# Flotation of flexible objects

Flotation of flexible objects is a phenomenon in which the bending of a flexible material allows an object to displace a greater amount of fluid than if it were completely rigid. This ability to displace more fluid translates directly into an ability to support greater loads, giving the flexible structure an advantage over a similarly rigid one. Inspiration to study the effects of elasticity are taken from nature, where plants, such as black pepper and animals living at the water surface have evolved to take advantage of the load-bearing benefits elasticity imparts.

## History

In his work "On Floating Bodies", Archimedes[1] famously stated:

Any object, wholly or partially immersed in a fluid, is buoyed up by a force equal to the weight of the fluid displaced by the object.

While this basic idea carried enormous weight and has come to form the basis of understanding why objects float, it is best applied for objects with a characteristic length scale greater than the capillary length. What Archimedes had failed to predict was the influence of surface tension and its impact at small length scales.

More recent works, such as that of Keller,[2] have extended these principles by considering the role of surface tension forces on partially submerged bodies. Keller, for instance, demonstrated analytically that the weight of water displaced by a meniscus is equal to the vertical component of the surface tension force.

The well known phenomena by which water striders support themselves through surface tension effects can be re-examined by considering the compliance and resultant deformation of the insect's leg at the water line.

Nonetheless, the role of flexibility and its impact on an object's load-bearing potential is one that did receive attention until the mid-2000s and onward. In an initial study, Vella[3] studied the load supported by a raft composed of thin, rigid strips. Specifically, he compared the case of floating individual strips to floating an aggregation of strips, wherein the aggregate structure causes portions of the meniscus (and hence, resulting surface tension force) to disappear. By extending his analysis to consider a similar system composed of thin strips of some finite bending stiffness, he found that this later case in fact was able support a greater load.[4]

A well known work in the area of surface tension aided flotation was the analysis of water strider locomotion along the surface of water.[5] Using the idea of flexible structures,[6] Ji et al. re-examined this problem by considering the compliance of a water strider leg. By modeling the leg as a compliant structure that deforms at the water surface (rather than pierce it), Ji was able to ascertain what added benefit this flexibility has in supporting the insect. Other studies on the water strider have examined the ways in which flexibility can affect wetting properties of the leg.[7]

Another track of research has been to investigate how exactly the interaction between liquid and a compliant object leads to the resulting deformation. In one example, such analysis has been extended to explain the difficulty in submerging hairs in a fluid.[8] These works focus on behavior near the contact line, and consider what role non-linear effects such as slippage play.

## Physical explanation of phenomena

In a liquid solution, any given liquid molecule experience strong cohesive forces from neighboring molecules. While these forces are balanced in the bulk, molecules at the surface of the solution are surrounded on one side by water molecules and on the other side by gas molecules. The resulting imbalance of cohesive forces along the surface results in a net "pull" toward the bulk, giving rise to the phenomena of surface tension.

Rigid plate submerged below water line. If the plate is flexible, its deformation (dashed) results in the displacement of additional fluid (blue, diagonal). However, doing so results in a simultaneous loss due to the narrowing of the above column (red, vertical).

When a hydrophobic object of weight ${\displaystyle w}$ is placed on the surface of water, its weight begins deforming the water line. The hydrophobic nature of the object means that the water will attempt to minimize contact due to an unfavorable energy tradeoff associated with wetting. As a result, surface tension attempts to pull back on the water line in order to minimize contact with the hydrophobic object and retain a lowest energy state. This action by the surface to pull back on the depressed water interface is the source of a capillary force, which acts tangentially along the contact line and thereby gives rise to a component in the vertical direction. An attempt to further depress the object is resisted by this capillary force until the contact line reaches a vertical position located about two capillary lengths below the undisturbed water line.[9] Once this occurs, the meniscus collapses and the object sinks.

The more fluid a floating object is able to displace, the greater the load it is able to bear. As a result, the ultimate payoff of flexibility is in determining whether or not a bent configuration results in an increased volume of displaced water. As a flexible object bends, it penetrates further into the water and increases the total fluid displaced above it. However, this bending action necessarily forces the cross-section at the water line to decrease, narrowing the column of displaced water above the object. Thus, whether or not bending is advantageous is ultimately given by a tradeoff of these factors.

