Floating liquefied natural gas
||This article contains wording that promotes the subject in a subjective manner without imparting real information. (May 2011) (Learn how and when to remove this template message)|
Floating liquefied natural gas (FLNG) refers to water-based liquefied natural gas (LNG) operations employing technologies designed to enable the development of offshore natural gas resources. While there are no FLNG facilities in production, there are multiple FLNG facilities in development. A facility is in development by the Malaysian national oil company PETRONAS, and is due to be completed by the end of 2015. Floating above an offshore natural gas field, the FLNG facility will theoretically produce, liquefy, store and transfer LNG (and potentially LPG and condensate) at sea before carriers ship it directly to markets. Another FLNG facility, developed by Exmar NV using Black & Veatch PRICO(R) technology, passed performance test in October 2016 in Nantong, China.
Studies into offshore LNG production have been conducted since the early 1970s, but it was only in the mid-1990s that significant research backed by experimental development began.
In 1997, Mobil developed a FLNG production concept based on a large, square structure (540 by 540 feet (160 m × 160 m)) with a moonpool in the center, commonly known as "The Doughnut". The Mobil proposal was sized to produce 6,000,000 tonnes (6,600,000 tons) LNG per year produced from 7,400,000 cubic metres (260,000,000 cu ft) per year of feed gas, with storage provided on the structure for 250,000 cubic metres (66,000,000 US gal) of LNG and 103,000 cubic metres (27,000,000 US gal) of condensate.
In 1999, a major study was commissioned as a joint project by Chevron Corporation and several other oil and gas companies. This was closely followed by the so-called 'Azure' research project, conducted by the EU and several oil and gas companies. Both projects made great progress in steel concrete hull design, topside development and LNG transfer systems.
Since the mid-1990s Royal Dutch Shell has been working on its own FLNG technology. This includes engineering and the optimization of its concept related to specific potential project developments in Namibia, Timor Leste/Australia, and Nigeria.
Petrobras invited three consortiums to submit proposals for engineering, procurement and construction contracts for FLNG plants in ultra-deep Santos Basin waters during 2009. A final investment decision was expected in 2011.[needs update]
As of November 2010[update], Japan's Inpex planned to leverage FLNG to develop the Abadi gas field in the Masela block of the Timor Sea, with a final investment decision expected by the end of 2013. Late in 2010, Inpex deferred start-up by two years to 2018 and cut its 'first phase' capacity to 2.5 million tons per year (from a previously proposed capacity of 4.5 million tonnes).[needs update]
As of November 2010[update], Chevron Corporation was considering an FLNG facility to develop offshore discoveries in the Exmouth Plateau of Western Australia,[needs update] while in 2011, ExxonMobil was waiting for an appropriate project to launch its FLNG development.
According to a presentation given by their engineers at GASTECH 2011, ConocoPhillips aimed to implement a facility by 2016-19, and had completed the quantitative risk analysis of a design that would undergo pre-FEED study during the remainder of 2011.[needs update]
In June 2014, GDF Suez and Santos Limited made a decision to halt development on an Australia offshore gas field project that had proposed to use floating LNG platform technology. A part of the decision included the perception that long-term capabilities of North American gas fields due to hydraulic fracturing technologies and increasing Russian export capabilities may adversely affect the profitability of the venture due to competition.
A number of major gas and oil companies are still researching and considering FLNG developments, with several initiatives planned for the future. However, the world's first development of FLNG is Shell's Au$12bn Prelude FLNG project, 200 kilometres (120 mi) offshore Western Australia. Royal Dutch Shell announced their investment in FLNG on 20 May 2011 and construction began in October 2012.
In April 2010 Shell's FLNG technology was selected as the Sunrise Joint Venture’s preferred option for developing the Greater Sunrise gas fields in the Timor Sea. This followed an extensive and rigorous concept-evaluation process during which the merits of the project were weighed up against alternative onshore solutions. The Woodside-operated JV is now seeking to engage regulators on the concept selection process. Following the decision by Shell to go ahead with its Prelude FLNG development, the Sunrise project would be the second deployment of Shell’s proprietary FLNG design. The Shell project is scheduled to begin processing gas in 2016.
In February 2011, Petronas awarded a FEED contract for an FLNG unit to a consortium of Technip and Daewoo Shipbuilding & Marine Engineering. The facility will be located in Malaysia, although the specific gas field is unknown.[needs update]
In March 2011, Petronas awarded a FEED contract for another FLNG unit called "PFLNG2" to consortium of JGC Corporation. and Samsung Heavy Industry. This Facility will be placed next to PFLNG1 describe above.
GDF Suez Bonaparte – a joint venture undertaken by the Australian oil and gas exploration company Santos (40%) and the French multi-international energy company GDF Suez (60%) – has awarded a pre-FEED contract for the Bonaparte FLNG project offshore Northern Australia. The final investment decision is expected in 2014,[needs update] with startup planned for 2018. The first phase of the project calls for a floating LNG production facility with a capacity of 2 million mt/year.
