Feminists for Life

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Feminists for Life of America
Feminists for Life of America logo
MottoWomen Deserve Better
than Abortion

Refuse to Choose
Legal status501(c)(3) not-for-profit
Serrin M. Foster

Feminists for Life of America (FFL) is a non-profit, pro-life feminist, non-governmental organization (NGO).[1] Established in 1972, and now based in Alexandria, Virginia, the organization describes itself as "shaped by the core feminist values of justice, non-discrimination, and non-violence".[2] FFL is dedicated to "systematically eliminating the root causes that drive women to abortion -primarily lack of practical resources and support - through holistic, woman-centered solutions".[3] FFL publishes a quarterly magazine, The American Feminist, and aims to reach young women, college students in particular.[4]

Feminists for Life professes to "stand on more than two hundred years of pro-life feminist history", continuing a tradition of nineteenth-century American feminists such as Susan B. Anthony and Elizabeth Cady Stanton.[5] This position has been challenged by critics who question comparisons between 19th and 20th century views on abortion, as well as the attribution of certain quotations to Anthony and Stanton.


Feminists for Life was founded by Pat Goltz and Cathy Callaghan in Ohio in 1972.[6] Goltz and Callaghan met in a judo club on the campus of Ohio State University, where Callaghan was a tenured professor of linguistics. In 1974, Goltz was expelled from the Columbus, Ohio, chapter of the National Organization for Women (NOW) for arguing that abortion violated feminist principles,[7] although she and Callaghan were not expelled from national NOW membership.

Mission and purpose[edit]

FFL describes itself as a non-sectarian, non-partisan, grassroots organization,[8] and its members as believing in "the strength of women and the potential of every human life", refusing "to choose between women and children", believing that "no woman should be forced to choose between sacrificing her education and career plans and sacrificing her child", and as rejecting violence and exploitation.[9]

FFL uses "pro-women" arguments in order to convince women that abortion is "immoral". Goltz argued that the legalization of abortion allowed sexually exploitative men to avoid responsibilities, like paying for child support, and run away from their actions.[10] FFL argues that abortion comes from gender inequality.[11] In response to Roe v. Wade, Callaghan made several claims, including that abortion causes bodily injury to women "in a third to a half of the cases", and that the Supreme Court legalized abortion because they "hate poor and unwed mothers".[11] This claim is called "unsubstantiated" by professor Kelsy Kretschmer.[11] However, Kretschmer does explain that the goal of these arguments were to make it hard for men and women to consider abortion a "feminist" victory.[11]

FFL describes its broader vision as opposing all forms of violence, which it considers "inconsistent with the core feminist principles of justice, non-violence and non-discrimination",[12] including the death penalty,[13] assisted suicide,[13] euthanasia,[14] infanticide[15] and child abuse.[16] FFL strives for the traditional feminist goal of equality for women in the workplace.[17] FFL claims that its pro-life positions are not merely compatible with feminism, but are the natural conclusion of feminist values.[18]

With respect to abortions allegedly required to save the life of the mother, FFL states that it "refuse[s] to choose between women and children".[19] FFL contends that doctors sometimes advise abortion because "they are unaware of other options, or because they are pressured by fear of malpractice suits". FFL argues that physicians "should treat both patients and do what they can to save both lives [because] [t]his is what was done before the Roe decision was handed down".[19] With respect to ectopic pregnancies (which are not medically classified as abortion), FFL states that, "Since the child has no chance of survival, and the mother can survive if the pregnancy is ended, we must do what we can to save her. To let both die would not be pro-life."[20]

FFL's pro-life positions have been criticized by some traditional feminists. Katha Pollitt, columnist for The Nation, argues that FFL seeks to make abortion illegal in all cases, including those of rape, incest, health, major fetal defects, and "even some abortions most doctors would say were necessary to save the woman's life".[21] Former FFL board member Sharon Long responded that, "FFL opposes the criminalization of women (as almost everyone in the pro-life movement does) and focuses our efforts on freeing women from abortion by addressing the issues reported by the Guttmacher Institute - and working along with pro-choice advocates to check off our task list".[22] Pollitt also states that FFL president Serrin Foster "professed ignorance" about rates of death and injury in countries where abortion has been illegal.[21]


Feminists for Life is inclusive of anyone supporting its mission, regardless of personal opinions about contraception or pre-conception issues, stating, "Preconception issues are outside FFL's mission".[23] FFL also states that its members and supporters "hold a broad spectrum of opinions regarding preconception issues, and FFL welcomes anyone committed to working alongside us in our shared mission".[23] FFL and its representatives have repeatedly reiterated that the group takes no position on contraception.[24][25][26] Prominent FFL member Sarah Palin stated in 2006, "I'm pro-contraception, and I think kids who may not hear about it at home should hear about it in other avenues".[27]

Some commentators have criticized FFL for not promoting contraception. Katha Pollitt says that she asked Serrin Foster about it, and that Foster replied in part that the Pill did not work for teenagers, which Pollitt said was a belief she knew to be false.[21] Foster has said that FFL members hold a wide range of beliefs about contraception.[28] Feminist scholar Laury Oaks pointed out that FFL's silence on the subjects of contraception and safer sex "fails to address some of the most critical sexual and reproductive issues for women and presents views on pregnancy that cannot encompass the reality of many women's experiences".[4]

