Fathers' rights movement by country
||This article may require cleanup to meet Wikipedia's quality standards. (November 2011)|
|Part of a series on|
|Men's rights portal|
The fathers' rights movement has evolved in many countries. This article provides details about the fathers' rights movement in specific countries.
Fathers' rights groups began in Australia in the 1970s with the founding of organizations such as the Lone Fathers Association. Other well-known groups include Equality for Fathers, Dads Against Discrimination, Dads in Distress, Fathers Without Rights, The Men's Confraternity and the Shared Parenting Council. As with other fathers' rights activists, Australian organizations focus on issues of erosion of the family unit, custody, access, child support, domestic violence (including false allegations, and violence against men), child abuse, maintenance, the reintroduction of fault into divorce proceedings, biased and adversarial court systems and secrecy issues. Groups have successfully garnered media, as well as influence on politicians and legal reform. On May 22, 2006, Australia passed the "Family Law Amendment (Shared Parental Responsibility) Act 2006" making both parents responsible for decisions about their child through the concept of ‘equal shared parental responsibility’. The Act requires courts to consider an order that the child spend equal amounts of time with each parent under certain circumstances, but the Act does not state that courts must order that the child spend equal amounts of time with each parent. While Dad's in Distress expressed both appreciation of the Act as a small step in the right direction and concern whether the changes would be taken seriously by Family Law Practitioners and Barry Williams, national president and founder of the Lone Fathers Association, stated, "I think these new laws are going to be the best in 30 years", The Men's Confraternity welcomed the changes but also expressed disppointment and stated that the Act does not "force the Court to view parents as equals."
The Non-Custodial Parents Party (Equal Parenting) was formed in Australia in 1998. The party’s web-site states that the core policies centre on the issue of family law and child support reform. The Non-Custodial Parents Party (Equal Parenting) is currently registered as a political party with the Australian Electoral Commission (AEC).
Fathers' rights groups in Australia have condemned the actions of a militant men's group that engaged in criminal activities, including stalking and harassment.
Since Sep 2006 the Belgian federal law on "co-parenté" came into effect. It introduced a presumption of dual location or shared residency which by law should be taken into serious consideration and thorough investigation with priority in each individual case by the Belgian family courts and judges on the request of either one of the divorcing parents separately. Immediate court-access can also be requested by one parent, when additional reinforcement orders are necessary.
In an attempt to pass a law creating a rebuttable presumption for shared parenting, several fathers' rights groups launched an action in the Federal Court of Canada to overturn the child custody provisions of the existing federal Divorce Act claiming that the legal test used to decide which parent obtains custody is biased against fathers, thereby violating the discrimination based on sex provisions of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, as well as the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child.
Canada has few father's rights organizations, most are political in nature to lobby long term for changes to the Divorce act. www.OttawaMensCentre.com provides resources for fathers including lawyer referrals to deal with classic cases of alienation and false allegations.
The Canadian Equal Parenting Council, a coalition of 40 member organizations and worldwide affiliates stated that it is pleased with a proposed amendment to the Divorce Act to create a presumption for equal parenting.
There are at least two registered associations in Finland with a focus in fathers' rights: Association for Equality of Men (established 2009) and Fathers for Children Association (established 2012). The former works for equality of the genders in general from the viewpoint of men. The latter focuses on retaining the bonds between fathers and children after divorce. Fathers for Children disapproves parental alienation regardless of the sex of the parent who is trying to alienate a child from the other parent.
Separation of the parents has no effect on the rules governing the awarding of parental authority. Parental authority continues to be exercised jointly except if in the interest of the child the exercise of this authority must be entrusted to only one of the parents.
The latest was created after 2 Fathers climbed on top a of 2 yellow and grey cranes in feb 2013 in Nantes and tries to gather mothers, fathers and grandparents.
In Germany, one parent may apply to the family court for sole right of custody. The court will agree to such an application if they decide the removal of joint custody and transfer of custody to one parent is in the child’s best interests.