In October 2016, Exmar NV performance tested a facility design by Black & Veatch using the proprietary PRICO(R) process. The facility has a single liquefaction train that can produce 72 million cubic feet a day of LNG.
Moving LNG production to an offshore setting presents a demanding set of challenges. In terms of the design and construction of the FLNG facility, every element of a conventional LNG facility needs to fit into an area roughly one quarter the size, whilst maintaining appropriate levels of safety and giving increased flexibility to LNG production.
Once a facility is in operation, wave motion will present another major challenge. LNG containment systems need to be capable of withstanding the damage that can occur when the sea’s wave and current motions cause sloshing in the partly filled tanks. Product transfers also need to deal with the effects of winds, waves and currents in the open seas.
Solutions to reduce the effect of motion and weather are addressed in the design, which must be capable of withstanding – and even reducing – the impact of waves. In this area, technological development has been mainly evolutionary rather than revolutionary, leveraging and adapting technologies that are currently applied to offshore oil production or onshore liquefaction. For example, traditional LNG loading arms[clarification needed] have been adapted to enable LNG transfers in open water, and hose-based solutions for both side-by-side transfers in calmer seas and tandem transfers in rougher conditions are nearing[when?] fruition.
||This section's factual accuracy is disputed. (June 2011) (Learn how and when to remove this template message)|
Among fossil fuels, natural gas is relatively clean burning. It is also abundant and affordable and may be able to meet world energy needs by realising the potential of otherwise unviable gas reserves (several of which can be found offshore North West Australia). FLNG technology also provides a number of environmental and economic advantages:
- Environmental - Because all processing is done at the gas field, there is no need to lay long pipelines all the way to the shore. There is also no requirement for compression units to pump the gas to shore, dredging and jetty construction or the onshore construction of an LNG processing plant, all of which significantly reduce the project's environmental footprint. Avoiding construction also helps preserve marine and coastal environments. Additionally, environmental disturbance would be minimised during the later decommissioning of the facility, because it could be disconnected easily and removed before being refurbished and re-deployed elsewhere.
- Economic – Where pumping gas to shore can be prohibitively expensive, FLNG makes development economically viable. As a result, it will open up new business opportunities for countries to develop offshore gas fields that would otherwise remain stranded, such as those off the coast of East Africa. FLNG is also conducive to side stepping complexities involving neighboring countries where disputes would make pipelines vulnerable or impractical such as in Cyprus and Israel. Moreover, LNG is slowly gaining its role as direct use fuel without regasification with operational cost and least pollution benefits in road, rail, air and marine transport.
The FLNG facility will be moored directly above the natural gas field. It will route gas from the field to the facility via risers. When the gas reaches the facility, it will be processed to produce natural gas, LPG, and natural gas condensate. The processed feed gas will be treated to remove impurities, and liquefied through freezing, before being stored in the hull. Ocean-going carriers will offload the LNG, as well as the other liquid by-products, for delivery to markets worldwide. The conventional alternative to this would be to pump gas through pipelines to a shore-based facility for liquefaction, before transferring the gas for delivery.
In the case of Shell’s Prelude FLNG, engineers have managed to fit every component of an LNG plant into an area roughly one quarter the size of a conventional onshore plant. Even so, Shell's facility will be the largest floating offshore facility ever built: It will measure around 488m long and 74m wide, and when fully ballasted will weigh 600,000 tonnes (roughly six times as much as the USS Nimitz aircraft carrier).
The specifications make Shell's FLNG facility particularly well-suited for fields with high production rates for reserves starting at 2 to 3 trillion cubic feet (57×109 to 85×109 m3) and beyond – less than a tenth the size of the Groningen gas field in the Netherlands.
The First FLNG, Shell 'Prelude' FLNG facility will be constructed at Samsung's Geoje Island shipyard in Korea. Some modules may be constructed elsewhere and then transferred to the shipyard for assembly. The facility can remain on station for more than 25 years, and its lifetime can be further extended through overhaul and refurbishment. The hull has a design life of 50 years.
Petronas two FLNG facility will be constructed at different place, Samsung and Daewoo.
A unique feature of Shell’s FLNG design is its ability to stay safely moored in harsh weather conditions, including category five cyclones. Potentially, this could result in more uptime for the facility.
Additionally, Shell designers have optimised safety on the facility by locating storage facilities and process equipment as far from crew accommodation as possible. As a result of this, the accommodation areas of visiting LNG carriers are also at maximum distance from critical safety equipment. Safety gaps have been allowed between modules of process equipment so that gas can disperse quickly in the event of a gas leak.
- "PETRONAS launches hull of its first floating LNG facility". Petronas.com.my. 2014-04-07. Retrieved 2014-09-17.
- EconoTimes. "Black & Veatch PRICO SMR Becomes World’s First Proven FLNG Technology to Achieve Production on a Floating Facility - EconoTimes". EconoTimes. Retrieved 2016-10-20.
