Effects of blue light technology
This article needs additional citations for verification. (September 2017) (Learn how and when to remove this template message)
This article contains content that is written like an advertisement. (March 2019) (Learn how and when to remove this template message)
Current academic consensus suggests there are no known health effects of day-to-day exposure to 400-450 nm blue light and it is not regarded as a cause of eye disease. It is illegal in the UK for a health practitioner to indicate to a patient that 400-450 nm blue light causes health effects. Société française de radioprotection, a member organisation of International Radiation Protection Association recommended installing welding curtains around fixtures fitted with 400-450 nm LED lamps instead of filter lenses as a precautionary measure in 2018. Harvard appears to have retracted their health claims regarding blue light in 2018.
Blue light is a range of the visible light spectrum, defined as having a wavelength between 400−495 nm. This short wavelength means that blue light is a type of high-energy visible light, defined as having a wavelength between 400 and 450 nm.
Blue light sources are becoming increasingly common in today's environment. Exposure to blue light comes from a variety of technologies including computers, televisions, and lights. Much of the exposure arises from light emitting diodes (LEDs). Today, many white LEDs are produced by pairing a blue LED with a lower-energy phosphor, thereby creating solid-state light (SSL). This is often considered “the next generation of illumination” as SSL technology dramatically reduces energy resource requirements.
Increasingly, people are exposed to blue light via everyday technology. The 2015 Pew Research Center study found that 68% of U.S. adults own a smartphone and 45% own a tablet. The study also found that levels of technology ownership vary by age; 86% of Americans 18-29 and 83% of those 30-49 own smartphones. Younger Americans also use high rates of blue light technologies. The survey of Common Sense Media in 2013 also demonstrated that 72% of children age 0–8 years old used mobile devices for watching videos and playing games. Moreover, 93% of teens owned a computer or had access to one at home. In contrast, computer ownership rates are lower for older Americans.
Effects of blue light on sleep and circadian rhythm
It is claimed the timing people receive light should be taken into consideration, as light can prevent sleep when absorbed at night from devices. A 93-page European Commission report concluded that, "exposure to light in the late evening, including that from LED lighting and/or screens, may have an impact on the circadian rhythm...At the moment, it is not yet clear if this disturbance of the circadian system leads to adverse health effects." The commissions findings were not specific to digital devices, LEDs or blue light but to light exposure in general.
Blue light exposure has been shown to impact the circadian rhythm. Natural exposure to blue light during the daylight hours boosts people's energy, alertness and mood. However, elongated exposure to the waves transmitted through screen devices during the evening can disrupt normal sleep schedules. Scientists believe this is caused by blue-light-sensitive intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells suppressing the production of melatonin and/or stimulating the suprachiasmatic nucleus of the hypothalamus.
The average sleep time has significantly decreased over the last two decades. Teens typically need to receive nine hours of sleep a night, but statistics reveal that less than twenty percent actually do receive enough sleep each night. People who do not get enough sleep each night tend to become more depressed, exercise less, and eat more because a hormone stimulates their appetite. Not getting enough sleep severely affects cognitive performance and overall health, and long-term sleep deprivation eventually leads to death. A study has discovered teenagers are more likely to exhibit behavior problems and have trouble paying attention during the day if they spend time on blue light screens at night.
Lack of sleep has consequences for teenagers. A study found that over seventy percent of teenagers get less than eight hours of sleep each night, and less than ten percent receive the recommended nine hours of sleep. Just one night of irregular sleep can drastically cause an imbalance in our bodies. Because blue light is the color of the sky, this may be the reason it is extremely sensitive to our eyes. Blue light has been found to delay sleepiness and can affect our circadian rhythm. Wearing yellow tinted sunglasses at night to avoid the blue wavelengths can ensure that you will become naturally tired and may help induce sleep quicker.[better source needed]
A research study measured the effect of iPads at full brightness. It was found that after one hour of use, there was no notable change in melatonin. However, after two hours of light exposure through the iPad, melatonin was drastically inhibited. Blue light has been found to affect teenagers more than adults. Teenagers were more alert and awake compared to adults, even when the teenagers were only exposed to a tenth of the blue light adults were exposed to. In another study, a group of people spent a week outdoor camping without any blue light devices. At the end of the week, the circadian rhythm of the entire group locked into the sunrise and sunset.
