F-statistics

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Not to be confused with the "F-test" statistic as used in general statistical inference. See F-test and F-distribution.

In population genetics, F-statistics (also known as fixation indices) describe the statistically expected level of heterozygosity in a population; more specifically the expected degree of (usually) a reduction in heterozygosity when compared to Hardy–Weinberg expectation.

F-statistics can also be thought of as a measure of the correlation between genes drawn at different levels of a (hierarchically) subdivided population. This correlation is influenced by several evolutionary processes, such as mutation, migration, inbreeding, natural selection, or the Wahlund effect, but it was originally designed to measure the amount of allelic fixation owing to genetic drift.

The concept of F-statistics was developed during the 1920s by the American geneticist Sewall Wright,[1][2] who was interested in inbreeding in cattle. However, because complete dominance causes the phenotypes of homozygote dominants and heterozygotes to be the same, it was not until the advent of molecular genetics from the 1960s onwards that heterozygosity in populations could be measured.

F can be used to define effective population size.[further explanation needed]

Definitions and equations[edit]

The measures FIS, FST, and FIT are related to the amounts of heterozygosity at various levels of population structure. Together, they are called F-statistics, and are derived from F, the inbreeding coefficient. In a simple two-allele system with inbreeding, the genotypic frequencies are:

The value for F is found by solving the equation for F using heterozygotes in the above inbred population. This becomes one minus the observed frequency of heterozygotes in a population divided by the expected frequency of heterozygotes at Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium:

where the expected frequency at Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium is given by

where p and q are the allele frequencies of A and a, respectively. It is also the probability that at any locus, two alleles from a random individuum of the population are identical by descent.

For example, consider the data from E.B. Ford (1971) on a single population of the scarlet tiger moth:

Table 1:
Genotype White-spotted (AA) Intermediate (Aa) Little spotting (aa) Total
Number 1469 138 5 1612

From this, the allele frequencies can be calculated, and the expectation of ƒ(Aa) derived :

The different F-statistics look at different levels of population structure. FIT is the inbreeding coefficient of an individual (I) relative to the total (T) population, as above; FIS is the inbreeding coefficient of an individual (I) relative to the subpopulation (S), using the above for subpopulations and averaging them; and FST is the effect of subpopulations (S) compared to the total population (T), and is calculated by solving the equation:

as shown in the next section.

Partition due to population structure[edit]

FIT can be partitioned into FST due to the Wahlund effect and FIS due to inbreeding.

Consider a population that has a population structure of two levels; one from the individual (I) to the subpopulation (S) and one from the subpopulation to the total (T). Then the total F, known here as FIT, can be partitioned into FIS (or f) and FST (or θ):

This may be further partitioned for population substructure, and it expands according to the rules of binomial expansion, so that for I partitions:

Fixation index[edit]

A reformulation of the definition of F would be the ratio of the average number of differences between pairs of chromosomes sampled within diploid individuals with the average number obtained when sampling chromosomes randomly from the population (excluding the grouping per individual). One can modify this definition and consider a grouping per sub-population instead of per individual. Population geneticists have used that idea to measure the degree of structure in a population.

Unfortunately, there is a large number of definitions for FST, causing some confusion in the scientific literature. A common definition is the following:

where the variance of p is computed across sub-populations and p(1−p) is the expected frequency of heterozygotes.

Fixation index in human populations[edit]

It is well established that the genetic diversity among human populations is low,[3] although the distribution of the genetic diversity was only roughly estimated. Early studies argued that 85–90% of the genetic variation is found within individuals residing in the same populations within continents (intra-continental populations) and only an additional 10–15% is found between populations of different continents (continental populations).[4][5][6][7][8] Later studies based on hundreds of thousands single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNPs) suggested that the genetic diversity between continental populations is even smaller and accounts for 3 to 7%[9][10][11][12][13][14] A later study based on three million SNPs found that 12% of the genetic variation is found between continental populations and only 1% within them.[15] Most of these studies have used the FST statistics [16] or closely related statistics.[17][18]

See also[edit]

References[edit]

