Eric Horvitz

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Eric Horvitz, Microsoft portrait

Eric Joel Horvitz (/ˈhɔːrvɪts/) is an American computer scientist, and Technical Fellow at Microsoft, where he serves as the company's first Chief Scientific Officer.[1] He was previously the director of Microsoft Research Labs, including research centers in Redmond, WA, Cambridge, MA, New York, NY, Montreal, Canada, Cambridge, UK, and Bangalore, India.


Horvitz received his Ph.D and M.D. from Stanford University in 1991 and 1994, respectively.[2] His doctoral dissertation, Computation and Action Under Bounded Resources, and follow-on research introduced models of bounded rationality founded in probability and decision theory. He did his doctoral work under advisors Ronald A. Howard, George B. Dantzig, Edward H. Shortliffe, and Patrick Suppes.

He is currently Technical Fellow at Microsoft, where he serves as director of Microsoft Research Labs. He has been elected Fellow of the Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AAAI), the National Academy of Engineering (NAE), the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, and of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). He was elected to the ACM CHI Academy in 2013 and ACM Fellow 2014 "For contributions to artificial intelligence, and human-computer interaction."[3]

He was elected to the American Philosophical Society in 2018.[4]

In 2015, he was awarded the AAAI Feigenbaum Prize,[5] a biennial award for sustained and high-impact contributions to the field of artificial intelligence through the development of computational models of perception, reflection and action, and their application in time-critical decision making, and intelligent information, traffic, and healthcare systems.

In 2015, he was also awarded the ACM - AAAI Allen Newell Award,[6] for "contributions to artificial intelligence and human-computer interaction spanning the computing and decision sciences through developing principles and models of sensing, reflection, and rational action."

He serves on the Scientific Advisory Committee of the Allen Institute for Artificial Intelligence (AI2), the Computer Science and Telecommunications Board (CSTB)[7] of the US National Academies, and on the Board of Regents[8] of the US National Library of Medicine (NLM). He was nominated in 2019[9] to serve on the U.S. National Security Commission on AI.

He has served as president of the Association for the Advancement of AI (AAAI), on the NSF Computer & Information Science & Engineering (CISE) Advisory Board, on the council of the Computing Community Consortium (CCC), and chair of the Section on Information, Computing, and Communications of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS).


Horvitz's research interests span theoretical and practical challenges with developing systems that perceive, learn, and reason. His contributions include advances in principles and applications of machine learning and inference, information retrieval, human-computer interaction, bioinformatics, and e-commerce.

Horvitz played a significant role in the use of probability and decision theory in artificial intelligence. His work raised the credibility of artificial intelligence in other areas of computer science and computer engineering, influencing fields ranging from human-computer interaction to operating systems. His research helped establish the link between artificial intelligence and decision science. As an example, he coined the concept of bounded optimality, a decision-theoretic approach to bounded rationality.[10] The influences of bounded optimality extend beyond computer science into cognitive science and psychology.[11][12]

He studied the use of probability and utility to guide automated reasoning for decision making. The methods include consideration of the solving of streams of problems[13] in environments over time. In related work, he applied probability and machine learning to identify hard problems and to guide theorem proving.[14] He introduced the anytime algorithm paradigm in AI,[15][16] where partial results, probabilities, or utilities of outcomes are refined with computation under different availabilities or costs of time, guided by the expected value of computation.[17][18]

He has issued long-term challenge problems for AI[19]—and has espoused a vision of open-world AI,[20] where machine intelligences have the ability to understand and perform well in the larger world where they encounter situations they have not seen before.

He has explored synergies between human and machine intelligence.[21] In this area, he studied the value of displayed information,[22] methods for guiding machine versus human initiative,[23] learning models of human attention,[24][25] and using machine learning and planning to identify and merge the complementary abilities of people and AI systems.[26][21]

He also investigated the use of Bayesian methods to provide assistance to users.[27][28] he made contributions to multimodal interaction.[29] In 2015, he received the ACM ICMI Sustained Accomplishment Award[30][31] for contributions to multimodal interaction. His work on multimodal interaction includes studies of situated interaction,[32][33] where systems consider physical details of open-world settings and can perform dialog with multiple people.[34]

He co-authored probability-based methods to enhance privacy, including a model of altruistic sharing of data called community sensing[35] and stochastic privacy.[36]

