Foreskin restoration is the process of expanding the skin on the penis to mimic the functionality of the foreskin, which has been removed by circumcision or injury. Foreskin restoration is primarily accomplished through non-surgical methods by stretching the residual skin of the penis; however, surgical methods also exist.
- 1 Motivation
- 2 History
- 3 Non-surgical techniques
- 4 Surgical techniques
- 5 Results
- 6 Organizations
- 7 See also
- 8 Notes
- 9 Books
- 10 External links
Foreskin restoration can be attempted for several reasons, among them being a desire to create the appearance of a natural foreskin (prepuce) covering the glans, or to increase sexual sensitivity of the glans and the interior of the restored foreskin, or to reduce discomfort due to exposure of sensitive areas during everyday activities. Foreskin restoration techniques are most commonly undertaken by men who have been circumcised or who have sustained an injury, but are also used by men who desire a longer foreskin and by men who have phimosis. Bigelow lists:
- Restoration of glanular sensation
- Sexual stimulation and restored sexual function
- Restoration of a sense of wholeness
- Improvement of body image
as reasons that circumcised men choose to restore their missing foreskin.
Foreskin restoration is of ancient origin and dates back to the reign of Emperor Tiberius, when surgical means were taken to lengthen the foreskin of individuals with either a short foreskin that did not cover the glans completely or a completely exposed glans as a result of circumcision. In classical Greek and Roman societies, exposure of the glans was considered improper, and did not conform to the Hellenistic ideal of gymnastic nudity. Men with short foreskins would wear the kynodesme to prevent exposure. As a consequence of this social stigma, an early form of foreskin restoration known as epispasm was practiced among some Jews in Ancient Rome. Again, during World War II some European Jews sought foreskin restoration to avoid Nazi persecution.
Non-surgical foreskin restoration, accomplished through tissue expansion, is the more commonly used method. Both the skin of the penile shaft and the mucosal inner lining of the foreskin, if any remains after circumcision, may be expanded.
Tissue expansion has long been known to stimulate mitosis, and research shows that regenerated human tissues have the attributes of the original tissue. Unlike conventional skin expansion techniques, however, the process of nonsurgical foreskin restoration may take several years to complete. The time required depends on the amount of skin available to expand, the amount of skin desired in the end, and the regimen of stretching methods used. Patience and dedication are needed; support groups exist to help with these (see External links section).
The act of stretching the skin is often described informally as "tugging" in these groups, especially those on the internet.
Methods and devices
Manual methods are often used by men first starting restoration, but can be used at any stage of the restoration process, and refers to the necessity of the restorer to manually maintain the tension by holding the skin tautly with his fingers using one of several variations in finger placement.
Many specialized foreskin restoration devices that grip the skin with or without tape are also commercially available. Tension from these devices may be applied by weights, elastic straps, or inflation as a means to either push the skin forward on the penis, or by a combination of these methods. An example of a device using elastic straps is the T-Tape method, which was developed in the 1990s with the idea of enabling restoration to take place more rapidly. In 2009, a method known as Reverse Taping Method, RTM, was introduced to the restoration population that restores the foreskin to intact appearance, many times in under 2 years and was found to be very lifestyle friendly. RTM could be worn under just about anything from slacks to swim briefs and the ability to urinate and apply skin emollients while the taping was on made it a very healthy and rapid restoration method.
Tissue expansion through inflation devices have gained popularity in recent years among men of the forum www.restoringforeskin.org. Inflation methods involve sealing off the area between the glans and the skin pulled over it using a clamping device (commonly baby bottle nipples are used), and either inflating the skin or a balloon placed under the skin. This causes circumferential skin stretch which is thought to stimulate mitosis. Men using this technique report fast skin regenerative growth, and in particular it is thought to be beneficial to stimulate growth of inner skin (mucous membrane) tissues which are vital to restoring the lubrication function of the foreskin.
The amount of tension produced by any method must be adjusted to avoid causing injury, pain or discomfort, and provides a limit on the rate at which new skin can be grown. There is a risk of seriously damaging tissues from the use of excessive tension or applying tension for too long. Websites about foreskin restoration vary in their recommendations, from suggesting a regimen of moderate amounts of tension applied for several hours a day, to recommending periods of higher tension applied for only a few minutes per day, as with manual techniques.
Instead of growing new skin or until enough skin has been grown through tissue expansion, some men may opt to use a retaining device to hold remaining skin, if available, over the glans in a manner similar to the ancient Greek kynodesme. Since the glans is an internal membrane, originally protected by the foreskin until it is removed during circumcision, the goal of retaining methods is to replicate a protective covering for the glans.
If an insufficient amount of skin exists to retain glans coverage with remaining penile skin, one may use a commercially available artificial glans covering. Examples of such artificial coverings include a prosthetic foreskin made of latex that covers the glans in a moist environment, and an undergarment that wraps the penis in a double-layered soft fabric "hood" to minimize friction on the glans.
