Emelle, Alabama

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Emelle, Alabama
Location of Emelle in Sumter County, Alabama.
Location of Emelle in Sumter County, Alabama.
Coordinates: 32°43′47″N 88°18′51″W / 32.72972°N 88.31417°W / 32.72972; -88.31417Coordinates: 32°43′47″N 88°18′51″W / 32.72972°N 88.31417°W / 32.72972; -88.31417
Country United States
State Alabama
County Sumter
 • Total 0.21 sq mi (0.55 km2)
 • Land 0.21 sq mi (0.55 km2)
 • Water 0.00 sq mi (0.00 km2)
Elevation 259 ft (79 m)
Population (2010)
 • Total 53
 • Estimate (2016)[2] 50
 • Density 236.97/sq mi (91.56/km2)
Time zone Central (CST) (UTC-6)
 • Summer (DST) CDT (UTC-5)
ZIP code 35459
Area code(s) 205
FIPS code 01-23872
GNIS feature ID 0155060

Emelle is a town in Sumter County, Alabama, United States. It was named after the daughters of the man who donated the land for the town. The town was started in the 19th century but not incorporated until 1981. The daughters of the man who donated were named Emma Dial and Ella Dial, so he combined the two names to create Emelle. Emelle was famous for their great cotton. The first mayor of Emelle was James Dailey. He served two terms. The current mayor is Roy Willingham, Sr. The population was 53 at the 2010 census, up from 31 in 2000.

The town is known for being the site of the largest hazardous waste landfill in the United States, operated by Waste Management, Inc. That hazardous waste disposal facility was the subject of a case decided by the United States Supreme Court, Chemical Waste Management, Inc. v. Hunt, 504 U.S. 334 (1992).


Emelle is located at 32°43′48″N 88°18′52″W / 32.729882°N 88.314333°W / 32.729882; -88.314333.[3]

According to the U.S. Census Bureau, the town has a total area of 0.2 square miles (0.52 km2), all land.


Historical population
Census Pop.
1990 44
2000 31 −29.5%
2010 53 71.0%
Est. 2016 50 [2] −5.7%
U.S. Decennial Census[4]
2013 Estimate[5]

As of the 2010 United States Census, there were 53 people residing in the town. The racial makeup of the town was 94.3% Black and 5.7% White.

As of the census[6] of 2000, there were 31 people, 15 households, and 10 families residing in the town. The population density was 142.9 people per square mile (54.4/km2). There were 16 housing units at an average density of 73.8 per square mile (28.1/km2). The racial makeup of the town was 6.45% White and 93.55% Black or African American.

There were 15 households out of which 33.3% had children under the age of 18 living with them, 46.7% were married couples living together, 20.0% had a female householder with no husband present, and 33.3% were non-families. 33.3% of all households were made up of individuals and 6.7% had someone living alone who was 65 years of age or older. The average household size was 2.07 and the average family size was 2.60.

In the town, the population was spread out with 29.0% under the age of 18, 3.2% from 18 to 24, 22.6% from 25 to 44, 41.9% from 45 to 64, and 3.2% who were 65 years of age or older. The median age was 42 years. For every 100 females there were 63.2 males. For every 100 females age 18 and over, there were 57.1 males.

The median income for a household in the town was $5,833, and the median income for a family was $5,000. Males had a median income of $36,250 versus $23,333 for females. The per capita income for the town was $10,738. There were 66.7% of families and 61.9% of the population living below the poverty line, including 100.0% of under eighteens and none of those over 64.

Chemical Waste Management landfill[edit]

Emelle is home to the largest hazardous waste landfill in the United States, called the “Cadillac of Landfills”, owned by Chemical Waste Management, Inc. This town of just a few dozen residents, became a center for controversy on environmental racism.[7] Environmental racism is the idea that the majority of the nation’s hazardous chemical wastes are landfilled in African American, Hispanic and Native American communities. In 1978, Chemical Waste Management purchased a landfill permit of 300 acres (1.2 km2) near Emelle in Sumter County. In Sumter County, one-third of the residents live below poverty level, which makes it one of the country's most impoverished regions. Over 90 percent of the residents near the landfill are Black, which to some qualifies this as environmental racism.[8] This landfill has become the largest hazardous waste landfill in the United States and among the top in the world, as Waste Management, Inc. has landfilled 5 or 6 million tons of hazardous waste.[9] Most of the waste disposed of in the United States, due to the Superfund removal program, ended up at the landfill between 1984 and 1987. It is on top of the Eutaw Aquifer, which supplies water to a large part of Alabama.[10]