Non-married Fathers; To obtain "Shared Custody" (and any real rights concerning children) is possible through marriage or by the mother signing a declaration of shared custody or since May 2013 by applying to the court. Sole custody (for the father) is of course not realistic under the current German family law. The German Supreme Court (Bundesverfassungericht) has decided on 21 July 2010 that the actual Family Law is against the German Constitution Law. For a very detailed explanation of the legal situation, see Wikipedia German web page;
Joint custody can be defeated when the parents do not agree. See Constitutional Court decision 1 BvR 738/01 from March 1, 2004, paragraph II. 1. a) The third sentence is translated into English as: "The joint exercise of parental responsibility presupposes a viable social relationship between the parents and requires a minimal level of agreement between them." If one parent refuses to cooperate, the court changes joint custody to sole custody. The law governing the choice of parent receiving sole custody is based on "best interests of the child"  The non-cooperation of a parent is not a factor when determining "best interests of the child" and therefore which parent receives sole custody. A parent can refuse to cooperate in order to force a decision in favor of sole custody and then be eligible to win sole custody after refusing to cooperate with the other parent.
Mathieu Carriere, a well-known German actor, who after the mother and sole custodian of his 8-year-old daughter sued him for allowing several newspapers to publish pictures of Carriere with his daughter, decided to refuse to pay a 5,000 Euro fine associated with the lawsuit and instead announced publicly that he would be serving a 10-day prison sentence in support of the campaign for equal rights for both parents following divorce or separation.
There are many small to medium-sized organizations created to advocate for changing rights like Blauer-Weihnachtsmann.de, Väteraufbruch.
1.000.000 divorced fathers are living in Greece. With the present Greek family civil law, there is almost no option for shared or joined parenting between parents in a case of divorce. In 98% of these cases, the Greek judges decide against the fathers and order that the mothers will have the exclusive child custody. The unic association SYGAPA with 35.000 members, hold many activities for equality between parents and for changing the Greek civil law. As of 2013Greek fathers are still expecting real equality from politicians. They have created the "European Social Movement" covering all European countries.
The association SYGAPA www.sos-sygapa.eu with his President Nicolas Spitalas have changed the mentality and his 35.000 members support the actions: 2003: mediation, 2004: Scientific actions, 2005: International Forum, 2006: Congress, 2007: activists actions, 2008: Organisation at Thessaloniki, 2009: Athens-Syntagma, 2010: Conference at Drama, 2011: activism at Larissa, 2012: Publication of books, 2013: propositions for the family law.
Shared parenting cannot be requested by one parent, it is unregulated. The Family Court must 'place the children' and it must suspend the other parents' rights after divorce/separation. Any other formation requires mutual agreement between the parents. Post-divorce equal shared parenting is disfavoured resulting in penetration of 0.1% of divorce cases annual. Judges are not seeking any form of equality regarding legal status, economic situation or family work sharing of the parents.
In principle, during divorce or separation the state takes away the presence and caring of one parent and the revenue share of the other parent from the children. In other words divorce in Dual Earner Dual Carer family means 100% increase in child raising costs for one of the parents.
The main organisation is non-political, called the Association of Divorce Fathers, Hungary (ADF), it was founded in 1989 when NGO's became possible again after 40 years. ADF has Prof. Miklós Hernádi, the writer, as honorary president. The current slogan is "Apák összefognak gyermekeikért" (Fathers Unite for Their Children). ADF activities cover protests, media events, petitions, it offers Fathers'Day programs and free legal counselling.
An activist father group called Eurocsalád Workgroup was formed in 2005 focusing on the legal security of parenthood and family work sharing. A joint petition was followed by a father demonstration protesting against the practically impossible legal access to equal parenting (For the Law of Mind and Heart, 2008). The movement became active on the international scene: a father meeting called ESP-WG 2010 was held in Hotel Mercure Korona, Budapest with guests from 4 countries with the goal to join isolated efforts of local father NGO's into an EU level movement for equal shared parenting. Only 16 months later the Platform for European Fathers (PEF) was founded by 11 member countries in Brussels.