Horvitz speaks on the topic of artificial intelligence, including on NPR and the Charlie Rose show.[37][38][39] Online talks include both technical lectures and presentations for general audiences (TEDx Austin: Making Friends with Artificial Intelligence). His research has been featured in the New York Times and the Technology Review.[40][41][42][43] He has testified before the US Senate on progress, opportunities, and challenges with AI.[44]

AI and Society[edit]

He has addressed technical and societal challenges and opportunities with the fielding of AI technologies in the open world,[45] including beneficial uses of AI,[46] AI safety and robustness,[47] and where AI systems and capabilities can have inadvertent effects, pose dangers, or be misused.[45][48][49][50] He has presented on caveats with applications of AI in military settings.[51]

Asilomar AI Study[edit]

He served as President of the AAAI from 2007–2009. As AAAI President, he called together and co-chaired the Asilomar AI study which culminated in a meeting of AI scientists at Asilomar in February 2009. The study considered the nature and timing of AI successes and reviewed concerns about directions with AI developments, including the potential loss of control over computer-based intelligences, and also efforts that could reduce concerns and enhance long-term societal outcomes. The study was the first meeting of AI scientists to address concerns about superintelligence and loss of control of AI and attracted interest by the public.[52]

In coverage of the Asilomar study, he said that scientists must study and respond to notions of superintelligent machines and concerns about artificial intelligence systems escaping from human control.[52] In a later NPR interview, he said that investments in scientific studies of superintelligences would be valuable to guide proactive efforts even if people believed that the probability of losing of control of AI was low because of the cost of such outcomes.[53]

One Hundred Year Study on Artificial Intelligence[edit]

In 2014, Horvitz defined and funded with his wife the One Hundred Year Study of Artificial Intelligence at Stanford University.[54][55] According to Horvitz, the gift, which may increase in the future, is sufficient to fund the study for a century.[55] A Stanford press release stated that sets of committees over a century will "study and anticipate how the effects of artificial intelligence will ripple through every aspect of how people work, live and play." A framing memo for the study calls out 18 topics for consideration, including law, ethics, the economy, war, and crime.[55][56] Topics include abuses of AI that could pose threats to democracy and freedom and addressing possibilities of superintelligences and loss of control of AI.

The One Hundred Year Study is overseen by a Standing Committee. The Standing Committee formulates questions and themes and organizes a Study Panel every five years. The Study Panel issues a report that assesses the status and rate of progress of AI technologies, challenges, and opportunities with regard to AI's influences on people and society.

The 2015 study panel of the One Hundred Year Study, chaired by Peter Stone, released a report in September 2016, titled "Artificial Intelligence and Life in 2030."[57] The panel advocated for increased public and private spending on the industry, recommended increased AI expertise at all levels of government, and recommended against blanket government regulation.[58][59] Panel chair Peter Stone argues that AI won't automatically replace human workers, but rather, will supplement the workforce and create new jobs in tech maintenance.[58] While mainly focusing on the next 15 years, the report touched on concerns and expectations that had risen in prominence over the last decade about the risks of superintelligent robots, stating "Unlike in the movies, there's no race of superhuman robots on the horizon or probably even possible.[59][60] Stone stated that "it was a conscious decision not to give credence to this in the report."[55]

Founding of Partnership on AI[edit]

He co-founded and has served as board chair of the Partnership on AI, a non-profit organization bringing together Apple, Amazon, Facebook, Google, DeepMind, IBM, and Microsoft with representatives from civil society, academia, and non-profit R&D. The organization's website points at initiatives, including studies of risk scores in criminal justice,[61] facial recognition systems,[62] AI and economy,[63] AI safety,[64] AI and media integrity,[65] and documentation of AI systems.[66]

Microsoft Aether Committee[edit]

He founded and chairs the Aether Committee at Microsoft, Microsoft's internal committee on the responsible development and fielding of AI technologies.[67][68] He reported that the Aether Committee had made recommendations on and guided decisions that have influenced Microsoft's commercial AI efforts.[69][70] In April 2020, Microsoft published content on principles, guidelines, and tools developed by the Aether Committee and its working groups, including teams focused on AI reliability and safety, bias and fairness, intelligibility and explanation, and human-AI collaboration.[71]



  • Horvitz, E. (December 1990), Computation and Action Under Bounded Resources (PDF) (Dissertation), Stanford, CA: Stanford University

Selected articles[edit]