Surgical methods of foreskin restoration, known as foreskin reconstruction, usually involve a method of grafting skin onto the distal portion of the penile shaft. The grafted skin is typically taken from the scrotum, which contains the same smooth muscle (known as dartos fascia) as does the skin of the penis. One method involves a four-stage procedure in which the penile shaft is buried in the scrotum for a period of time. Such techniques are costly, and have the potential to produce unsatisfactory results or serious complications related to the skin graft. The frenulum can also be reconstructed.
British Columbia resident Paul Tinari was held down and circumcised at the age of eight in what he stated was "a routine form of punishment" for masturbation at residential schools. Following a lawsuit Tinari's surgical foreskin restoration was covered by the British Columbia Ministry of Health. The plastic surgeon who performed the restoration was the first in Canada to have done such an operation, and used a technique similar to that described above.
Recently there has been growing interest in regenerative medicine as a means to regenerate the human male foreskin. This option, unlike foreskin restoration, would result in a true human male foreskin being regrown. Pioneers in the field of regenerative medicine include Dr. Anthony Atala of the Wake Forest Institute of Regenerative Medicine (WFIRM).
In early 2010, Foregen, a non-profit organization dedicated to funding a clinical trial for the purposes of regrowing the human male foreskin using the regenerative capabilities of the extracellular matrix, in the hopes of eventually being able to provide free regeneration to circumcised men, was founded. A clinical trial had been scheduled for late 2010, but there were insufficient donations to follow through. The goal was reached in June 2012, and they managed to obtain a laboratory and cooperation from biochemists and regenerative medicine experts. Results from their first clinical trial were released in February 2013, and they are preparing for a human application trial. Clinical trials on human subjects might be achieved by 2019.
The proposed method would involve placing the patient under general anaesthesia. The penile skin would be opened at the circumcision scar, while the scar tissue is surgically debrided. A biomedical solution would then be applied to both ends of the wound, causing the foreskin to regenerate with the DNA in the patient's own cells. A biodegradable scaffold (i.e. the de-cellularized foreskin of a cadaver) would be used to offer support for the regenerating foreskin. While social forums have assisted in the discussion of current tools and hurdles towards this method  scientific and medical institutes, and bioengineering companies must be involved for a more professional and meaningful discourse, and plan of action.
Foreskin regeneration along with laboratory-grown penises (regeneration of the entire penis) could be possible very soon. In 2014, it was announced that it might be possible 5 years from the initial announcement. It is unclear whether or not having a restored foreskin with full coverage of the glans could interfere with fitting a foreskin scaffold on the penis and subsequent regeneration.
The amount of time required to restore a foreskin using non-surgical methods depends on the amount of skin present at the start of the process, the subject's degree of commitment, the techniques used, the body's natural degree of plasticity, and the length of foreskin the individual desires.
The results of surgical restoration are immediate, but often described as unsatisfactory, and most restoration groups advise against surgery.
|This section needs expansion with: Information about foreskin regeneration. You can help by adding to it. (June 2016)|
Restoration creates a facsimile of the prepuce, but specialized tissues removed during circumcision cannot be reclaimed, in particular the ridged band, an innervated structure encircling the penis along the cusp of the foreskin, which among other functions serves to contract the opening around the glans. Surgical procedures exist to reduce the size of the opening once restoration is complete (as depicted in the image above), or it can be alleviated through a longer commitment to the skin expansion regime to allow more skin to collect at the tip. The circumcision scar becomes hidden as shaft skin begins to fold, mimicking the natural function and appearance of the foreskin.
The natural foreskin has three principal components, in addition to blood vessels, nerves and connective tissue: skin, which is exposed exteriorly; mucous membrane, which is the surface in contact with the glans penis when the penis is flaccid; and a band of muscle within the tip of the foreskin. Generally, the skin grows more readily in response to stretching than does the mucous membrane. The ring of muscle which normally holds the foreskin closed is completely removed in the majority of circumcisions and cannot be regrown, so the covering resulting from stretching techniques is usually looser than that of a natural foreskin. Nonetheless, according to some observers it is difficult to distinguish a restored foreskin from a natural foreskin because restoration produces a "nearly normal-appearing prepuce."
Non-surgical foreskin restoration does not restore portions of the frenulum or the ridged band removed during circumcision. Although not commonly performed, there are surgical "touch-up" techniques that can re-create some of the functionality of the frenulum and dartos muscle.
The process of foreskin restoration seeks to regenerate some of the tissue removed by circumcision, as well as providing coverage of the glans. According to research, the foreskin comprises over half of the skin and mucosa of the human penis.
