|sRGBB (r, g, b)||(16, 52, 166)|
|CMYKH (c, m, y, k)||(90, 69, 0, 35)|
|HSV (h, s, v)||(226°, 90%, 65%)|
|B: Normalized to [0–255] (byte)
H: Normalized to [0–100] (hundred)
Egyptian blue, also known as calcium copper silicate (CaCuSi4O10 or CaOCuO(SiO2)4) or cuprorivaite, is a pigment used in ancient Egypt for thousands of years. It is considered to be the first synthetic pigment. The pigment was known to the Romans by the name caeruleum. After the Roman era, Egyptian blue fell from use and the manner of its creation was forgotten.
The ancient Egyptian word wadjet signifies blue, blue-green, and green.
Egyptian blue is a synthetic blue pigment made up of a mixture of silica, lime, copper, and alkali. Its color is due to a calcium-copper tetrasilicate CaCuSi4O10 of exactly the same composition as the naturally occurring mineral cuprorivaite. It occurs in Egypt during the third millennium BC and is the first synthetic pigment to have been produced there, continuing in use until the end of the Greco-Roman period (332 BC–395 AD). The term for it in the Egyptian language is hsbd-iryt, which means artificial lapis lazuli (hsbd). It was used in antiquity as a blue pigment to color a variety of different media such as stone, wood, plaster, papyrus, and canvas, and in the production of numerous objects, including cylinder seals, beads, scarabs, inlays, pots, and statuettes. It is also sometimes referred to in Egyptological literature as blue frit. Some have argued that this is an erroneous term that should be reserved for use to describe the initial phase of glass or glaze production, while others argue that Egyptian blue is a frit in both the fine and coarse form since it is a product of solid state reaction. Its characteristic blue color, resulting from one of its main components—copper—ranges from a light to a dark hue, depending on differential processing and composition. Apart from Egypt, it has also been found in the Near East, the Eastern Mediterranean, and the limits of the Roman Empire. It is unclear whether the pigment's existence elsewhere was a result of parallel invention or evidence of the technology's spread from Egypt to those areas.
History and background
The ancient Egyptians held the color blue in very high regard and were eager to present it on many media and in a variety of forms. They also desired to imitate the semiprecious stones turquoise and lapis lazuli, which were valued for their rarity and stark blue color. Use of naturally occurring minerals, such as azurite, to acquire this blue, was impractical, as these minerals were rare and difficult to work. Therefore, to appropriate the large quantities of blue color the Egyptians sought, it was necessary for them to manufacture the pigment themselves. It has also been found at Ayanis fortress in eastern Turkey.
The Egyptians developed a wide range of pigment varieties, including what is now known as Egyptian blue, which was the first of its color at the time of its development. This accomplishment was due to the advancement of Egypt as a settled agricultural society. This stable and established civilization encouraged the growth of a nonlabor workforce, including clerics and the Egyptian theocracy. Egyptian pharaohs were patrons of the arts and consequently were devoted to the advancement of pigment technology.
The earliest evidence for the use of Egyptian blue is in the 4th Dynasty (circa 2575–2467 BC), limestone sculptures from that period in addition to being shaped into a variety of cylinder seals and beads. In the Middle Kingdom (2050–1652 BC), it continued to be used as a pigment in the decoration of tombs, wall paintings, furnishings and statues, and by the New Kingdom (1570–1070 BC), began to be more widely used in the production of numerous objects. Its use continued throughout the Late period, and Greco-Roman period, only dying out in the fourth century AD, when the secret to its manufacture was lost. No written information exists in ancient Egyptian texts about the manufacture of Egyptian blue in antiquity, and it was only first mentioned in Roman literature by Vitruvius during the first century BC. He refers to it as coeruleum and describes in his work De architectura how it was produced by grinding sand, copper, and natron, and heating the mixture, shaped into small balls, in a furnace. Lime is necessary for the production, as well, but probably lime-rich sand was used. Theophrastus gives it the Greek term κύανος (kyanos, blue), which probably originally referred to lapis lazuli. Finally, only at the beginning of the 19th century was interest renewed in learning more about its manufacture when it was investigated by Sir Humphry Davy in 1815 and others such as W. T. Russell and F. Fouqué.
