Artist's representation of Falcon Heavy Reusable on launchpad
|Function||Orbital super heavy-lift launch vehicle
Potential Lunar or Martian launch vehicle
|Country of origin||United States|
|Cost per launch||$90M for up to 8,000 kg to GTO|
|Height||70 m (230 ft)|
|Diameter||3.66 m (12.0 ft)|
|Width||12.2 m (40 ft)|
|Mass||1,420,788 kg (3,132,301 lb)|
|Payload to LEO (28.5°)||54,400 kg (119,900 lb)|
|Payload to GTO (27°)||22,200 kg (48,900 lb)|
|Payload to Mars||13,600 kg (30,000 lb)|
|Payload to Pluto||2,900 kg (6,400 lb)|
|Comparable||Delta IV Heavy, Angara A5V, Saturn C-3|
|First flight||Early 2017 (planned)|
|Engines||9 Merlin 1D|
|Thrust||Sea level: 7,607 kN (1,710,000 lbf)
Vacuum: 8,227 kN (1,850,000 lbf)
|Specific impulse||Sea level: 282 seconds
Vacuum: 311 seconds
|Burn time||162 seconds|
|Fuel||Subcooled LOX / Chilled RP-1|
|Engines||27 Merlin 1D (two boosters plus single core)|
|Thrust||(boosters plus core)
Sea level: 22,819 kN (5,130,000 lbf)
Vacuum: 24,681 kN (5,549,000 lbf)
|Specific impulse||Sea level: 282 seconds
Vacuum: 311 seconds
|Burn time||162 seconds|
|Fuel||Subcooled LOX / Chilled RP-1|
|Engines||1 Merlin 1D Vacuum|
|Thrust||934 kN (210,000 lbf)|
|Specific impulse||348 seconds|
|Burn time||397 seconds|
|Fuel||LOX / RP-1|
Falcon Heavy (FH), previously known as the Falcon 9 Heavy, is a super heavy lift space launch vehicle being designed and manufactured by SpaceX. The Falcon Heavy is a variant of the Falcon 9 launch vehicle and will consist of a standard Falcon 9 rocket core, with two additional strap-on boosters derived from the Falcon 9 first stage. This will increase the low Earth orbit (LEO) payload to 54.4 tonnes, compared to 22.8 tonnes for a Falcon 9 full thrust. Falcon Heavy was designed from the outset to carry humans into space and it would restore the possibility of flying crewed missions to the Moon or Mars.
Following the Falcon 9 CRS-7 failure investigation in 2015, repeated rocket development delays, and given a very busy Falcon 9 launch manifest in 2016, the first Falcon Heavy launch is now expected in early 2017.
- 1 History
- 2 Design
- 3 Pricing and development funding
- 4 Testing
- 5 Scheduled launches and potential payloads
- 6 See also
- 7 References
- 8 External links
Elon Musk first mentioned Falcon Heavy in a September 2005 news update, referring to a customer request from 18 months prior. Various solutions using the planned Falcon 5 had been explored, but the only cost effective, reliable iteration was one that used a 9-engine first stage - the Falcon 9. Further exploration of the capabilities of the notional Falcon 9 vehicle led to a Falcon 9 Heavy concept: "two first stages as liquid strap on boosters, like Delta IV Heavy, allowed us to place about 25 tons into LEO – more than any launch vehicle in use today."
At this time the Falcon 1 had not seen its first flight yet, but SpaceX were intending to use a fleet composed of the 1, 5, 9 and Heavy variants, using the same Merlin engine across all vehicles to achieve cost savings and reliability through mass production. "I want to emphasize that although SpaceX development is now primarily on the Falcon 5/9, Falcon 1 is and will always remain a very important part of our business. I think that once the satellite market has time to adapt to its existence, Falcon 1 may very well see the highest launch rate per year of any rocket in the world."
As the Falcon Heavy was based on common cores and engines, subsequent development followed that of the Falcon 9.
By August 2008, SpaceX were aiming for the first launch of Falcon 9 in Q2 2009, and "Falcon 9 Heavy would be in a couple of years." Speaking at the 2008 Mars Society Conference, Elon Musk also said that a hydrogen-fuelled upper stage would follow 2–3 years later (notionally 2013).
