European Research Council
This article may rely excessively on sources too closely associated with the subject, potentially preventing the article from being verifiable and neutral. (March 2014) (Learn how and when to remove this template message)
|Purpose||Fund excellent research conducted in Europe|
|€13 billion (2014 – 2020)|
The European Research Council (ERC) is a public body for funding of scientific and technological research conducted within the European Union (EU). Established by the European Commission in 2007, the ERC is composed of an independent Scientific Council, its governing body consisting of distinguished researchers, and an Executive Agency, in charge of the implementation. It forms part of the framework programme of the union dedicated to research and innovation, Horizon 2020, preceded by the Seventh Research Framework Programme (FP7). The ERC budget is over €13 billion from 2014 – 2020 and comes from the Horizon 2020 programme, a part of the European Union's budget. Under Horizon 2020 it is estimated that around 7,000 ERC grantees will be funded and 42,000 team members supported, including 11,000 doctoral students and almost 16,000 post-doctoral researchers.
Researchers from any field can compete for the grants that support pioneering projects. The ERC competitions are open to top researchers also from outside the union. The average success rate is about 12%. Five ERC grantees have won Nobel Prizes. Grant applications are assessed by qualified experts. Excellence is the sole criterion for selection; there are neither thematic priorities, nor geographical quotas for funding. The aim is to recognise the best ideas, and confer status and visibility to the best research in Europe, while also attracting talent from abroad.
Along with national funding bodies, the ERC aims to improve the climate for European frontier research. The Scientific Council has been keen to learn from the ERC’s peers in national research councils (European and overseas) and to engage in dialogue and appropriate collaboration. Also, some countries – such as Poland – have used the ERC model to establish national basic research funding bodies.
The idea of having a pan-European funding mechanism for basic research has been discussed and supported for a long time. However, its realisation was held back at the political level because the founding treaties of the European Union was interpreted as allowing union funding only to strengthen the scientific and technological base of European industry – that is, only funding for applied research rather than basic research. In conjunction with the Lisbon declaration in 2000, leaders of the EU, in particular the European Commissioner for Research at the time, Philippe Busquin, realised that the European Treaty had to be reinterpreted; a transformation of European economy from traditional manufacturing to a knowledge-based economy has to involve the enhanced support at the European level for science of all kinds, including both fundamental and applied research.
In 2003, a report from the ERC Expert Group (ERCEG), chaired by Professor Federico Mayor, described how the ERC could take shape. In 2004, a high-level expert group was commissioned to further explore the possibilities of creating a European Research Council. This group concluded that the EU should establish an institution to support frontier research. A number of other expert groups, such as one commissioned by the European Science Foundation, another charged with the task of analysing the economic implications of the Lisbon declaration and a high level group commissioned by the European Commission, also arrived at a similar conclusion and boosted the idea. With the ice broken, scientists and politicians have since strongly supported the establishment of an ERC. In 2006, the European Parliament and EU Council of Ministers accepted the Seventh Framework Programme (FP7) for the European Union's support for research, of which the ERC was a flagship component. In the ERC kick-off conference in Berlin, various speakers talked of 'an idea whose time has come', 'a European factory of ideas', 'a champions' league’, 'a great day for Europe and a great day for science', and the beginning of a 'snowball effect'.
The ERC is governed by the Scientific Council (ScC), consisting of 22 eminent European scientists and scholars (including Nobel prize laureates), and supported operationally by the European Research Council Executive Agency (ERCEA), based in Brussels. The ScC acts on behalf of the scientific community in Europe to promote creativity and innovative research. It is responsible for setting the ERC's scientific strategy, including establishing the annual Work Programmes, designing the peer review systems, identifying the peer review experts, and communicating with the scientific community. The first Scientific Council members were nominated by Commissioner Potočnik in July 2005 and worked intensively to define the key principles and scientific operating practices of the ERC in preparation for the start-up.
The members of the Scientific Council are selected by an Identification Committee, consisting of highly respected personalities in European research, and appointed by the European Commission. The ScC members term of office lasts four years.