India is not a signatory to the Hague Convention for child custody cases.
See Dowry law in India.
||This section possibly contains original research. (November 2011)|
Shared parenting is usually only granted by the courts where the children are not a contentious issue and there is broad agreement on their upbringing education etc. The Fathers Rights-Responsibility Party contested the 2007 Irish general election. John Waters of The Irish Times frequently advocates improved father's rights in his weekly op-ed.
In Israel, fathers' rights activists staged protests against what they viewed as discriminatory divorce laws and family court policies, and an appeal to the United Nations resulted in a UN condemnation of Israel for discrimination against divorced fathers. Following the UN hearing, several Israeli fathers filed civil lawsuits alleging human rights violations. In particular, Israeli fathers' rights activists protested the Tender Years' Clause of Israeli law, which automatically granted custody of children aged six and under to the mother, as well as what they viewed as family court judges' tendency to automatically award custody of children to the mother in all but exceptional cases. High rates of alimony and child support imposed regardless of economic capability and no-exit orders prohibiting men owing child support from leaving the country unless depositing large sums of money, strict domestic violence laws that could see men unilaterally evicted from their homes and the legal exemption from prosecution for filing false claims enjoyed by women, and the high rate of fathers forced to see their children in supervised visitation centers due to false claims of child abuse were other major areas where activists called for reform.
A committee chaired by Professor Dan Schnitt, known as the Schnitt Commission, was formed to look into the issue in 2005. In 2008, it submitted its report, recommending joint custody in favor of automatic custody for mothers. On January 19, 2012, the Tender Years' Clause was abolished after Justice Minister Yaakov Neeman accepted the Schnitt Commission's findings. Under the new Israeli law, shared custody and parenting arrangements will be the default custody arrangement. In addition, a committee was formed to investigate child support laws.
By November 2014, joint custody became default in Israeli family courts, and child support obligations have been increasingly divided between both parents by court rulings. However, at this point, the law is still in flux, with future changes expected.
On May 18, 2007, members of the Fathers' Armada protested to highlight their claim that only women have rights after a divorce. Delegates met with the Equal Opportunities Minister, Barbara Pollastrini, who pledged support.
Father's Rights in Japan (FRIJ) and Children's Rights Network Japan  are campaigning to change the current legal position which allows the abduction of the child by the mother with no legal redress. K Net is campaigning in Japanese.
||This section possibly contains original research. (November 2011)|
The translation of joint custody in Spanish is 'custodia compartida'. Recent changes in regional laws, as Aragon, establish joint custody as preferency regim for children after the divorce of their parents. The INE, National Statistic Institute, offers fiable data on the custody (mother, father or joint custody): see: http://www.ine.es/jaxi/menu.do?type=pcaxis&path=/t18/p420/p01/a2009/&file=pcaxis In 2009, 84,1% of the custody is only for mother, 5,6% only for father and 9,6% is joint custody. Father's Rights in Spain [CCPMI] http://www.ccpmi.eu PARTY of Father's Rights Shared Custodia (equal rights and obligations in the raising and the education of the children after the divorce).
Members of the fathers' rights movement raise awareness about the need for shared parenting in New Zealand by sponsoring an award-winning website, holding meetings, and protesting publicly from their War-4-Kids wagon. Fathers of New Zealand sponsors a website that offers advice to help fathers succeed in family court.
The fathers movement in the Netherlands started in the end of the 70's of the previous century after the introduction of no-fault divorce laws combined with single parent care familycourt practices putting children in single parent care of mainly mothers without any access provisions in family law to also protect and secure the care and contact of children from and with their fathers. During the first decade several initiatives, groups and organisations emerged and then disappeared again. By 1989 the "Stichting Kind en Omgangsrecht" (Dutch Foundation for Children and Access) was formed, which was renamed in 2003 into the "Stichting Vader Kennis Centrum" (Dutch Father Knowledge Centre Foundation).