By April 2011, the capabilities of the Falcon 9 vehicle and performance were better understood, SpaceX having completed 2 successful demonstration missions to LEO, one of which included reignition of the second-stage engine. At a press conference at the National Press Club in Washington, DC. on 5 April 2011, Elon Musk stated that Falcon Heavy would "carry more payload to orbit or escape velocity than any vehicle in history, apart from the Saturn V moon rocket, which was decommissioned after the Apollo program. This opens a new world of capability for both government and commercial space missions.”
With the expected increase in demand for both variants, SpaceX were planning to expand their factory, "as we build towards the capability of producing a Falcon 9 first stage or Falcon Heavy side booster every week and an upper stage every two weeks."
SpaceX were targeting late 2012 for pad integration of the Falcon Heavy demonstration rocket at its west-coast launch location, Vandenberg Air Force Base, California, followed by first launch in 2013. In order to accommodate Falcon 9 and Heavy, Launch Complex 4 at Vandenberg was being demolished as part of a pad upgrade.
In April 2015, SpaceX sent the "U.S. Air Force an updated letter of intent April 14 outlining a certification process for its Falcon Heavy rocket to launch national security satellites." The process includes three successful flights of the Falcon Heavy including two consecutive successful flights, and states that Falcon Heavy can be ready to fly national security payloads by 2017.
By September 2015, impacted by the failure of Falcon 9 Flight 19 that June, SpaceX rescheduled the maiden Falcon Heavy flight for April/May 2016, but by February 2016 had moved that back to late 2016. The flight was now to be launched from the refurbished Kennedy Space Center Launch Complex 39A. In August 2016, the demonstration flight was moved to early 2017 and further missions are rescheduled accordingly.
As at November 2016 all scheduled Falcon 9 and Falcon Heavy flights are on hold following damage to Launch Complex 40 caused by the explosion of a rocket during fueling operations for a launch rehearsal.
On 29 December 2016, SpaceX released a photo showing the Falcon Heavy interstage at the company headquarter in Hawthorne, California. 
The Falcon Heavy falls into the "super heavy-lift" range of launch systems under the classification system used by a NASA human spaceflight review panel.
The initial concept envisioned payloads of 25 tons to LEO, but by April 2011 this was projected to be up to 53,000 kilograms (117,000 lb) with GTO payloads up to 12,000 kilograms (26,000 lb),. Later reports in 2011 projected higher payloads beyond LEO, including 19,000 kilograms (42,000 lb) to geostationary transfer orbit, 16,000 kilograms (35,000 lb) to translunar trajectory, and 14,000 kilograms (31,000 lb) on a trans-Martian orbit to Mars.
By late 2013, SpaceX raised the projected GTO payload for Falcon Heavy to up to 21,200 kilograms (46,700 lb).
The Heavy configuration consists of a standard Falcon 9 with two additional Falcon 9 first stages acting as liquid strap-on boosters, which is conceptually similar to EELV Delta IV Heavy launcher and proposals for the Atlas V HLV and Russian Angara A5V. Falcon Heavy will be more capable than any other operational rocket, with a payload to low earth orbit of 54,400 kilograms (119,900 lb) and 13,600 kilograms (30,000 lb) to Mars. The rocket was designed to meet or exceed all current requirements of human rating. The structural safety margins are 40% above flight loads, higher than the 25% margins of other rockets.
Falcon Heavy was designed from the outset to carry humans into space and it would restore the possibility of flying crewed missions to the Moon or Mars. The Falcon Heavy's designed payload capacity, capabilities, and total thrust are equivalent to the Saturn C-3 launch vehicle concept (1960) for the Earth Orbit Rendezvous approach to an American lunar landing.
The first stage is powered by three Falcon 9 derived cores, each equipped with nine Merlin 1D engines. The Falcon Heavy has a total sea-level thrust at liftoff of 22,819 kN (5,130,000 lbf), from the 27 Merlin 1D engines, while thrust rises to 24,681 kN (5,549,000 lbf) as the craft climbs out of the atmosphere.
All three cores of the Falcon Heavy arrange the engines in a structural form SpaceX calls Octaweb, aimed at streamlining the manufacturing process, and each core will include four extensible landing legs. To control the descent of the boosters and center core through the atmosphere, SpaceX uses small grid fins which deploy from the vehicle after separation. After the side boosters separate, the center engine in each will burn for a few seconds in order to control the booster’s trajectory safely away from the rocket. The legs will then deploy as the boosters turn back to Earth, landing each softly on the ground. The center core will continue to fire until stage separation, after which its legs will deploy and land it back on Earth as well. The landing legs are made of state-of-the-art carbon fiber with aluminum honeycomb. The four legs stow along the sides of each core during liftoff and later extend outward and down for landing. Both the grid fins and the landing legs on the Falcon Heavy are currently undergoing testing on the Falcon 9 launch vehicle, which are intended to be used for vertical landing once the post-mission technology development effort is completed.
