by the parameter η =εe/εo − 1. The angular intervals for the DSW phase and group velocities (Δθph and Δθgr) are different. The phase velocity interval is proportional to η^2 and even for the most strongly birefringent natural crystals is very narrow Δθph ≃ 1° (rutile) and Δθph ≃4° (calomel). However the physically more important group velocity interval is substantially larger (proportional to η). Calculations give Δθgr ≃ 7° for rutile, and Δθgr ≃ 20° for calomel.


A widespread experimental investigation of DSW material systems and evolution of related practical devices has been largely limited by the stringent anisotropy conditions necessary for successful DSW propagation, particularly the high degree of birefringence of at least one of the constituent materials and the limited number of naturally available materials fulfilling this requirement. However, this is about to change in light of novel artificially engineered metamaterials and revolutionary material synthesis techniques.

The extreme sensitivity of DSW to anisotropy, and thereby to stress, along with their low-loss (long-range) character render them particularly attractive for enabling high sensitivity tactile and ultrasonic sensing for next-generation high-speed transduction and read-out technologies.


  1. ^ Dyakonov, M. I. (April 1988). "New type of electromagnetic wave propagating at an interface" (Free PDF download). Soviet Physics JETP. 67 (4): 714.
  2. ^ Averkiev, N. S. and Dyakonov, M. I. (1990). "Electromagnetic waves localized at the interface of transparent anisotropic media". Optics and Spectroscopy (USSR). 68 (5): 653. Bibcode:1990OptSp..68..653A.
  3. ^ Torner, L., Artigas, D., and Takayama, O. (2009). "Dyakonov Surface Waves". Optics and Photonics News. 20 (12): 25. Bibcode:2009OptPN..20...25T. doi:10.1364/OPN.20.12.000025.
  4. ^ Takayama, O., Crassovan, L., Artigas D., and Torner, L. (2009). "Observation of Dyakonov Surface Waves" (Free PDF download). Phys. Rev. Lett. 102 (4): 043903. Bibcode:2009PhRvL.102d3903T. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.043903. PMID 19257419.
  5. ^ Takayama, O., Crassovan, L. C., Mihalache, D., and Torner, L. (2008). "Dyakonov Surface Waves: A Review". Electromagnetics. 28 (3): 126–145. doi:10.1080/02726340801921403.
  6. ^ Crassovan, L. C., Artigas, D., Mihalache, D., and Torner, L. (2005). "Optical Dyakonov surface waves at magnetic interfaces". Opt. Lett. 30 (22): 3075–7. Bibcode:2005OptL...30.3075C. doi:10.1364/OL.30.003075. PMID 16315726.
  7. ^ Crassovan, L. C., Takayama, D., Artigas, D., Johansen, S. K., Mihalache, D., and Torner, L. (2006). "Enhanced localization of Dyakonov-like surface waves in left-handed materials". Phys. Rev. B. 74 (15): 155120. arXiv:physics/0603181. Bibcode:2006PhRvB..74o5120C. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.74.155120.
  8. ^ Nelatury, S. R., Polo jr., J. A., and Lakhtakia, A. (2008). "Electrical Control of Surface-Wave Propagation at the Planar Interface of a Linear Electro-Optic Material and an Isotropic Dielectric Material". Electromagnetics. 28 (3): 162–174. arXiv:0711.1663. CiteSeerX doi:10.1080/02726340801921486.
  9. ^ Nelatury, S. R., Polo jr., J. A., and Lakhtakia, A. (2008). "On widening the angular existence domain for Dyakonov surface waves using the Pockels effect". Microwave and Optical Technology Letters. 50 (9): 2360–2362. arXiv:0804.4879. doi:10.1002/mop.23698.
  10. ^ Gao, Jun; Lakhtakia, Akhlesh; Lei, Mingkai (2009). "On Dyakonov-Tamm waves localized to a central twist defect in a structurally chiral material". Journal of the Optical Society of America B. 26 (12): B74–B82. Bibcode:2009JOSAB..26B..74G. doi:10.1364/JOSAB.26.000B74.
  11. ^ Takayama, O., Nikitin, A. Yu., Martin-Moreno, L., Mihalache, D., Torner, L., and Artigas, A. (2011). "Dyakonov surface wave resonant transmission". Optics Express. 19 (7): 6339–47. Bibcode:2011OExpr..19.6339T. doi:10.1364/OE.19.006339. hdl:10261/47330. PMID 21451661.
  12. ^ Guo, Yu.. Newman, W., Cortes, C. L. and Jacob, Z. (2012). "Review Article: Applications of Hyperbolic Metamaterial Substrates". Advances in OptoElectronics. 2012: 1–9. doi:10.1155/2012/452502.
  13. ^ Jacob, Z. and Narimanov, E. E. (2008). "Optical hyperspace for plasmons: Dyakonov states in metamaterials". Appl. Phys. Lett. 93 (22): 221109. Bibcode:2008ApPhL..93v1109J. doi:10.1063/1.3037208.
  14. ^ Takayama, O., Artigas, D., and Torner, L. (2012). "Coupling plasmons and dyakonons". Optics Letters. 37 (11): 1983–5. Bibcode:2012OptL...37.1983T. doi:10.1364/OL.37.001983. PMID 22660095.