The American Feminist[edit]

FFL publishes a quarterly magazine called The American Feminist that is included with membership in the organization.[13] Each issue is centrally focused on a theme like Remarkable Pro-Life Women—Part III, Pro-Woman Answers to Pro-Choice Questions and Our Pro-Woman, Pro-Life Legacy.[29] Using original and reprinted articles[30] The American Feminist shows a "reliance on factual data, experiential testimony, and well-phrased analysis of abortion-related issues that can't be dismissed as expressions of inherited, unexamined religious beliefs".[13] Regular features include Herstory—a profile of an abortion opponent, news items, and legislative updates.[13]

College Outreach program[edit]

Susan B. Anthony image and attributed words that are used by FFL to portray her as "anti-choice". The quote deals with child custody in estate law rather than abortion.[31]

In 1994, Foster began to visit college campuses to deliver her speech "The Feminist Case Against Abortion".[4] FFL established a college outreach program in 1996.[4] The program provides information, excluding contraception but including the coercive factors that drive college women to choose between their education and bearing children.

For a college audience, FFL designed a promotional campaign that challenged abortion rights advocacy and provided information for pregnant women, not including how to obtain an abortion. FFL members created several kits for student activists, a kit for residential advisers and psychological counselors, a feminist history kit for libraries, and challenging ads for college audiences, in addition to the resources available through FFL's website.[32] Two of the eight "Question Abortion" posters offered in 2000 touched upon political issues, one of these saying "No law can make the wrong choice right".[4] One poster used an image of Susan B. Anthony together with text that was determined two years earlier by FFL historian Mary Krane Derr to be about estate law, not abortion.[31] The words attributed to Anthony are not a direct quote but rather a paraphrase by Frances Willard, president of the Woman's Christian Temperance Union, who said that Anthony spoke "after this fashion" during a conversation.[33] Other posters recast choice as the "imperative to have an abortion", or implied that life was better before abortion rights, back when abortion was illegal.[4] FFl also has more controversial posters that verify their anti abortion stance even in the terms of rape or incest.[4] FFL reports that its College Outreach Program has reached more than 5 million students since 1994, and that the rate of abortion among college-educated women has dropped by 30%.[34]

One of the goals of the college program is to get members of college campuses to help advocate for student parenting as a way to reduce the prevalence of abortion.[4] This is an example of "common ground" advocacy. Both sides of the abortion issues are coming together in attempt to work together to find solutions for other issues relating to abortion.[35] "

In 1997 Planned Parenthood Federation of America's INsider called FFL's growing College Outreach Program the "newest and most challenging concept in anti-choice organizing" and predicted it could "have a profound impact" on college campuses.[34]

FFL believes that there should be daycares on college campuses', dorm housing for women with children, and maternity coverage in health insurances.[36] They blame Pro-Choice activists for failing to secure provisions that would help make motherhood an easier choice for women.[36]

"Women Deserve Better" campaign[edit]

Feminists for Life's "Women Deserve Better" campaign was launched in 2003 on the 30th anniversary of Roe v. Wade. FFL described it as "a long-term public education effort examining the failure of abortion. The campaign aims to refocus the nation on the reasons women feel pressured into abortion and to promote women-centered solutions".[37] The basic message of the campaign, featured on billboards, posters, and placards, was "Abortion is a reflection that we have not met the needs of women. Women deserve better than abortion."[37]

"Abortion is not a measure of society's success in meeting the needs of women", explained Foster, "it's a measure of its failure. Why celebrate failure? Abortion is a symptom of—never a solution to—the problems faced by women... abortion has completely failed as a social policy designed to aid women...women have had to settle for far less than they need and deserve".[38]

The "Women Deserve Better" and the "Refuse to Choose" slogans reflected what FFL saw as integrated aspects of their philosophy. Foster explained: "We refuse to choose between women and children. We refuse to choose between sacrificing our education and career plans or sacrificing our children".[39]

The major legislative goal of FFL's "Women Deserve Better" campaign was the passage of the Elizabeth Cady Stanton Pregnant and Parenting Students Act by Congress. The Elizabeth Cady Stanton Act was first introduced into the United States Senate by Elizabeth Dole on November 8, 2005, and into the House of Representatives by Melissa Hart the next day. The first Capitol Hill briefing on the legislation took place on February 15, 2006.[40] The bill was criticized by writer Emily Bazelon in Mother Jones as a "largely hollow 'message bill'".[26] Bazelon opined that the 10 million dollars provided by the bill would be "paltry" when spread nationwide.[26] Bazelon quoted Frances Kissling, leader of the pro-choice organization Catholics for a Free Choice, as calling the bill "not serious", and adding that "if we support these message bills that don't really give women much help, then the real message we send is that we're not strongly committed to women".[26]