In May 2007 the Dutch father and equal parenting organisations have addressed Dutch Parliament with a Joint Manifesto to legislate for an equal parenting presumption (in Dutch: 'gelijkwaardig ouderschap') in Dutch family law. As a result in the Dutch family law change of 2009 a 'Right for children to be cared for and raised by both their parents equally' was introduced by a constitutional majority vote in the Dutch Parliament in support of an equal parenting amendment that was forwarded by the Dutch Socialist Party (SP). However since then the familycourt practices of giving single parent care to mainly mothers have remained largely unchanged. This in fact is a classic case and example of conservative familycourts and judges involved in the practice of 'legislating from the bench' by largely ignoring in stead of interpreting and applying new legislation as it was adopted by the Dutch parliament in 2009.
|This section needs additional citations for verification. (November 2011)|
Laws on Children were introduced in 1981. Several changes has been made since then, the latest January 1, 2009. The letter of the laws are very similar to those of Germany. The Family Activist Movement started to become a force in Norway in the mid-1980s with the introduction of F2F (Foreningen 2 Foreldre). Today F2F is by most Norwegian activists considered as a political organisation that speak according to what the government want to be the official truth, that mothers are best fit to be single parents. However, several researchers in Norway have found that mothers are actually more dangerous to their children than fathers.
In 2004 the first Men's Day (October 7) was held in Oslo. Only the Ombud of Gender Equality was represented and held a speech in front of Stortinget (The Parliament) in 2004. All other public institutions, including the Ombud for Children, refused to participate. The extreme radical feminist organisation, Ottar have tried to ridicule the Men's Day, but there are still Family Activists that keep it as an official day to argue for Children-, Men's- and Fathers Rights.
In 2006 the organisation Far og Barn [Father and Child(ren)] was started. Later that year another family organisation in Norway, was founded. Familiestiftelsen was established in December 2006 partly after the Swedish model. Familiestiftelsen use the Swedish Pappa-Barn logo.
In 2010 Far og Barn started
Polish Fathers want a rebuttable presumption for shared parenting in Polish law. There is a project of new law actually being prepared. The Polish Parliament should pass it shortly.
Active Fathers organizations are DzielnyTata.pl, Inicjatywa Społeczna Porozumienie Rawskie PorozumienieRawskie.pl, Rodzice Pomorza and a web portal www.opiekarownowazna.pl. This groups are active to highlight their claim that only women have rights after a divorce. Delegates work in Senate and Parliament to pass the new coo parenting law.
||This section possibly contains original research. (April 2013)|
If one of the parents wants a change in custody, the question of custody may be decided by a court. The same applies to the questions of which of the parents the child is to live with and how access for the other parent is to be organised. In divorce proceedings, moreover, the court must, in the absence of a claim, award custody of the child to one of the parents if joint custody is manifestly incompatible with the welfare of the child. This Law, passed in 2006, has resulted in significant majority of all court cases in which sole custody is requested, being awarded to the mother.
If a child is born to an unmarried mother, the mother gains sole custody automatically unless she elects to, in her sole decision, agree to shared custody. \
In Sweden there are four organizations that fight for fathers rights in custody disputes. http://www.minpappa.nu (the largest with soon 4000 members) revealed that 4 out of 5 fathers were discriminated by court as the mothers received sole custody. They also revealed one court in Sweden, in Lund, that had not given custody to any fathers. Pappa-Barn, http://www.pappa-barn.se/ is one of the best known lobby organisation in Sweden which have a large membership of fathers and mothers supporting equal gender rights in custody. http://www.pappaliv.se is another big lobby organisation with more than 1000 members. http://www.minpappa.nu is a smaller organisation located in the south of Sweden and more helpful for fathers who need help.