Following its formal establishment, the Scientific Council reaffirmed the election of its Chair and ERC president, Professor Fotis Kafatos, and the two Vice-Chairs and ERC Vice-Presidents, Professor Helga Nowotny and Dr. Daniel Estève. After the highly successful Presidency of Fotis Kafatos, Helga Nowotny took over as President in March 2010 with Prof. Carl-Henrik Heldin and Prof. Pavel Exner as Vice-Presidents. In January 2014, after the end of Helga Nowotny's term of office, Professor Jean-Pierre Bourguignon became ERC President. Since then, the ERC also has a third Vice-President, Professor Nuria Sebastian Galles, alongside the two vice-presidents already in office (each of them in charge of one of the ERC scientific domains). In May 2019, internationally-recognized nanomedicine scientist Dr. Mauro Ferrari was named the next president of the European Research Council.
|Portrait||Term in office||Name||Nationality|
|February 2007 – February 2010||Fotis Kafatos||Greece|
|March 2010 – January 2014||Helga Nowotny||Austria|
|January 2014 – January 2020||Jean-Pierre Bourguignon||France|
|January 2020 – April 2020||Mauro Ferrari||Italy|
The ERC Scientific Council has established two Standing Committees: one deals with conflict of interest issues, the other oversees the selection of reviewers and panel lists.
The Scientific Council is supported operationally by the European Research Council Executive Agency (ERCEA), based in Brussels. The implementing pillar of the ERC, the ERC Executive Agency (ERCEA), is responsible for supporting the peer review process, implementing the ERC strategy as set by the ScC, executing all financial operations and communicating about the ERC. The ERCEA is currently headed by the Director, Pablo Amor. It employs some 400 staff of which more than 50 hold PhDs.
The fact that most Scientific staff hold a PhD, have done post-docs and/or have been academics reinforces the feeling among panellists and the Scientific Community as a whole that ERC Schemes are implemented by scientists understanding the pitfalls and hurdles of Research and who are constantly working to better their procedures in order to simplify the application as well as the granting processes, hand in hand with their colleagues from financial units.
There is also a five-member ERCEA Steering Committee, chaired by the European Commission's Director-General for Research and Innovation, two ScC members, and two Commission officials.
Measures to ensure an integrated institution
To create an integrated institution consisting of the ScC and the ERCEA, two integrative mechanisms were initially put in place:
- The Secretary General (SG), selected by the ScC, was located in Brussels with the goal of interacting closely with the ERCEA. This post no longer exists. The first SG was Professor Ernst-Ludwig Winnacker (2007 – 2009). The second SG was Professor Andreu Mas-Colell (2009 – 2010). The third and the last SG was Professor Donald Bruce Dingwell (2010 – 2013). The Secretaries General have been instrumental in the successful setting-up of the ERC, and have worked closely and fruitfully together with the two consecutive Directors ad interim of the ERCEA, Jack Metthey and thereafter Pablo Amor. During the first half of 2011, a Task Force chaired by the European Commission's Research Director-General, Robert-Jan Smits, decided to give further suggestions regarding the governance structure of the ERC in the European Commission's Framework Programme (Horizon 2020), 2014 - 2020. It inter alia suggested to merge the positions of the President and of the Secretary General into a full-time President based in Brussels. This recommendation was implemented as of January 2014; since then, the ERC President is permanently based in Brussels and there is no Secretary General.
- The ERC Board currently consists of the ERC President, the three Vice-Presidents, and the Director of the ERCEA.
Budget and peer review
Under the EU's Framework Programme for Research and Innovation Horizon 2020 the ERC has a budget of €13.1 billion for the period 2014 - 2020. That is a substantial increase from its initial seven-year budget under the EU's seventh Research Framework Programme (2007-2013), when the total allocated to the ERC was €7.5 billion. The ERC budget is supported by the European Commission and is supplemented by contributions from the EU associated countries. Together, the 27 EU member states and the associated countries comprise the European Research Area (ERA).
