Electromagnetic Aircraft Launch System

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
  (Redirected from EMALS)
Jump to: navigation, search
A computer-generated model of the linear induction motor used in the EMALS.

The Electromagnetic Aircraft Launch System (EMALS) is a system under development by the United States Navy to launch carrier-based aircraft from an aircraft catapult using a linear motor drive instead of the conventional steam piston drive. The main advantage is that this system allows for a more graded acceleration, inducing less stress on the aircraft's airframe.

Other advantages include lower system weight, with a projected lower cost and decreased maintenance requirements. The design includes the ability to launch aircraft that are heavier or lighter than the conventional system can accommodate. In addition, the system requires far less fresh water, reducing the need for energy-intensive desalination.

Design and development[edit]

The EMALS is being developed by General Atomics for the U.S. Navy's newest aircraft carriers. A somewhat similar system, Westinghouse's electropult had been developed in 1946 but not deployed.[1]

Linear induction motor[edit]

The EMALS uses a linear induction motor (LIM), which uses electric currents to generate magnetic fields that propel a carriage down a track to launch the aircraft.[2] The EMALS consists of four main elements:[3] The linear induction motor consists of a row of stator coils that have the function of a conventional motor’s armature. When energized, the motor accelerates the carriage down the track. Only the section of the coils surrounding the carriage is energized at any given time, thereby minimizing reactive losses. The EMALS' 300-foot (91 m) LIM will accelerate a 100,000-pound (45,000 kg) aircraft to 130 knots (240 km/h).[2]

Energy storage subsystem[edit]

The induction motor requires a large amount of electric power; more than the ship's own power source can provide. The EMALS energy-storage subsystem draws power from the ship and stores energy kinetically on rotors of four disk alternators, and then releases that energy (up to 484MJ) in 2–3 sec.[4] Each rotor can store 121 megajoules at 6400 rpm, and can be recharged within 45 seconds of a launch, faster than steam catapults.[2]

Power conversion subsystem[edit]

During launch, the power conversion subsystem releases the stored energy from the disk alternators using a cycloconverter.[2] The cycloconverter provides a controlled rising frequency and voltage to the LIM, energizing only the small portion of stator coils that affect the launch carriage at any given moment.[4]

Control consoles[edit]

Operators control the power through a closed loop system. Hall effect sensors on the track monitor its operation, allowing the system to ensure that it provides the desired acceleration. The closed loop system allows the EMALS to maintain a constant tow force, which helps reduce launch stresses on the plane’s airframe.[2]

Program status[edit]

The Electromagnetic Aircraft Launch System at Naval Air Systems Command, Lakehurst, launching a United States Navy F/A-18E Super Hornet during a test on 18 December 2010

In June 2014, the Navy completed EMALS prototype testing of 450 manned aircraft launches involving every fixed-wing carrier-borne aircraft type in the USN inventory at Joint Base McGuire-Dix-Lakehurst during two Aircraft Compatibility Testing (ACT) campaigns. ACT Phase 1 concluded in late 2011 following 134 launches (aircraft types comprising the F/A-18E Super Hornet, T-45C Goshawk, C-2A Greyhound, E-2D Advanced Hawkeye, and F-35C Lightning II). On completion of ACT 1, the EMALS demonstrator was reconfigured to be more representative of the actual ship configuration on board Ford, which will use four catapults sharing several energy storage and power conversion subsystems. ACT Phase 2 began on 25 June 2013 and concluded on 6 April 2014 after a further 310 launches (including launches of the EA-18G Growler and F/A-18C Hornet, as well as another round of testing with aircraft types previously launched during Phase 1). In Phase 2 various carrier situations were simulated, including off-centre launches and planned system faults, to demonstrate that aircraft could meet end-speed and validate launch-critical reliability.[13]


Compared to steam catapults, EMALS weighs less, occupies less space, requires less maintenance and manpower, is more reliable, recharges more quickly, and uses less energy. Steam catapults, which use about 1350 pounds of steam per launch, have extensive mechanical, pneumatic, and hydraulic subsystems.[4] EMALS uses no steam, which makes it suitable for the Navy's planned all-electric ships.[14]

Compared to steam catapults, EMALS can control the launch performance with greater precision, allowing it to launch more kinds of aircraft, from heavy fighter jets to light unmanned aircraft.[14] EMALS can also deliver 29 percent more energy than steam's approximately 95 megajoules, increasing the output to 122 megajoules.[4] The EMALS will also be more efficient than the 5-percent efficiency of steam catapults.[2]

Systems that use or will use electromagnetic aircraft launch systems[edit]

EMALS is a design feature of the Ford-class carrier.[15] Such a launch system was also considered as a retrofit for carriers of the Nimitz class, but was not workable due to the high electrical power requirements of the EMALS catapults, requirements that the two Westinghouse nuclear reactors on board the ships of this class could not provide.[16] John Schank stated: "The biggest problems facing the Nimitz class are the limited electrical power generation capability and the upgrade-driven increase in ship weight and erosion of the center-of-gravity margin needed to maintain ship stability." [17] Therefore, the newer Ford class' carriers were equipped with power plants that produce more power than the ship actually needs as of now. This allows unforeseen technological advances to be implemented later, something which was not possible with the Nimitz-class when the possibility for EMALS was considered.

