The Einstein–Hilbert action (also referred to as Hilbert action) in general relativity is the action that yields the Einstein field equations through the principle of least action. With the (− + + +) metric signature, the gravitational part of the action is given as
where is the determinant of the metric tensor matrix, is the Ricci scalar, and is Einstein's constant ( is the gravitational constant and is the speed of light in vacuum).
If it converges, the integral is taken over the whole spacetime. If it does not converge, is no longer well-defined, but a modified definition where one integrates over arbitrarily large, relatively compact domains, still yields the Einstein equation as the Euler–Lagrange equation of the Einstein–Hilbert action.
The action was first proposed by David Hilbert in 1915.
The derivation of equations from an action has several advantages. First of all, it allows for easy unification of general relativity with other classical field theories (such as Maxwell theory), which are also formulated in terms of an action. In the process the derivation from an action identifies a natural candidate for the source term coupling the metric to matter fields. Moreover, the action allows for the easy identification of conserved quantities through Noether's theorem by studying symmetries of the action.
In general relativity, the action is usually assumed to be a functional of the metric (and matter fields), and the connection is given by the Levi-Civita connection. The Palatini formulation of general relativity assumes the metric and connection to be independent, and varies with respect to both independently, which makes it possible to include fermionic matter fields with non-integral spin.
The Einstein equations in the presence of matter are given by adding the matter action to the Einstein-Hilbert action.
Derivation of Einstein's field equations
Suppose that the full action of the theory is given by the Einstein–Hilbert term plus a term describing any matter fields appearing in the theory.
The action principle then tells us that the variation of this action with respect to the inverse metric is zero, yielding
Since this equation should hold for any variation , it implies that
is the equation of motion for the metric field. The right hand side of this equation is (by definition) proportional to the stress–energy tensor,
To calculate the left hand side of the equation we need the variations of the Ricci scalar R and the determinant of the metric. These can be obtained by standard text book calculations such as the one given below, which is strongly based on the one given in Carroll 2004.
Variation of the Riemann tensor, the Ricci tensor, and the Ricci scalar
To calculate the variation of the Ricci scalar we calculate first the variation of the Riemann curvature tensor, and then the variation of the Ricci tensor. So, the Riemann curvature tensor is defined as,
Since the Riemann curvature depends only on the Levi-Civita connection , the variation of the Riemann tensor can be calculated as,
Now, since is the difference of two connections, it is a tensor and we can thus calculate its covariant derivative,
We can now observe that the expression for the variation of Riemann curvature tensor above is equal to the difference of two such terms,
We may now obtain the variation of the Ricci curvature tensor simply by contracting two indices of the variation of the Riemann tensor, and get the Palatini identity:
The Ricci scalar is defined as
Therefore, its variation with respect to the inverse metric is given by
In the second line we used the metric compatibility of the covariant derivative, , and the previously obtained result for the variation of the Ricci curvature (in the second term, renaming the dummy indices and to and respectively).
The last term, , multiplied by , becomes a total derivative, since
and thus by Stokes' theorem only yields a boundary term when integrated. The boundary term is in general non-zero, because the integrand depends not only on , but also on its partial derivatives ; see the article Gibbons–Hawking–York boundary term for details. However when the variation of the metric vanishes in a neighbourhood of the boundary or when there is no boundary, this term does not contribute to the variation of the action. And we thus obtain,
at events not in the closure of the boundary.
Variation of the determinant
Jacobi's formula, the rule for differentiating a determinant, gives:
or one could transform to a coordinate system where is diagonal and then apply the product rule to differentiate the product of factors on the main diagonal.
Using this we get
In the last equality we used the fact that
which follows from the rule for differentiating the inverse of a matrix
Thus we conclude that
Equation of motion
Now that we have all the necessary variations at our disposal, we can insert them into the equation of motion for the metric field to obtain,
which is Einstein's field equation and
has been chosen such that the non-relativistic limit yields the usual form of Newton's gravity law, where G is the gravitational constant (see here for details).
When a cosmological constant Λ is included in the Lagrangian, the action
yields the field equations:
- ^ Richard P. Feynman, Feynman Lectures on Gravitation, Addison-Wesley, 1995, ISBN 0-201-62734-5, p. 136, eq. (10.1.2)
- Carroll, Sean M. (2004), Spacetime and Geometry, Addison-Wesley, ISBN 0-8053-8732-3
- Hilbert, D. (1915) Die Grundlagen der Physik (German original for free) (English translation for $25), Konigl. Gesell. d. Wiss. Göttingen, Nachr. Math.-Phys. Kl. 395-407
- Sokolov, D.D. (2001) , "Cosmological constant", in Hazewinkel, Michiel, Encyclopedia of Mathematics, Springer Science+Business Media B.V. / Kluwer Academic Publishers, ISBN 978-1-55608-010-4
- Feynman, Richard P. (1995), Feynman Lectures on Gravitation, Addison-Wesley, ISBN 0-201-62734-5
- Christopher M. Hirata Lecture 33: Lagrangian formulation of GR (27 April 2012).