A Harvard research study indicated that blood sugar levels and leptin production become altered when the subjects’ schedules were shifted, changing their circadian rhythms. Two additional studies focused on the power of blue light's powerful suppression of melatonin compared to other light wavelengths.
Many people who are convinced they have sleep disorders average over six hours of sleep each night, and our bodies need significantly less sleep than that to remain functional. In fact, one study found that the risk of a stroke was doubled in middle-aged people and older who received more than eight hours of sleep a night. Dr. Irshaad Ebrahim, a director of the Sleep Centre in London believes most people are actually receiving sufficient sleep. Research has showed that the primitive age of ancestral humans actually received only about six hours of sleep each night without any negative impact on their health.
Use of computers with blue-lit screens in the hours immediately before bedtime can lead to fewer hours of deep sleep. Staying up late to study for a test may seem prudent, but research has found the practice can actually impede memory retention. A clinical psychological study found that students who were able to fall asleep earlier and sleep more received better grades than students who slept less. Additionally, as technology continues to grow, the sleep time for students decreases. It has been found that the average American sleeps an hour and a half less than the average sleep time half a century ago.
Alzheimer's disease affects the sleep of people who carry this disease by making it more difficult to fall and stay asleep. An experiment measured the effect of sleep on patients who had Alzheimer's by seeing how well they slept after being exposed to blue light in the evening compared to red light (which is believed not to impact our sleep cycle). In this study, when the patients were exposed to blue light, they were able to sleep better throughout the night. In addition, the patients were more active during the day and had more energy when they were exposed to blue light.
Blue light vs other forms of light on sleep
An experiment in this article[clarification needed] was performed to test this idea using three variables, blue light, yellow light, and darkness. Each group was exposed to light or in the case of the control group, darkness, for before bed. The results concluded that blue light inhibited signs of sleepiness while the control group showed expected signs of tiredness and the yellow light showed no significant effect on sleep. Overall, absorbing light during the day, as opposed to night, may make a difference in falling and staying asleep.
Public health concerns regarding prolonged exposure to blue light
On eye health
Concerns regarding blue LEDs are related to the difference between the photopic luminous flux and radiometric radiance. Blue LEDs, particularly those used in white LEDs, operate at around 450 nm. the perception of the brightness of different frequencies of light is defined according to the CIE luminosity function. Photometry is concerned with the study of the perception of visible light. Radiometry is concerned with the measurement of energy. At the outer edges of the range of light perception, the amount of energy as light required to register as a perception increases. The peak efficiency of light perception is defined at 555 nm, having a value of V(λ)=1. at 450 nm, V(λ)=0.038 or to put it another way, it requires more than 26 times the radiometric energy to perceive the same luminous flux as green at 555 nm. For comparison, UV-A at 380 nm(V(λ)=0.000 039) requires 25 641 times the amount of radiometric energy to be perceived at the same intensity as green, three orders of magnitude greater than blue LEDs. Studies often compare animal trials using identical luminous flux rather than radiance meaning comparative levels of perceived light at different frequencies rather than total emitted energy. As interest in LED backlighting has increased, so has the technology developed. studies often select low quality generic LEDs from little-known brands with a high proportion of blue light, especially selecting low CRI LEDs which are not suitable for either lighting or backlight technologies. LCD screens and LED lighting generally use much higher CRI LEDs as consumers demand accurate color reproduction. white LEDs are designed to emulate natural sunlight as closely as is economically and technologically possible. Natural sunlight has a relatively high spectral density of blue light, similar to LEDs, making exposure to relatively high levels of blue light not a new or unique phenomenon.
