In logic, equivocation is an informal fallacy resulting from the use of a word in multiple senses throughout an argument leading to a false conclusion. Abbott and Costello's "Who's on first?" routine is a well known example of equivocation.
Some examples of equivocation in syllogisms (a logical chain of reasoning) are below:
- Since only man [human] is rational,
- and no woman is a man [male],
- Therefore, no woman is rational.
- A feather is light.
- What is light cannot be dark.
- Therefore, a feather cannot be dark.
In the above example distinct meanings of the word "light" are implied in contexts of the first and second statements.
- All jackasses have long ears.
- Carl is a jackass.
- Therefore, Carl has long ears.
Here the equivocation is the metaphorical use of "jackass" to imply a stupid or obnoxious person instead of a male donkey.
- Etymological fallacy
- Persuasive definition
- Principle of explosion
- Evasion (ethics)
- Fallacy of four terms
- False equivalence
- Mental reservation
- Plausible deniability
- When a white horse is not a horse
- Antanaclasis, a similar usage for stylistic or rhetorical purposes
- Damer, T. Edward (21 February 2008). Attacking Faulty Reasoning: A Practical Guide to Fallacy-Free Arguments. Cengage Learning. pp. 121–123. ISBN 0-495-09506-0.
- Fischer, D. H. (June 1970), Historians' fallacies: toward a logic of historical thought, Harper torchbooks (first ed.), New York: HarperCollins, p. 274, ISBN 978-0-06-131545-9, OCLC 185446787
- Curtis, Gary (n.d.). "Logical Fallacy: Equivocation". The Fallacy Files. Retrieved 17 July 2017.