Edwards v. South Carolina
|Edwards v. South Carolina|
|Argued December 13, 1962
Decided February 25, 1963
|Full case name||Edwards, et al. v. South Carolina|
|Citations||372 U.S. 229 (more)|
|Prior history||Certiorari to the Supreme Court of South Carolina|
|Subsequent history||239 S. C. 339, 123 S. E. 2d 247, reversed.|
|State governments must protect First Amendment rights through the Fourteenth Amendment.|
|Majority||Stewart, joined by Warren, Black, Douglas, Harlan, Brennan, White, Goldberg|
|U.S. Const. amend. I|
Edwards v. South Carolina, 372 U.S. 229 (1963), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution forbade state government officials to force a crowd to disperse when they are otherwise legally marching in front of a state house.
The 187 petitioners consisted of African-American high school and college students who peacefully assembled at the Zion Baptist Church in Columbia, South Carolina on March 2, 1961. The students marched in separate groups of roughly 15 to South Carolina State House grounds to peacefully express their grievances regarding civil rights of African-Americans. The crowd of petitioners did not engage in any violent conduct and did not threaten violence in any manner, nor did crowds gathering to witness the demonstration engage in any such behavior. Petitioners were told by police officials that they must disperse within 15 minutes or face arrest. The petitioners failed to disperse, opting to sing religious and patriotic songs instead. Petitioners were convicted of the common law crime of breach of the peace.
Opinion of the Court
The Supreme Court held that in arresting, convicting and punishing the petitioners, South Carolina infringed on the petitioners’ rights of free speech, free assembly and freedom to petition for a redress of grievances. The Court stated that these rights are guaranteed by the First Amendment and protected by the Fourteenth Amendment from invasion by the States.
The Supreme Court argued the arrests and convictions of 187 marchers were an attempt by South Carolina to “make criminal the peaceful expression of unpopular views” where the marchers’ actions were an exercise of First Amendment rights “in their most pristine and classic form.” The Court described the common law crime of breach of the peace as “not susceptible of exact definition.”
While the majority in Edwards distinguished Feiner v. New York (1951), based on the absence of violence or threats from the petitioners' march to the state capital, Justice Clark stated that the breach of the peace convictions upheld in Feiner presented "a situation no more dangerous than that found here." Justice Clark noted that Edwards was more dangerous because Feiner involved one person and was limited to a crowd of about 80, whereas the Edwards demonstration involved around 200 demonstrators and 300 onlookers. He argued that the City Manager's action may have averted a catastrophe because of the "almost spontaneous combustion in some Southern communities in such a situation."
- Brown v. Louisiana
- Adderley v. Florida
- List of United States Supreme Court cases
- List of United States Supreme Court cases by the Warren Court
- List of United States Supreme Court cases involving the First Amendment
- List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 372
- "Edwards v. South Carolina - 372 U.S. 229 (1963)". Oyez: Chicago-Kent College of Law. Retrieved 15 January 2014.
- "Edwards v. South Carolina - 372 U.S. 229 (1963)". Justia: US Supreme Court Center. Retrieved 15 January 2014.
- Christmas, Gary. "Supreme Court Case: Edwards v. South Carolina, 1963". Howell & Christmas.
- "Edwards v. South Carolina". Cornell University Law School.
|Wikisource has original text related to this article:|
- Text of Edwards v. South Carolina, 372 U.S. 229 (1963) is available from: Findlaw Justia
- First Amendment Library entry for Edwards v. South Carolina
- Summary of case from OYEZ
|This article related to the Supreme Court of the United States is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.|