On July 12, 2010, Feminists for Life announced that the Elizabeth Cady Stanton Pregnant and Parenting Student Services Act had been incorporated as the basis of one of three components in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act's Pregnancy Assistance Fund.[41] The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services announced that "The Act appropriates $25 million for each of fiscal years 2010 through 2019 for the purpose of awarding competitive grants to States and Indian tribes or reservations. It is anticipated that up to 25 grants in the amounts of $500,000 - $2,000,000 per year will be awarded".[42] FFL President Serrin M. Foster said, "This is what we have been working towards. Pregnancy and parenting should never terminate an education".[41]

Feminists for Life has been a participant in the annual March for Life in Washington, D.C. and a sponsor of the Walk for Life West Coast in San Francisco, both of which mark the anniversary of the United States Supreme Court decision of Roe v. Wade.[43]

References to 19th century feminists[edit]

Suffragettes Elizabeth Cady Stanton (seated) and Susan B. Anthony

Feminists for Life professes to "stand on more than two hundred years of pro-life feminist history", continuing the tradition of early feminists such as Susan B. Anthony, Elizabeth Cady Stanton, Mary Wollstonecraft, and Alice Paul, as well as others whose remarks they contend indicated opposition to abortion.[5] Serrin Foster, FFL's president has asserted that, "Without known exception, the early feminists condemned abortion in the strongest possible terms".[44] FFL's website features what are said to be quotes from several early feminists,[45] some of which have been challenged by specialists in women's history.[46]

The quotes attributed to Anthony led to a dispute about her views on abortion. Much of the dispute centered on an anonymous article called "Marriage and Maternity" published in Anthony's newspaper and signed "A". Anonymously written articles were common in The Revolution, which published a variety of viewpoints.[47] The author of this article used fervent religious language and called abortion "child-murder".[48] Pro-Life Feminism, a book published in 1995 by FFL leaders, said that Susan B. Anthony was the "A" who wrote the article.[49] Ann Dexter Gordon, an academic expert on Anthony, disagreed, saying that Anthony did not sign her writings as "A"[50] and that "many of the ideas expressed in the article clash with her known beliefs."[46] Another article in The Revolution that was signed "A" took issue with one of its editorials,[51] generating a discussion in which the editors referred its author as "Mr. A."[52][47] In 2007, FFL said, "Feminists for Life is cautious about the attribution of 'Marriage & Maternity.' In FFL materials, it is simply said to have appeared in Susan B. Anthony's publication, The Revolution."[45] FFL uses this approach in a brochure called "The Voice of our Feminist Foremothers". Under the heading "Susan B. Anthony", the brochure says, "In her publication, The Revolution, was written ..."[53] followed by four quotes, all from the "Marriage and Maternity" article.

A quote by suffragist and lecturer Mattie Brinkerhoff, from an 1869 letter to the editor of The Revolution, appears on the inside front cover of almost every issue of FFL's magazine, The American Feminist:

When a man steals to satisfy hunger, we may safely conclude that there is something wrong in society—so when a woman destroys the life of her unborn child, it is an evidence that either by education or circumstances she has been greatly wronged".[54]

FFL cites the writings of Stanton, a likely practitioner of contraception to enable family planning[55] and an opponent of the Comstock laws restricting education about contraception and abortion.[56]. Stanton helped organize the Seneca Falls Convention, the first women's rights convention. According to "The Voice of our Feminist Foremothers", a brochure distributed by FFL, Stanton said this about abortion: "There must be a remedy for such a crying evil as this. But where shall it be found, at least where begin, if not the complete enfranchisement and elevation of woman?"[57] This quote comes from an unsigned article in The Revolution,[58] a newspaper owned by Susan B. Anthony and co-edited by Stanton and Parker Pillsbury. Ann Gordon, an academic expert on Stanton and Anthony, concluded that Stanton was not the author of this article, saying its "flat style" does not match her style of writing.[59]

Prominent members[edit]

In 2007, Foster noted that FFL had reached 26,000 members, including the families of women who joined.[26] A number of the members are well known in the arts and politics.

Two-time Emmy Award winning actress Patricia Heaton and actress Margaret Colin are honorary co-chairs of FFL.[60][61] Actress Kate Mulgrew is also an FFL supporter.[62]

Jane Sullivan Roberts, wife of U.S. Chief Justice John Roberts, served as pro bono legal counsel to FFL for twelve years and is a former executive vice president of FFL's board of directors.[63] During the confirmation hearings for John Roberts, his position on abortion was questioned in light of his wife's FFL membership, leading to intensified focus by the media on the group.[64]

Sarah Palin, the first woman to be nominated by the Republican Party for Vice President of the United States and the first female governor of Alaska, has been a FFL member since 2006.[65][66][67][68][69][70]


Early years[edit]

In the 1970s, FFL founders Pat Goltz and Cathy Callaghan met many other pro-life feminists who similarly were or felt excluded from women's organizations during the Women's Liberation Movement's second wave. In protest, Goltz and dozens of other pro-life feminists picketed the National NOW convention, hoping to draw attention to the controversy. The plan backfired when most media sources failed to pick up the story, and the few that did only mentioned that the pickets were by a pro-life group, failing to convey the full meaning of the protest.