Light is transmitted to the retina through the lens. In humans, the amount of light transmitted by the lens is age-dependent. In young children, more than 65% of blue light is transmitted. This transmission rate decreases over time; at age 25, only 20% of blue light is transmitted to the retina. The decreased transmission of blue light occurs as our eyes’ lens naturally yellows and absorbs more blue light over time, thus preventing blue light from reaching the retina. As a result of this natural process, younger people are more susceptible to the effects of blue light.
One public health concern regarding exposure to blue light is based on the fact that children may be more susceptible to its effects. The concern is that not only are children the most vulnerable to the effects of blue light exposure but are also more likely to frequently use devices that emit blue light and will likely be exposed to more blue light sources over the course of their lifetime. The physicist and skeptic Sébastien Point, vice-president of non-ionizing section of French radioprotection society and member of Association française pour l'information scientifique, discusses the validity of blue light exposure values and concludes that these values could not be called into question by results of experiments made on rodent model, at least for healthy adults. However, regarding newborn infants, he concludes that "because of focal length and pupil diameter differences, limit for effective blue radiance for newborn infants could be around 2.8 times lower than for adults", what calls for particular caution with luminous toys. However, this author suggests that the higher transparency of the crystalline lens of newborn infants could increase risk from technologies such as halogen lamps and fluorescent lamps, which are rich in violet light, but not from LEDs, which are free from violet light. Point also worried  about the consequences for public health of using blue-rich lamps in pseudomedecines like chromotherapy, and asked for more regulation of pseudomedicines using lamps.
Although older adults absorb less blue light, possible eye damage from prolonged exposure may occur. The relative newness of blue light technology and its ubiquitous use in society creates questions for which there are no known answers yet. Continued research into the cause and effect of the dose-relationship of exposure to blue light and its negative health effects should be studied, and reasonable policy recommendations (such as limited screen time for young children) should be considered as prudent measures until more information is available.
IOLs (Intraocular lenses) are the ideal test model in-vivo on human models. They cannot be removed and are persistently active 24/7 owing to the fact that they are permanently implanted into the eye. A Cochrane Review found no evidence of any effect in 51 trials with yellow tinted intraocular implants. None of the studies reviewed provided any reliable statistical evidence to suggest any effect regarding contrast sensitivity, macular degeneration, vision, color-discrimination or sleep disturbances. A particular study claimed a large difference in observed fluorescein angiography examinations concluding they observed markedly less "progression of abnormal fundus autofluorescence"  however the authors failed to discuss the fact that the excitation beam is filtered light between 465-490 nm, is largely blocked by blue light filtering IOLs but not clear IOLs present in the control patients.
Aggressive advertisements may contribute to the public perception of the dangers of blue light. A sponsored post on NewGradOptometry promoted sales training from Essilor and their product range including the moral benefits, then a segue into the amoral nature of upselling unnecessary lenses, finishing by arguing that patients will go blind without blue filtering lenses. Essilor provided a pair of free glasses to a fashion blogger who did not need prescription glasses but nonetheless quoted a large number of Essilor marketing pitches including the blindness preventing promises of their blue light filtering technology. The Essilor website claims that you may experience vision loss without their special filtering lenses, whether you require prescription glasses or not. Zeiss offers a similar product yet does not make nearly as extreme claims.
Boots Opticians was criticised by the General Optical Council for their unsubstantiated claims regarding their line of blue light filtering lenses and fined £40,000 by the Advertising Standards Authority. Boots Opticians sold the lenses for a £20 markup. Trevor Warburton, speaking on behalf of the UK Association of Optometrists stated, "...current evidence does not support making claims that they prevent eye disease." Harvard University suggests without revealing its original research or having any listed authors, suggesting it is a paid advertisement and not a scholarly reference, that blue light adversely affects the circadian rhythm. They appear to have partially attempted to retract their previous health claims from 2012, "Light at night is bad for your health, and exposure to blue light emitted by electronics and energy-efficient lightbulbs may be especially so." The main article is not supported by any references or authorship but states that blue light could, "potentially cause disease.".