- https://web.archive.org/web/20090801000955/http://www.touchoilandgas.com/offshore-production-happen-review-a465-1.html. Archived from the original on 1 August 2009. Retrieved 20 May 2011. Missing or empty
- "Mobil's Floating LNG Plant" (PDF). 1998. Retrieved 2014-12-30.
- (PDF) https://web.archive.org/web/20111001092033/http://www.touchbriefings.com/pdf/1482/ACF58D.pdf. Archived from the original (PDF) on 1 October 2011. Retrieved 20 May 2011. Missing or empty
- Article by John Bradbury (2001-05-01). "Floaters considered for stranded gas". Epmag.com. Retrieved 2011-06-10.
- "Shell awards floating LNG contracts to Technip and Samsung". Technip. 2009-07-28. Retrieved 2011-06-10.
- "Petrobras dishes out FLNG FEEDs". Upstream Online. 2009-12-21. Retrieved 2011-06-10.
- "UPDATE 1-Inpex delays Indonesia LNG output start by 2 years | Reuters". Uk.reuters.com. 21 December 2010. Retrieved 2011-06-10.
- "Chevron considers floating LNG plant". The Australian. 2010-11-03. Retrieved 2011-06-10.
- Guegel, Anthony (2011-05-03). "ExxonMobil in icy innovation". Upstream Online. Retrieved 2011-06-10.
- "Belanak FPSO – 5 years of Successful Operation and Its Application to Floating LNG" (PDF). Kgu.or.kr. Retrieved 30 December 2014.
- Kelly, Ross (19 June 2014). "GDF Suez, Santos Halt Innovative LNG Plan in Australia : Companies Say Offshore Conversion Project Not Commercially Viable". Wall Street Journal. Retrieved 30 December 2014.
The decision highlights the risks confronting Australian gas-export projects as they grapple with high costs and competition from North America and Russia, which are vying to provide Asian utilities with cleaner-burning fuels. Confidence in "floating" liquefied natural gas may also be diminishing—two years before a Royal Dutch Shell PLC-owned vessel is due to begin processing gas for the first time.
- "$12bn Prelude floating plant has Shell fired for LNG". The Australian. Retrieved 28 October 2012.
- "Shell floating LNG technology chosen by joint venture for Greater Sunrise project - Shell Worldwide". Shell.com. Retrieved 2011-06-10.
- "Technip, Daewoo win FEED contract on Petronas’ FLNG vessel offshore Malaysia". Asia Top News. Retrieved 2011-06-10.
- "awarded a key engineering contract for a FLNG in Malaysia". Technip. 2011-02-01. Retrieved 2011-06-10.
- "Pre-FEED contracts awarded for Bonaparte LNG" (PDF). Santos.com. Retrieved 30 December 2014.
- (PDF) https://web.archive.org/web/20110812201942/http://www.igu.org/html/wgc2006pres/data/wgcppt/pdf/PGC%20Programme%20Committees/PGC%20D/Safety%20and%20technology%20developments%20in%20LNG%20plants,%20terminals%20and%20vessels/9.3EF.06.pdf. Archived from the original (PDF) on 12 August 2011. Retrieved 20 May 2011. Missing or empty
- "The Netherlands: FLNG Vessel as Safe as any Other Offshore Facility, Shell Says >>". LNG World News. 2010-10-21. Retrieved 2011-06-10.
- "A BREAKTHROUGH FOR FLOATING LNG?" (PDF). Laohamutuk.org. Retrieved 30 December 2014.
- "Natural Gas: Cleanest Burning Fossil Fuel Understand the numbers behind the claim" (PDF). Ngsa.org. Retrieved 30 December 2014.
- "Natural Gas: Clean, Quality, Cheap, Domestic, & Abundant". :. 2011-04-26. Retrieved 2011-06-10.
- "Prelude LNG Development to Deploy Shell’s FLNG Technology". Offshore-industry.eu. Retrieved 2011-06-10.
- "Shell receives green light for Prelude FLNG — SEAAOC 2011". Seaaoc.com. 2010-11-12. Retrieved 2011-06-10.
- "The Floating Liquefied Natural Gas (FLNG) Market 2011-2021 - Report - Energy". visiongain. 2011-01-28. Retrieved 2011-06-10.
- "Assessment of the fuel cycle impact of liquefied natural gas as used in international shipping" (PDF). Theicct.org. Retrieved 6 June 2014.
- "Gas at the gates of oil's transport fuel citadel". Retrieved 6 June 2014.
- "Microsoft PowerPoint - Disconnectable and Relocatable Riser System Solution for FLNG in Harsh Environment.ppt" (PDF). 2hoffshore.com. Retrieved 2011-06-10.
- "Shell Booklet-blank pgs in.indd" (PDF). Static.shell.com. Retrieved 2011-06-10.
- "FLNG gets serious — Gas Today — The magazine for Australia’s natural gas industry". Gastoday.com.au. Retrieved 2011-06-10.
- http://www-static.shell.com/static/aus/downloads/about_shell/prelude/chap4lowres. Retrieved 20 May 2011. Missing or empty