Parental Alienation and Parental Alienation Syndrome are unrecognized by the courts and psychologists of Sweden. The Alliance for the Child ("Allians för Barnen") is a social initiative to connect interdisciplinary scholars into a competence network engaging in informing political decision-makers in Sweden, Scandinavia and Europe about Parental Alienation Disorder (PAD). This condition, coined by Professor William Bernet, Professor of Psychiatry at Vanderbilt University, USA, is defined as one of several forms of emotional child abuse. It has been active since the late 70's in media by publishing articles in the press (Svenska Dagbladet, Brännpunkt: Barns rätt till två föräldrar - "Children's rights to two parents", Dec 27, 1979), in Swedish Radio (P1: Tendens), and, recently on the social debate media Newsmill (Ny Lag behövs till stöd för barn som berövas sina pappor - "A new law is required to support children deprived of their fathers")
The United Kingdom
The fathers' rights movement in the UK consists of a variety of groups, ranging from charities, self-help groups to civil disobedience activists. The movement can be traced to the founding in 1974 of Families Need Fathers, though the organization does not see itself as a fathers' rights organisation, pointing out that its primary focus is on the children's right to have a meaningful relationship with their fathers. FNF provides self-help support groups, promotes research into shared parenting, and lobbies political for legal changes in the family law system in the UK. It has been credited with several successes. The founding of Fathers 4 Justice in 2003 brought the cause of fathers' rights to public attention with high-profile stunts with members dressing as comic book superheroes and other easily recognizable characters to scale public buildings and monuments. With time their protests became increasingly controversial, and internal strife divided the group. It was briefly disbanded in January 2006 following a suggestion that Prime Minister Tony Blair's son be briefly kidnapped, though further protests by a F4J splinter groups, the 'Real F4J' and New Fathers 4 Justice, have occurred. Fathers 4 Justice reformed in May 2006 Fathers 4 Justice. Other fathers' rights activists have been criticized for harassment, threats and illegal activities, including fraud. In the UK, fathers' rights groups have advocated for changes to the Child Support Act including child support, shared parenting and access to children and lack of enforcement of court orders. Pressure from the fathers' movement has influenced the UK Government, which published a draft Children (Contact) and Adoption Bill in February 2005 that aims to widen judges' powers in dealing with parents who obstruct their ex-partner from seeing their children.
Bob Geldof reported that of the approximately 15,000 custodial cases that are resolved in family courts each year, only 7% of fathers in the UK are allowed to live with their children, and that 4 out of 10 fathers lose all touch with their children permanently. He reports that family courts think it extremely unhealthy for a man to articulate his love for his children. He states that 1 in 4 children live in single parent homes, children who grow up without their fathers are 5 times as likely to be unemployed and 3 times as likely to be involved in crime, 80% of all social housing is for single parent families, and that taxpayer costs for fatherlessness are at least £15B per year.
The fathers’ rights movement in Turkey emerged with the founding of Divorced Fathers in Istanbul in 2006 to create awareness on Parental Alienation, Parental Alienation Syndrome. The movement has protested Turkish family laws, which they pointed out, discriminated against men in child custody, alimony, child support settlements and in a presumption of maternal custody. They requested legal shared custody and physical shared custody and new laws reflecting more rights of child visitation. They also demanded better enforcement of child visitation rights and highlighted that it was against human rights and rights of children in UN to enforce child visitation rights by defining child as things per laws and requested to transfer the responsibility of enforcement of child visitation rights to Family and Social Policies Ministry to provide humanistic methods .
They have established different groups to organize their activities and raise their voices on PA (Parental Alienation) and PAS (Parental Alienation Syndrome). These groups are called Divorced Fathers Platform “Bosanmis Babalar Platformu”. Aggrieved Fathers “Magdur Babalar” and Divorced Fathers and Family Platform “Bosanmis Babalar ve Aile Platformu”. As a result of the movements, A Sub-Committee assigned by Turkish Parliament and representatives of platforms have had serious of sessions and have written a report to be given to the Parliament to make necessary changes on Turkish Family Law to recognize and protect the following rights.