Goltz later drew attention to what she saw as the growing trend of pro-life feminism and hostility against it from the feminist establishment. While testifying before a Congressional panel in 1975, Goltz stated, "The National Organization for Women suppresses any woman who is pro-life. It does not matter how sincere her feminism on the basic issues." (Senate Testimony, 1975)

The newsletter, Sisterlife, was first published during Goltz's tenure as national president. Originally the Feminists for Life Journal, the newsletter got its unique name from a letter to Goltz by a member of the Canadian chapter of FFL, who instead of closing her letter with the customary "In Sisterhood", wrote "In Sisterlife". Editors conferred the title on the newsletter, feeling that it reflected what they saw as a dedication to life from conception to natural death.


FFL was active in the ten-year battle to ratify the ill-fated Equal Rights Amendment (ERA). The organization's commitment to the ERA formed with the organization, during Goltz's presidency. Unlike Goltz, Callaghan was not immediately convinced of the need for the amendment, having achieved success as a professor at Ohio State University. Callaghan soon changed her mind, however, and began to support the amendment. In 1973, Goltz published an article (included in the anthology, Pro-Life Feminism: Yesterday and Today) disparaging the fact that the widespread fear of abortion on demand had blocked the ratification of ERA in Ohio at the time, and that it would eventually kill the amendment's ratification.

Like many other feminist groups of the women's liberation movement, the personal experiences of members of FFL were what informed their drive for equality and social justice. Many pro-life feminists had experiences with pregnancy discrimination, abortion, rape, child molestation. Their stories were published in various journals, newsletters, and other publications. Many of these stories were included in the anthology, Pro-Life Feminism: Different Voices.

After five years as president of FFL, Goltz retired. In 1977, organizational management was moved to Wisconsin. The group's activities focused on being a presence at both pro-life and feminist events, distributing literature, and writing letters to various publications. A national workshop that became an annual conference for pro-life feminists was launched during this time. Many members supported both the Equal Rights Amendment and a Human Life Amendment as "complementary in their concern for human life".[71]

FFL's work for the Equal Rights Amendment was met with a great deal of resistance, including strong resistance at pro-E.R.A. demonstrations, when FFL members attempted to distribute Pro-Life/Pro-E.R.A. tracts. In the late 1970s, Goltz spoke with the legendary suffragist Alice Paul, who authored the original Equal Rights Amendment. Paul conveyed to Goltz her belief that abortion was inconsistent with feminism, and that many of the founding mothers of feminism disapproved.[72] She also related her fear that the increased attempts to link abortion to E.R.A. would prevent the amendment's ratification, and eventually end feminism as well.


In June 1984, at the annual FFL meeting in Omaha, Nebraska, peace activist Rachel MacNair was elected president of FFL.[73] Out of her office at a crisis pregnancy center in Kansas City, Missouri, she ran FFL for ten years. Under MacNair, FFL began to receive more national exposure through media interviews, involvement in a broad spectrum of pro-life issues, and invitations to speak at pro-life events. By 1989, FFL was reporting that their research had found statements against abortion that had been made by early feminists.[74] Some of these findings were challenged by specialists in women's history, especially in the case of Susan B. Anthony, leading to a public dispute about her views on abortion. During 1992, MacNair also worked toward founding the Susan B. Anthony List as a political action committee working against abortion through electing pro-life candidates.[75]


In June 1994, the organization relocated its national office to Washington, D. C., where FFL re-organized its structure, and updated its image: The Sisterlife newsletter was renamed as The American Feminist magazine, a website was created, and new outreach programs were developed, including the College Outreach Program. FFL also became more involved in political advocacy, working to ensure the passage of the Violence Against Women Act, the Family and Medical Leave Act, and enhanced enforcement for child support. Child exclusion provisions in the Welfare Reform Act were opposed by FFL.


At the 2002 March for Life, which observes the anniversary of the Supreme Court's Roe v. Wade decision, several members of the Pro-Life Alliance of Gays and Lesbians (PLAGAL) were arrested for attempting to march under the PLAGAL banner, on the orders of Nellie Gray, holder of the permit for the march. Foster came out publicly in support of PLAGAL, saying she also had had similar run-ins with Gray in the past.

In mid-2005, the Woodward Building, which housed the offices of Feminists for Life, the National Organization for Women, and The Hill newspaper, among others,[76] closed to be converted into apartments.[77] FFL moved their headquarters to Alexandria, Virginia. FFL's recent work has involved advocating laws protecting pregnant women from being coerced into an abortion, laws that provide pregnant and parenting students with services, and monitoring cases of pregnancy discrimination.

