Ethical socialism

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Ethical socialism is a political philosophy that appeals to socialism on ethical and moral grounds as opposed to economic, egoistic, and consumeristic grounds.[1] It emphasizes the need for a morally conscious economy based upon the principles of altruism, cooperation, and social justice while opposing possessive individualism.[2] In contrast to socialism inspired by rationalism, historical materialism, neoclassical economics, and Marxist theory which base their appeals for socialism on grounds of economic efficiency, rationality, or historical inevitability, ethical socialism focuses on the moral and ethical reasons for advocating socialism.[citation needed]

Overview[edit]

Ethical socialism had a profound impact on the social democratic movement and reformism during the later half of the 20th century, particularly in Great Britain.[3] Ethical socialism is distinct in its focus on criticism of the ethics of capitalism and not merely criticism of the economic, systemic, and material issues of capitalism.[1]

The term ethical socialism initially originated as a pejorative by the Marxian economist Rosa Luxemburg against reformist, Marxist revisionist Eduard Bernstein and his supporters, who evoked neo-Kantian liberal ideals and ethical arguments in favour of socialism.[4] Self-recognized ethical socialists soon arose in Britain such as the Christian socialist R. H. Tawney and its ideals were connected to Christian socialist, Fabian, and guild socialist ideals.[5] Ethical socialism was an important ideology within the British Labour Party.[6] Ethical socialism has been publicly supported by British Prime Ministers Ramsay MacDonald,[7] Clement Attlee,[8] and Tony Blair.[6]

When the Social Democratic Party of Germany (SPD) renounced Marxism during the Godesberg Program in the 1950s, ethical socialism became the official philosophy within the SPD.[9]

Themes[edit]

R. H. Tawney denounced self-seeking amoral and immoral behaviour that he claimed is supported by capitalism.[1] Tawney opposed what he called the "acquisitive society" that causes private property to be used to transfer surplus profit to "functionless owners", i.e. capitalist rentiers.[2] However, he did not denounce managers as a whole, believing that management and employees could join together in a political alliance for reform.[2] Tawney supported the pooling of surplus profit through means of progressive taxation to redistribute these funds to provide social welfare (including public health care, public education, and public housing)[2] and the nationalization of strategic industries and services.[2] He supported worker participation in the business of management in the economy as well as consumer, employee, employer and state cooperation in regulating the economy.[2]

Alhough Tawney supported a substantial role for public enterprise in the economy, he stated that where private enterprise provided a service that was commensurate with its rewards that was functioning private property, then a business could be usefully and legitimately be left in private hands.[10] Thomas Hill Green supported the right of equal opportunity for all individuals to be able freely appropriate property, but claimed that acquisition of wealth did not imply that an individual could do whatever they wanted to once that wealth was in their possession.[11] Green opposed "property rights of the few" that were preventing the ownership of property by the many.[11]

Ethical socialism was advocated and promoted by former British Prime Minister Tony Blair, who has been influenced by John Macmurray who himself was influenced by Green.[12][13] Blair has defined ethical socialism with similar notions promoted by earlier ethical socialists, such as emphasis on the common good, rights, and responsibilities, and support of an organic society in which individuals flourish through cooperation.[12][14][15] Blair believes that the Labour Party ran into problems in the 1960s and 1970s when it "abandoned" ethical socialism and believes that the Labour Party's recovery required a return to the ethical socialist values last promoted by the Attlee Labour government.[16][17]

See also[edit]

References[edit]

Footnotes[edit]

  1. ^ a b c Thompson 2006, p. 52.
  2. ^ a b c d e f Thompson 2006, pp. 58–59.
  3. ^ Dearlove & Saunders 2000, p. 427; Thompson 2006, p. 52.
  4. ^ Steger 1997, p. 115.
  5. ^ Thompson 2006, pp. 52, 58, 60.
  6. ^ a b Tansey & Jackson 2008, p. 97.
  7. ^ Morgan 2006, p. 29.
  8. ^ Howell 2006, pp. 130–132.
  9. ^ Orlow 2000, p. 190.
  10. ^ Thompson 2006, pp. 60–61.
  11. ^ a b Carter 2003, p. 35.
  12. ^ a b Carter 2003, pp. 189–190.
  13. ^ "Socialism – Tony Blair – Fabian Society".
  14. ^ "Let Us Face the Future: The 1945 Anniversary Lecture – Tony Blair – Fabian Society".
  15. ^ "Socialism – Tony Blair – Fabian Society".
  16. ^ Bevir 2005, p. 72.
  17. ^ "Let Us Face the Future: The 1945 Anniversary Lecture – Tony Blair – Fabian Society".

Bibliography[edit]

Bevir, Mark (2005). New Labour: A Critique. London: Routledge. ISBN 978-0-203-00738-9.
Carter, Matt (2003). T.H. Green and the Development of Ethical Socialism. Exeter, England: Imprint Academic. ISBN 978-0-907845-32-4.
Dearlove, John; Saunders, Peter (2000). Introduction to British Politics. Wiley-Blackwell.
Howell, David (2006). Attlee. London: Haus Publishing. ISBN 978-1-904950-64-6.
Morgan, Kevin (2006). Ramsay MacDonald. London: Haus Publishing. ISBN 978-1-904950-61-5.
Orlow, Dietrich (2000). Common Destiny: A Comparative History of the Dutch, French, and German Social Democratic Parties, 1945–1969. New York: Berghahn Books. ISBN 978-1-57181-185-1.
Steger, Manfred B. (1997). The Quest for Evolutionary Socialism: Eduard Bernstein and Social Democracy. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511558603. ISBN 978-0-511-55860-3.
Tansey, Stephen D.; Jackson, Nigel A. (2008). Politics: The Basics (4th ed.). Abingdon, England: Routledge.
Thompson, Noel W. (2006). Political Economy and the Labour Party: The Economics of Democratic Socialism, 1884–2005 (2nd ed.). Abingdon, England: Routledge. ISBN 978-0-415-32880-7.