Electronics right to repair

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

The right to repair electronics refers to government legislation that is intended to allow consumers the ability to repair and modify their own consumer electronic devices, where otherwise the manufacturer of such devices require the consumer to use only their offered services or void the product's warranty.

History[edit]

Background[edit]

The right to repair concept has generally come from the United States. Within the automotive industry, Massachusetts passed the United States' first Motor Vehicle Owners' Right to Repair Act in 2012, which required automobile manufacturers to provide the necessary documents and information to allow anyone to repair their vehicles. While not passed at the federal level, the major automobile trade organizations signed a memorandum to agree to abide by Massachusetts' law in all fifty states starting in the 2018 automotive year.[1]

Inspired by this approach, the Digital Right to Repair Coalition (DRRC), of whom later changed their title to The Repair Association (TRA), was founded in 2013 to carry the same principles to electronics.

Attempted legislation[edit]

With consumer electronics becoming increasingly more complex, many electronics manufacturers have instituted systems whereby the only means to repair a device or obtain repair parts would be through one of their authorized vendors or original equipment manufacturer (OEM). (For example, Apple, Inc. offers its Genius Bar to service and support products it sold.) Companies, like Apple, Inc., claim this is primarily to restrict the release of confidential trade secrets and other intellectual property, such as the blueprints for devices. Moreover, companies also risk third parties dismantling their monopoly on key components and after-sale servicing and repair, the former of whom could reverse engineer these components and offer them at a lower price to consumers. However, if disassembly of tangiable goods is outlawed for any third party, so is the right for consumers to repair said goods (even if the company has already hit insolvency or discontinues servicing).

The anti-competitive practice of requiring consumers to go to the manufacturer for repairs has generally been criticized as it prevents any type of third-party from servicing these devices, manufacturing compatible parts (that may offer more benefit to consumers, such as more environmentally-friendly manufacturing processes), and can stifle innovation.[2] Further, recycling of old electronic goods can be inefficient or impossible without such information.[3]

Manufacturers have also been able to succeed in using legislation like the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) to prevent consumers from tinkering with their devices. Some have argued that this restrictive approach by manufacturers creates planned obsolescence for consumer products, thus forcing consumers to upgrade their devices and assure revenues for manufacturers.[4] TRA, representing both repair shops and consumer tinkers, saw a need to protect consumers' rights. One of its first activities was to promote the Unlocking Consumer Choice and Wireless Competition Act in 2014, which repealed a ruling made by the United States Copyright Office that otherwise prevented consumers from unlocking their cell phones.

TRA worked with four states - South Dakota, New York, Minnesota, and Massachusetts - to introduce "Right to Repair" laws in those states between 2014 and 2016, which would require OEMs to provide the required information and documentation for consumers and third-party repair shops to repair their products. While New York introduced its bill in February 2015,[5] it did not see much progression by the last month it was up for consideration in the New York State Senate, and failed to pass. It was discovered that Apple had lobbied against the bill's passage.[2] The company had similarly lobbied to stop the Massachusetts bill.[3]

Right to repair movement[edit]

With knowledge that companies like Apple were fighting these bills in mid-2016, a larger "right to repair" movement began to grow, led by TRA.[6][7] The movement gained a boost from the farming sector, where many farmers found they could not legally repair their own tractors or other farm equipment purchased from companies like John Deere without using the manufacturer's own repair services at a high cost to them. The American Farm Bureau Federation lobbied to provide the necessary exemptions from the DCMA to allow farmers to repair their own tangiable equipment.[8] TRA continues to lobby for state bills in numerous states particularly in the midwest to give consumers the right to repair their equipment.[9] Companies like Apple, John Deere, and AT&T lobbied against these bills, and created a number of "strange bedfellows" from high tech and agricultural sectors on both sides of the issue, according to Time.[10]

In late 2017, users of Apple, Inc. older iPhone models discovered evidence that recent updates to the phone's operating system, iOS was purposely throttling the speed of the phone. Apple responded initially that the goal of the software was to prevent overtaxing the older models of lithium-ion batteries to avoid unexpected shutdowns of the phone.[11] Many blogs instilled on Apple users that Apple was purposely slowing down their phones to make users upgrade their phones[12][13]. In response, Apple allowed users to control the battery throttling feature (disabling the feature and allowing the phone to shut down under load, or let the feature work as intended) in a iOS update[14]. And to obtain service to replace batteries in out-of-warranty phones for a reduced cost of service (US$29 compared to US$79).[15] However, the "right to repair" movement pointed out that such a scenario could have been handled if Apple allowed consumers to purchase third-party batteries and possess the instructions to replace it at lower cost to the consumer.[16]

With new state Congressional terms at the start of 2018, seventeen states had introduced right-to-repair legislation by mid-January 2018;[17] California joined in with their own state bill introduced in March.[18] In response, by February 2018, the Association of Equipment Manufacturers and the Equipment Dealers Association, representing most of the major agricultural equipment manufacturers, agreed to a similar memorandum as the automotive industry to provide comprehensive information for their farming equipment to users by model year 2021.[19] However, in September 2018, the Equipment Dealers Association reached a compromise with the California Farm Bureau with a version of this memorandum that while equipment manufacturers will provide manuals, product guides, and diagnostic tools to interface with on-board software, thus allowing famers to make physical repairs, this does not extend to any of the actual software or computerized systems on the equipment. The Association asserts that they need to prevent unauthorized access to software to prevent users from changing the settings to operate in unsafe manners and to protect any software IP on the equipment, stating that the right to repair is not to be taken as a right for software abstraction. As the California Farm Bureau has agreed to the Association's terms, it is unlike that any right to repair legislation in California will include farm equipment.[20][21]