On February 15, 2006, the first major Congressional discussions on the Elizabeth Cady Stanton Pregnant and Parenting Students Act began.[78] The act was passed in 2010 to supply funds during 2011–2019 for pregnant students and parents in school.[79]

Structure and chapters[edit]

FFL of New York[edit]

FFL's New York chapter was dissolved in 2007, and replaced by a new organization, Feminists Choosing Life of New York.[80]

Carol Crossed, founder of the New York chapter of Democrats for Life of America and former board member of FFL's New York chapter, purchased the Adams, Massachusetts, birthplace of Susan B. Anthony on August 5, 2006.[81][82] FFL did not own the Susan B. Anthony birthplace,[82] which was opened as the Susan B. Anthony Birthplace Museum on February 14, 2010.[83] Its mission states, "The Museum will highlight the familial and regional influences which shaped Ms. Anthony's early life, by displaying the textiles and furnishings of that period, as well as the literature and other memorabilia associated with her later career".[84] The birthplace is managed by The Susan B. Anthony Birthplace Museum, a non-profit corporation.[85]

Feminists for Life International[edit]

International outreach program[edit]

In 2004, FFL launched an International Outreach Program, reflecting that abortion is a global issue.[86] According to FFL's "Global Vision":

Feminists for Life advocates for
  • increased education standards and opportunities for the poor, especially for girls
  • increased employment opportunities for all women, especially poor women and others who have been excluded
  • micro-loans and other business assistance for low-income women to start businesses and purchase land
  • health care for mother and child, before and after birth, including pre-natal care, assisted delivery, post-partum care, emergency services, immunizations, disease prevention and treatment, especially for the HIV/AIDS pandemic
  • sustainable development that provides clean water, sanitation, housing, and food
  • child care for the working poor, and regulations to protect vulnerable women and children from forced labor
  • protection for women and children from violence, including sex trafficking
  • measures to rescue women trapped in domestic violence
(The American Feminist vol. 12 no. 1, p. 20)

"Abortion doesn't put food on the table, or provide clean water. After an abortion, a woman returns to the same situation that drove her there. One abortion is too many. It means we have failed women", argued FFL's international outreach director Marie Smith. "What women want and need is full participation as citizens, equal access to resources and opportunities, and enforced legal protection against discrimination, violence, and oppression... Education is the most empowering choice for any woman's future."[87]

In 2005, FFL was granted special consultative status as a Non-Governmental Organization (NGO) by the United Nations' Economic and Social Council.[88]

FFL International[edit]

Feminists for Life International is the international organization beyond its national groups Feminists for Life of America, and Feminists for Life of Ireland, which focuses on global violations of women's rights, particularly poverty, sex trafficking, domestic violence, and abortion.

The Spring-Summer Edition 2002 of "The American Feminist" was devoted to monitoring crimes against women around the world, including abortion, sex trafficking, bride burning, female genital mutilation, forced illiteracy, and sweatshop labor.[89] Three other editions of the organization's newsletter were specifically devoted to monitoring sex trafficking.[citation needed]

Feminists for Life International also supported the United Nations' Millennium Development Goals by publishing a statement saying, "Feminists for Life believes that the Millennium Development Goals are life-affirming targets that, if achieved, will greatly improve billions of lives around the globe. Women and children will be freed from lives of poverty, hunger, death, disease, and despair. We support the promotion of these goals and work to ensure that all members of society, including the unborn, benefit from their promotion and achievement." FFL's international director and UN representative Marie Smith cautioned, however, that "[w]omen's advocates must unite and direct our full attention to addressing the unmet needs of women - life-saving health care and nutrition, eliminating poverty through education and work opportunities, protecting women and children from violence and exploitation. Abortion is a sign that women's needs have not been met, and women deserve better."[90] "While Feminists for Life was gratified that the concluding document of the Summit was not compromised by the insertion of 'sexual or reproductive rights' (code for abortion), we believe caution must be taken with language that was adopted into the document. The inclusion, 'Ensuring equal access to reproductive health', is problematic. While 'reproductive health' has never been defined by the members of the United Nations to include abortion, proponents of abortion often use a broad definition of this term that includes abortion as a part of fertility regulation."[90] "Political word games do not serve women. Word games distract us and delay our efforts to help those in greatest need".[90]

Additionally, Smith published an editorial in 2005 in the Washington Times on the growing problem of sex trafficking of young Americans in the United States as a result of homelessness, child abuse, and poverty.[91]

FFL of Ireland[edit]

Feminists for Life also had an international branch in Ireland, known as Feminists for Life of Ireland, now defunct. The group was once headed by Breda O'Brien, who was profiled by The American Feminist's project "Herstory Worth Repeating".

Feminists for Life of Ireland worked with other groups such as Feminists Against Eugenics.[citation needed]

FFL New Zealand (1978–1983)[edit]

Founded in response to correspondence with American founder Goltz, Feminists for Life New Zealand (1978-1983) was founded by Connie Purdue (who also founded the New Zealand National Organization for Women) and romance writer Daphne Clair de Jong, who, like their American counterparts Goltz and Callaghan, found themselves at odds with the feminist establishment's endorsement of abortion.

During this period, de Jong authored "Abortion and Feminism; the Great Inconsistency" and "The Feminist Sell-Out" for the New Zealand Listener. The articles attacked pro-choice ideology as inconsistent with feminist principles, and as a pandering to a male system devised by men, for men. However, de Jong soon drifted away from the organization, disheartened at the increasingly social conservative membership and wholesale anti-feminist agenda of the organization.

Feminists for Life of New Zealand no longer exists. After 1984, it was known as "Women for Life". Although it began as a pro-life feminist organization, the organization gradually changed from a secular liberal organization to a Christian conservative pressure group, which reflected the increasingly socially conservative views of its late founder Connie Purdue. It then changed its name to the "Family Education Network", which published "Off the Fence" until it ceased publication in 2003.