Composition and manufacture
Several experiments have been carried out by scientists and archaeologists interested in analyzing the composition of Egyptian blue and the techniques used to manufacture it. It is now generally regarded as a multiphase material that was produced by heating together quartz sand, a copper compound, calcium carbonate, and a small amount of an alkali (ash from salt tolerant, halophyte plants or natron) at temperatures ranging between 800 and 1,000 °C (1,470 and 1,830 °F) (depending on the amount of alkali used) for several hours. The result is cuprorivaite or Egyptian blue, carbon dioxide, and water vapor:
- Cu2CO3(OH)2 + 8 SiO2 + 2 CaCO3 → 2 CaCuSi4O10 + 3 CO2 + H2O
In its final state, Egyptian blue consists of rectangular blue crystals together with unreacted quartz and some glass. From the analysis of a number of samples from Egypt and elsewhere, the weight percentage of the materials used to obtain Egyptian blue in antiquity was determined to usually range within these amounts:
To obtain theoretical cuprorivaite, where only blue crystals occur, with no excess of unreacted quartz or formation of glass, these percentages would need to be used:
- 64% silica
- 15% calcium oxide
- 21% copper oxide
However, none of the analyzed samples from antiquity was made of this definitive composition, as all had excesses of silica, together with an excess of either CuO or CaO. This may have been intentional; an increase in the alkali content results in the pigment containing more unreacted quartz embedded in a glass matrix, which in turn results in a harder texture. Lowering the alkali content (less than 1%), though, does not allow glass to form and the resultant Egyptian blue is softer, with a hardness of 1–2 Mohs.
In addition to the way the level of the different compositions influenced texture, the way Egyptian blue was processed also had an effect on its texture, in terms of coarseness and fineness. Following a number of experiments, Title et al. concluded that for fine-textured Egyptian blue, two stages were necessary to obtain uniformly interspersed crystals. First, the ingredients are heated, and the result is a coarse-textured product. This is then ground to a fine powder and water is added. The paste is then reshaped and fired again at temperatures ranging between 850 and 950 °C for one hour. These two stages possibly were needed to produce a paste that was fine enough for the production of small objects. Coarse-textured Egyptian blue, though, would not have gone through the second stage. Since it is usually found in the form of slabs (in the dynastic periods) and balls (in the Greco-Roman period), these could have either been awaiting to be processed through a second stage, where they would be ground and finely textured, or they would have been ground for use as a blue pigment.
The shade of blue reached was also related to the coarseness and fineness of Egyptian blue as it was determined by the degree of aggregation of the Egyptian blue crystals. Coarse Egyptian blue was relatively thick in form, due to the large clusters of crystals which adhere to the unreacted quartz. This clustering results in a dark blue color that is the appearance of coarse Egyptian blue. Alternatively, fine-textured Egyptian blue consists of smaller clusters that are uniformly interspersed between the unreacted quartz grains and tends to be light blue in color. Diluted light blue, though, is used to describe the color of fine-textured Egyptian blue that has a large amount of glass formed in its composition, which masks the blue color, and gives it a diluted appearance. It depends on the level of alkali added to the mixture, so with more alkali, more glass formed, and the more diluted the appearance. This type of Egyptian blue is especially evident during the 18th dynasty and later, and is probably associated with the surge in glass technology at this time.
If certain conditions were not met, the Egyptian blue would not be satisfactorily produced. For example, if the temperatures were above 1050 °C, it would become unstable. If too much lime was added, wollastonite (CaSiO3) forms and gives the pigment a green color. Too much of the copper ingredients results in excesses of copper oxides like cuprite and tenorite.
The main component of Egyptian blue was the silica, and quartz sand found adjacent to the sites where Egyptian blue was being manufactured may have been its source, although there is no concrete evidence to support this hypothesis. The only evidence cited is by Jakcsh et al., who found crystals of titanomagnetite, a mineral found in desert sand, in samples collected from the tomb of Sabni (sixth dynasty). Its presence in Egyptian blue indicates that quartz sand, rather than flint or chert, was used as the silica source. This contrasts with the source of silica used for glassmaking at Qantir (New Kingdom Ramesside site), which is quartz pebbles and not sand.