Apple and Microsoft's operating systems include the option to reduce blue light emissions by adjusting the color temperature to a warmer gamut. This blue light protection is also available through third-party software such as f.flux or Iris. ViewSonic monitors, for example, feature a more robust blue light filter and advertise it as a way to reduce eye strain and prevent the alleged health problems associated with blue light emission.
- Powell, Selina (May 26, 2017). "BOOTS OPTICIANS FINED £40,000 OVER MISLEADING BLUE LIGHT ADVERTISING". Optometry Today.
- "Opinion on Potential risks to human health of Light Emitting Diodes (LEDs)" (PDF). Scientific Committee on Health, Environmental and Emerging Risks SCHEER. June 6, 2018. p. 2.
- Point, Sébastien; Barlier-Salsi, Annick (June 1, 2018). "LED lighting and retinal damage, technical information sheets" (PDF). Société Française de Radioprotection. p. 8. Archived from the original (PDF) on June 14, 2018.
- "Blue Light Has A Dark Side". Harvard Health Letter. August 13, 2018.
- "Blue Light Has A Dark Side". Harvard Health Letter. August 13, 2018. Archived from the original on February 2, 2015.
- US. Department of energy. (2013). Solid-State Lighting Technology Fact Sheet (Optical Safety of LEDs). Available at: https://www.lightingglobal.org/wp-content/uploads/bsk-pdf-manager/82_opticalsafety_fact-sheet.pdf
- Monica Anderson (2015-10-29). "Technology Device Ownership: 2015". Pew Research Center: Internet, Science & Tech. Retrieved 2016-10-28.
- Kabali, Hilda K.; Irigoyen, Matilde M.; Nunez-Davis, Rosemary; Budacki, Jennifer G.; Mohanty, Sweta H.; Leister, Kristin P.; Bonner, Robert L. (2015-12-01). "Exposure and Use of Mobile Media Devices by Young Children". Pediatrics. 136 (6): 1044–1050. doi:10.1542/peds.2015-2151. ISSN 0031-4005. PMID 26527548.
- Madden, Mary; Am; Lenhart, a; Duggan, Maeve; S; Cortesi, ra; Gasser, Urs (2013-03-13). "Teens and Technology 2013". Pew Research Center: Internet, Science & Tech. Retrieved 2016-10-28.
- Cajochen, Christian; Frey, Sylvia; Anders, Doreen; Späti, Jakub; Bues, Matthias; Pross, Achim; Mager, Ralph; Wirz-Justice, Anna; Stefani, Oliver (2011-05-01). "Evening exposure to a light-emitting diodes (LED)-backlit computer screen affects circadian physiology and cognitive performance". Journal of Applied Physiology. 110 (5): 1432–1438. doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00165.2011. ISSN 8750-7587. PMID 21415172.
- Harris, Lynn. "End The No-Sleep Insanity." Redbook 216.3 (2011): 138. MasterFILE Premier. Web. 28 Feb. 2016.
- Ornes, Stephen. "For Kids: Slumber By The Numbers." Science News For Kids (2010): 2. Middle Search Plus. Web. 5 Mar. 2016
- Kim, Meeri. "Get Out of the Blue." The Hamilton Spectator (ON) 08 Sept. 2014: Newspaper Source Plus. Web. 28 Feb. 2016
- Peta, Bee. "Sleep: Are You Getting Too Much Of It?." Times, The (United Kingdom) (2015): 6,7. Newspaper Source Plus. Web. 5 Mar. 2016.