## Mathematical model: flotation of hinged plates

### Two rigid plates connected by a torsional spring

The following analysis is taken largely from the work of Burton and Bush,[9] and offers some mathematical insight into the role that flexibility plays in improving load-bearing characteristics of floating objects.

Consider two plates of infinite width, thickness ${\displaystyle t}$, and length ${\displaystyle b}$ that are connected by a torsional spring with spring constant per unit width ${\displaystyle K_{s}}$. Furthermore, let ${\displaystyle \alpha }$ be the angle between a plate and the horizontal, and ${\displaystyle \phi }$ the from where the meniscus meets the plate to the horizontal. The distance from the undisturbed water line to the plate's outer edge is ${\displaystyle h}$. The density of water is ${\displaystyle \rho }$, the density of air is considered negligible, and the plate density, ${\displaystyle \rho _{s}}$, shall be varied. All systems naturally assume a configuration that minimizes total energy. Thus, the goal of this analysis is to identify the configurations (i.e., values of ${\displaystyle h}$ and ${\displaystyle \alpha }$) that result in a stable equilibrium for a given value of ${\displaystyle \rho _{s}}$.

For a total system energy of ${\displaystyle \Pi }$, it is natural to distinguish sub-components:

Two rigid plates connected by a torsional spring and submerged between the water line. Since the material is taken to be hydrophobic, the water deforms, forming the meniscus at the plate edge.

${\displaystyle \Pi =U-V}$

${\displaystyle V}$: Work done on the system
${\displaystyle U}$: System potential energy

In defining ${\displaystyle V}$, there are several associated components:

${\displaystyle V=W_{H,i}+W_{H,p}-W_{g,p}+W_{\sigma }}$

${\displaystyle W_{H,i}}$ is the work done on the interface by hydrostatic pressure
${\displaystyle W_{H,p}}$ is the work done on the plates by hydrostatic pressure
${\displaystyle W_{g,p}}$ is the work done on the plates by gravitational force
${\displaystyle W_{\sigma }}$ is the work done on the plates by surface tension forces

Similarly, the system potential energy, ${\displaystyle U}$, is taken to be composed of two terms: ${\displaystyle U=S+E_{s}}$

${\displaystyle S}$ is the surface energy of the water/air interface
${\displaystyle E_{s}}$ is the energy stored in the torsional spring and is equal to ${\displaystyle E_{s}=K_{s}(2\alpha )^{2}/2}$

There are two ways in which the system energy can change by an incremental amount. The first is a translation of the center of mass of the plates by some distance ${\displaystyle \delta h}$. The second is an incremental change, ${\displaystyle \delta \alpha }$ in the hinge angle. Such a change will induce a new moment.

As mentioned, the system will seek the orientation that minimizes ${\displaystyle \delta \Pi =\delta U-\delta V}$ in order to find point of stable equilibrium. Writing out these terms more explicitly:

${\displaystyle \delta V=\delta W_{H,i}+\delta W_{H,p}-\delta W_{g,p}+\delta W_{\sigma }}$

${\displaystyle \delta W_{H,i}=\rho g\int \eta (x)dx\delta \epsilon }$
${\displaystyle \delta W_{H,p}=\rho g\left(\left(2bh{\text{cos}}\alpha +b^{2}{\text{cos}}\alpha {\text{sin}}\alpha \right)\delta h+\left({\frac {b^{3}}{3}}{\text{sin}}\alpha +b^{2}h\right)\delta \alpha \right)}$
${\displaystyle \delta W_{g,p}=\rho _{s}gt\left(2b\delta h+b^{2}{\text{cos}}\left(\alpha \right)\delta \alpha \right)}$
${\displaystyle \delta W_{\sigma }=2\sigma \left({\text{sin}}\phi \delta h+b\left({\text{sin}}\left(\phi -\alpha \right)\delta \alpha \right)\right)}$

${\displaystyle \delta U=\sigma \delta {\mathcal {L}}+4K_{s}\alpha \delta \alpha }$

Here, ${\displaystyle \eta (x)}$ is the equation air/water interface, ${\displaystyle \delta \epsilon }$ is the incremental displacement of the interface, and ${\displaystyle \sigma }$ is the surface tension of water.