Calcium oxide is believed to have been not added on its own in the manufacture of Egyptian blue, but introduced as an impurity in the quartz sand and alkali. It is not clear from this, then, as to whether the craftsmen involved in the manufacture realized the importance of adding lime to the Egyptian blue mixture.
The source of copper could have either been a copper ore (such as malachite), filings from copper ingots, or bronze scrap and other alloys. Prior to the New Kingdom, evidence is scarce as to which copper source was being used, but it is believed to have been copper ores. During the New Kingdom, evidence has been found for the use of copper alloys, such as bronze, due to the presence of varying amounts of tin, arsenic, or lead found in the Egyptian blue material. The presence of tin oxide could have come from copper ores that contained tin oxide and not from the use of bronze. However, no copper ores have been found with these amounts of tin oxide. It is unclear as yet, why there would have been a switch from the use of copper ores in earlier periods, to the use of bronze scrap during the Late Bronze Age. Reserves possibly had run out.
The total alkali content in analyzed samples of Egyptian blue is greater than 1%, suggesting the alkali was introduced deliberately into the mixture and not as an impurity from other components. Sources of alkali could either have been natron from areas such as Wadi Natroun and El-Kab, or plant ash. By measuring the amounts of potash and magnesia in the samples of Egyptian blue, it is generally possible to identify which source of alkali had been used, since the plant ash contains higher amounts of potash and magnesia than the natron. However, due to the low concentration of alkali in Egyptian blue, which is a mere 4% or less, compared to glass, for example, which is at 10–20%, identifying the source is not always easy. The alkali source likely was natron, although the reasons for this assumption are unclear. However, analysis by Jaksch et al. of various samples of Egyptian blue identified variable amounts of phosphorus (up to 2 wt %), suggesting the alkali source used was in actuality plant ash and not natron. Since the glass industry during the Late Bronze Age used plant ash as its source of alkali, there might have possibly been a link in terms of the alkali used for Egyptian blue before and after the introduction of the glass industry.
Amarna: In the excavations at Amarna, Lisht, and Malkata at the beginning of the 20th century, Petrie uncovered two types of vessels that he suggested were used in antiquity to make Egyptian blue: bowl-shaped pans and cylindrical vessels/saggers. In recent excavations at Amarna by Barry Kemp (1989), very small numbers of these “fritting” pans were uncovered, although various remaining pieces of Egyptian blue ‘cake’ were found, which allowed the identification of five different categories of Egyptian blue forms and the vessels associated with them: large round flat cakes, large flat rectangular cakes, bowl-shaped cakes, small sack-shaped pieces, and spherical shapes. No tin was found in the samples analyzed, which the authors suggest is an indication that use of scrap copper was possible instead of bronze.
Qantir: In the 1930s, Mahmud Hamza excavated a number of objects related to the production of Egyptian blue at Qantir, such as Egyptian blue cakes and fragments in various stages of production, providing evidence that Egyptian blue was actually produced at the site. Recent excavations at the same site uncovered a large copper-based industry, with several associated crafts, namely bronze-casting, red-glass making, faience production, and Egyptian blue. Ceramic crucibles with adhering remains of Egyptian blue were found in the excavations, suggesting again it had been manufactured on site. These Egyptian blue ‘cakes’ possibly were later exported to other areas around the country to be worked, as a scarcity of finished Egyptian blue products existed on site. For example, Egyptian blue cakes were found at Zawiyet Umm el-Rakham, a Ramesside fort near the Libyan coast, indicating the cakes were in fact traded, and worked at and reshaped away from their primary production site.
Connections with other vitreous material and with metals
Egyptian blue is closely related to the other vitreous materials produced by the ancient Egyptians, namely glass and Egyptian faience, and the Egyptians possibly did not employ separate terms to distinguish the three products from one another. Although it is easier to distinguish between faience and Egyptian blue, due to the distinct core of faience objects and their separate glaze layers, it is sometimes difficult to differentiate glass from Egyptian blue due to the very fine texture that Egyptian blue could occasionally have. This is especially true during the New Kingdom, as Egyptian blue became more refined and glassy and continued as such into the Greco-Roman period. Since Egyptian blue, like faience, is a much older technology than glass, which only begins during the reign of Thutmose III (1479–1425 BC),changes in the manufacture of Egyptian blue undoubtedly were associated with the introduction of the glass industry.