  1. ^ Bonifacic, Igor (11 March 2020). "Microsoft appoints its first-ever chief scientific officer". Engadget. Retrieved 27 March 2020.
  2. ^ "Eric Horvitz". IEEE Xplore Digital Library. Retrieved 3 June 2019.
  3. ^ ERIC HORVITZ ACM Fellows 2014
  4. ^ "Election of New Members at the 2018 Spring Meeting | American Philosophical Society".
  5. ^ "The AAAI Feigenbaum Prize". AAAI. Retrieved 14 April 2016.
  6. ^ "ERIC HORVITZ - Award Winner". ACM. Retrieved 3 June 2019.
  7. ^ "Membership of the Computer Science and Telecommunications Board". The National Academies of Sciences, Engineeringm and Medicine. Retrieved 3 June 2019.
  8. ^ "Board of Regents". U.S. National Library of Medicine. Retrieved 3 June 2019.
  9. ^ Chappellat-Lanier, Tajha (14 November 2018). "Alphabet, Microsoft leaders named to National Security Commission on Artificial Intelligence". FedScoop. Retrieved 3 June 2019.
  10. ^ Mackworth, Alan (July 2008). "Introduction of Eric Horvitz" (PDF). AAAI Presidential Address.
  11. ^ Gershman, Samuel J.; Horvitz, Eric J.; Tenenbaum, Joshua B. (17 July 2015). "Computational rationality: A converging paradigm for intelligence in brains, minds, and machines". Science. 349 (6245): 273–278. Bibcode:2015Sci...349..273G. doi:10.1126/science.aac6076. PMID 26185246. S2CID 14818619.
  12. ^ Howes, Andrew; Duggan, Geoffrey B.; Kalidindi, Kiran; Tseng, Yuan-Chi; Lewis, Richard L. (1 July 2016). "Predicting Short-term Remembering as Boundedly Optimal Strategy Choice" (PDF). Cognitive Science. 40 (5): 1192–1223. doi:10.1111/cogs.12271. PMID 26294328.
  13. ^ Horvitz, Eric (February 2001), "Principles and Applications of Continual Computation", Artificial Intelligence, 126 (1–2): 159–196, CiteSeerX, doi:10.1016/S0004-3702(00)00082-5
  14. ^ Horvitz, Eric J.; Ruan, Y.; Gomes, C.; Kautz, H.; Selman, B.; Chickering, D.M. (July 2001), "A Bayesian Approach to Tackling Hard Computational Problems" (PDF), Proceedings of the Conference on Uncertainty and Artificial Intelligence: 235–244
  15. ^ Horvitz, Eric (July 1987). "Reasoning about beliefs and actions under computational resource constraints" (PDF). UAI'87 Proceedings of the Third Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence. Arlington, VA: AUAI Press: 429–447. ISBN 0-444-87417-8.
  16. ^ Horvitz, Eric (August 1988). "Reasoning under varying and uncertain resource constraints" (PDF). AAAI'88 Proceedings of the Seventh AAAI National Conference on Artificial Intelligence. AAAI Press: 111–116.
  17. ^ Horvitz, Eric J.; Cooper, Gregory F.; Heckerman, David E. (August 1989). "Reflection and action under scarce resources: theoretical principles and empirical study" (PDF). IJCAI'89 Proceedings of the 11th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence - Volume 2. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc.: 1121–1127.
  18. ^ Horvitz, Eric (December 1990). "Computation and Action Under Bounded Resources" (PDF) (Dissertation). Stanford, CA: Stanford University. Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  19. ^ Selman, B.; Brooks, R.; Dean, T.; Horvitz, E.; Mitchell, T.; Nilsson, N. (August 1996), "Challenge Problems for Artificial Intelligence", Proceedings of AAAI-96, Thirteenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Portland, Oregon: 1340–1345
  20. ^ Horvitz, Eric (July 2008), "Artificial Intelligence in the Open World", AAAI Presidential Lecture
  21. ^ a b Horvitz, Eric (Jan 13, 2020). "2019 Annual Meeting Plenary: People, Machines, and Intelligence". YouTube. Retrieved 2020-04-02.
  22. ^ Horvitz, Eric; Barry, Matthew (August 1995). "Display of information for time-critical decision making" (PDF). Proceeding, UAI'95 Proceedings of the Eleventh Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc: 296–305. ISBN 1-55860-385-9.