Cancelled propellant crossfeed
Falcon Heavy had originally been designed with a unique propellant crossfeed capability, where some of the center core engines are supplied with fuel and oxidizer from the two side cores, up until the side cores are near empty and ready for the first separation event. This allows engines from all three cores to ignite at launch and operate at full thrust until booster depletion, while still leaving the central core with most of its propellant at booster separation. The propellant crossfeed system, nicknamed "asparagus staging", comes from a proposed booster design in a book on orbital mechanics by Tom Logsdon. According to the book, an engineer named Ed Keith coined the term "asparagus-stalk booster" for launch vehicles using propellant crossfeed. Elon Musk has stated that crossfeed is not currently planned to be implemented, at least in the first Falcon Heavy version.
The upper stage is powered by a single Merlin 1D engine modified for vacuum operation, with a thrust at of 934 kN (210,000 lbf), an expansion ratio of 117:1 and a nominal burn time of 397 seconds. For added reliability of restart, the engine has dual redundant pyrophoric igniters (TEA-TEB).
The interstage, which connects the upper and lower stage for Falcon 9, is a carbon fiber aluminum core composite structure. Stage separation occurs via reusable separation collets and a pneumatic pusher system. The Falcon 9 tank walls and domes are made from aluminium-lithium alloy. SpaceX uses an all-friction stir welded tank. The second stage tank of Falcon 9 is simply a shorter version of the first stage tank and uses most of the same tooling, material and manufacturing techniques. This approach reduces manufacturing costs during vehicle production.
Reusable technology development
Although not a part of the initial Falcon Heavy design, SpaceX is doing parallel development on a reusable rocket launching system that is intended to be extensible to the Falcon Heavy, recovering the boosters and core stage only.
Early on, SpaceX had expressed hopes that all rocket stages would eventually be reusable. While no efforts are currently dedicated toward return of Falcon upper stages, SpaceX has since demonstrated both land and sea recovery of the first stage of the Falcon 9 a number of times. This approach is particularly well suited to the Falcon Heavy where the two outer cores separate from the rocket much earlier in the flight profile, and are therefore both moving at a slower velocity at the initial separation event. Since late 2013, every Falcon 9 first stage has been instrumented and equipped as a controlled descent test vehicle.
SpaceX has indicated that the Falcon Heavy payload performance to geosynchronous transfer orbit (GTO) will be reduced due to the addition of the reusable technology, but would fly at much lower launch price. With full reusability on all three booster cores, GTO payload will be 7,000 kg (15,000 lb). If only the two outside cores fly as reusable cores while the center core is expendable, GTO payload would be approximately 14,000 kg (31,000 lb). "Falcon 9 will do satellites up to roughly 3.5 tonnes, with full reusability of the boost stage, and Falcon Heavy will do satellites up to 7 tonnes with full reusability of the all three boost stages," [Musk] said, referring to the three Falcon 9 booster cores that will comprise the Falcon Heavy's first stage. He also said Falcon Heavy could double its payload performance to GTO "if, for example, we went expendable on the center core."
Pricing and development funding
At an appearance in May 2004 before the United States Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation, Elon Musk testified, "Long term plans call for development of a heavy lift product and even a super-heavy, if there is customer demand. We expect that each size increase would result in a meaningful decrease in cost per pound to orbit. ... Ultimately, I believe $500 per pound or less is very achievable." This $500 per pound ($1,100/kg) goal stated by Musk in 2011 is 35% of the cost of the lowest-cost-per-pound LEO-capable launch system in a circa-2000 study: the Zenit, a medium-lift launch vehicle that can carry 14,000 kilograms (30,000 lb) into LEO.