Analysis of the source of copper used in the manufacture of Egyptian blue indicates a relationship with the contemporaneous metal industry. Whereas in the earlier periods, it is most probable that copper ores were used, during the reign of Tutmosis III, the copper ore is replaced by the use of bronze filings. This has been established by the detection of a specific amount of tin oxide in Egyptian blue which could only have resulted from the use of tin bronze scraps as the source of copper, which coincides with the time when bronze became widely available in ancient Egypt.
Occurrences outside of Egypt
Egyptian blue was found in Western Asia during the middle of third millennium BC in the form of small artifacts and inlays, but not as a pigment. It was found in the Mediterranean area at the end of the Middle Bronze age, and traces of tin were found in its composition suggesting the use of bronze scrap instead of copper ore as the source of copper. During the Roman period, use of Egyptian blue was extensive, as a pot containing the unused pigment, found in 1814 in Pompeii, illustrates. It was also found as unused pigment in the tombs of a number of painters. Etruscans also used it in their wall paintings. The related Chinese blue has been suggested as having Egyptian roots.
Egyptian blue’s extremely powerful and long-lived luminescence under infrared light has enabled its presence to be detected on objects which appear unpainted to the human eye. This property has also been used to identify traces of the pigment on paintings produced as late as the 16th century, long after its use was assumed to have died out. The luminescence, in conjunction with the capacity of Egyptian blue to delaminate by splitting into nanosheets after immersion in water, also indicates it may have several high-technology applications, such as in biomedicine, telecommunications, laser technology, and security inks.
- Han purple and Han blue
- Maya blue
- Prussian blue
- Ancient Chinese glass
- List of colors
- Egyptian blue shades
- Maerz and Paul A Dictionary of Color New York:1930 McGraw-Hill Page 194; Color Sample of Sunset: Page 93 Plate 35 Color Sample L8
- Pagès-Camagna S, (1998) "Bleu et vert égyptiens en question: vocabulaire et analyses" in La couleur dans la peinture et l’émaillage de l’Egypte Ancienne, CUEBC, Ravello, 20–22 mars 1997 (Colinart S, Menu M, eds), Ed. Edipuglia, Bari, 51–59.
- Lee, L. & Quirke, S. (2000). "Painting materials". In P. Nicholson and I. Shaw. Ancient Egyptian materials and technology. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-45257-0.
- Nicholson, P.T. & Henderson, J. 2000, Glass. In: In: P. Nicholson and I. Shaw (eds.), Ancient Egyptian materials and technology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-45257-0
- Ingo, Journal of Archaeological Science 2013
- Chase, W.T. 1971, Egyptian blue as a pigment and ceramic material. In: R. Brill (ed.) Science and Archaeology. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press. ISBN 0-262-02061-0
- Vitruvius, De Architectura, Book VII, Chapter 11.
- Theophrastus, de Lapidibus (On Stones), section 55.
- Sir Humphry Davy (1815) "Some experiments and observations on the colours used in painting by the ancients," Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, vol. 105, pages 97–124. Reprinted in: The Collected Works of Sir Humphry Davy,... (London, England: Smith, Elder, and Co., 1840), vol. VI, pages 131–159.
- Tite, M.S., Bimson, M. & Cowell, M.R. (1987). "The technology of Egyptian blue". In M. Bimson & I.C. Freestone. Early Vitreous materials. British Museum occasional paper 56. London: British Museum. ISBN 0-86159-056-2.
- Tite, M.S., Bimson, M. & Cowell, M.R. (1984). "Technological examination of Egyptian blue". In J.B. Lambert. Archaeological Chemistry III. Advances in chemistry series 205. Washington, DC: American Chemical Society. ISBN 0-8412-0767-4.
- Jaksch, H., Seipel, W., Weiner, K.L. & El Goresy, A. (1983). "Egyptian Blue- Cuprorivaite, a window to Ancient Egyptian technology". Die Naturwissenschaften 70 (11): 525–535. doi:10.1007/BF00376668.
