|Predecessor||IJmuiden steelworks, Hoesch Dortmund steelworks|
|Successor||IJmuiden steelworks, Hoesch Dortmund steelworks|
Number of locations
|Products||Iron, Raw steel, finished steel, manufactured steel|
Estel (also styled as ESTEL) was a steel company formed by the merging of Koninklijke Hoogovens IJmuiden steel plant and Hoesch's main steel plant in Dortmund. The company existed from 1972 to 1982 until de-merged.
In 1966 the board of Koninklijke Hoogovens voted in favour of merging their IJmuiden steelworks with the Dortmund plant of German steelmaker Hoesch; Hoesch would benefit from the IJmuiden steelwork's port, and Koninklijke Hoogovens' 43% shareholding in the Dortmund-Hörder Hüttenunion (DHHU) was converted into a 15% shareholding in Hoesch with Hoesch acquiring DHUU.[note 1] The two firms made agreements on division of work between the plants – IJmuiden was to concentrate on pig iron, crude steel, and semi-manufactured products, whilst Hoesch's Dortmund plant was to produce finished steels and manufactured products. The two entities were merged in 1972, forming Estel NV, headquarter in Nijmegen.
In the mid 1970s the Steel crisis caused overcapacity in steel production throughout Europe; Estel needed to invest to improve production quality and efficiency to compensate for loss of production volume, and to cut production costs; additionally Hoesch's branch of Estel was making losses, and required support; as such it sought investment from both the German and Netherlands government; however the Dutch government was only willing to invest if the German state also supported the venture, whilst the German state wished any restructuring and investment to be done in collaboration with Krupp (also loss making) which was not acceptable to Dutch banks. As a result, in 1982 the 50:50 partnership of Estel was dissolved, with Hoesch taking 61% of its liabilities.
- Staff (31 Jan 1975). "Envirotech, Dutch Firm Sign Pact". The Times (San Mateo, California). p. 41 – via Newspapers.com.
- Hans Schenk (2001), "6. A 'Dutch Miracle' in steel policy? Laissez-faire intervention, wage restraint and the evolution of Hoogovens", in B. Guy Peters; Mark Bovens; Paul 't Hart, Success and failure in public governance: a comparative analysis, New Horizons in Public Policy, series editor Wayne Parsons, Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 84–104 
- Jay P. Pederson, ed. (2008), "Koninklijke Nederlandsche Hoogovens en Staalfabrieken NV", International Directory of Company Histories, Gale, 91, via www.encyclopedia.com
- Karl Eckart (2003), "2.4.2 The companies of iron and steel industry: Estel-Hoesch, Thyssen, Klöckner", Social, economic and cultural aspects in the dynamic changing process of old industrial regions: Ruhr District (Germany), Upper Silesia (Poland), Ostrava Region (Czech Republic), LIT Verlag Münster, pp. 51–52
- Günter K. Stahl; Mark E. Mendenhall (2005), Mergers and acquisitions: managing culture and human resources, Stanford University Press, pp. 326–331, 335–336
- Hans Schenk (May 2000), "IS POLDER-TYPE GOVERNANCE GOOD FOR YOU? Laissez-Faire Intervention, Wage Restraint, And Dutch Steel" (PDF), repub.eur.nl, pp. 11–13
- "History of Koninklijke Hoogovens" (PDF), www.tatasteeleurope.com, Corus
- "Hoesch Partnership", www.nytimes.com, New York Times, 17 November 1982
- "HOESCH-HOOGOVENS Antrag ohne Absicht", www.spiegel.de (in German), Der Spiegel, 15 August 1966
- "HOESCH/HOOGOVENS Befund im Herbst", www.spiegel.de (in German), Der Spiegel, 13 July 1970
- "Das Jahr 1972 : "Stahlehe" Hoesch AG Hoogovens", www.nahraum.de (in German)
- "Das Jahr 1982 : Stahlehe Hoogovens und Hoesch getrennt", www.nahraum.de (in German)