File:Dora Maar Au Chat.jpg

This work is copyrighted (or assumed to be copyrighted) and unlicensed. It does not fall into one of the blanket acceptable non-free content categories listed at Wikipedia:Non-free content § Images or Wikipedia:Non-free content § Audio clips, and it is not covered by a more specific non-free content license listed at Category:Wikipedia non-free file copyright tags. However, it is believed that the use of this work: To illustrate the subject in question Where no free equivalent is available or could be created that would adequately give the same information On the English-language Wikipedia, hosted on servers in the United States by the non-profit Wikimedia Foundation, qualifies as fair use under United States copyright law. Any other uses of this image, on Wikipedia or elsewhere, may be copyright infringement. See Wikipedia:Non-free content and Wikipedia:Copyrights. Fair use //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Dora_Maar_Au_Chat.jpg

To the uploader: This tag is not a sufficient claim of fair use. Please add a detailed non-free use rationale for each use, as well as the source of the work and all available copyright information. For example fair use rationales, see here. Template:Non-free use rationale may be helpful for stating the rationale. To patrollers and administrators: If this image has a complete fair use rationale, please append |image has rationale=yes as a parameter to the license template.

Licensing[edit]

• Fair use rationale for Dora Maar with Cat

1. The subject in question is an encyclopedic entry about the image.
2. This is a significant work that could not be conveyed in words.
3. There is no alternative, public domain or free-copyrighted replacement available.
4. Inclusion is for information, education and analysis only.
5. Its inclusion in the article(s) adds significantly to the article(s) because it shows the subject, or the work of the subject, of the article(s).

• Fair use rationale:for Pablo Picasso

1. The subject in question is an encyclopedic entry about the image.
2. This is a significant work that could not be conveyed in words.
3. There is no alternative, public domain or free-copyrighted replacement available.
4. Inclusion is for information, education and analysis only.
5. Its inclusion in the article(s) adds significantly to the article(s) because it shows the subject, or the work of the subject, of the article(s).
6. The image is a low resolution copy of the original work of such low quality that it would be unlikely to impact sales of the work.

• Fair use rationale:for Woman with Flowered Hat

1. The subject in question is an encyclopedic entry about the image.
2. This is a significant work that could not be conveyed in words.
3. There is no alternative, public domain or free-copyrighted replacement available.
4. Inclusion is for information, education and analysis only.
5. Its inclusion in the article(s) adds significantly to the article(s) because it shows the subject, or the work of the subject, of the article(s).
6. The image is a low resolution copy of the original work of such low quality that it would be unlikely to impact sales of the work.

Source: [1] ok