Legal Shared Custody
Physical Shared Custody
New enforcements to assure Child visitation rights
New enforcements and new measures to prevent Parental Alienation
The fathers’ rights movement in the US emerged with the founding of Divorce Racket Busters in California in 1960 to protest Californian divorce laws which they stated discriminated against men in alimony, child support settlements and in a presumption of maternal custody. The group expanded into other states, changing its name to Divorce Reform in 1961. With the increase in divorce rates in the 1960s and 1970s, more local grassroots men’s organization grew up devoted to divorce reform, and by the 1980s, there were a total of more than 200 fathers’ rights groups active in almost every state. These groups focused their actions on what they viewed as sex discrimination in family law, by engaging in political activities such as lobbying state legislatures, filing class action suits, picketing courthouses, and monitoring judges’ decisions through “court watches”. The 1990s saw the emergence of new and larger organizations such as National Fatherhood Initiative and the American Fathers coalition. Several attempts have been made to found a national organization to which local fathers’ rights organizations could belong, however this has been difficult to achieve. As a result the movement remains mainly a loose coalition of local groups.
- Kaye, Miranda; Julia Tolmie (1998). "Fathers' Rights Groups in Australia and their Engagement with Issues in Family Law". Australian Journal of Family Law 12: pp 19–68. Retrieved 2007-03-24.
- Watts McCray Lawyers (2006). "A Layman's Guide to the Family Law Amendment (Shared Parental Responsibility) Act 2006" (PDF). Archived from the original (pdf) on 2007-01-04. Retrieved 2007-03-25.
- Watts McCray Lawyers (2006). "SOME PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS OF THE FAMILY LAW AMENDMENT". Archived from the original (pdf) on 2007-06-26. Retrieved 2007-04-20.
- "Dads in Distress Welcome new changes" (Press release). Fatherhood Foundation. 2006-06-29. Retrieved 2007-04-20.
- "New law agony for divorced fathers" (Press release). Fatherhood Foundation. 2006-07-02. Retrieved 2007-04-20.
- "Submission by Men's Confraternity" (PDF) (Press release). Parliament of Australia. 2006-07-15. Retrieved 2007-04-20.
- "Men's Confraternity discuss Family Lawyer Tricks". Men's Confraternity. Retrieved 2007-04-20.
- Non-Custodial Parents Party (Equal Parenting). Home Page. Date accessed 28 March 2013.
- Australian Electoral Commission’s current Index of Registered Political Parties. Date accessed 28 March 2013
- Flood, Michael (2004). "Angry Men's Movements" (PDF). In Stacey Elin Rossi. The Battle and Backlash Rage On (pdf). Xlibris Corporation. Retrieved 2007-09-16.
- Gordan, Sheldon. "Fathers' Day". Canadian Bar Association Magazine. Retrieved 2007-05-28.
- Barry, Martin (2009-07-15). "Private bill for ‘equal parenting’ goes on Parliament’s order". Laval News. Retrieved 2009-07-21.[dead link]
- Miesten tasa-arvo ry: http://www.miestentasa-arvo.fi/
- Isät lasten asialla ry: http://www.isätlastenasialla.fi/
- European Commission - European Judicial Network - Parental responsibility - France
- European Commission - European Judicial Network - Parental responsibility - Germany
- http://www.bverfg.de/pressemitteilungen/bvg10-057.html Actually only in German Language
- "Decision of Case 1 BvR 738/01". German Constitutional Court. 2004-03-01. Retrieved 2014-03-14.
- "Transfer of sole custody where the parents live apart". juris GmbH, Langenscheidt Translation Service. 2013-10-01. Retrieved 2014-03-14.
- "German Actor Willingly Goes to Jail for Being a Dad!!!". Families & Fathers. 2004-12-13. Retrieved 2007-05-26.