See also[edit]


  1. ^ "List of NGOs in consultative status with the Economic and Social Council as of 18 September 2008", UN Economic and Social Council
  2. ^ "Living the Legacy of Pro-Life Feminism". Feminists for Life. 2007. Archived from the original on 2007-09-27. Retrieved 2007-08-08.
  3. ^ Becker, Brenda L. (Fall 2000). "Finding One Another: The Internet's Genius". Feminists for Life. p. 5. Retrieved 2007-08-07.
  4. ^ a b c d e f g h Oaks, Laury (Spring 2009). "What Are Pro-Life Feminists Doing on Campus?" (PDF). Feminist Formations. 21 (1): 178–203. ISSN 1040-0656.
  5. ^ a b The American Feminist vol. 12 no. 1, p. 5
  6. ^ Meehan, Mary (Summer 2008). "Feminists for Life on Campus". Human Life Review. The Human Life Foundation. Archived from the original on 2010-09-19. Retrieved Sep 11, 2010.
  7. ^ Dennis Doyle, "Catholic Social Teaching and Movements", The Church Emerging from Vatican II: A Popular Approach to Contemporary Catholicism (1992), p.212.
  8. ^ FFL's mission, p.2 Archived 2005-09-03 at the Wayback Machine, feministsforlife.org, accessed January 10, 2010
  9. ^ FFL's mission, p.1 Archived 2009-12-27 at the Wayback Machine, feministsforlife.org, accessed January 10, 2010
  10. ^ Ziegler, M. (2013). Women's Rights on the Right: The History and Stakes of Modern Pro-Life Feminism. Berkeley Journal of Gender, Law Justice28(2), 232-268.
  11. ^ a b c d Kretschmer, Kesly (2014). "Shifting Boundaries and Splintering Movements: Abortion Rights in the Feminist and New Right Movements". Sociological Forum. 29 (4): 839–915. doi:10.1111/socf.12125.
  12. ^ O'Brien, Nancy; Foster, Serrin (Summer 1995). "Women's Groups March in Wrong Direction". Feminists for Life. Archived from the original on 2007-09-27. Retrieved 2007-08-07.
  13. ^ a b c d e Hoyt, Robert G. (1999-06-04). "In The Know: Newsletters worth your time". Commonweal. Retrieved 2007-08-08.
  14. ^ Mathewes-Green, Frederica (2006). "The Euthanasia/Abortion Connection (reprinted from SisterLife)". Feminists for Life. Archived from the original on 2007-09-27. Retrieved 2007-08-08.
  15. ^ Kiniorski, Kerri-Ann (Fall 1997). "Desperate Young Women Kill Their Newborn Babies: Fighting a Culture of Violence". Feminists for Life. Archived from the original on 2007-08-16. Retrieved 2007-08-08.
  16. ^ Gordon, Karen J. (Winter 1999). "Child Abuse: Abortion and the Battered Child" (PDF). Feminists for Life. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2007-09-27. Retrieved 2007-08-08.
  17. ^ Kiniorski, Karri-Ann (Summer 1998). "U.S. Work-Family Policies: Historical Precedents and new Directions" (PDF). Feminists for Life. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2007-09-27. Retrieved 2007-08-08.
  18. ^ "Feminist for Life Winn Wants Support for Pregnant Students" Archived 2008-09-16 at the Wayback Machine, A. Cerny, Brown Daily Herald, 17 February 2006.
  19. ^ a b FFL Q&A Archived 2010-09-05 at the Wayback Machine
  20. ^ "Pro-Woman Answers to Pro-Choice Questions" Archived 2010-09-19 at the Wayback Machine, The American Feminist, 2005.
  21. ^ a b c Katha Pollitt, "Feminists for (Fetal) Life", The Nation, Aug. 11, 2005.
  22. ^ Long, Sharon. "Fetal Position" (letter to the editor)[permanent dead link], The Nation, April 5, 2010.
  23. ^ a b "FFL's Frequestly Asked Questions". Feminists for Life. 2007. Archived from the original on 2010-09-18. Retrieved 2010-09-11.
  24. ^ "Feminists for Life Thrilled to See Sarah Palin as Vice Presidential Nominee", Catholic News Agency, 29 August 2008 ("Palin...is in support of contraception, a position that lies beyond the scope of FFL’s mission, Ms. Foster said.")
  25. ^ "The Battle to Ban Birth Control", Salon, Mar. 20, 2006 ("Feminists for Life refused interview requests ... [because] contraception lies outside of its purview".)
  26. ^ a b c d e Bazelon, Emily (January–February 2007) "Suffragette City: Pro-life Feminists." Mother Jones, Politics, Current Affairs. Retrieved on January 12, 2010.
  27. ^ Mehta, Seema, "GOP Ticket Split Over Condom Use", Los Angeles Times, 6 September 2008.
  28. ^ Martin, Michel. "Women's Group Advocates For Abortion Alternatives" on Tell Me More, National Public Radio, January 22, 2010.
  29. ^ "The following issues of The American Feminist". Feminists for Life. 2007. Archived from the original on 2007-09-11. Retrieved 2007-08-08.
  30. ^ "Organizations Opposed to Reproductive Freedom". Political Research Associates. Retrieved 2007-08-08.