Converteam UK were working on an electro-magnetic catapult (EMCAT) system for the Queen Elizabeth-class aircraft carrier.[18] In August 2009, speculation mounted that the UK may drop the STOVL F-35B for the CTOL F-35C model, which would have meant the carriers being built to operate conventional takeoff and landing aircraft utilizing the UK-designed non-steam EMCAT catapults.[19][20]

In October 2010, the UK Government announced it had opted to buy the F-35C, using a then-undecided CATOBAR system. A contract was signed in December 2011 with General Atomics of San Diego to develop EMALS for the Queen Elizabeth-class carriers.[18][21] However, in May 2012, the UK Government reversed its decision after the projected costs rose to double the original estimate and delivery moved back to 2023, cancelling the F-35C option and reverting to its original decision to buy the STOVL F-35B.[22]

The Indian navy has shown interest in installing EMALS for its planned CATOBAR Supercarrier INS Vishal.[23][24][25][25] Indian government has shown interest to produce the Electromagnetic Aircraft Launch System locally with the assistance of General Atomics.[26]

Rear Admiral Yin Zhuo of the People's Liberation Army Navy has said that China's next aircraft carrier will also have an electromagnetic aircraft launch system.[27]

See also[edit]



  1. ^ http://www.theengineer.co.uk/archive/october-1946-westinghouse-unveils-the-electropult/1017387.article
  2. ^ a b c d e f Schweber, Bill (2002-04-11). "How It Works" (PDF). EDN Magazine. Retrieved 2014-11-07. 
  3. ^ http://www.ga.com/atg/EMS/m1346.php
  4. ^ a b c d Doyle, Samuel, Conway, and Klimowski (1994-04-15). "Electromagnetic Aircraft Launch System – EMALS ( DEAD 2015-03-13)" (PDF). Doyle, Samuel, Conway, and Klimowski. "Electromagnetic Aircraft Launch System – EMALS" (PDF). 
  5. ^ EMALS launches first Goshawk
  6. ^ EMALS successfully launches first Greyhound
  7. ^ http://www.navair.navy.mil/NewsReleases/index.cfm?fuseaction=home.view&id=4468
  8. ^ "USN undertakes first EMALS Hornet launch". Air Forces Monthly (Key Publishing Ltd) (275): page 18. March 2011. ISSN 0955-7091. 
  9. ^ "Navy's new electromagnetic catapult 'real smooth'". Newbury Park Press. 28 September 2011. Retrieved 2011-10-04. 
  10. ^ "New carrier launch system tested". Security Industry. UPI. 3 October 2011. Retrieved 2011-10-04. 
  11. ^ "F-35C launches from emals". 
  12. ^ "Navy Announces Successful Test of Electromagnetic Catapult on CVN 78". www.imperialvalleynews.com (PEO Carriers). 15 May 2015. Retrieved 16 May 2015. 
  13. ^ http://www.janes.com/article/39799/emals-to-start-sled-trials-on-cvn-78-in-late-2015
  14. ^ a b Lowe, Christian. "Defense Tech: EMALS: Next Gen Catapult". Retrieved 2008-02-27. 
  15. ^ AVIATIONWEEK.COM Carrier Launch System Passes Initial Tests
  16. ^ Launch-Systems.com
  17. ^ Schank, John. Modernizing the U.S. Aircraft Carrier Fleet: Accelerating CVN 21 Production Versus Mid-Life Refueling. Santa Monica: Rand Corporation, 2005. p. 76.
  18. ^ a b "Converteam develops catapult launch system for UK carriers" By Tim Fish, Jane's. 26 July 2010
  19. ^ "Britain rethinks jump jet order". UPI.com. 12 August 2009. Retrieved 14 August 2009. 
  20. ^ Harding, Thomas (5 August 2009). "Defence jobs at risk". London: Telegraph.co. Retrieved 14 August 2009. 
  21. ^ Hoyle, Craig. "Cameron: UK to swap JSFs to carrier variant, axe Harrier and Nimrod." Flightglobal.com, 19 October 2010.
  22. ^ "It’s Official: UK to Fly F-35B JSFs". Retrieved 19 July 2012. 
  23. ^ "Indian Navy seeks EMALS system for second Vikrant-class aircraft carrier". 
  24. ^ "India plans a 65,000-tonne warship". 
  25. ^ a b "This US Technology Could Give Indian Aircraft Carriers an Important Edge". 
  26. ^ defence secretary to visit India in May to push aircraft carrier technologies The Times of India 5 April 2015
  27. ^ "Chinese aircraft carrier should narrow the gap with its U.S. counterpart". english.peopledaily.com.cn. People's Daily. 18 October 2013. Retrieved 18 October 2013. 

External links[edit]