- Rehren, Th. & Pusch, E.B. (2005). "Late Bronze Age glass production at Qantir-Piramesses, Egypt". Science 305 (5729): 1756–1758. doi:10.1126/science.1110466.
- Rehren, Th. (2001). "Aspects of the production of cobalt-blue glass in Egypt". Archaeometry 43 (4): 483–489. doi:10.1111/1475-4754.00031.
- Kemp, B. 1989, Amarna Reports V. London: Egypt Exploration Society. ISBN 0-85698-109-5
- Weatherhead, F. & Buckley, A. 1989, Artists’ pigments from Amarna. In: B. Kemp (ed.), Amarna Reports V: 202–239. London: Egypt Exploration Society. ISBN 0-85698-109-5
- Rehren, Th., Pusch, E.B. & Herold, A. (2001). "Problems and possibilities in workshop reconstruction: Qantir and the organization of LBA glass working sites". In A.J. Shortland. The social context of technological change, Egypt and the Near East 1650–1550 BC. Proceedings of a conference held at St Edmund Hall, Oxford 12–14 September 2000. Oxford: Oxbow Books. ISBN 1-84217-050-3.
- Nicholson, P.T. & Peltenburg, E. 2000, Egyptian faience. In: In: P. Nicholson and I. Shaw (eds.), Ancient Egyptian materials and technology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-45257-0
- Verri, G, “The spatially resolved characterisation of Egyptian blue, Han blue and Han purple by photo-induced luminescence digital imaging”, Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, June 2009 Vol 394, Iss 4, pp 1011.
- McCouat, P, “Egyptian blue: the colour of technology”, Journal of Art in Society, http://www.artinsociety.com
- Accorsi, G et al, “The exceptional near-infrared luminescence of cuprorivaite (Egyptian blue)”, Chemical Communications, Issue 23, 2009, 3392.
- Bredal-Jørgensen, J, et al, “Striking presence of Egyptian blue identified in a painting by Giovanni Battista Benvenuto from 1524”, Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, Sep 2011 Vol 401 Iss 4, p 1433.
- Dayton, J. 1978, Minerals, metals, glazing & man, or, Who was Sesostris I? London: Harrap. ISBN 0-245-52807-5.
- Lucas, A. & Harris. J.R.  1999, Ancient Egyptian materials and industries. Dover books on Egypt. Mineola, N.Y. : Dover. ISBN 0-486-40446-3.
- Noll, W. 1981, Mineralogy and technology of the painted ceramics of ancient Egypt. In: M.J. Huges (ed.) Scientific studies in ancient ceramics. Occasional paper 19. London : British Museum, ISBN 0-86159-018-X.
- Rehren, Th. & Pusch, E.B. & Herold, A. 1998, Glass coloring works within a copper-centered industrial complex in Late Bronze Age Egypt. In: McCray, P (ed), The prehistory and history of glassmaking technology. Ceramics and Civilization 8. Westerville, OH: American Ceramic Society. ISBN 1-57498-041-6
- Riederer, J. 1997, Egyptian Blue. In: E.W. Fitzhugh, (ed.), Artists’ pigments 3: 23–45. Oxford university Press. ISBN 0-89468-256-3
- Tite, M.S. 1985, Egyptian blue, faience and related materials: technological investigations. In: R.E. Jones & H.W. Catling (eds.) Science in Archaeology : proceedings of a meeting held at the British School at Athens, January 1985. London : Leopard's Head. ISBN 0-904887-02-2.
- Warner, T.E. 2011, Artificial Cuprorivaite CaCuSi4O10 (Egyptian Blue) by a Salt-Flux Method. In: Terence E. Warner, Synthesis, Properties and Mineralogy of Important Inorganic Materials, 26–49. Chichester: Wiley. ISBN 978-0-470-74611-0.
- Wiedemann, H.G., Bayer, G. & Reller, A. 1998, Egyptian blue and Chinese blue. Production technologies and applications of two historically important blue pigments. In: S. Colinart & M. Menu (eds.), La couleur dans la peinture et lémaillage de l’Egypte Ancienne. Scienze e materiali del patrimonio culturale 4. Bari: Edipuglia. ISBN 88-7228-201-2.