As of March 2013[update], Falcon Heavy launch prices are below $1,000 per pound ($2,200/kg) to low-Earth orbit when the launch vehicle is transporting its maximum delivered cargo weight. The published prices for Falcon Heavy launches have moved some from year to year, with announced prices for the various versions of Falcon Heavy priced at $80–125 million in 2011, $83–128M in 2012, $77–135M in 2013, $85M for up to 6,400 kilograms (14,100 lb) to GTO in 2014, and $90M for up to 8,000 kilograms (18,000 lb) to GTO in 2016 (with no published price for heavier GTO or any LEO payload). Launch contracts typically reflect launch prices at the time the contract is signed.
In 2011, SpaceX stated that the cost of reaching low Earth orbit could be as low as US$1,000/lb if an annual rate of four launches can be sustained, and as of 2011 planned to eventually launch as many as 10 Falcon Heavy and 10 Falcon 9 annually. A third launch site, intended exclusively for SpaceX private use, is planned at Boca Chica near Brownsville, Texas. SpaceX expects to start construction on the third Falcon Heavy launch facility, after final site selection, no earlier than 2014, with the first launches from the facility no earlier than 2016. In late 2013, SpaceX had projected Falcon Heavy's inaugural flight to be sometime in 2014, but as of March 2014[update] expected the first launch to be in 2015 due to limited manufacturing capacity and the need to deliver on the Falcon 9 launch manifest.
By late 2013, SpaceX prices for space launch were already the lowest in the industry. If SpaceX is able to successfully complete development on its SpaceX reusable rocket technology and return booster stages to the launch pad for reuse—enabling even lower launch prices—a new economically driven Space Age could result.
As of May 2013[update], a new, partially underground test stand was being built at the SpaceX Rocket Development and Test Facility in McGregor, Texas specifically to test the triple cores and twenty-seven rocket engines of the Falcon Heavy.[needs update]
Scheduled launches and potential payloads
|Summer 2017||Falcon Heavy Demo||SpaceX|
|Q3, 2017||USAF STP-2||DoD||The mission will support the U.S. Air Force EELV certification process for the Falcon Heavy. Secondary payloads include LightSail, Prox-1 nanosatellite, GPIM, the Deep Space Atomic Clock, six COSMIC-2 satellites, and the ISAT satellite.|
|2018||Arabsat 6A||Arabsat||Saudi Arabian communications satellite.|
|June 2020||Red Dragon||First mission to Mars with a Dragon 2 spacecraft. Payloads and customers to be determined.|
|August 2022||Mars Cargo 1||Start of regular cargo missions to Mars with Dragon 2 spacecraft. Open to multiple payloads and customers.|
|September 2024||Mars Cargo 2||Start of regular cargo missions to Mars with Dragon 2 spacecraft. Open to multiple payloads and customers.|
First commercial contracts
In May 2012, SpaceX announced that Intelsat had signed the first commercial contract for a Falcon Heavy flight. It was not confirmed at the time when the first Intelsat launch would occur, but the agreement will have SpaceX delivering satellites to geosynchronous transfer orbit (GTO). In August 2016, it emerged that this Intelsat contract had been reassigned to a Falcon 9 Full Thrust mission to deliver Intelsat 35e into orbit in the first quarter of 2017. Performance improvements of the Falcon 9 vehicle family since the 2012 announcement, advertising 8,300 kg to GTO for its expendable flight profile, enable the launch of this 6-tonne satellite without upgrading to a Falcon Heavy variant.
In 2014, Inmarsat booked 3 launches with Falcon Heavy, but due to delays they switched a payload to Ariane 5 for 2017. Similarly to the Intelsat 35e case, another satellite from this contract, Inmarsat 5-F4, was switched to a Falcon 9 Full Thrust thanks to the increased liftoff capacity. The remaining contract covers the launch of Inmarsat 6-F1 in 2020 on a Falcon 9.
First DoD contract: USAF
In December 2012, SpaceX announced its first Falcon Heavy launch contract with the United States Department of Defense (DoD). "The United States Air Force Space and Missile Systems Center awarded SpaceX two Evolved Expendable Launch Vehicle (EELV)-class missions" including the Space Test Program 2 (STP-2) mission for Falcon Heavy, originally scheduled to be launched in March 2017, but later postponed to the third quarter of 2017, to be placed at a near circular orbit at an altitude of ~700 km, with an inclination of 70º.
The Green Propellant Infusion Mission (GPIM) will be a STP-2 payload; it is a technology demonstrator project partly developed by the US Air Force. Another secondary payload is the miniaturized Deep Space Atomic Clock.