The ERC's peer-review evaluation process must command the confidence of the research community and is central to the achievement of the ERC's objectives. The ERC Scientific Council divided the full range of scientific disciplines into three major domains, with budgets allotted as follows. The peer review in the three domains is carried out by a total of 25 panels led by Panel Chairs whose scientific status gives credibility to the selection process. The peer review experts come from all over the world, which makes the ERC peer review process one of the most international of its kind on this scale. There are currently about 900 ERC panel members; together with the 2000 external reviewers, they constitute the backbone of the ERC evaluation structure.
|Domain||Allotment of budget||Panel|
|Name||Discipline||Description of discipline|
|Physical sciences and engineering (PE)||39%||PE1||Mathematical foundations||All areas of mathematics, pure and applied, plus mathematical foundations of computer science, mathematical physics and statistics|
|PE2||Fundamental constituents of matter||Particle, nuclear, plasma, atomic, molecular, gas, and optical physics|
|PE3||Condensed matter physics||Structure, electronic properties, fluids, nanosciences|
|PE4||Physical and analytical chemical sciences||Analytical chemistry, chemical theory, physical chemistry/chemical physics|
|PE5||Materials and synthesis||Materials synthesis, structure-properties relations, functional and advanced materials, molecular architecture, organic chemistry|
|PE6||Computer science and informatics||Informatics and information systems, computer science, scientific computing, intelligent systems|
|PE7||Systems and communication engineering||Electronic, communication, optical and systems engineering|
|PE8||Products and processes engineering||Product design, process design and control, construction methods, civil engineering, energy systems, material engineering|
|PE9||Universe sciences||Astro-physics/chemistry/biology; solar system; stellar, galactic and extragalactic astronomy, planetary systems, cosmology, space science, instrumentation|
|PE10||Earth system science||Physical geography, geology, geophysics, meteorology, oceanography, climatology, ecology, global environmental change, biogeochemical cycles, natural resources management.|
|Social sciences and humanities (SH)||17%||SH1||Individuals, institutions and markets||Economics, finance and management|
|SH2||Institutions, values and beliefs and behaviour||Sociology, social anthropology, political science, law, communication, social studies of science and technology|
|SH3||Environment and society||Environmental studies, demography, social geography, urban and regional studies|
|SH4||The Human Mind and its complexity||Cognition, psychology, linguistics, philosophy and education|
|SH5||Cultures and cultural production||Literature, visual and performing arts, music, cultural and comparative studies|
|SH6||The study of the human past||Archaeology, history and memory|
|Life sciences (LS)||34%||LS1||Molecular and Structural Biology and Biochemistry||Molecular biology, biochemistry, biophysics, structural biology, biochemistry of signal transduction|
|LS2||Genetics, Genomics, Bioinformatics and Systems Biology||Genetics, population genetics, molecular genetics, genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, metabolomics, bioinformatics, computational biology, biostatistics, biological modelling and simulation, systems biology, genetic epidemiology|
|LS3||Cellular and Developmental Biology||cell biology, cell physiology, signal transduction, organogenesis, developmental genetics, pattern formation in plants and animals|
|LS4||Physiology, Pathophysiology and Endocrinology||Organ physiology, pathophysiology, endocrinology, metabolism, ageing, regeneration, tumorigenesis, cardiovascular disease, metabolic syndrome|
|LS5||Neurosciences and neural disorders||Neurobiology, neuroanatomy, neurophysiology, neurochemistry, neuropharmacology, neuroimaging, systems neuroscience, neurological disorders, psychiatry|
|LS6||Immunity and infection||Immunobiology, aetiology of immune disorders, microbiology, virology, parasitology, global and other infectious diseases, population dynamics of infectious diseases, veterinary medicine|
|LS7||Diagnostic tools, therapies and public health||Aetiology, diagnosis and treatment of disease, public health, epidemiology, pharmacology, clinical medicine, regenerative medicine, medical ethics|
|LS8||Evolutionary, population and environmental biology||Evolution, ecology, animal behaviour, population biology, biodiversity, biogeography, marine biology, ecotoxicology, prokaryotic biology|
|LS9||Applied life sciences and biotechnology||Agricultural, animal, fishery, forestry and food sciences; biotechnology, chemical biology, genetic engineering, synthetic biology, industrial biosciences; environmental biotechnology and remediation|
The ScC encourages interdisciplinary proposals.
