Freedom-class littoral combat ship
Freedom shows off her new camouflage scheme on sea trials in February 2013 before her first deployment
|Operators:||United States Navy|
|Type:||Littoral combat ship|
|Displacement:||3,500 metric tons (3,900 short tons) (full load)|
|Length:||378 ft (115 m)|
|Beam:||57.4 ft (17.5 m)|
|Draft:||12.8 ft (3.9 m)|
|Installed power:||Electrical: 4 Isotta Fraschini V1708 diesel engines, Hitzinger generator units, 800 kW each|
|Propulsion:||2 x Rolls-Royce MT30 36 MW (48,000 hp) gas turbines, 2 x Colt-Pielstick 16PA6B 6.8 MW (9,100 hp) diesel engines, 4 Rolls-Royce waterjets|
|Speed:||47 knots (87 km/h; 54 mph) (sea state 3)|
|Range:||3,500 nmi (6,500 km; 4,000 mi) at 18 knots (33 km/h; 21 mph)|
|Endurance:||21 days (336 hours)|
|Boats & landing |
|11 m (36 ft) RHIB, 40 ft (12 m) high-speed boats|
|Complement:||50 core crew, 65 with mission crew (Blue and Gold crews).|
|Sensors and |
|Electronic warfare |
The Freedom class was proposed by a consortium formed by Lockheed Martin as "prime contractor" and by Fincantieri (project) through the subsidiary Marinette Marine (manufacturer) as a contender for a fleet of small, multipurpose warships to operate in the littoral zone. Two ships were approved, to compete with the Independence-class design offered by General Dynamics and Austal for a construction contract of up to 55 vessels.
Despite initial plans to only accept two of the Freedom and Independence variants,[clarification needed] the U.S. Navy has since announced plans to order up to ten additional ships of each class, for a total twelve ships per class. As of 2016[update], five ships are active and an additional nine are either on order, under construction or fitting out.
It was announced in early September 2016 that the first four vessels of the LCS program would be used as test ships rather than being deployed with the fleet. This includes Freedom and Fort Worth. In February 2020 it was announced that the Navy plans to retire the first four LCS ships.
- 1 Planning and construction
- 2 Design
- 3 Ships
- 4 Freedom-class based variants
- 5 Foreign sales
- 6 See also
- 7 References
- 8 External links
Planning and construction
Planning for a class of small, multipurpose warships to operate in the littoral zone began in the early 2000s. The construction contract was awarded to Lockheed Martin's LCS team (Lockheed Martin, Gibbs & Cox, Marinette Marine, Bollinger Shipyards) in May 2004 for two vessels. These would then be compared to two ships built by Austal USA to determine which design would be taken up by the Navy for a production run of up to 55 ships.
The keel of the lead ship Freedom was laid down in June 2005, by Marinette Marine in Marinette, Wisconsin. She was christened in September 2006, delivered to the Navy in September 2008, and commissioned that November. During INSURV trials, 2,600 discrepancies were discovered, including 21 considered high-priority. Not all of these were rectified before the ship entered service, as moving the ship away from Milwaukee before the winter freeze was considered a higher priority.
Cost overruns during Freedom's construction combined with projected future overruns led the government to issue a "Stop-work" in January 2007 and ultimately led to the cancellation of construction of LCS-3 (the second Lockheed Martin ship) on 13 April 2007. This ship was later re-ordered.
The ship is a semi-planing steel monohull with an aluminum superstructure. It is 377 feet (115 m) in length, displaces 3,500 metric tons (3,400 long tons), and can achieve 47 knots (87 km/h; 54 mph). The design incorporates a large reconfigurable seaframe to allow rapidly interchangeable mission modules, a flight deck with integrated helicopter launch, recovery and handling system and the capability to launch and recover boats (manned and unmanned) from both the stern and side.
The flight deck is one and a half times larger than that of a standard surface ship[clarification needed], and uses a Trigon traversing system to move helicopters in and out of the hangar. The ship has two ways to launch and recover various mission packages: a stern ramp and a starboard side door near the waterline. The mission module bay has a 3-axis crane for positioning modules or cargo.