Solar System transport missions
In 2011, NASA Ames Research Center proposed a Mars mission called Red Dragon, that would use a Falcon Heavy as the launch vehicle and trans-Martian injection vehicle, and the Dragon capsule to enter the Martian atmosphere. The proposed science objectives were to detect biosignatures and to drill 3.3 feet (1.0 m) or so underground, in an effort to sample reservoirs of water ice known to exist under the surface. The mission cost as of 2011 was projected to be less than US$425,000,000, not including the launch cost. The concept was to be formally proposed in 2012/2013 as a NASA Discovery mission but was not selected.
Beyond the Red Dragon concept, SpaceX announced in May 2015 that they are positioning Dragon V2 spacecraft variants—in conjunction with the Falcon Heavy launch vehicle—to transport science payloads across much of the solar system, in cislunar and inner solar system regions such as the Moon and Mars as well as to outer solar system destinations such as Jupiter's moon Europa. Details include that SpaceX expects to be able to transport 2,000–4,000 kg (4,400–8,800 lb) to the surface of Mars, including a soft retropropulsive landing using SuperDraco thrusters following a limited atmospheric deceleration. When the destination has no atmosphere, the Dragon variant would dispense with the parachute and heat shield and add additional propellant.
- Falcon 9 (A single core version of Falcon rocket family)
- Comparison of orbital launch systems
- Comparison of orbital launchers families
- Delta IV Heavy
- Interplanetary Transport System (formerly known as Mars Colonial Transporter)
- Saturn C-3
- Space Launch System
- Tybor, Frank SpaceX: Access to Space in the Commercial Era, February 12, 2013, Speech.
- "Capabilities & Services". SpaceX. Archived from the original on 7 October 2013. Retrieved 1 April 2016.
- "Falcon Heavy". SpaceX. Retrieved 2016-05-01.
- Bergin, Chris (August 9, 2016). "Pad hardware changes preview new era for Space Coast". NASA Spaceflight. Retrieved August 16, 2016.
- "Falcon 9". SpaceX. Archived from the original on 1 May 2013. Retrieved 29 September 2013.
- Ahmad, Taseer; Ammar, Ahmed; Kamara, Ahmed; Lim, Gabriel; Magowan, Caitlin; Todorova, Blaga; Tse, Yee Cheung; White, Tom. "The Mars Society Inspiration Mars International Student Design Competition" (PDF). Mars Society. Retrieved 24 October 2015.
- "Falcon 9". SpaceX. Archived from the original on 2014-08-05. Retrieved 2016-04-14.
- elonmusk (2015-12-17). "-340 F in this case. Deep cryo increases density and amplifies rocket performance. First time anyone has gone this low for O2. [RP-1 chilled] from 70F to 20 F" (Tweet). Retrieved 19 December 2015 – via Twitter.
- "Falcon 9 Overview". SpaceX. 8 May 2010. Archived from the original on 2014-08-05.
- Musk, Elon. "June 2005 through September 2005 Update". SpaceX News. SpaceX. Retrieved 14 November 2016.
- Musk, Elon (2008-08-16). "Transcript - Elon Musk on the future of SpaceX". Shit Elon Says. Mars Society Conference, Boulder Colorado. Retrieved 15 November 2016.
- "SpaceX announces launch date for FH". 2011-04-05. Retrieved 2011-08-25.
First launch from our Cape Canaveral launch complex is planned for late 2013 or 2014.
- Musk, Elon. "F9/DRAGON: PREPARING FOR ISS". SpaceX. SpaceX. Retrieved 14 November 2016.
- "SpaceX Press Conference". SpaceX. Retrieved 2011-04-16.
- "US co. SpaceX to build heavy-lift, low-cost rocket". Reuters. 5 April 2011. Archived from the original on 5 April 2011. Retrieved 2011-04-05.
- de Selding, Peter B. (2015-03-20). "SpaceX Aims To Debut New Version of Falcon 9 this Summer". Space News. Retrieved 23 March 2015.
- Gruss, Mike (2015-04-15). "SpaceX Sends Air Force an Outline for Falcon Heavy Certification". Space News. Retrieved 21 April 2015.
- Foust, Jeff (2015-09-02). "First Falcon Heavy Launch Scheduled for Spring". Space News. Retrieved 3 September 2015.
- "Launch Schedule". Spaceflight Now. Archived from the original on 2016-01-01. Retrieved 2016-01-01.