  23. ^ Horvitz, Eric (May 1999). "Principles of mixed-initiative user interfaces" (PDF). Proceeding, CHI '99 Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. New York, NY: ACM: 159–166. CiteSeerX doi:10.1145/302979.303030. ISBN 0-201-48559-1. S2CID 8943607.
  24. ^ Horvitz, Eric; Kadie, Carl; Peak, Tim; Hovel, David (March 2003). "Models of attention in computing and communication: from principles to applications" (PDF). Communications of the ACM. New York, NY: ACM. 46: 52–59. doi:10.1145/636772.636798. S2CID 2584780.
  25. ^ Markhoff, John (17 July 2000). "Microsoft Sees Software ´Agent´ as Way to Avoid Distractions". New York Times. Retrieved 3 June 2019.
  26. ^ Kamar, Ece; Hacker, Severin; Horvitz, Eric (8 June 2018). "Combining human and machine intelligence in large-scale crowdsourcing" (PDF). Proceeding, AAMAS '12 Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems - Volume 1. Richland, SC: International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems. 1: 467–474. ISBN 978-0-9817381-1-6.
  27. ^ Horvitz, E; Breese, J; Heckerman, D; Hovel, D; Rommelse, K (July 1998). "The Lumiere Project: Bayesian User Modeling for Inferring the Goals and Needs of Software Users". Proceedings of UAI, Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence: 256–265.
  28. ^ "Lumiere - Intelligent User Interface". YouTube. 2009-08-31 [1995]. Retrieved 2020-04-02.
  29. ^ "Information Agents: Directions and Futures (2001)". YouTube. 2020-02-21 [2001]. Retrieved 2020-04-02.
  30. ^ "ICMI Sustained Accomplishment Award". International Conference on Multimodal Interaction. Retrieved 2020-04-02.
  31. ^ Bohus, D; Horvitz, E (November 2009). "Dialog in the Open World: Platform and Applications" (PDF). ACM International Conference on Multimodal Interaction.
  32. ^ Bohus, D; Horvitz, E (2019). "Situated Interaction". The Handbook of Multimodal-Multisensor Interfaces, Volume 3. Association for Computing Machinery and Morgan & Claypool. pp. 105–143. ISBN 978-1-970001-75-4.
  33. ^ "Elevating human-computer interaction to a new level of sophistication". YouTube. 2014-04-08. Retrieved 2020-04-02.
  34. ^ Bohus, D; Horvitz, E (September 2009). "Models for multiparty engagement in open-world dialog" (PDF). SIGDIAL '09: Proceedings of the SIGDIAL 2009 Conference: The 10th Annual Meeting of the Special Interest Group on Discourse and Dialogue: 225–234. doi:10.3115/1708376.1708409. ISBN 9781932432640. S2CID 2125746.
  35. ^ Krause, A.; Horvitz, E.; Kansal, A.; Zhao, F. (April 2008), "Toward Community Sensing", Proceedings of IPSN 2008
  36. ^ Singla, A.; Horvitz, E.; Kamar, E.; White, R.W. (July 2014), "Stochastic Privacy" (PDF), AAAI, arXiv:1404.5454, Bibcode:2014arXiv1404.5454S
  37. ^ Hansen, Liane (21 March 2009). "Meet Laura, Your Virtual Personal Assistant". NPR. Retrieved 16 March 2011.
  38. ^ Kaste, Martin (11 Jan 2011). "The Singularity: Humanity's Last Invention?". NPR. Retrieved 14 Feb 2011.
  39. ^ Rose, Charlie. "A panel discussion about Artificial Intelligence". Archived from the original on 2011-02-13. Retrieved 2011-03-12.
  40. ^ Markoff, John (10 April 2008). "Microsoft Introduces Tool for Avoiding Traffic Jams". New York Times. Retrieved 16 March 2011.
  41. ^ Markoff, John (17 July 2000). "Microsoft Sees Software 'Agent' as Way to Avoid Distractions". New York Times. Retrieved 16 March 2011.
  42. ^ Lohr, Steve, and Markoff, John (24 June 2010). "Smarter Than You Think: Computers Learn to Listen, and Some Talk Back". New York Times. Retrieved 12 March 2011.
  43. ^ Waldrop, M. Mitchell (March–April 2008). "TR10: Modeling Surprise". Technology Review. Retrieved 12 March 2011.