In April 2018, the Federal Trade Commission sent notice to six automobile, consumer electronics, and video game console manufacturers, later revealed through a Freedom of Information Act request to be Hyundai, Asus, HTC, Microsoft, Sony, and Nintendo,[22] stating that their warranty practices may violate the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act. The FTC specifically identified that informing consumers that warranties are voided if they break a warranty sticker or seal on the unit's packaging, use third-party replacement parts, or use third-party repair services is a deceptive practice, as these terms are only valid if the manufacturer provides free warranty service or replacement parts.[23] Both Sony and Nintendo released updated warranty statements following this notice.[24]

In April 2018, US Public Interest Research Group issued a statement defending Eric Lundgren over his sentencing for creating the ‘restore disks’ to extend the life of computers.[25]

The Library of Congress, as part of its three-year review of exemptions to the DMCA, approved an exemption in October 2018 that would allow for one to bypass copyright-protection mechanisms used in either land vehicles, smartphones, and home appliances for the ability to maintain ("to make it work in accordance with its original specifications and any changes to those specifications authorized for that device or system") or repair ("restoring of the device or system to the state of working in accordance with its original specifications and any changes to those specifications authorized for that device or system") the device. (83 FR 54010)[26]

References[edit]

  1. ^ Weins, Kyle (February 13, 2014). "You Gotta Fight For Your Right to Repair Your Car". The Atlantic. Retrieved March 8, 2018.
  2. ^ a b Turner, Karen (June 17, 2016). "Apple wants to kill a bill that could make it easier for you to fix your iPhone". The Washington Post. Retrieved March 8, 2018.
  3. ^ a b Beres, Damon; Campbell, Andy (June 9, 2016). "Apple Is Fighting A Secret War To Keep You From Repairing Your Phone". Huffington Post. Retrieved March 8, 2018.
  4. ^ "A "right to repair" movement tools up". The Economist. September 30, 2017. Retrieved March 8, 2018.
  5. ^ "3998--B". New York State Senate. February 25, 2015. Retrieved March 8, 2018.
  6. ^ Matchar, Emily (July 13, 2016). "The Fight for the "Right to Repair"". Smithsonian Magazine. Retrieved March 8, 2018.
  7. ^ Thompson, Andrew (September 6, 2016). "Advocates, Tinkerers Fight for Their 'Right to Repair' Devices". MSNBC. Retrieved March 8, 2018.
  8. ^ Rogers, Kaliegh (January 31, 2017). "The 'Right to Repair' Movement Is Being Led by Farmers". Vice. Retrieved March 8, 2018.
  9. ^ Grossman, David (February 16, 2017). ""Right to Repair" Is About a Whole Lot More Than iPhones". Popular Mechanics. Retrieved March 8, 2018.
  10. ^ Fitzpatrick, Alex (June 22, 2017). "Hand Me That Wrench: Farmers and Apple Fight Over the Toolbox". Time. Retrieved March 8, 2018.
  11. ^ Warren, Tom; Statt, Nick (December 20, 2017). "Apple confirms iPhones with older batteries will take hits in performance". The Verge. Retrieved March 8, 2018.
  12. ^ Kottasová, Michelle Toh, Ben Geier and Ivana. "Apple is facing lawsuits over iPhone slowdown controversy". CNNMoney. Retrieved 2018-07-14.
  13. ^ "Apple admitted it's slowing down certain iPhones". Vox. Retrieved 2018-07-14.
  14. ^ "You can now disable the feature that lets Apple slow down your phone, but should you?". Global News. Retrieved 2018-07-14.
  15. ^ Stevens, Matt (December 28, 2017). "Accused of Slowing Old iPhones, Apple Offers Battery Discounts". The New York Times. Retrieved March 8, 2018.
  16. ^ Koebler, Jason (December 21, 2017). "Apple's iPhone Throttling Will Reinvigorate the Push for Right to Repair Laws". Vice. Retrieved March 8, 2018.
  17. ^ ""Right to Repair" legislation has now been introduced in 17 states". Fast Company. January 18, 2018. Retrieved March 8, 2018.
  18. ^ Guntenburg, Chaim (March 8, 2018). "California becomes the 18th state to introduce right to repair bill". The Verge. Retrieved March 8, 2018.
  19. ^ Vogt, Willie (February 1, 2018). "Equipment companies, dealers commit to right-to-repair". Farm Futures. Retrieved March 8, 2018.
  20. ^ Koebler, Jason (September 11, 2018). "Farmer Lobbying Group Sells Out Farmers, Helps Enshrine John Deere's Tractor Repair Monopoly". Vice. Retrieved October 5, 2018.
  21. ^ Weins, Kyle; Chamberlain, Elizabeth (September 18, 2018). "John Deere Just Swindled Farmers Out Of Their Right To Repair". Wired. Retrieved October 5, 2018.
  22. ^ Kastrenakes, Jacob (May 1, 2018). "Microsoft, Nintendo, and Sony warned by FTC about potentially illegal product warranties". The Verge. Retrieved May 1, 2018.
  23. ^ Liao, Shannon (April 10, 2018). "FTC warns console and smartphone makers against limiting consumer warranties". The Verge. Retrieved April 10, 2018.
  24. ^ Kim, Matt (May 9, 2018). "Nintendo, Sony Update Their Warranty Following Warning From the FTC". USGamer. Retrieved May 9, 2018.
  25. ^ "E-waste recycler must serve 15-month sentence for selling discs with free Microsoft software". The Verge. April 25, 2018. Retrieved May 25, 2018.
  26. ^ Koebler, Jason (October 25, 2018). "In Groundbreaking Decision, Feds Say Hacking DRM to Fix Your Electronics Is Legal". Vice. Retrieved October 26, 2018.