Erie Gauge War
|Date||December 7, 1853 - February 1, 1854|
|Location||Pennsylvania, United States|
|Also known as||Erie Railroad War|
The Erie Gauge War (sometimes called the Erie Railroad War) was a conflict between the citizens of Erie, Pennsylvania, and two railroad companies over the standardization of the track gauge between Erie and the New York border. It started on December 7, 1853, and ended on February 1, 1854.
In 1849, the Erie and North East Railroad started laying track east from Erie to the New York–Pennsylvania border at a gauge of 6 ft (1,829 mm). At the same time, the Franklin Canal Company was laying track west from Erie to the Ohio–Pennsylvania border and the Buffalo and State Line Railroad was laying track from Buffalo to the New York border, both were at a gauge of 4 ft 10 in (1,473 mm) (Ohio gauge). On November 23, 1852, the first train left Erie heading to Ashtabula, Ohio, and on January 19, 1852, the first train from New York state arrived in Erie. A passenger traveling from Buffalo to Cleveland would be forced to change trains at the Pennsylvania border because of the different gauges. Only 20 miles (32 km) down the road in Erie, the passenger would again have to change trains. The process of having to change trains repeatedly would result in lengthy delays, often causing passengers to miss connecting trains and then to be forced to stay in Erie.
The citizens of Erie enjoyed being an "enforced stopping place," as they made big profits from the transferring of freight from one train to another and from passengers having to buy food at Erie's restaurants or street vendors (leading the conflict to sometimes be referred to as the "Peanut War," as Erie's peanut sellers would be the hardest hit by the lack of passengers). The owners of the Buffalo and State Line Railroad were able to acquire two thirds of the Erie and North East's stock, and on November 16, 1853, they made the decision to re-lay the 6 ft (1,829 mm) track between Erie and the New York border as Ohio gauge, but four months earlier, to try to prevent the change, Erie's city council had enacted ordinances barring the railroads from crossing the city's streets. On November 26, 1853, the council was reconvened when railroad ties were found being laid in the preparation for the gauge change. The council passed an ordinance to allow the mayor to call out the city's police to take down any of the railroad bridges that crossed the city's streets "in order to preserve the present railroad gauge."
On December 7, 1853, after swearing in 150 "special police constables", Mayor Alfred King led the police to the railroad bridge crossing State and French streets and, where engineers had marked the edges of the streets on the bridges, had sections of the bridges cut out. That evening, 7 miles (11 km) away in town of Harborcreek, its citizens decided to pass its own ordinances and then proceeded to tear up tracks along the highway. Three days later, tracks of the new gauge were completed up to the city limits and that night the people of Harbor Creek tore out the tracks again, knocked down a bridge, and even ploughed up a level crossing. An injunction was obtained by the railroad from the United States Circuit Court in Pittsburgh and a United States Marshal was dispatched to Harborcreek. Upon arriving in Harborcreek, the marshal served it to one of the officials of Harborcreek and pointed out the seal of the United States. The official promptly threw it on the ground and stomped it with his heel and declaring the heelmark "the seal of Harborcreek."
The most serious incident occurred on December 27, 1853, when a train of railroad officials and workers was stopped outside of Harborcreek by a crowd of people ripping up the tracks. An official shot at one the men in the crowd and knocked him unconscious. The crowd, who believed the man to be dead, chased the official back on to his train. After two or three members of the crowd forced their way on to the train, the train reversed and "headed at full speed for the state line". Once across the border, the train stopped, and stowaways from Harborcreek were sent back over border into Pennsylvania.
Finally, on February 1, 1854, the railroad ran a train through Erie without change. But civil disturbances continued for years. Townspeople were assaulted, the local newspaper was torn down and the ruins burnt, and the Presbyterian church split in two. The matter caused such hard feelings that people avoided discussing it for years afterwards in order to avoid starting arguments.
Pennsylvania holds the key to this important link of connexion between the East and the West, and I most unhesitatingly say, that where no principle of amity or commerce is to be violated, it is the right and the duty of the State to turn her natural advantages to the promotion of the views and welfare of her own people.
|“||Let Erie be avoided by all travelers until grass shall grow in her streets, and till her pie-men in despair shall move away to some other city.||”|
|— Horace Greeley, New York Tribune|
Although the governor and state of Pennsylvania agreed with Erie's objectives, people in other states criticized Pennsylvania for its "selfishness". The United States Representative from Ohio, Edward Wade, suggested that Pennsylvania's nickname be changed to the "Shylock State" because it "demanded a 'pound of flesh' from all who passed its borders".
On December 26, 1853, Horace Greeley, editor of the New York Tribune, had to travel through Erie on his way to Chicago and had to travel from Harborcreek to Erie in an open sleigh "through a cutting storm of wind, snow, and sleet". Greeley had hoped to be able to give a lecture in Adrian, Michigan, that same day "but that could not now be, for the Kingdom of Erie forbade it".
On January 28, the Pennsylvania General Assembly passed legislation maintaining "the break at Erie" and repealing the charter for the Franklin Canal Company. Governor Bigler appointed future governor William F. Packer to state superintendent and personally took control of the Franklin Canal Company. With Bigler in Erie, the tracks and bridges of the Erie and North East were replaced without any difficulty.
- Wellejus, Edward (1980). Erie: Chronicle of a Great Lakes City. Woodland Hills, CA: Windsor Publications. ISBN 0-89781-007-4.
- Reed, p. 352.
- Rhodes, p. 20.
- Kent, p. 254.
- Rhodes, p. 21.
- Reed, pp. 352–353.
- Reed, p. 354.
- Rhodes, p. 22
- Kent, p. 253
- Kent, p. 264.
- Davis, Earle, "When Erie Fought the Railroad," Railroad Stories Magazine, January 1933, at 42. "A union station was built at Erie, but the feud dragged on with occasional outbreaks until 1865, when it was forgotten in the larger issues of the Civil War."
- Frank Spearman, "The Famous Erie War" in Moody's Magazine, 1904, p. 234-237.
- Egle, William Henry (1902). Pennsylvania Archives. 4. VII. Harrisburg: State of Pennsylvania. pp. 651.
- Congressional Globe, House of Representatives, 33rd Congress, 1st Session, 230.
- Most people had to walk the seven mile gap left by the Rippers, even in the dead of winter "with icy winds sweeping across Lake Erie...Many had feet, hands and faces frostbitten. One man was frozen to death....Embittered tourists stumbled through the snow afoot, dragging their luggage with them whenever it was humanly possible rather than buy anything in Erie." Davis, Earle, "When Erie Fought the Railroad, Railroad Stories Magazine January 1933, at 40.
- Kent, p. 262.
- Rhodes, p. 23.
- Kent, p. 269.
- Kent, Donald H (October 1948). "The Erie War of the Gauges" (PDF). Pennsylvania History. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. 15 (4): 253–275. Retrieved February 1, 2011.
- Reed, John Elmer (1925). History of Erie County. Topeka, Kansas: Historical Publishing Company. OCLC 2566729.
- Rhodes, James Ford (1900). History of the United States from the compromise of 1850. 3. New York, New York: Harper & Brothers.