- Foust, Jeff (2016-02-04). "SpaceX seeks to accelerate Falcon 9 production and launch rates this year". SpaceNews. Retrieved 2016-02-06.
- Stephen Clark [StephenClark1] (2016-03-01). "Payload officials with satellites aboard STP-2 mission (second Falcon Heavy) say launch has slipped from Oct. 2016 to March 2017." (Tweet) – via Twitter.
- "Anomaly Updates". SpaceX News. SpaceX. 1 September 2016. Retrieved 13 November 2016.
- HSF Final Report: Seeking a Human Spaceflight Program Worthy of a Great Nation, October 2009, Review of U.S. Human Spaceflight Plans Committee, p. 64-66: "5.2.1 The Need for Heavy Lift ... require a “super heavy-lift” launch vehicle ... range of 25 to 40 mt, setting a notional lower limit on the size of the super heavy-lift launch vehicle if refueling is available ... this strongly favors a minimum heavy-lift capacity of roughly 50 mt ..."
- Clark, Stephen (April 5, 2011). "SpaceX enters the realm of heavy-lift rocketry". Spaceflight Now. Retrieved 2012-06-04.
- "Space Exploration Technologies Corporation - Falcon Heavy". SpaceX. 2011-12-03. Retrieved 2011-12-03.
- "SpaceX Brochure" (PDF). Retrieved 2011-06-14.
- "Feasibility of a Dragon-derived Mars lander for scientific and human-precursor investigations" (PDF). 8m.net. October 31, 2011. Retrieved 2012-05-14.
- "Capabilities & Services". SpaceX. 2013. Archived from the original on 2013-10-07. Retrieved 2014-03-25.
- "SpaceX Announces Launch Date for the World's Most Powerful Rocket". Spaceref.com. Retrieved 2011-04-10.
- "Falcon Heavy". SpaceX. 2015. Retrieved 2016-04-29.
- "Saturn C-3". Encyclopedia Astronautica. Retrieved 2012-06-08.
- "Octaweb". SpaceX News. 2013-04-12. Retrieved 2013-08-02.
The Octaweb structure of the nine Merlin engines improves upon the former 3x3 engine arrangement. The Octaweb is a metal structure that supports eight engines surrounding a center engine at the base of the launch vehicle. This structure simplifies the design and assembly of the engine section, streamlining our manufacturing process.
- "Landing Legs". SpaceX News. 2013-04-12. Retrieved 2013-08-02.
The Falcon Heavy first stage center core and boosters each carry landing legs, which will land each core safely on Earth after takeoff.
- Kremer, Ken (27 January 2015). "Falcon Heavy Rocket Launch and Booster Recovery Featured in Cool New SpaceX Animation". Universe Today. Universe Today. Retrieved 12 February 2015.
- Nield, George C. (April 2014). Draft Environmental Impact Statement: SpaceX Texas Launch Site (PDF) (Report). 1. Federal Aviation Administration, Office of Commercial Space Transportation ". pp. 2–3. Archived from the original on December 7, 2013.
The center core engines are throttled down after liftoff and up to two engines may be shut down as the vehicle approaches maximum acceleration. After the side boosters drop off, the center core engines throttle back up to full thrust. The center engine in each side core continues to burn for a few seconds after separation to control the descent trajectorie of the side boosters.
- Simberg, Rand (2012-02-08). "Elon Musk on SpaceX's Reusable Rocket Plans". Popular Mechanics. Retrieved 2012-02-07.
- Strickland, John K., Jr. (September 2011). "The SpaceX Falcon Heavy Booster". National Space Society. Retrieved 2012-11-24.
- "SpaceX Announces Launch Date for the World's Most Powerful Rocket". SpaceX. 2011-04-05. Retrieved 2011-04-05.
- Logsdon, Tom (1998). Orbital Mechanics - Theory and Applications. New York: Wiley-Interscience. p. 143. ISBN 978-0-471-14636-0.
- Musk ambition: SpaceX aim for fully reusable Falcon 9, NASAspaceflight.com, 2009-01-12, accessed 2010-06-03
- Svitak, Amy (2013-03-05). "Falcon 9 Performance: Mid-size GEO?". Aviation Week. Archived from the original on 2014-03-25. Retrieved 2014-03-25.
- Testimony of Elon Musk (May 5, 2004). "Space Shuttle and the Future of Space Launch Vehicles". U.S. Senate.