The fore deck has a modular weapons zone which can be used for a 57 mm gun turret or missile launcher. A Rolling Airframe Missile launcher is mounted above the hangar for short-range defense against aircraft and cruise missiles, and .50-caliber gun mounts are provided topside. The Fleet-class unmanned surface vessel is designed for operations from Freedom variant ships.
The core crew will be 40 sailors, usually joined by a mission package crew and an aviation detachment for a total crew of about 75. Automation allows a reduced crew, which greatly reduces operating costs, but workload can still be "gruelling". During testing of the class lead, two ship's companies will rotate on four-month assignments.
The Congressional Budget Office estimates that fuel will account for only "8 percent to 18 percent" of the total life-cycle costs for Freedom. Senator Jeff Sessions of Alabama has called the report into question and has suggested that Independence, built in his state, would be more fuel efficient and that less frequent refuelings would affect military operations beyond the cost of fuel.
Survivability has been a criticism of both Littoral Combat Ship classes, rated at level one by the Navy, compared to level two for the Oliver Hazard Perry-class guided-missile frigates (FFG) they were designed to replace. Lockheed claims the Freedom class is actually more survivable than the FFGs because Navy requirements for various survivability levels have changed since the FFGs were assessed, and because the Freedoms' hull is made of high-strength, low-weight steel that was not previously available.
Milwaukee was the first Freedom-class LCS to be fitted with cavitation performance waterjets (Rolls Royce Axial-Flow Waterjet Mk-1). The jets create partial vacuums in liquid using an improved impeller blade design. Cavitation jets do not increase the ship's top speed, but deliver 10 percent greater fuel efficiency with less noise and vibration, reduced life-cycle costs, improved maintainability, increased availability, and potentially improved efficiency at lower speeds. The Navy plans to add the new waterjets to every Freedom variant that is produced, including LCS 5, 7, 9, 11, and 13. The mixed flow design was changed to an axial design to push water parallel to the shaft of the impeller.
The first ships of both LCS classes were delivered before the designs were mature so that improvements could be built into future ships. Many improvements to the Freedom class came from the problems experienced by Freedom (LCS-1) on its first deployment including power outages, corroded equipment, and a faulty air compressor. To prevent water being taken into the anchor windlass room, the anchor winch, hydraulic unit, and mooring capstan were replaced with a single electric chain winch on the main deck, and the existing towing chain was replaced with a lighter chain. Corrosion resistance was also improved by the Impressed Current Cathodic Protection system being modified by adding protections to the water jet inlet tunnel. Starting with LCS-3, the stern transom was lengthened and buoyancy tanks were added to the stern to increase weight service and enhance stability. A significantly less complex gas turbine electric start system will be added on LCS-5 to reduce costs and lower ship weight.
Starting with LCS-17, the Freedom-class ships will be equipped with the TRS-4D naval radar. The TRS-4D is an AESA radar built by Airbus Defense and Space that is similar to the one on German F125-class frigates, the difference being the LCS will have a rotating version instead of a fixed panel, the first AESA rotating radar aboard a U.S. Navy ship. It is a three-dimensional, multi-function naval radar combining mechanical and electronic azimuth scanning that delivers increased sensitivity to detect smaller targets with greater accuracy and faster track generation.
Engine maintenance incidents
As of November 2016[update], three of four active Freedom-class littoral combat ships have suffered engine maintenance incidents. Milwaukee broke down in the Atlantic Ocean in December 2015 and had to be towed back to port. Metallic debris was found in the filter system. The cause was traced to a clutch between the gas turbine and diesel engine systems, which failed to disengage as designed while switching from one propulsion system to the other. Fort Worth suffered a similar breakdown in the Pacific Ocean in January 2016. Improper procedures used aboard ship caused a set of combining gears—hardware used to transfer power to the ship's water propulsion system—to be operated with insufficient oil. And in July 2016, Freedom suffered a seawater leak into one of its two main diesel propulsion systems and had to return to San Diego for seawater decontamination.
