This article needs additional citations for verification. (July 2016) (Learn how and when to remove this template message)
A fiducial marker or fiducial is an object placed in the field of view of an imaging system which appears in the image produced, for use as a point of reference or a measure. It may be either something placed into or on the imaging subject, or a mark or set of marks in the reticle of an optical instrument.
In high-resolution optical microscopy, fiducials can be used to actively stabilize the field of view. Stabilization to better than 0.1 nm is achievable.
In physics, 3D computer graphics, and photography, fiducials are reference points: fixed points or lines within a scene to which other objects can be related or against which objects can be measured. Cameras outfitted with Réseau plates produce these reference marks (also called Réseau crosses) and are commonly used by NASA. Such marks are closely related to the timing marks used in optical mark recognition.
Airborne geophysical surveys also use the term "fiducial" as a sequential reference number in the measurement of various geophysical instruments during a survey flight. This application of the term evolved from air photo frame numbers that were originally used to locate geophysical survey lines in the early days of airborne geophysical surveying. This method of positioning has since been replaced by GPS, but the term "fiducial" continues to be used as the time reference for data measured during flights.
In applications of augmented reality, fiducials help resolve several problems of integration between the real world view and the synthetic images that augment it. Fiducials of known pattern and size can serve as real world anchors of location, orientation and scale. They can establish the identity of the scene or objects within the scene. For example, a fiducial printed on one page of an alternative reality popup book would identify the page to allow the system to select the augmentation content. It would also serve to moor the coordinates of the augmented content to the three dimensional location, orientation and scale of the open book, helping to create a stable and accurate fusion of real and synthetic imagery.
A slightly more complex example would be multiple fiducials, each attached to an individual piece in an alternative reality board game.
The appearance of markers in images may act as a reference for image scaling, or may allow the image and physical object, or multiple independent images, to be correlated. By placing fiducial markers at known locations in a subject, the relative scale in the produced image may be determined by comparison of the locations of the markers in the image and subject. In applications such as photogrammetry, the fiducial marks of a surveying camera may be set so that they define the principal point, in a process called "collimation". This would be a creative use of how the term collimation is conventionally understood.
Fiducial marker sets
Some sets of fiducial markers are specifically designed to allow rapid, low-latency detection of the 2D location, 2D orientation, and identity of hundreds of unique fiducial markers. For example, the "amoeba" reacTIVision fiducials, the d-touch fiducials, or the TRIP circular barcode tags (ringcodes).
Fiducial markers are used in a wide range of medical imaging applications. Images of the same subject produced with two different imaging systems may be correlated by placing a fiducial marker in the area imaged by both systems. In this case, a marker which is visible in the images produced by both imaging modalities must be used. By this method, functional information from SPECT or positron emission tomography can be related to anatomical information provided by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Similarly, fiducial points established during MRI can be correlated with brain images generated by magnetoencephalography to localize the source of brain activity. Such fiducial points or markers are often created in tomographic images such as computed tomography, magnetic resonance and positron emission tomography images using a device known as the N-localizer.
In electrocardiography (ECG), fiducial points are landmarks on the ECG complex such as the isoelectric line (PQ junction), and onset of individual waves such as PQRST.
In processes that involve following a labelled molecule as it is incorporated in some larger polymer, such markers can be used to follow the dynamics of growth/shrinkage of the polymer, as well as its movement. Commonly used fiducial markers are fluorescently labelled monomers of bio-polymers. The task of measuring and quantifying what happens to these is borrowed from methods in physics and computational imaging like Speckle imaging.
In radiotherapy and radiosurgical systems, fiducial points are landmarks in the tumour to facilitate correct targets for treatment. In neuronavigation, a "fiducial spatial coordinate system" is used as a reference, for use in neurosurgery, to describe the position of specific structures within the head or elsewhere in the body. Such fiducial points or landmarks are often created in magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography images by using the N-localizer.
Printed circuit boards
In printed circuit board (PCB) manufacturing, fiducial marks, also known as circuit pattern recognition marks, allow SMT placement equipment to accurately locate and place parts on boards. These devices locate the circuit pattern by providing common measurable points. They are usually made by leaving a circular area of the board bare from solder-mask coating. Inside this area is a circle exposing the copper plating beneath. This center metallic disc can be solder-coated, gold-plated or otherwise treated, although bare copper is most common if not a current-carrying contact. Alternatively, it is possible to use clear solder-mask lacquer to cover the fiducials. In order to minimize rounding errors it was good practice to place fiducials in the same grid (or some multiple of it) that was used to place the parts, however, this isn't always possible on high-density boards nor is it a requirement any more with modern high-precision machines.
Most placement machines are fed boards for assembly by a rail conveyor, with the board being clamped down in the assembly area of the machine. Each board will clamp slightly differently than the others, and the variance—which will generally be only tenths of a millimeter—is sufficient to ruin a board without proper calibration. Consequently, a typical PCB will have multiple fiducials to allow placement robots to precisely determine the board's orientation. By measuring the location of the fiducials relative to the board plan stored in the machine's memory, the machine can reliably compute the degree to which parts must be moved relative to the plan, called offset, to ensure accurate placement.
Using three fiducials enables the machine to determine PCB offset in both the X and Y axes, as well as to determine if the board has rotated during clamping, allowing the machine to rotate parts to be placed to match. Such fiducials are also called global fiducials. Global fiducials are also used in conjunction with stencil printing. Without them the printer would not print the solder paste in exact alignment with the pads. Parts requiring a very high degree of placement precision, such as ball grid array packages, may have additional local fiducials near the package placement area of the board to further fine-tune the targeting. Local fiducial, however, cannot be used in the stencil printing process.
