Fisher's fundamental theorem of natural selection
Fisher's fundamental theorem of natural selection is an idea about genetic variance in population genetics developed by the statistician and evolutionary biologist Ronald Fisher. The proper way of applying the abstract mathematics of the theorem to actual biology has been a matter of some debate.
- "The rate of increase in fitness of any organism at any time is equal to its genetic variance in fitness at that time."
Or in more modern terminology:
- "The rate of increase in the mean fitness of any organism at any time ascribable to natural selection acting through changes in gene frequencies is exactly equal to its genetic variance in fitness at that time".
The theorem was first formulated in Fisher's 1930 book The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection. Fisher likened it to the law of entropy in physics, stating that "It is not a little instructive that so similar a law should hold the supreme position among the biological sciences". The model of Quasi-linkage equilibrium was introduced by Motoo Kimura in 1965 as an approximation in the case of weak selection and weak epistasis.
Largely as a result of Fisher's feud with the American geneticist Sewall Wright about adaptive landscapes, the theorem was widely misunderstood to mean that the average fitness of a population would always increase, even though models showed this not to be the case. In 1972, George R. Price showed that Fisher's theorem was indeed correct (and that Fisher's proof was also correct, given a typo or two), but did not find it to be of great significance. The sophistication that Price pointed out, and that had made understanding difficult, is that the theorem gives a formula for part of the change in gene frequency, and not for all of it. This is a part that can be said to be due to natural selection.
More recent work (reviewed by Grafen in 2003) builds on Price's understanding in two ways. One aims to improve the theorem by completing it, i.e. by finding a formula for the whole of the change in gene frequency, and accounting for the effects of mutations. The other argues that the partial change is indeed of great conceptual significance, and aims to extend similar partial change results into more and more general population genetic models.
Due to confounding factors, tests of the fundamental theorem are quite rare though Bolnick in 2007 did test this effect in a natural population.
- Crow, JF. "Perspective: Here's to Fisher, additive genetic variance, and the fundamental theorem of natural selection". Evolution. 56: 1313–6. doi:10.1554/0014-3820(2002)056[1313:phstfa]2.0.co;2. PMID 12206233.
- Fisher's Fundamental Theorem of Natural Selection Revisited by Sabin Lessard
- Fisher, R.A. (1930) The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection, Clarendon Press, Oxford
- Edwards, A.W.F. (1994). "The fundamental theorem of natural selection". Biological Reviews. 69: 443–474. doi:10.1111/j.1469-185x.1994.tb01247.x.
- Kimura, Motoo (1965). "Attainment of quasi linkage equilibrium when gene frequencies are changing by natural selection". Genetics. 52: 875–890.
- Singh, Rama S.; Krimbas, Costas B. (28 March 2000). Evolutionary Genetics: From Molecules to Morphology. Cambridge University Press. p. 267. ISBN 978-0-521-57123-4.
- Provine, William B. (May 2001). The Origins of Theoretical Population Genetics: With a New Afterword. University of Chicago Press. pp. 140–166. ISBN 978-0-226-68464-2.
- Price, G.R. (1972). "Fisher's "fundamental theorem" made clear". Annals of Human Genetics. 36: 129–140. doi:10.1111/j.1469-1809.1972.tb00764.x. PMID 4656569.
- Grafen, Alan (21 August 2003). "Fisher the evolutionary biologist" (PDF). The Statistician. Royal Statistical Society. 52 (3): 319–329. doi:10.1111/1467-9884.00362.
- Bolnick D. I. & Nosil, P. "Natural Selection in Populations Subject to a Migration Load". Evolution. 61: 2229–2243. doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2007.00179.x.
- Brooks, D. R. & Wiley, E. O. Evolution as Entropy, Towards a unified theory of Biology. The University of Chicago Press, 1986.
- Ewens, W. J. 1989 An interpretation and proof of the Fundamental Theorem of Natural Selection. Theor. Pop. Biol. 36, 167–180
- Ewens, W.J.; Lessard, S. (2015). "On the interpretation and relevance of the Fundamental Theorem of Natural Selection". Theoretical Population Biology. 104: 59–67. doi:10.1016/j.tpb.2015.07.002.
- Frank, S.A. (1997) The Price Equation, Fisher's fundamental theorem, kin selection, and causal analysis. Evolution 51:1712–1729. Abstract — page for pdfs
- Frank, S.A. (1998) Foundation of Social Evolution. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Book's website ISBN 0-691-05934-9
- Frank, S.A. and Slatkin, M. (1992) Fisher's fundamental theorem of natural selection. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 7:92–95. abstract — pdfs
- Grafen, A. (2000) Developments of the Price equation and natural selection under uncertainty. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 267:1223–1227.
- Grafen, A (2002). "A first formal link between the Price equation and an optimisation program". Journal of Theoretical Biology. 217: 75–91. doi:10.1006/jtbi.2002.3015.
- Grafen, A (2003). "Fisher the evolutionary biologist". Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series D. 52: 319–329. doi:10.1111/1467-9884.00362.
- Kjellström, G. Evolution as a statistical optimization algorithm. Evolutionary Theory 11:105–117, January, 1996.
- Maynard Smith, J. Evolutionary Genetics. Oxford University Press, 1998.
- Mayr, E. What Evolution is. Basic Books, New York, 2001.
- van Veelen, Matthijs; Allen, Benjamin; Hoffman, Moshe; Simon, Burton; Veller, Carl (2017). "Hamilton's rule". Journal of Theoretical Biology. 414: 176–230. doi:10.1016/j.jtbi.2016.08.019.
|Wikimedia Commons has media related to Fisher's fundamental theorem of natural selection.|