  44. ^ Horvitz, Eric (30 November 2016). "Reflections on the Status and Future of Artificial Intelligence" (PDF). Retrieved 3 June 2019.
  45. ^ a b Horvitz, Eric (7 July 2017). "AI, people, and society". Science. 357 (6346): 7. Bibcode:2017Sci...357....7H. doi:10.1126/science.aao2466. PMID 28684472.
  46. ^ "AI for Social Good (2016): Keynote AI in Support of People and Society". YouTube. 2016-06-13. Retrieved 2020-04-20.
  47. ^ Horvitz, Eric (2016-06-27). "Reflections on Safety and Artificial Intelligence" (PDF). Retrieved 2020-04-20.
  48. ^ Dietterich, Thomas G; Horvitz, Eric J. (October 2015). "Rise of Concerns about AI: Reflections and Directions" (PDF). Communications of the ACM. 58 (10): 38–40. doi:10.1145/2770869.
  49. ^ "Conference on Ethics & AI: Keynote Session". YouTube. 2018-04-09. Retrieved 2020-04-20.
  50. ^ Horvitz, Eric (2017-03-28). "The Long View: AI Directions, Challenges, and Futures". YouTube. Retrieved 2020-04-20.
  51. ^ "Keynote Address, Eric Horvitz: AI Advances, Aspirations—and Concerns". YouTube. 2019-11-15. Retrieved 2020-04-20.
  52. ^ a b Markoff, John (26 July 2009). "Scientists Worry Machines May Outsmart Man". York Times.
  53. ^ Siegel, Robert (11 January 2011). "The Singularity: Humanity's Last Invention?". NPR.
  54. ^ You, Jia (9 January 2015). "A 100-year study of artificial intelligence? Microsoft Research's Eric Horvitz explains". Science.
  55. ^ a b c d Markoff, John (15 December 2014). "Study to Examine Effects of Artificial Intelligence". The New York Times. Retrieved 1 October 2016.
  56. ^ "One-Hundred Year Study of Artificial Intelligence: Reflections and Framing". Eric Horvitz. 2014. Retrieved 1 October 2016.
  57. ^ "Report: Artificial intelligence to transform urban cities". Houston Chronicle. 1 September 2016. Retrieved 1 October 2016.
  58. ^ a b Dussault, Joseph (4 September 2016). "AI in the real world: Tech leaders consider practical issues". Christian Science Monitor. Retrieved 1 October 2016.
  59. ^ a b Peter Stone et al. "Artificial Intelligence and Life in 2030." One Hundred Year Study on Artificial Intelligence: Report of the 2015-2016 Study Panel, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, September 2016. Doc: Accessed: October 1, 2016.
  60. ^ Knight, Will (1 September 2016). "Artificial intelligence wants to be your bro, not your foe". MIT Technology Review. Retrieved 1 October 2016.
  61. ^ "Report on Algorithmic Risk Assessment Tools in the U.S. Criminal Justice System". The Partnership on AI. 2019-04-23. Retrieved 2020-04-24.
  62. ^ "Bringing Facial Recognition Systems To Light". The Partnership on AI. 2020-02-18. Retrieved 2020-04-24.
  63. ^ "AI, Labor, and the Economy Case Study Compendium". The Partnership on AI. 2019-04-30. Retrieved 2020-04-24.
  64. ^ "Introducing SafeLife: Safety Benchmarks for Reinforcement Learning". The Partnership on AI. 2019-12-04. Retrieved 2020-04-24.
  65. ^ "AI and Media Integrity Steering Committee". The Partnership on AI. 2019-12-05. Retrieved 2020-04-24.
  66. ^ "About ML". The Partnership on AI. Retrieved 2020-04-24.
  67. ^ Nadella, Satya (2018-03-29). "Satya Nadella email to employees: Embracing our future: Intelligent Cloud and Intelligent Edge". Microsoft Stories. Retrieved 3 June 2019.
  68. ^ "Microsoft #TechTalk: AI and Ethics". YouTube. 2019-07-17. Retrieved 2020-04-15.
  69. ^ Boyle, Alan (9 April 2018). "Microsoft is turning down some sales over AI ethics, top researcher Eric Horvitz says". GeekWire. Retrieved 3 June 2019.
  70. ^ "Conference on Ethics & AI: Keynote Session". YouTube. Carnegie Mellon University. 9 April 2018. Retrieved 3 June 2019.
  71. ^ "Responsible AI principles from Microsoft". Microsoft Artificial Intelligence. Retrieved 2020-04-15.

External links[edit]