Jump to content

Essex School of discourse analysis

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 81.249.72.89 (talk) at 21:27, 7 December 2015. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

The Essex School constitutes a variety of discourse analysis, one that combines theoretical sophistication – mainly due to its reliance on the post-structuralist and psychoanalytic traditions and, in particular, on the work of Lacan, Foucault, Barthes, Derrida, etc. – with analytical precision,[verification needed] since it focuses predominantly on an in-depth analysis of political discourses in late modernity.

Founding figures of this approach are Ernesto Laclau and Chantal Mouffe, two post-Marxist political theorists, who, disillusioned with economic reductionism, tried, since the 1970s, to reinterpret Gramsci’s theory of hegemony to highlight the role of meaning and of processes of interpellation and identification in the creation of political identities and in the articulation and sedimentation of political discourses and hegemonic orders. The paradigmatic formulation of this innovative orientation and of its various conceptual innovations can be found in Laclau’s and Mouffe’s Hegemony and Socialist Strategy, first published in 1985, as well as in many subsequent contributions of the two thinkers.[1]

The approach developed by Laclau and Mouffe and the theoretical traditions influencing their thought – mainly Saussurean linguistics, Lacanian psychoanalysis and deconstruction – provided the teaching backbone of the graduate programme in Ideology and Discourse Analysis Laclau founded at the University of Essex in the early 1980s.[2] Already from its inception, the programme attracted many MA and PhD students from around the globe, especially from Argentina, Mexico, Greece, Denmark, Spain, the US and the UK. Many PhD theses further developing Laclau’s and Mouffe’s discourse theory and/or applying it in the empirical analysis of concrete empirical cases have since been completed. Graduates of the programme are now employed by universities in many parts of the world, while the programme itself is run by three members of staff at Essex: Aletta Norval, David Howarth and Jason Glynos, all ex-PhD students of Laclau. Academics associated with the programme have also set up a World Network in Ideology and Discourse Analysis,[3] which provides a web-based channel of communication between its 203 registered members and has also organized the Inaugural World Conference in Ideology and Discourse Analysis, which took place from 8-10 September 2008 at Roskilde University, Denmark, with Ernesto Laclau as keynote speaker.[4]

Apart from setting up a distinct graduate programme, now in its third decade, three other factors are indicative of the increasing international recognition and the gradual institutionalization of the research tradition initiated by Laclau and Mouffe: (i) The activities of the Centre for Theoretical Studies in the Humanities and the Social Sciences, also founded by Laclau at the University of Essex (and now co-directed by Norval and Howarth), which functioned as the intellectual hub of the Ideology and Discourse Analysis group;[5] (ii) The publication, from 2000 onwards, of a series of monographs, edited collections and textbooks by members of the group, some of them based on the doctoral research conducted within the programme;[6] (iii) The inclusion of the orientation developed by Laclau and Mouffe and their students as a distinct research direction within the field of discourse analysis in textbooks and introductions to the field published by independent scholars.[7]

As a result of all these developments, the distinct identity of the group and of its research output gradually triggered a process of naming. From 2003 onwards, when critics wanted to refer to the work of members of the group, they used the phrase ‘the Essex School’,[8] which is now widely used by both members of the group and ‘outsiders’.[9]

The Essex School does not limit the research direction of its ‘members’, each one of whom develops her or his own orientation independently; it offers, however, a loose framework within which a multitude of theoretical and political interventions can flourish, enriching the original vision of Laclau and Mouffe.

Members

References

  1. ^ See Laclau, Ernesto & Mouffe, Chantal, Hegemony and Socialist Strategy, London: Verso, 1985.
  2. ^ See the Ideology and Discourse Analysis programme website: http://www.essex.ac.uk/ida/
  3. ^ See: http://www.essex.ac.uk/idaworld/
  4. ^ See: http://magenta.ruc.dk/isg/discourse/
  5. ^ See: http://www.essex.ac.uk/centres/Theostud/
  6. ^ Especially see: Howarth, David, Discourse, Buckingham: Open University Press, 2000; Howarth, David, Norval, Aletta & Stavrakakis, Yannis (eds) Discourse Theory and Political Analysis: identities, hegemonies and social change. Manchester - New York: Manchester University Press – St Martin's Press, 2000; and Howarth, David & Torfing, Jacob (eds) Discourse Theory in European Politics, Houndmills: Palgrave, 2005.
  7. ^ See, for example, Phillips, Louise & Jorgensen, Marianne, Discourse Analysis as Theory and Method. London: Sage, 2002.
  8. ^ See Townshend, Jules, ‘Discourse theory and political analysis: a new paradigm from the Essex School?’, British Journal of Politics and International Relations, Vol. 5, 2003, pp. 129–142, and ‘Laclau and Mouffe’s Hegemonic Project: The Story So Far’, Political Studies, 52, 2004, pp. 269-288.
  9. ^ See, for example, Robinson, Andrew, ‘The Politics of Lack’, British Journal of Politics and International Relations, Vol. 6, 2004, pp. 259-269; Selg, Peeter & Ventsel, Andreas, ‘An Outline of a Semiotic Theory of Hegemony’, Semiotica, 182, 2010, pp. 443-474; Soage, Ana, ‘La teoria del discurso de la escuela de Essex an su contexto teorico’, clac circulo, no. 25, 2006: http://www.ucm.es/info/circulo/no25/soage.pdf

Bibliography

  • Glynos, Jason & Howarth, David (2007) Logics of Critical Explanation in Social and Political Theory. London: Routledge.
  • Howarth, David (2000) Discourse. Buckingham: Open University Press.
  • Howarth, David, Norval, Aletta & Stavrakakis, Yannis, eds. (2000) Discourse Theory and Political Analysis: identities, hegemonies and social change. Manchester - New York: Manchester University Press – St Martin's Press.
  • Howarth, David & Torfing, Jacob, eds. (2005) Discourse Theory in European Politics. Houndmills: Palgrave.
  • Laclau, Ernesto & Mouffe, Chantal (1985) Hegemony and Socialist Strategy. London: Verso.
  • Laclau, Ernesto (1990) New Reflections on the Revolution of Our Time. London: Verso.
  • Laclau, Ernesto, ed. (1994) The Making of the Political Identities. London: Verso.
  • Laclau, Ernesto (1996) Emancipation(s). London: Verso.
  • Laclau, Ernesto (2005) The Populist Reason. London: Verso.
  • Mouffe, Chantal (1993) The Return of the Political. London: Verso.
  • Mouffe, Chantal, ed. (1996) Deconstruction and Pragmatism. New York: Routledge.
  • Mouffe, Chantal (2000) The Democratic Paradox. London: Verso.
  • Mouffe, Chantal (2006) On the Political. London: Routledge.
  • Phillips, Louise & Jorgensen, Marianne (2002) Discourse Analysis as Theory and Method. London: Sage.
  • Smith, A. M. (1998) Laclau and Mouffe: The Radical Democratic Imaginary. London: Routledge.
  • Stavrakakis, Yannis (1999) Lacan and the Political. London and New York: Routledge.
  • Stavrakakis, Yannis (2007) The Lacanian Left. Albany: SUNY Press.
  • Torfing, Jacob (1999) New Theories of Discourse. Oxford: Blackwell.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Essex_School_of_discourse_analysis&oldid=694218995"