  31. ^ a b Derr, Mary Krane (Spring 1998). "herstory Worth Repeating" (PDF). The American Feminist. 5 (1): 19. Retrieved October 2, 2019.
  32. ^ "The Feminist Case Against Abortion" was included in the Women's Rights anthology of the Great Speeches in History book series (2001, ISBN 0-7377-0773-9).
  33. ^ Willard, Frances E., "The Dawn of Woman's Day," in Our Day: a Record and Review of Current Reform, Vol. 2, July–December 1888. Boston: Our Day Publishing Company, p. 347.
  34. ^ a b "College Outreach Program". Feminists for Life. Archived from the original on 2006-09-02.
  35. ^ Joffe, C. (1997). Abortion as single-issue politics. Society, 34(5), 25-29.
  36. ^ a b BAILEY, C. (2006). "Taking Back the Campus": Right-Wing Feminism as the "Middle Ground" Feminist Teacher, 16(3), 173-188. JSTOR 40535471
  37. ^ a b Feminists for Life. Serrin M. Foster. smf.htm "Women Deserve Better than Abortion"[permanent dead link]
  38. ^ "Women Deserve Better than Abortion" Archived 2006-02-16 at the Wayback Machine
  39. ^ "Some Feminists Won't Participate in 'March for Women's Lives'" Archived 2006-09-02 at the Wayback Machine
  40. ^ Elizabeth Cady Stanton Pregnant and Parenting Student Services Act Archived 2006-09-08 at the Wayback Machine
  41. ^ a b "Major Victory for Pregnant & Parenting Students" (Press release). Feminists for Life. 2010-07-12. Archived from the original on 2010-09-19. Retrieved 2010-09-24.
  42. ^ "HHS Secretary Sebelius Announces the Availability of Funding for the Support of Pregnant and Parenting Teens and Women" (Press release). U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. 2010-07-02. Archived from the original on 2010-10-14. Retrieved 2010-09-24.
  43. ^ Official website of the Walk for Life "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 2009-05-05. Retrieved 2009-04-12.CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
  44. ^ Foster, Serrin, "The Feminist Case Against Abortion", The American Feminist vol. 11 nos. 2–3, p. 29
  45. ^ a b Clark, Cat (Spring 2007). "The Truth About Susan B. Anthony: Did One of America's First Feminists Oppose Abortion?". The American Feminist. Feminists for Life: 1–5. ISSN 1532-6861. Retrieved October 2, 2019.
  46. ^ a b Stevens, Allison (Washington Bureau Chief) (October 6, 2006). "Susan B. Anthony's Abortion Position Spurs Scuffle". Women's e-News. Retrieved October 2, 2019.
  47. ^ a b Harper Ward. "Misrepresenting Susan B. Anthony on Abortion". Susan B. Anthony Museum and House. Retrieved October 7, 2019.
  48. ^ "Marriage and Maternity". The Revolution. July 8, 1869. p. 4. Retrieved October 7, 2019.
  49. ^ Derr, Mary Krane; MacNair, Rachel; Naranjo-Huebl, Linda (2005). Pro-Life Feminism: Yesterday and Today. Feminism & Nonviolence Studies Association. p. 43–47. ISBN 1-4134-9576-1. The article was reprinted under the heading "'A Dreadful Volume of Heart-Histories' by Susan B. Anthony". The authors said in an endnote that it was signed "A" but provided reasons for believing that it was written by Anthony.
  50. ^ Sherr, Lynn; Gordon, Ann D. (May 21, 2010). "Sarah Palin is no Susan B. Anthony". The Washington Post. Retrieved August 3, 2010.
  51. ^ "Woman and Finance". The Revolution. October 29, 1868. p. 262. Retrieved October 7, 2019.
  52. ^ "Capital and Labor". The Revolution. November 12, 1868. p. 301. Retrieved October 7, 2019.
  53. ^ "The Voice of our Feminist Foremothers" (PDF). Feminists for Life. Retrieved October 7, 2019.
  54. ^ The Revolution, 4(9):138–9, September 2, 1869.
  55. ^ Baker, Jean H. (2006). Sisters: The Lives of America's Suffragists. Macmillan. pp. 106–107. ISBN 978-0-8090-8703-7.
  56. ^ Brodie, Janet Farrell (1997). Contraception and Abortion in Nineteenth-Century America. Cornell University Press. pp. 278–280. ISBN 978-0-8014-8433-9.
  57. ^ "The Voice of our Feminist Foremothers" (PDF). Feminists for Life. Feminists for Life. Retrieved October 1, 2019.
  58. ^ "Child Murder". The Revolution. March 12, 1868. pp. 146–147. Retrieved October 1, 2019.
  59. ^ Thomas, Tracy (2012). "Misappropriating Women's History in the Law and Politics of Abortion". Seattle University Law Review. Seattle University School of Law. 36 (1): 62. Retrieved October 1, 2019. Thomas agreed with Gordon, saying (pp. 55-57) the article was probably written by Pillsbury, based on similarity to his other writings. Thomas said that Pillsbury performed most of the day-to-day editorial activities for the newspaper because Stanton was away on speaking tours for much of the year, sending in her articles by mail.