Seven Freedom-class LCS ships have been commissioned, two more ships are being fitted out, four more are under construction and three are on order.
Ship orders and naming history
The Navy originally ordered two Freedom-class littoral combat ships, the lead ship Freedom (LCS-1) and Fort Worth (LCS-3), announced in March 2009 by then-Secretary of the Navy Donald C. Winter, with even hull numbers being used for the Independence class. On 29 December 2010, the Navy announced that it would be placing a block-buy order of up to ten additional Freedom-class ships, for a total of 12 ships in the class. On 31 March 2016, the Navy exercised an option under the block-buy contract for one additional Freedom-class vessel; LCS-25 would be the eleventh vessel built under the block-buy contract and the thirteenth overall (Freedom and Fort Worth were built prior to the block-buy order).
On 10 March 2014, the Navy awarded contract options to fund construction of LCS-17 and LCS-19, the seventh and eighth ships in a 10-ship contract. On 1 April 2015 the Navy awarded LCS-21 to Lockheed Martin. On 1 April 2016, the Navy awarded a contract to Lockheed Martin for LCS-25, the thirteenth of the Freedom-class variants. On 8 October 2017, Marinette Marine announced the order to build LCS-27, at a cost under the congressional cost cap of $584 million.
On 18 September 2018, the Navy announced that two additional Independence-class ships, and one Freedom-class ship, have been ordered.
On 15 January 2019, the Navy exercised an option in their contract with Lockheed Martin to purchase a single Freedom-class variant, which will be numbered LCS-31.
Ships in class
|Ship||Hull Number||Laid down||Launched||Commissioned||Status|
|Freedom||LCS-1||2 June 2005||23 September 2006||8 November 2008||Active in service|
|Fort Worth||LCS-3||11 July 2009||7 December 2010||22 September 2012||Active in service|
|Milwaukee||LCS-5||27 October 2011||18 December 2013||21 November 2015||Active in service|
|Detroit||LCS-7||11 August 2012||18 October 2014||22 October 2016||Active in service|
|Little Rock||LCS-9||27 June 2013||18 July 2015||16 December 2017||Active in service|
|Sioux City||LCS-11||19 February 2014||30 January 2016||17 November 2018||Active in service|
|Wichita||LCS-13||9 February 2015||17 September 2016||12 January 2019||Active in service|
|Billings||LCS-15||2 November 2015||1 July 2017||3 August 2019||Active in service|
|Indianapolis||LCS-17||18 July 2016||18 April 2018||26 October 2019||Active in service|
|St. Louis||LCS-19||17 May 2017||15 December 2018||Fitting out|
|Minneapolis-Saint Paul||LCS-21||22 February 2018||15 June 2019||Fitting out|
|Cooperstown||LCS-23||14 August 2018||19 January 2020||Fitting out|
|Marinette||LCS-25||27 March 2019||Under construction|
|Nantucket||LCS-27||9 October 2019||Under construction|
- Note: The Navy has placed orders for Independence-class variants numbered LCS-32, LCS-34, LCS-36 & LCS-38, but as of September 2018, have not as of yet placed orders for additional Freedom-class variants, that would become LCS-33, LCS-35, & LCS-37 in the dual-class numbering scheme.
Freedom-class based variants
Small Surface Combatant variant
Lockheed submitted a variety of upgrade options for Freedom-class ships to the Small Surface Combatant Task Force, aimed at transforming the Littoral Combat Ship from "niche" platforms into ships with more protection and firepower beyond Flight 0 to survive against more advanced military adversaries. With 180 metric tons of space available for mission packages, there is room for added capabilities. Anti-aircraft warfare was suggested with the installation of a SPY-1F air defense radar and permanently installed vertical launch systems (VLS). Current 118-meter length versions could house 4 to 32 VLS cells, each holding four RIM-162D Evolved Sea Sparrow Missiles or one SM-2 missile. For surface warfare, the 57mm gun could be replaced with a larger weapon up to the Mk 45 5-inch; integration of the AGM-114L Hellfire missile for defense against fast attack craft (FAC) was also factored in. Lockheed's approach was to integrate mission systems into the hull so that the ships could perform anti-submarine, anti-surface, and anti-aircraft duties without needing to swap out mission packages. Weight would be increased from 3,400 tons to 3,600 tons and the hull could be stretched an additional 7–10 m (23–33 ft). In addition to adding vertical launch tubes and a sonar, the main gun would be integrated with the stronger and more sophisticated radar.