For a given value of ${\displaystyle \rho _{s}}$, stable equilibrium configurations are identified as being those values of ${\displaystyle h}$ and ${\displaystyle \alpha }$ that satisfy

${\displaystyle {\frac {\delta \Pi }{\delta h}}=0}$

${\displaystyle {\frac {\delta \Pi }{\delta \alpha }}=0}$

Taken in a different light, these conditions can be seen as identifying ${\displaystyle h}$ and ${\displaystyle \alpha }$ that result in zero net force and zero net torque for a given ${\displaystyle \rho _{s}}$.

### Analytical results for maximum load

Defining non-dimensional plate length ${\displaystyle \beta ={\frac {b}{2l_{c}}}}$, non-dimensional plate edge depth ${\displaystyle H={\frac {h}{l_{c}}}}$, and non-dimensional load ${\displaystyle D={\frac {\rho _{s}-\rho }{\rho }}{\frac {t}{l_{c}}}}$, Burton and Bush derived the following analytical results:

${\displaystyle H_{{\text{max}},D}={\frac {2\left({\sqrt {2}}+\beta \right)}{\sqrt {4+2{\sqrt {2}}\beta +\beta ^{2}}}}}$
${\displaystyle \alpha _{{\text{max}},D}={\text{arcos}}\left({\sqrt {{\frac {1}{2}}+{\frac {8+\beta ^{2}\left(-2+{\sqrt {2}}\beta \right)}{16+\beta ^{2}}}}}\right)}$
${\displaystyle D_{\text{max}}={\frac {\beta }{4}}+{\sqrt {2}}+{\frac {1}{\beta }}}$

The equations for ${\displaystyle H}$ and ${\displaystyle \alpha }$ give the configuration parameters that give the maximum value of ${\displaystyle D}$. For further insight, it is helpful to examine various regimes of the non-dimensional plate length, ${\displaystyle \beta }$.

#### Case 1: Small scale ${\displaystyle \beta <

When the characteristic plate length is much smaller than the characteristic plate edge depth, the effects of gravity, surface tension, and spring energy become dominant. In this limiting case, it turns out that flexibility does not improve load-bearing capabilities of the plates; indeed, the optimal configuration is a flat plate. Since the plate length is so much smaller than the displacement from the undisturbed water line, the extra fluid displaced by bending a rigid plate is outweighed by the loss of fluid in the column above the plate.

#### Case 2: Mid scale ${\displaystyle \beta \sim H}$

In this regime, flexibility may or may not improve load-bearing capabilities of the plates. The two characteristics lengths are of comparable dimension, so particular values for each determine whether or not additional fluid displaced through bending exceeds fluid lost through the narrowing of the column.

#### Case 3: Large scale ${\displaystyle \beta >>H}$

In this regime, the benefit of flexibility is most pronounced. The characteristic plate length is significantly longer than the characteristic depth to which the plate is submerged beneath the water line. As a result, the narrowing column above the plate is negligible, which the additional displacement of water due to bending is significant.

### Extensions to continuously deformable body

To relate this mathematical to physical systems, the above analysis can be extended to continuously deformable bodies. Generalizing the equations of the two plate system allows one to write a corresponding set of equations for the case of a continuously deformable plate. This continuously deformable plate is composed of ${\displaystyle n}$ sub-plates, where similar force and torque equilibrium conditions described before must be satisfied for each sub-plate. Such analysis reveals that for a highly compliant 2D structure with a characteristic length much greater than the capillary length, the shape bearing the highest load is a perfect semi-circle. As stiffness increases, the semi-circle is deformed to shapes with lower curvature.

This initial look at continuously deformable bodies represents an initial stab into a very complicated problem. With the groundwork laid here in this analysis, it is likely that future works will implement this general ideology in a finite element approach. Doing so will allow much closer simulation of real world phenomena and will aid in determining how effects of elasticity can aid in the design of robots, instruments, and other devices that operate along the water line.

## Examples in nature

### Fire ants

To survive floods, colonies of fire ants will join limbs to create a living raft.