- Sietzen, Frank, Jr. (2001-03-18). "Spacelift Washington: International Space Transportation Association Faltering; The myth of $10,000 per pound". spaceref.com. Retrieved 2013-08-08.
- Upgraded Spacex Falcon 9.1.1 will launch 25% more than old Falcon 9 and bring price down to $4109 per kilogram to LEO, NextBigFuture, 22 Mar 2013.
- "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 2013-10-07. Retrieved 2013-09-28.. Retrieved 2014-03-25.
- "Capabilities and Services". SpaceX. May 3, 2016. Archived from the original on July 2, 2014.
- Foust, Jeff (2013-04-01). "The great state space race". The Space Review. Retrieved 2013-04-03.
- Svitak, Amy (2014-03-05). "SpaceX to Compete for Air Force Launches This Year". Aviation Week. Retrieved 2013-03-12.
- Svitak, Amy (2014-03-10). "SpaceX Says Falcon 9 To Compete For EELV This Year". Aviation Week. Retrieved 2014-03-11.
'We need to find three additional cores that we could produce, send them through testing and then fly without disrupting our launch manifest,' Musk says. 'I'm hopeful we'll have Falcon Heavy cores produced approximately around the end of the year. But just to get through test and qualification, I think it's probably going to be sometime early next year when we launch.'
- Boozer, R.D. (2014-03-10). "Rocket reusability: a driver of economic growth". The Space Review. 2014. Retrieved 2014-03-25.
- Belfiore, Michael (December 9, 2013). "The Rocketeer". Foreign Policy; Feature article. Retrieved 2013-12-11.
- Messier, Doug (January 14, 2014). "Shotwell: Reusable Falcon 9 Would Cost $5 to $7 Million Per Launch". Parabolic Arc. Retrieved 2014-01-15.
- "Falcon Heavy Test Stand". Retrieved 2013-05-06.
- "SpaceX is pushing back the target launch date for its first Mars mission". Space.com. 17 February 2017. Retrieved 19 February 2017.
- Clark, Stephen (18 February 2017). "Spaceflight Now — Launch schedule". Spaceflight Now. Retrieved 20 February 2017.
- Leone, Dan (2014-07-24). "Solar Probe Plus, NASA's 'Mission to the Fires of Hell,' Trading Atlas 5 for Bigger Launch Vehicle". Space News. Retrieved 2014-07-25.
SpaceX, has three Falcon Heavy launches on its manifest between now and 2017: an inaugural demonstration launch planned for 2015 followed in short order by the shared launch of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s Deep Space Climate Observatory and the U.S. Air Force’s Space Test Program-2 experimental spacecraft, and a 2017 launch of a commercial communications satellite for Intelsat of Washington and Luxembourg.
- "Lightsail". Planetary Society. Retrieved 21 April 2015.
- "About Green Propellant Infusion Mission (GPIM)". NASA. 2014. Retrieved 2014-02-26.
- "Green Propellant Infusion Mission (GPIM)". Ball Aerospace. 2014. Retrieved 2014-02-26.
- "The Green Propellant Infusion Mission (GPIM)" (PDF). Ball Aerospace & Technologies Corp. March 2013. Retrieved 2014-02-26.
- "Deep Space Atomic Clock". NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory. NASA. 27 April 2015. Retrieved 2015-10-28.
- "SPACEX AWARDED TWO EELV-CLASS MISSIONS FROM THE UNITED STATES AIR FORCE". SpaceX.
- "FORMOSAT 7 / COSMIC-2". Gunter's Space Page.
- Falcon overloaded with knowledge – Falcon Heavy rocket under the Space Test Program 2 scheduled in October 2016. November 2, 2015.
- "Arabsat contracts go to Lockheed Martin, Arianespace and SpaceX". Spaceflight Now. Retrieved 2015-05-05.
- "SpaceX plans to debut Red Dragon with 2018 Mars mission" (Press release). Space Flight Now. 2016-04-27. Retrieved 2012-12-16.
- Peter B. de Selding (February 10, 2016). "ViaSat details $1.4-billion global Ka-band satellite broadband strategy to oust incumbent players". SpaceNews. Retrieved February 13, 2016.