The two founding principles of the ERC regarding grants are:
- Research grant applications should be judged using the sole criterion of peer-reviewed excellence, independent of political, geographic or economic considerations. All ERC competitions for funding are open to top researchers from any country in the world, as long as they are committed to work at least half of their time in Europe. The quality and originality of the research project and the qualifications of the applicant( as shown, for example, by their publication record) are the only evaluation criteria. This means that there will be no juste retour, in other words there are no guarantees that the individual countries contributing to the programme will receive any part of the funding.
- Frontier research should be targeted by encouraging high-risk, high-reward proposals that may revolutionise science and potentially lead to innovation if successful. With its bottom-up approach, the Scientific Council does not pre-determine thematic priorities, but challenges applicants to identify them themselves. Funding is provided for individual projects initiated in an investigator-driven, ‘bottom‑up’ process. Although collaborations within a project are welcome, there is no formal demand to collaborate.
The ERC asks researchers to think big, and provides generous support for ambitious projects. It does not want its carefully selected grantees to waste their time by taking on numerous peripheral projects, or constantly having to seek additional money to fund their research. The grants are flexible, so that all costs for a specific project can be covered, and portable, meaning that if grant holders move to another university or institute, the grant moves with them.
The applicant can be of any nationality and age, and needs to demonstrate an excellent track record and present a ground-breaking research proposal. The research must be conducted in a Host Institution located within the European Union or an associated country.
|Starting Grants||PhD + 2–7 years experience||€1.5 million
(+ €0.5 million to cover "start-up" costs)
|Supports up-and-coming independent research leaders. This is targeted at promoting early scientific independence of promising talent.|
|Consolidator Grants||PhD + 7–12 years experience||€2 million
(+ €0.75 million)
|Supports researchers at the stage at which they are consolidating their own independent research team or programme.|
|Advanced Grants||10-year excellent scientific track record||€2.5 million
(+ €1.0 million)
|Supports researchers who have already established themselves as independent research leaders in their own right.|
|Proof of Concept Grants||Holder of a previous ERC grant||€150,000||Top-up funding open only to existing grant holders to bring their research ideas closer to market|
The following charts present annual success rates.
Availability of publications and results
The Scientific Council has adopted an ‘open access’ policy with regard to the access and availability of publications and research results. This requires all peer-reviewed publications from ERC-funded research projects to be deposited in the appropriate Internet-accessible libraries within six months of publication.
- Directorate-General for Research
- Directorate-General of the Joint Research Centre (European Commission)
- European Council of Applied Sciences and Engineering (Euro-CASE)
- European Defence Fund
- European Institute of Technology (EIT)
- European Research Advisory Board (EURAB)
- European Research Area (ERA)
- Framework Programmes for Research and Technological Development
- Information Society Technologies Advisory Group (ISTAG)
- Lisbon Strategy
- basic statistics for ERC funding activities
- "ERC starting grant holder wins Nobel physics prize - Science-Business". www.sciencebusiness.net.
- "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 4 March 2016. Retrieved 18 September 2015.CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
- Winnacker E.-L. (2008). "On Excellence through Competition". European Educational Research Journal. 7: 124. doi:10.2304/eerj.2008.7.2.124.
- Heldin C.-H. (2008). "The European Research Council – a new opportunity for European science". Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 9: 417–420. doi:10.1038/nrm2374.
- Antonoyiannakis M.; Hemmelskamp J.; Kafatos F. C. (2009). "The European Research Council Takes Flight". Cell. 136: 805–809. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2009.02.031. PMID 19269357.
- Decided by the Scientific Council
- H. Nowotny, Frontier Research in the Social Sciences and Humanities: what does it mean, what can it mean? (PDF) (PDF)[permanent dead link]
- "ERC Starting Grants".
- "ERC Consolidator Grants".
- "ERC Advanced Grants".
- basic statistics for ERC funding activities
- December 2003, Report from Expert Group The European Research Council A Cornerstone in the European Research Area
- Frontier Research: The European Challenge, High Level Expert Group Report, February 2005
- BBC News story of ERC launch – Feb 2007
- Webpage of the Scientific Council of the European Research Council
- EU press release IP/05/956, Scientific Council of the European Research Council announced, released 18 July 2005.
- CORDIS – FP7 (Ideas)