  1. ^ Wright, S (1950). "Genetical structure of populations". Nature. 166 (4215): 247–9. Bibcode:1950Natur.166..247W. doi:10.1038/166247a0. PMID 15439261. 
  2. ^ Kulig, K (1985). "Utilization of emergency toxicology screens". The American journal of emergency medicine. 3 (6): 573–4. doi:10.1016/0735-6757(85)90177-9. LCCN 67025533. PMID 4063030. 
  3. ^ Holsinger, Kent E.; Weir, Bruce S. (2009). "Genetics in geographically structured populations: Defining, estimating and interpreting FST". Nature Reviews Genetics. 10 (9): 639–50. doi:10.1038/nrg2611. PMID 19687804. 
  4. ^ Lewontin (1972). "The apportionment of human diversity". Evolutionary Biology. 6: 381–98. doi:10.1007/978-1-4684-9063-3_14. ISBN 978-1-4684-9065-7. 
  5. ^ Bowcock, Anne M.; Kidd, Judith R.; Mountain, Joanna L.; Herbert, Joan M.; Carotenuto, Luciano; Kidd, Kenneth K.; Cavalli-Sforza, Luca (1991). "Drift, admixture, and selection in human evolution: A study with DNA polymorphisms". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 88 (3): 839–43. Bibcode:1991PNAS...88..839B. doi:10.1073/pnas.88.3.839. JSTOR 2356081. PMC 50909free to read. PMID 1992475. 
  6. ^ Barbujani, Guido; Magagni, Arianna; Minch, Eric; Cavalli-Sforza, L. Luca (1997). "An apportionment of human DNA diversity". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 94 (9): 4516–9. Bibcode:1997PNAS...94.4516B. doi:10.1073/pnas.94.9.4516. JSTOR 42042. PMC 20754free to read. PMID 9114021. 
  7. ^ Jorde, L.B.; Watkins, W.S.; Bamshad, M.J.; Dixon, M.E.; Ricker, C.E.; Seielstad, M.T.; Batzer, M.A. (2000). "The Distribution of Human Genetic Diversity: A Comparison of Mitochondrial, Autosomal, and Y-Chromosome Data". The American Journal of Human Genetics. 66 (3): 979–88. doi:10.1086/302825. PMC 1288178free to read. PMID 10712212. 
  8. ^ Jorde, Lynn B; Wooding, Stephen P (2004). "Genetic variation, classification and 'race'". Nature Genetics. 36 (11s): S28–33. doi:10.1038/ng1435. PMID 15508000. 
  9. ^ Mahasirimongkol, Surakameth; Chantratita, Wasun; Promso, Somying; Pasomsab, Ekawat; et al. (2006). "Similarity of the allele frequency and linkage disequilibrium pattern of single nucleotide polymorphisms in drug-related gene loci between Thai and northern East Asian populations: Implications for tagging SNP selection in Thais". Journal of Human Genetics. 51 (10): 896–904. doi:10.1007/s10038-006-0041-1. PMID 16957813. 
  10. ^ Hannelius, Ulf; Salmela, Elina; Lappalainen, Tuuli; Guillot, Gilles; Lindgren, Cecilia M; Von Döbeln, Ulrika; Lahermo, Päivi; Kere, Juha (2008). "Population substructure in Finland and Sweden revealed by the use of spatial coordinates and a small number of unlinked autosomal SNPs". BMC Genetics. 9: 54. doi:10.1186/1471-2156-9-54. PMC 2527025free to read. PMID 18713460. 
  11. ^ Lao, Oscar; Lu, Timothy T.; Nothnagel, Michael; Junge, Olaf; et al. (2008). "Correlation between Genetic and Geographic Structure in Europe". Current Biology. 18 (16): 1241–8. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2008.07.049. PMID 18691889. 
  12. ^ Biswas, Shameek; Scheinfeldt, Laura B.; Akey, Joshua M. (2009). "Genome-wide Insights into the Patterns and Determinants of Fine-Scale Population Structure in Humans". The American Journal of Human Genetics. 84 (5): 641–650. doi:10.1016/j.ajhg.2009.04.015. 
  13. ^ Nelis, Mari; Esko, Tõnu; Mägi, Reedik; Zimprich, Fritz; et al. (2009). Fleischer, Robert C, ed. "Genetic Structure of Europeans: A View from the North–East". PLoS ONE. 4 (5): e5472. Bibcode:2009PLoSO...4.5472N. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0005472. PMC 2675054free to read. PMID 19424496. 
  14. ^ Reich, David; Thangaraj, Kumarasamy; Patterson, Nick; Price, Alkes L.; et al. (2009). "Reconstructing Indian population history". Nature. 461 (7263): 489–94. Bibcode:2009Natur.461..489R. doi:10.1038/nature08365. PMC 2842210free to read. PMID 19779445. 
  15. ^ Elhaik, E (2012). "Empirical Distributions of FST from Large-Scale Human Polymorphism Data". Plos ONE. 7 (11): e49837. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0049837. PMC 3504095free to read. 
  16. ^ Wright, Sewall (1965). "The Interpretation of Population Structure by F-Statistics with Special Regard to Systems of Mating". Evolution. 19 (3): 395–420. doi:10.2307/2406450. JSTOR 2406450. 
  17. ^ Shalev, B. A.; Dvorin, A.; Herman, R.; Katz, Z.; Bornstein, S. (1991). "Long-term goose breeding for egg production and crammed liver weight". British Poultry Science. 32 (4): 703–9. doi:10.1080/00071669108417396. PMID 1933444. 
  18. ^ Excoffier, L; Smouse, PE; Quattro, JM (1992). "Analysis of molecular variance inferred from metric distances among DNA haplotypes: Application to human mitochondrial DNA restriction data". Genetics. 131 (2): 479–91. PMC 1205020free to read. PMID 1644282. 

External links[edit]