  60. ^ The American Feminist vol. 7 no. 4, pp. 12–13
  61. ^ The American Feminist vol. 12 no. 1, p. 4
  62. ^ WinterTAF00-01.11-17.quark Archived 2008-05-09 at the Wayback Machine
  63. ^ "Jane Sullivan Roberts' Service to Women". Feminists for Life. Archived from the original on 2006-07-17.
  64. ^ "Stalking the pro-life feminists". Archived from the original on 2005-11-22.
  65. ^ "Abortion Draws Clear Divide in State Races", Juneau Empire, accessed Aug. 29, 2008
  66. ^ "Governor’s Race: Top Contenders Meet One Last Time to Debate", Anchorage Daily News, Nov. 3, 2006.
  67. ^ Alter, Jonathan (August 29, 2008). "McCain's 'Hail Sarah' Pass". Newsweek. Retrieved 2008-09-04.
  68. ^ "Same-sex Unions, Drugs Get Little Play" Archived 2008-06-11 at the Wayback Machine, Anchorage Daily News, Aug. 6, 2006
  69. ^ Saunders, Debra J. (August 18, 2010). "Gov. Sarah Palin - GOP's dream V.P. candidate". The San Francisco Chronicle.
  70. ^ Yardley, William (August 29, 2008). "Sarah Heath Palin, an Outsider Who Charms". The New York Times. Retrieved 2008-09-03.
  71. ^ "Reflecting as FFL Celebrates Its Tenth Birthday" and "HLA and ERA—Inedible Alphabet Soup?" in Pro-Life Feminism: Different Voices, ISBN 0-919225-22-5, pp. 17, 35
  72. ^ [Feminist History: Voices of our Feminist Foremothers "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 2008-05-18. Retrieved 2008-06-24.CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)]
  73. ^ Paynter, Ben (October 21, 2004). "Mind Field – Rachel MacNair has come up with a theory to bring peace. But it could turn soldiers into better killers". Pitch News. Archived from the original on 2012-09-26. Retrieved September 2, 2011.
  74. ^ D'Souza, Dinesh (December 1989). "Feminism Derailed". Crisis: 4. Feminists for Life, a group of women's advocates who oppose abortion, have unearthed quotations showing that many of the founders of the feminist movement had grave reservations about abortion. Susan B. Anthony called it 'child-murder'.
  75. ^ Kennedy, Angela (1997). Swimming against the tide: feminist dissent on the issue of abortion. Open Air. p. 117. ISBN 978-1-85182-267-6. Rachel MacNair ...is the founder of the Susan B. Anthony List...
  76. ^ Woodward Building, 733 15th St NW DC. Retrieved September 24, 2010.
  77. ^ SJG Residential Properties: The Woodward Building Archived 2011-02-11 at the Wayback Machine. Retrieved September 24, 2010.
  78. ^ Bottcher, Rosemary Oelrich (Fall 2002) "The Conception and Life of FFL." Archived 2010-07-06 at the Wayback Machine The American Feminist, volume 9, number 2, pp. 3–6. Retrieved on January 12, 2010.
  79. ^ Bader, Eleanor J. (Winter 2011). "'Feminists for Life': A built-in contradiction?". On the Issues. Retrieved December 4, 2016.
  80. ^ "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 2008-05-09. Retrieved 2008-06-01.CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
  81. ^ Schiff, Stacy (2006-10-13). "Desperately Seeking Susan". The New York Times.
  82. ^ a b Leibovich, Lori (2006-08-07). "Suffragist's home bought by anti-choice group". salon.com. Archived from the original on 2006-08-24.
  83. ^ Mayer, Lauren."Susan B. Anthony Birthplace and Museum Opens." Preservation Magazine. March 4, 2010.
  84. ^ "Mission." Archived 2011-03-01 at the Wayback Machine Susan B. Anthony Birthplace Museum. Retrieved September 24, 2010.
  85. ^ "Frequently Asked Questions." Archived 2013-12-03 at the Wayback Machine Susan B. Anthony Birthplace Museum. Retrieved September 24, 2010
  86. ^ FFL International index Archived 2005-09-03 at the Wayback Machine
  87. ^ The American Feminist vol. 12 no. 1, pp. 20–21
  88. ^ "New Voice for Women and Children at United Nations" Archived 2005-04-18 at the Wayback Machine
  89. ^ Foster, Serrin, ed. (Spring, Summer 2002) "Crimes Against Women Around The World." Archived 2007-09-27 at the Wayback Machine The American Feminist, volume 9, number 1. Retrieved on January 12, 2010.
  90. ^ a b c Smith, Marie (2005) United Nations Millennium Development Summit. Archived 2007-06-12 at the Wayback Machine Feminists for Life. Retrieved on January 12, 2010.
  91. ^ Washington Times, Editorial/Op-Ed. Marie Smith, Homegrown sex trafficking. Archived webpage.

External links[edit]