- "Blauer-Weihnachtsmann.de". Families & Fathers. 2010-10-24. Retrieved 2010-10-24. http://Blauer-Weihnachtsmann.de
- http://elvaltapak.hu Association of Divorced Fathers - Elvált Apák Egyesülete (hu only)
- http://europeanfathers.eu Platform for European Fathers 27/06/2011
- European Commission - European Judicial Network - Parental responsibility - Ireland
- "Small groups seek to end large parties' dominance". The Irish Times. 19 May 2007.
- Child support a revolution!
- "Fathers' Armada Wants Equal Rights for Dads". Italy. 2007-05-18. Archived from the original on 2007-10-06. Retrieved 2007-05-26.
- K Net Shared Parenting Movement Net Work
- "Blogger's Choice Award for Hands On Equal Parenting". Bloggerschoiceawards. 2007-05-26. Retrieved 2007-05-26.
- "Hands On Equal Parenting". 2007-05-26. Retrieved 2007-05-26.
- "Father of New Zealand". 2007-05-26. Retrieved 2007-05-26.
- Vader Kennis Centrum: http://www.vaderkenniscentrum.nl
- Joint Manifesto of the Fathersummit organised by the Dutch Father Knowledge Centre (Vader Kennis Centrum) on May 10, 2007: http://vadertop.blogspot.nl/2007/06/manifest-vadertop.html
- The Dutch equal parenting presumption in Dutch familylaw (Art247.4:BW): http://wetten.overheid.nl/BWBR0002656/Boek1/Titel14/Afdeling1/Artikel247/
- Dutch Socialist Party: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Socialist_Party_%28Netherlands%29
- Judicial activism: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judicial_activism
- Norwegian Law on Children: http://www.lovdata.no/all/nl-19810408-007.html
- Foreningen 2 Foreldre: http://www.f2f.no
- Translation of article from Dagbladet: http://www.mediaradar.org/norwayMinisterWorriedAboutWomensViolence.php
- Featured article Dagbladet comparing the feminist movement and the Family Movement and their slogans: http://www.dagbladet.no/kultur/2004/10/07/410529.html
- OTTAR; extreme radical feminist organisation: http://kvinnegruppa-ottar.no/no/
- Far og Barn: http://www.farogbarn.no/
- Familiestiftelsen 15. mai: http://www.familiestiftelsen.no
- Pappamagasinet FAR OG BARN: http://www.pappamagasinet.no/
- "MAMA TO NIE TATO Konkubenci mają więcej praw do dziecka, niż biologiczni ojcowie. Opieka równoważna ma to zmienić.". POLAND. 2009-10-28. Retrieved 2009-11-26.
- European Commission - European Judicial Network - Parental responsibility - Sweden
- "The Operation of the Family Courts" (PDF). House of Commons Constitutional Affairs Committee Family Justice. 2004-11-08. Retrieved 2007-03-18. Evidence Submitted by Families Need Fathers on page 146
- Coates, Sam (2005-06-08). "Fathers 4 Justice split by infighting". London: The Times. Retrieved 2007-03-24.
- Travis, Alan (2004-12-31). "Militant fathers intimidating court staff". The Guardian. Retrieved 2007-03-24.
- Dyer, Clare (2003-05-23). "Contact ban for hated father". The Guardian Unlimited. Retrieved 2007-03-18.
- Dyer, Clare (2005-03-02). "Fathers get raw deal on child access, say MPs". Guardian Unlimited. Retrieved 2007-03-18.
- Collier, Richard; Sally Sheldon (2006-11-01). "Unfamiliar territory". The Guardian. Retrieved 2007-03-24.
- UK Children (Contact) and Adoption Bill
- Geldof, Bob. "Bob Geldof on Fathers". YouTube. Retrieved 2007-05-26.
- Williams, Gwyneth I (2002). "Fathers' Rights Movement". Historical and Multicultural Encyclopedia of Women's Reproductive Rights in the United States. Greenwood Press. pp. 81–83. ISBN 978-0-313-30644-0.
- Clatterbaugh, Kenneth (1997). Contemporary Perspectives on Masculinity. Westview Press. p. 70. ISBN 978-0-8133-2701-3.