- Sparks, Sarah D. "Does 'Blue Light' Impair Students' Sleep? (Cover Story)." Education Week 33.14 (2013): 1. MasterFILE Premier. Web. 28 Feb. 2016
- Wallace, John. "Blue Light Helps Alzheimer's Patients Sleep." Laser Focus World 39.1 (2003): 8.Small Business Reference Center. Web. 4 Mar. 2016
- Harder, Ben. "Blue Light Keeps Night Owls Going." Science News 167.16 (2005): 253. Health Source - Consumer Edition. Web. 20 Feb. 2016.
- Holzman, David C. "Blue Alert." New Scientist 210.2811 (2011): 44. MAS Ultra - School Edition. Web. 21 Feb. 2016.
- "Product family data sheet:Cree® XLamp® XM-L LEDs" (PDF). Cree. p. 4.
- "Technical Data Sheet X42182(Z-power LEDs)" (PDF). pp. 12–13.
- "Colorimetry -- Part 1: CIE standard colorimetric observers". International Organization for Standardization. Retrieved December 9, 2018.
- "Kay & Laby;tables of physical & chemical constants;General physics;SubSection: 2.5.3 Photometry". National Physical Laboratory; UK. Retrieved December 9, 2018.
- Krigel, Arthur (2016). "Light-induced retinal damage using different light sources, protocols and rat strains reveals LED phototoxicity" (PDF). Centre de Recherches des Cordeliers. Université Paris Descartes, France.(Sorbonne University Faculty of Medicine, Physiology Department). Retrieved December 9, 2018.
- "Light-emitting-diode induced retinal damage and its wavelength dependency in vivo" (PDF). International Journal of Ophthalmology, Vol. 10, No. 2. Feb 18, 2017.
- "LM131A - Middle Power LED" (PDF). SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS. p. 12.
- Bush, Steve (April 7, 2014). "L+B: Samsung's flip chip LEDs and modules"."PRODUCT FAMILY DATA SHEET: 3535 G6 LEMWA33X Family". p. 12.
- Point, Some evidence that white LEDs are toxic for human at domestic radiance? , Radioprotection, September 2017
- Point, why you shouldn't be afraid of leds, https://www.europeanscientist.com/en/features/shouldnt-afraid-leds/
- S.Point, blue light hazard: are exposure limit values protective enough for newborn infants?, Radioprotection, July 2018.
- Point S, the danger of chromotherapy, skeptical Inquirer, 2017, http://skepdigest.awardspace.us/The_Danger_of_Chromotherapy.pdf
- "Artificial, blue-light filtering lenses in the eye for protecting the macula (back of the eye) after cataract surgery". Cochrane. May 22, 2018.
- Nagai, H.; Hirano, Y.; Yasukawa, T.; Morita, H.; Nozaki, M.; Wolf-Schnurrbusch, U.; Wolf, S.; Ogura, Y. (September 2015). "Prevention of increased abnormal fundus autofluorescence with blue light-filtering intraocular lenses". Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery. Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery. 41 (9): 1855–9. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2015.01.017. PMID 26471051.
- Bennett, Timothy J. (2017). "Equipment & Technique". Ophthalmic Photographers' Society.
- Bennett, Timothy J. (2017). "Fluorescein Fundamentals". Ophthalmic Photographers' Society.
- Geller, Matt (September 8, 2014). "Everything to Know About Blue Light and Crizal Prevencia". NewGradOptometry.
- "Crizal Prevencia: Just Another Marketing Gimmick?". 2014.
- "Lenses To Protect Your Eyes From Harmful Blue Light". Essilor. Retrieved December 9, 2018.
- "Blue Light: the good and the bad". October 16, 2017.
- Woodley, Matthew (May 31, 2017). "Optical chain fined $69,000 for misleading ad". Insight.
- "How to use Night Shift on your Mac". March 13, 2019.
- "Set your display for night time in Windows 10". March 13, 2019.
- "Blue Light Filters & Eye Strain - What you need to know". February 21, 2019.