In the Brazilian rain forest, sudden rainfall can trigger flooding at a moment's notice. Given that flooding can potentially destroy a colony and drown the insects, fire ants have developed a unique adaptation to this situation. While individual fire ants are hydrophobic and flounder at the waters surface, large groups of ants can link together to form a living raft. As the queen and larvae are evacuated from the flooding colony, they sit upon this living raft, floating along the waterline until reaching some solid land.

The importance of flexibility in this self-assembled ant raft is several fold. The extra weight-bearing that flexibility imparts is vital as hungry fish will swim along the underside of the raft and eat at many of the members. Furthermore, as waves travel along the water surface, the ant raft's flexibility allows it to effectively "roll" with the wave and minimize disturbances it would otherwise cause for a similar but rigid structure.

### Aquatic vegetation

To protect its reproductive material, the daisy's petals fold in during floods to prevent the rush of water.

Among aquatic vegetation, the lily pad is perhaps the most recognizable, commonly associated with ponds and lakes. Their flexibility allows for increased loads, enabling them to support animals, such as frogs, many times their own weight.

Some aquatic flowers, such as the daisy Bellis perennis, use compliance as a survival mechanism. Such flowers have roots that extend down to the underlying soil, anchoring the flower to the surface of the water. When flooding occurs, the petals pull inward and deform the water line, shielding the genetic material in the core.[10] Some flowers are even known to completely close up into a shell in this fashion, trapping air inside.

## References

1. ^ Acott, Chris (1999). "The diving "Law-ers": A brief resume of their lives". South Pacific Underwater Medicine Society Journal. 29 (1). ISSN 0813-1988. OCLC 16986801.
2. ^ Keller, Joseph B. (1998). "Surface tension force on a partly submerged body". Physics of Fluids. 10 (11): 3009. Bibcode:1998PhFl...10.3009K. doi:10.1063/1.869820.
3. ^ Vella, Dominic; Metcalfe, Paul D.; Whittaker, Robert J. (2006). "Equilibrium Conditions for the Floating of Multiple Interfacial Objects". Journal of Fluid Mechanics. 549 (215): 215–224. arXiv:physics/0509009. Bibcode:2006JFM...549..215V. doi:10.1017/s0022112005008013.
4. ^ Vella, Dominic (2007). The fluid mechanics of floating and sinking (PhD Dissertation). Cambridge: Trinity College, University of Cambridge.
5. ^ Hu, David; Chan, Brian; Bush, John W.M. (2003). "The hydrodynamics of water strider locomotion". Nature. 424 (6949): 663–666. Bibcode:2003Natur.424..663H. doi:10.1038/nature01793. PMID 12904790.
6. ^ Ji, Xiang-Ying; Wang, Jia-Wen; Feng, Xi-Xiao (2012). "Role of flexibility in the water repellency of water strider legs: Theory and experiment". Physical Review E. 85 (2): 021607. Bibcode:2012PhRvE..85b1607J. doi:10.1103/physreve.85.021607. PMID 22463223.
7. ^ Park, Kun Joong; Kim, Ho-Young (2008). "Bending of floating flexible legs". Journal of Fluid Mechanics. 610: 381–390. Bibcode:2008JFM...610..381P. doi:10.1017/s0022112008002784.
8. ^ Anderotti, B.; Marchand, A.; Das, S.; Snoeijer, J.H. (2011). "Elastocapillary instability under partial wetting conditions: Bending versus buckling". Physical Review E. 84 (6): 061601. arXiv:1109.3414. Bibcode:2011PhRvE..84f1601A. doi:10.1103/physreve.84.061601. PMID 22304096.
9. ^ a b Burton, L.J.; Bush, J.W.M (2012). "Can flexibility help you float?" (PDF). Physics of Fluids. 24 (10): 101701–101701–7. Bibcode:2012PhFl...24j1701B. doi:10.1063/1.4757121.
10. ^ Reis, Pedro M.; Hure, Jérémy; Jung, Sungwan; Bush, John W.M.; Clanet, Cristophe (2010). "Grabbing water". Soft Matter. 6 (22): 5705–5708. arXiv:1207.3756. Bibcode:2010SMat....6.5705R. doi:10.1039/c0sm00895h. hdl:1721.1/77954.