Conversely, low end, low-precision boards may only have two fiducials, or use fiducials applied as part of the screen printing process applied to most circuit boards. Some very low-end boards may use the plated mounting screw holes as ersatz fiducials, although this yields very low accuracy.
For prototyping and small batch production runs, the use of a fiducial camera can greatly improve the process of board fabrication. By automatically locating fiducial markers, the camera automates board alignment. This helps with front to back and multilayer applications, eliminating the need for set pins.
- Carter, Ashley R.; King, Gavin M.; Ulrich, Theresa A.; Halsey, Wayne; Alchenberger, David; Perkins, Thomas T. (2007-01-04). "Stabilization of an optical microscope to 01 nm in three dimensions". Applied Optics. 46 (3): 421. doi:10.1364/AO.46.000421.
- Lo, Chih-Chung; Chang, C. A., Neural networks for bar code positioning in automated material handling, doi:10.1109/IACET.1995.527607
- Bencina, Ross; Kaltenbrunner, Martin. "The Design and Evolution of Fiducials for the reacTIVision System" (PDF).
- Bencina, Ross; Kaltenbrunner, Martin; Jordà, Sergi. "Improved Topological Fiducial Tracking in the reacTIVision System" (PDF).
- "reacTIVision: a toolkit for tangible multi-touch surfaces".
- de Ipina, Diego Lopez; Mendonca, Paulo R. S.; Hopper, Andy (2002). "TRIP: a Low-Cost Vision-Based Location System for Ubiquitous Computing". 
- Erickson, B. J.; Jack, Jr., C. R. (1993). "Correlation of single photon emission CT with MR image data using fiduciary markers". American Journal of Neuroradiology. 14 (3): 713–720.
- Brown, R. A.; Nelson, J. A. (2012). "Invention of the N-localizer for stereotactic neurosurgery and its use in the Brown-Roberts-Wells stereotactic frame". Neurosurgery. 70 (2 Supplement Operative): 173–176. doi:10.1227/NEU.0b013e318246a4f7. PMID 22186842.
- Brown, R. A.; Nelson, J. A. (2015). "The origin and history of the N-localizer for stereotactic neurosurgery". Cureus. 7 (9): e323. doi:10.7759/cureus.323. PMC . PMID 26487999.
- Brown, R. A. (2015). "The mathematics of three N-localizers used together for stereotactic neurosurgery". Cureus. 7 (10): e341. doi:10.7759/cureus.341. PMC . PMID 26594605.
- Brown, R. A. (2015). "The mathematics of four or more N-localizers for stereotactic neurosurgery". Cureus. 7 (10): e349. doi:10.7759/cureus.349. PMC . PMID 26623204.
- Heilbrun, M. P.; Roberts, T. S.; Apuzzo, M. L.; Wells, Jr., T. H.; Sabshin, J. K. (1983). "Preliminary experience with Brown-Roberts-Wells (BRW) computerized tomography stereotaxic guidance system". Journal of Neurosurgery. 59 (2): 217–222. doi:10.3171/jns.1983.59.2.0217. PMID 6345727.
- Thomas, D. G.; Anderson, R. E.; du Boulay, G. H. (1984). "CT-guided stereotactic neurosurgery: experience in 24 cases with a new stereotactic system". Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry. 47 (1): 9–16. doi:10.1136/jnnp.47.1.9. PMC . PMID 6363629.
- Leksell, L.; Leksell, D.; Schwebel, J. (1985). "Stereotaxis and nuclear magnetic resonance". Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry. 48 (1): 14–18. doi:10.1136/jnnp.48.1.14. PMC . PMID 3882889.
- Thomas, D. G.; Davis, C. H.; Ingram, S.; Olney, J. S.; Bydder, G. M.; Young, I. R. (1986). "Stereotaxic biopsy of the brain under MR imaging control". AJNR American Journal of Neuroradiology. 7 (1): 161–163. PMID 3082131.
- Heilbrun, M. P.; Sunderland, P. M.; McDonald, P. R.; Wells, Jr., T. H.; Cosman, E.; Ganz, E. (1987). "Brown-Roberts-Wells stereotactic frame modifications to accomplish magnetic resonance imaging guidance in three planes". Applied Neurophysiology. 50 (1-6): 143–152. doi:10.1159/000100700. PMID 3329837.
- Maciunas, R. J.; Kessler, R. M.; Maurer, C.; Mandava, V.; Watt, G.; Smith, G. (1992). "Positron emission tomography imaging-directed stereotactic neurosurgery". Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery. 58 (1-4): 134–140. doi:10.1159/000098986. PMID 1439330.
- Levivier, M.; Massager, N.; Wikler, D.; Lorenzoni, J.; Ruiz, S.; Devriendt, D.; David, P.; Desmedt, F.; Simon, S.; Van Houtte, P.; Brotchi, J.; Goldman, S. (2004). "Use of stereotactic PET images in dosimetry planning of radiosurgery for brain tumors: clinical experience and proposed classification". Journal of Nuclear Medicine. 45 (7): 1146–1154. PMID 15235060.
|Wikimedia Commons has media related to Images with rulers to indicate scale.|
|Wikimedia Commons has media related to Images with coins to indicate scale.|