Eparchy of Niš

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Eparchy of Niš
Location
Territorysouth-eastern regions of Serbia
HeadquartersNiš, Serbia
Information
DenominationEastern Orthodox
Sui iuris churchSerbian Orthodox Church
Established4th century
LanguageChurch Slavonic
Serbian
Current leadership
BishopArsenije Glavčić
Map
Map of Eparchies of Serbian Orthodox Church (including Orthodox Ohrid Archbishopric)-en.svg
Website
http://eparhijaniska.rs
Serbian Orthodox Cathedral in Niš
Serbian Orthodox church in Gornji Matejevac, dating from Middle Ages
Serbian Orthodox Monastery of Saint Nicolas in Kuršumlija, dating from the end of 12 century
Serbian Orthodox church in Niška Banja

The Eparchy of Niš (Serbian: Епархија нишка) is an eparchy (diocese) of the Serbian Orthodox Church with its seat in Niš, in Serbia. It has jurisdiction over the south-eastern regions of Serbia. Since 2017, Serbian Orthodox Bishop of Niš is Arsenije Glavčić.[1]

History[edit]

Eparchy of Niš is one of the oldest eparchies in the region. Modern name of the city of Niš was derived from the name of its predecessor, the ancient Roman city of Naissus. that belonged to the Roman province of Moesia and after its division to the province of Moesia Superior.[2] By the 3rd century early Christianity was already well established in that region.[3] Archeological excavations in ancient Naissus have discovered remains of early Christian churches and cemeteries.[4] The exact date of the foundation of ancient Bishopric of Naissus is not known, but it existed by the beginning of the 4th century. In that time, the city of Naissus belonged to the newly created province of Dacia Mediterranea with its capital in Serdica and in accordance to that, bishops of Naissus were under ecclesiastical jurisdiction of metropolitans of Serdica. Various bishops of Naissus from 4th to 6th century attended church councils and had prominent role in theological controversies of that time.[5]

After the division of the Roman Empire (395), the city of Naissus remained part of the Eastern Roman or Byzantine Empire. It was devastated by the Huns in 441 and later restored.[6] Up to the beginning of the 6th century, episcopal see of Naissus was already under supreme jurisdiction of Archbishopric of Thessaloniki, and in 535 it was transferred by the decree of emperor Justinian I (527–565) to newly created Archbishopric of Justiniana Prima. The city of Naissus was again devastated in 584, by the Avars and Slavs. Byzantine rule in that region finally collapsed at the beginning of the 7th century and the church life was later renewed after the Christianization of Serbs.[7]

After the Byzantine campaigns of 1018 and the establishment of imperial rule in Bulgarian and Serbian lands, by the orders of emperor Basil II an autonomous Archbishopric of Ohrid was created in 1019, under the supreme ecclesiastical jurisdiction the Ecumenical Patriarchate of Constantinople.[8] Imperial charters of 1019 and 1020 mention the Bishopric of Niš among eparchies that were placed under jurisdiction of the autonomous Archbishopric of Ohrid.[9] Until the beginning of the 13th century, archbishops of Ochrid were titled as metropolitans of all Bulgaria and Serbia.

During 11th and 12th century Byzantines and Serbs fought several battles over the city of Niš. Sometime around 1185, during the rule of Serbian "grand župan" Stefan Nemanja (1168–1196), Byzantine Empire lost Niš to Serbia, but Eparchy of Niš remained under the ecclesiastical jurisdiction of the Archbishipric of Ohrid. After 1203, Niš was conquered by Bulgarians and during 13th century Serbs and Bulgarians fought several battles over the city and its region.[10] By the end of the 13th century, the city war incorporated into medieval Serbia, and the Eparchy of Niš became part of Serbian Orthodox Church.[11]

By the end of 14th century much of the region of Niš was conquered by Ottoman Turks and by the second half of 15th century the conquest of Serbian lands was finalized and Serbian Patriarchate of Peć was suppressed.[12] Between 1526 and 1541, during the attempt of Metropolitan Pavle of Smederevo to restore the Serbian Patriarchate, Eparchy of Niš was also included in local ecclesiastical disputes with Archbishopric of Ohrid.[13] Finally in 1557, Serbian Patriarchate of Peć was restored and the Eparchy of Niš was returned to its jurisdiction, with bishops of Niš holding the honorary title of metropolitan.[14]

In 1766, when Serbian Patriarchate of Peć was abolished, the Eparchy of Niš and all other Serbian eparchies under Ottoman rule came under the jurisdiction of Ecumenical Patriarchate of Constantinople.[15] Bishop of Niš kept his honorary title of Metropolitan, as was also the custom in the Ecumenical Patriarchate. In 1878, region of Niš was finally liberated from the Ottoman rule and under incorporated into independent Serbia. In 1879, by the arrangement with the Ecumenical Patriarchate of Constantinople, Eparchy of Niš was transferred to the jurisdiction of the Metropolitanate of Belgrade.[16] After the end of the First World War, all Serbian ecclesiastical provinces united in 1920 and since then Eparchy of Niš remains part of the united Serbian Orthodox Church.[17]

Heads[edit]

This is an incomplete list of bishops and metropolitans of Niš.

Ancient Bishops of Naissus:
  • Cyriacus (before 343)
  • Gaudentius (around 343—350)
  • Bonosus (around 380—391)
  • Marcianus (around 409—414)
  • Dalmatius (around 467)
  • Gaianus (504—516)
  • Proiectus (around 553)

Later Bishops and Metropolitans of Niš:

Monasteries[edit]

Monasteries of the Eparchy of Niš are: Veta Monastery, Visoka Ržana Monastery, Ajdanovac Monastery, Divljana Monastery, Lipovac Monastery, Đunis Monastery, Sveti Roman Monastery, Naupara Monastery, Poganovo Monastery, Sićevo Monastery, Sukovo Monastery, Temska Monastery, Jašunja Monastery, Muštar Monastery, Monastery of the Holy Mother of God in Toplica, Monastery of St. Nicholas in Toplica.

See also[edit]

References[edit]

  1. ^ Communique of the Holy Assembly of Bishops (2017)
  2. ^ Papazoglu 1978, p. 197–204, 229–230.
  3. ^ Harnack 1905, p. 371, 375–376.
  4. ^ Mócsy 2014, p. 332.
  5. ^ Zeiller 1918, pp. 599.
  6. ^ Mócsy 2014, p. 350.
  7. ^ Curta 2001, pp. 125, 130.
  8. ^ Stephenson 2000, pp. 74–75.
  9. ^ Bulić 2013, pp. 221–222.
  10. ^ Ćirković 2004, pp. 43, 51.
  11. ^ Јанковић 1985, pp. 36–37.
  12. ^ Ćirković 2004, pp. 103–104.
  13. ^ Ćirković 2004, pp. 134–135.
  14. ^ Sotirović 2011, pp. 143–169.
  15. ^ Kiminas 2009, pp. 19, 27.
  16. ^ Kiminas 2009, pp. 21.
  17. ^ Kiminas 2009, pp. 22, 28.

Bibliography[edit]

External links[edit]