In some men, foreskin restoration may alleviate certain problems they attribute to their circumcisions. Such problems include prominent scarring (33%), insufficient penile skin for comfortable erection (27%), erectile curvature from uneven skin loss (16%), and pain and bleeding upon erection/manipulation (17%). The poll also asked about awareness of or involvement in foreskin restoration, and included an open comment section. Many respondents and their wives "reported that restoration resolved the unnatural dryness of the circumcised penis, which caused abrasion, pain or bleeding during intercourse, and that restoration offered unique pleasures, which enhanced sexual intimacy."
One man reported he has great loss of sensation in the glans because his foreskin is not present. Some men who have undertaken foreskin restoration report a visibly smoother glans, which some of these men attribute to decreased levels of keratinization following restoration.
Emotional, psychological, and psychiatric aspects
Foreskin restoration has been reported as having beneficial emotional results in some men, and has been proposed as a treatment for negative feelings in some adult men about their infant circumcisions that someone else decided to have performed on them.
Various groups have been founded since the late 20th century, especially in North America where circumcision has been routinely performed on infants. In 1982 the group Brothers United for Future Foreskins (BUFF) began to publicize non-surgical restoration. In 1989 the National Organization of Restoring Men (NORM) was founded as a non-profit support group for men undertaking foreskin restoration. In 1991 the group UNCircumcising Information and Resource Centers (UNCIRC) was formed, which was incorporated into NORM in 1994. Several NORM chapters have been founded throughout the United States, as well as internationally in Canada, the United Kingdom, Australia, New Zealand, and Germany. In France, there are two associations about this. The "Association contre la Mutilation des Enfants" AME (association against child mutilation), and more recently "Droit au Corps" (right to the body).
- Bigelow J. The Joy of Uncircumcising. Hourglass; 1992. ISBN 0-9630482-1-X. Why men today want to uncircumcise. p. 113–20.
- Money, John (1991). "Sexology, body image, foreskin restoration, and bisexual status". Journal of Sex Research. 28 (1): 145–56. doi:10.1080/00224499109551600.
- Hodges, Frederick Mansfield (2001). "The Ideal Prepuce in Ancient Greece and Rome: Male Genital Aesthetics and Their Relation to Lipodermos, Circumcision, Foreskin Restoration, and the Kynodesme". Bulletin of the History of Medicine. 75 (3): 375–405. doi:10.1353/bhm.2001.0119. PMID 11568485.
- Rubin, Jody P. (1980). "Celsus' decircumcision operation Medical and historical implications". Urology. 16 (1): 121–4. doi:10.1016/0090-4295(80)90354-4. PMID 6994325.
- Tushmet L. Uncircumcision. Medical Times. 1965 [archived 2013-10-23];93(6):588–93.[unreliable medical source?]
- Collier. Whole again: the practice of foreskin restoration. CMAJ. 2011;183(18):2092–3. doi:10.1503/cmaj.109-4009. PMID 22083672.
- Cordes, Stephanie; Calhoun, Karen H.; Quinn, Francis B. (1997-10-15). "Tissue Expanders". University of Texas Medical Branch Department of Otolaryngology Grand Rounds.
- "Manual Tugging". RestoringForeskin.org. Archived from the original on 2014-10-21. Retrieved 16 May 2015.
- "Manual Methods of Foreskin restoration". Doug's Site. Archived from the original on 21 October 2014. Retrieved 16 May 2015.
- "Restoring with T-Tape - A graphic guide". RestoringForeskin.org. Archived from the original on 2015-01-10. Retrieved 16 May 2015.
- Griffiths, R. Wayne. "NORM - Recommended Restoration Regimen". Retrieved 2006-08-27.
- "Foreskin Restoration Chat Manual Restoration Method and Guide". Retrieved 2006-08-27.
- "About Methods". Doug's site. Archived from the original on 21 October 2014. Retrieved 16 May 2015.
- "SenSlip Foreskin - Overcome Circumcision". Archived from the original on 2014-12-23. Retrieved 2015-05-15.
- "ManHood: The foreskin substitute for circumcised men". Archived from the original on 2015-04-26. Retrieved 2015-05-15.
- Greer, Donald M.; Mohl, Paul C.; Sheley, Kathy A. (2010). "A technique for foreskin reconstruction and some preliminary results". The Journal of Sex Research. 18 (4): 324–30. doi:10.1080/00224498209551158. JSTOR 3812166.
- Song B, Hou ZH, Liu QL, Qian WP (2015). "[Penile frenulum lengthening for premature ejaculation]". Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue = National Journal of Andrology (in Chinese). 21 (2): 149–52. PMID 25796689.
- Euringer, Amanda (2006-07-25). "BC Health Pays to Restore Man's Foreskin". The Tyee.
- Laliberté J. BC man's foreskin op a success. Nat Rev Med. 2006 [archived 2006-08-15];3(12).
- "Cell and Tissue Types". 23 June 2010. Retrieved 23 June 2010.