Key actors in this struggle were Chemical Waste Management, regulatory agencies, and Alabamians for a Clean Environment. Chemical Waste Management is the largest company in the hazardous waste industry, as it serves to more than 10 million residential customers and 1 million businesses.[11][12] Currently, the company is working on defining an environmental image by participating in many recycling projects. Regulatory agencies are groups responsible for environmental protection that want to establish facilities that can handle the nation's waste safely. Examples include the Alabama Department of Environmental Management and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The Alabamians for a Clean Environment (ACE) is a grassroots environmental group who wants to close down Chemical Waste Management. White women (such as Kaye Kiker) and their husbands formed the group.[13]

Residents and other concerned citizens held a demonstration in Emelle against the Chemical Waste landfill. This demonstration was based on the struggle in Warren County, North Carolina, where the idea of environmental racism and the need for environmental justice emerged. The Emelle demonstration marked the first time that blacks and whites in Sumter County joined together in a public protest over any political issue. Alabamians for a Clean Environment used techniques such as sign waving and name calling to draw attention to their cause. They also had access to the media and Attorney General Jimmy Evans, who became a powerful actor in their cause. Soon they attracted national attention and gained support from larger partisan organizations such as the National Toxics Fund Clearinghouse for Hazardous Wastes, the National Toxics Fund Campaign, the Sierra Club and Greenpeace. They did not achieve their goal of shutting down Chemical Waste Management.

Economic background[edit]

Emelle is located in the Black Belt soil region in Alabama. During the Civil War, this city played a large role in Alabama’s cotton plantation economy and about half of the residents were slaves. Cotton production kept the Black population in poverty and continued their dependence on the white man. The Civil Rights Act of 1964 brought changes to Emelle, and Blacks were elected to public office in 1978. Soon the economy began to change as government and business elites were the main people affecting land-use decisions. A general theme arose of polluting industries coming into poor minority communities where local community leaders had no input. The environmental risks were traded for jobs. Key local leaders supported Chemical Waste Management, as the counties budgets were increased $5.00 for every ton of waste buried in the county.[14] Once up and running, the dump has had many problems such as on-site fires, water contamination, environmental violations, dumping without permits, and unauthorized acceptance of dioxins.

What's happening now?[edit]

A state tax and a series of federal regulations majorly slowed business during the 90s. The company still operates today, but at a much smaller scale. Only 120,000 tons of waster per year are buried at the landfill. Certain chemicals and solvents are no longer allowed to be dumped, as well. Emelle is now dying, as many people lost their jobs when the landfill slowed down so much. This emulates the ongoing question with environmental justice debates: should the health and quality of life be sacrificed for jobs and economic security?[9]

Notable person[edit]


  1. ^ "2016 U.S. Gazetteer Files". United States Census Bureau. Retrieved Jul 17, 2017. 
  2. ^ a b "Population and Housing Unit Estimates". Retrieved June 9, 2017. 
  3. ^ "US Gazetteer files: 2010, 2000, and 1990". United States Census Bureau. 2011-02-12. Retrieved 2011-04-23. 
  4. ^ "U.S. Decennial Census". Census.gov. Archived from the original on May 12, 2015. Retrieved June 6, 2013. 
  5. ^ "Annual Estimates of the Resident Population: April 1, 2010 to July 1, 2013". Retrieved June 3, 2014. 
  6. ^ "American FactFinder". United States Census Bureau. Archived from the original on September 11, 2013. Retrieved 2008-01-31. 
  7. ^ Bullard, Robert D. "Environmental Racism in the Alabama Black Belt." Environmental Justice Resource Center (2000): n. pag. Web. 26 April 2010. <http://www.ejrc.cau.edu/envracismalablackbelt.htm>.
  8. ^ WIQ1725. "More minorities live around Emelle site Study finds disproportionate number of minorities around several of nation's biggest toxic facilities." Mobile Register (AL) 26 August 1994, AM, B: 1. NewsBank. Web. 26 April 2010.
  9. ^ a b Setterberg, Fred, and Lonny Shavelson. Toxic Nation: The Fight to Save Our Communities from Chemical Contamination. 1st ed. New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc., 1993. 216-245. Print.
  10. ^ Wanetick, Marvin. "The Superfund Stench." Progressive 49.11 (1985): 18-19. Academic Search Premier. EBSCO. Web. 26 April 2010.
  11. ^ Bullard, Robert D. "Dumping injustice." Mobile Register (AL) 26 January 2003, 05, D: 01. NewsBank. Web. 26 April 2010.
  12. ^ Herbert, Bob. "Poor, black and dumped on." Press-Register (Mobile, AL) 6 October 2006, 05, A: 15. NewsBank. Web. 26 April 2010.
  13. ^ Setterberg, Fred, and Lonny Shavelson. Toxic Nation: The Fight to Save Our Communities from Chemical Contamination. 1st ed. New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc., 1993. 216-245. Print.
  14. ^ "The governor's proposed fee on hazardous waste is really - political pollution. This time he's doing - Environmental demagoguery." Anniston Star, The (AL) 17 January 1990, Editorials: NewsBank. Web. 26 April 2010.

External links[edit]