The ViaSat-2 satellite, now in construction at Boeing Space and Intelligence Systems of El Segundo, California, will be launched in the first three months of 2017 aboard a European Ariane 5 rocket, and not the SpaceX Falcon Heavy vehicle as previously contracted. […] ViaSat is maintaining its Falcon Heavy launch contract, which will now be used to launch one of the ViaSat-3 satellites around 2020, and has booked a reservation for a future Falcon Heavy, also for ViaSat-3, which is not yet a contract.
- "Third Quarter Fiscal Year 2016 Results". ViaSat. February 9, 2016. Retrieved February 13, 2016.
ViaSat secured two launches with Arianespace - one for ViaSat-2 and one for a ViaSat-3 class satellite. The transition of the ViaSat-2 launch to Arianespace builds confidence in the launch schedule to meet ViaSat's goals of bringing new high-speed service plans across North and Central America, the Caribbean and the North Atlantic Ocean by the middle of calendar year 2017. ViaSat has also designated a ViaSat-3 class satellite launch to long-term partner SpaceX, using its Falcon Heavy.
- Davenport, Christian (June 10, 2016). "Elon Musk provides new details on his 'mind blowing' mission to Mars". The Washington Post. Retrieved June 21, 2016.
Essentially what we’re saying is we’re establishing a cargo route to Mars. It’s a regular cargo route. You can count on it. It’s going to happen every 26 months. Like a train leaving the station. […] By the next launch window, in 2020, Musk said the company would aim to fly at least two Falcon Heavy rockets and Dragon spacecraft, loaded with experiments.
- "SpaceX Announces First Commercial Contract For Launch In 2013". Red Orbit. 2012-05-30. Retrieved 2012-12-15.
- "Intelsat Signs First Commercial Falcon Heavy Launch Agreement With SpaceX" (Press release). SpaceX. 2012-05-29. Retrieved 2012-12-16.
- Clark, Stephen (30 August 2016). "SES agrees to launch satellite on 'flight-proven' Falcon 9 rocket". Spaceflight Now.
Intelsat, one of the world’s largest geostationary satellite operators alongside SES, has one launch reserved on a newly-built Falcon 9 rocket in the first quarter of 2017, when the Intelsat 35e satellite will launch from Cape Canaveral.
- "Falcon 9". SpaceX. Archived from the original on 5 August 2014. Retrieved 30 August 2016.
- de Selding, Peter B. (July 2, 2014). "Inmarsat Books Falcon Heavy for up to Three Launches". SpaceNews. Retrieved August 6, 2014.
- Foust, Jeff (8 December 2016). "Inmarsat shifts satellite from SpaceX to Arianespace". SpaceNews.
- de Selding, Peter B. (3 November 2016). "Inmarsat, juggling two launches, says SpaceX to return to flight in December". SpaceNews.
- Krebs, Gunter. "Inmarsat-6 F1, 2". Gunter's Space Page.
- David, Leonard (April 13, 2016). "Spacecraft Powered by 'Green' Propellant to Launch in 2017". Space. Retrieved 2016-04-15.
- Foust, Jeff (9 August 2016). "SpaceX offers large rockets for small satellites". SpaceNews. Retrieved 10 August 2016.
- "DSAC (Deep Space Atomic Clock)". NASA. Earth Observation Resources. 2014. Retrieved 2015-10-28.
- "Green Propellant Infusion Mission Project" (PDF). NASA. July 2013. Retrieved 2014-02-26.
- "Deep Space Atomic Clock". NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory. NASA. April 27, 2015. Retrieved 2015-10-28.
- Wall, Mike (2011-07-31). "'Red Dragon' Mission Mulled as Cheap Search for Mars Life". SPACE.com. Retrieved 2011-07-31.
This so-called "Red Dragon" mission, which could be ready to launch by 2018, would carry a cost of about $400 million or less. ... developing the Red Dragon concept as a potential NASA Discovery mission, a category that stresses exploration on the relative cheap. ... NASA will make another call for Discovery proposals in 18 months or so... If Red Dragon is selected in that round, it could launch toward Mars in 2018. ... Assuming that $425 million cap [for NASA Discovery missions] is still in place, Red Dragon could come in significantly under the bar. We'd have money left over to do some science.
- "Discovery Program". NASA Discovery Program Office. Retrieved 2013-08-03.
- Bergin, Chris (2015-05-11). "Falcon Heavy enabler for Dragon solar system explorer". NASASpaceFlight.com. Retrieved 12 May 2015.