- "2010 Trial Postponed". Foregen. 21 Sep 2010. Archived from the original on 10 May 2014. Retrieved 12 June 2012.
- "Foregen FAQ: When will the procedure to regenerate my foreskin become available?". Foregen. Archived from the original on 15 May 2015. Retrieved 15 May 2015.
- "Circumcised? Foregen wants to regrow your foreskin and restore sexual pleasure". 21 Feb 2014.
- "Clinical Regen Trial". 23 June 2010. Retrieved 23 June 2010.
- "Epistemcouk can create foreskin". 29 Jan 2012. Archived from the original on February 24, 2015. Retrieved 19 Jan 2012.
- http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/2014/10/08/laboratory-grown-penis_n_5951870.html?fb_action_ids=882834578407011&fb_action_types=og.comments[full citation needed]
- "Foregen's stance on foreskin restoration". foregen.org. Retrieved 24 September 2015.
- Taylor, John R. (1997-02-04). "Interview with John Taylor".
- Bigelow. The Joy of Uncircumcising!. p. 13. ISBN 0-9630482-1-X.
- Bigelow. The Joy of Uncircumcising! (1998 ed.). pp. 188–192. ISBN 0-9630482-1-X.
- Jefferson, Geoffrey (1916). Martin, Franklin Henry, ed. "The peripenic muscle: some observations on the anatomy of phimosis". Surgery, Gynecology & Obstetrics. 23: 177–81.
- Cold, C.J.; Taylor, J.R. (1999). "The prepuce". BJU International. 83 Suppl 1: 34–44. doi:10.1046/j.1464-410x.1999.0830s1034.x. PMID 10349413.
- Goodwin WE (1990). "Uncircumcision: a technique for plastic reconstruction of a prepuce after circumcision". The Journal of Urology. 144 (5): 1203–5. PMID 2231896.
- Bigelow, Jim. The Joy of Uncircumcising!, pp. 188-191.
- Taylor, J.R.; Lockwood, A.P.; Taylor, A.J. (1996). "The prepuce: specialized mucosa of the penis and its loss to circumcision". British Journal of Urology. 77 (2): 291–5. doi:10.1046/j.1464-410X.1996.85023.x. PMID 8800902.
- Hammond, T. (1999). "A preliminary poll of men circumcised in infancy or childhood". BJU International. 83 Suppl 1: 85–92. doi:10.1046/j.1464-410x.1999.0830s1085.x. PMID 10349419.
- Kirby, R S (1994). "The Joy of Uncircumcising! Restore Your Birthright and Maximize Sexual Pleasure". BMJ. 309 (6955): 676–7. doi:10.1136/bmj.309.6955.679a. PMC .
- Penn, Jack (1963). "Penile Reform". British Journal of Plastic Surgery. 16: 287–8. doi:10.1016/S0007-1226(63)80123-X. PMID 14042759.
- Boyle, G.J.; Goldman, R.; Svoboda, J.S.; Fernandez, E. (2002). "Male Circumcision: Pain, Trauma and Psychosexual Sequelae". Journal of Health Psychology. 7 (3): 329–43. doi:10.1177/135910530200700310. PMID 22114254.
- Bigelow J. Uncircumcising: undoing the effects of an ancient practice in a modern world. Mothering. 1994;Summer:36–60.
- Griffiths, R. Wayne. "NORM - History". Retrieved 2006-08-21.
- Template:Title= Association contre la Mutilation des Enfants
- Template:Title= Qui sommes-nous ?
- Griffin, Gary M. (1992). Decircumcision: Foreskin Restoration, Methods and Circumcision Practices. Los Angeles: Added Dimensions Publishing. ISBN 1-879967-05-7.
- Bigelow, Jim (1992). The Joy of Uncircumcising!: Exploring Circumcision: History, Myths, Psychology, Restoration, Sexual Pleasure, and Human Rights. Aptos, CA: Hourglass Book Publishing. ISBN 0-9630482-1-X. (foreword by James L. Snyder)
- Information and Support Forums:
- Foreskin Restoration (2016)
- CIRP Foreskin restoration for circumcised males
- Foregen: Foreskin Regeneration
- Payne, Roy M.; Fryer, Leo (March 2001). "My responses to a few Frequently Asked Questions about Non-Surgical Foreskin Restoration:" (PDF).
- Brandes, S.B.; McAninch, J.W. (1999). "Surgical methods of restoring the prepuce: a critical review" (PDF). BJU Int. 83 (Suppl. 1): 109–13. doi:10.1046/j.1464-410x.1999.0830s1109.x.
- Schultheiss D, Truss MC, Stief CG, Jonas U (1998). "Uncircumcision: a historical review of preputial restoration". Plast Reconstr Surg. 101 (7): 1990–8. doi:10.1097/00006534-199806000-00037. PMID 9623850.