The Navy's recommendation to base the Small Surface Combatant on upgraded versions of both Freedom and Independence LCSs was accepted in December 2014. Although Lockheed submitted improvements including vertical launch systems, 76 mm guns, and advanced combat systems and sensors, the Navy opted to keep the 57 mm gun, not add a vertical launch system, and chose to add an upgraded 3-D radar. Other changes included installation of an unspecified over-the-horizon missile, Mark 38 25 mm guns, a torpedo countermeasures system, a multifunction towed array system, installation of the SeaRAM launcher, an upgraded countermeasures decoy system, an upgraded electronic warfare system, armor added to vital spaces, and improved signature management. The SSC will focus in SUW and ASW with these additions, as well as retaining all other features of their mission packages; the SSC is not required to perform MCM, which will continue to be handled by the LCS. The vessels will retain a degree of modularity to concentrate on one mission set and will still have mission bays, although they may be reduced. SSC vessels are planned to begin procurement by 2019, and it is being investigated if the enhancements can be added to existing LCS hulls.
Multi-Mission Combat Ship variant
In 2012, Lockheed renamed the Surface Combat Ship (SCS) to match GD's Multi-Mission Combatant term and revealed that the full capabilities, such as Aegis, would only be available on a stretched 3,500 ton hull.
Lockheed has also been working on a trimmed down version of the Freedom-class LCS to offer on the international market for smaller patrol vessels. This Multi-Mission Combat Ship adds in phased-array radar and a vertical launch system on a smaller hull with a smaller crew size, at the cost of removing the high speed gas turbines and one third of the mission module area.
A much larger more capable frigate design was submitted to meet the requirements of the U.S. Navy's proposed FFG(X) program. Although based on the Freedom hull form, it has to be bigger and more heavily armed to meet more demanding mission requirements. In February 2018, this design was one of the five finalists selected to be considered for the 20-ship contract which will be awarded in 2020.
The Surface Combat Ship was offered to Saudi Arabia as part of a 2011 arms deal. The total cost for the eight ships was reported to be as much as $5 billion. The Saudi Naval Expansion Program II calls for some $20 billion for new warships, which can include up to 12 Freedom-class ships; the Saudis have not looked to purchase Austal's Independence-class ship. The Saudis, as well as other potential foreign buyers, want permanent weapons capabilities built into the ship rather than interchangeable mission packages. Another potential ship under evaluation was the Arleigh Burke-class destroyer; the Freedom class would be outfitted with vertical missile launchers and the SPY-1F radar, a smaller and lighter but shorter range version of Arleigh Burke's SPY-1D. A decision between the ships would be based on the desire for a large-hulled ship with a large missile defense system or a larger number of small-hulled multi-mission ships.
In October 2015, Saudi Arabia requested the sale of four Freedom-class ships to update its eastern fleet in a potential $11.25 billion deal. The Multi-Mission Surface Combatant (MMSC) variant does away with the LCS modular mission package ability and the forward two mission bays, but keeps the aft mission bay with a stern ramp. The requirement for an Aegis combat system was dropped for cost reasons and the ships will instead feature the TRS-4D AESA air search radar. Unlike the Flight 0 Freedom, the MMSC features two 8-cell Mk 41 VLS that can carry 16 SM-2 or 64 ESSMs in total, as well as an OTO Melara 76 mm main gun, Harpoon Block II anti-ship missiles, torpedoes, and the SeaRAM. It will also have an MH-60R helicopter, ASW sonar suites, and the Link 16 data-link for interoperability with regional U.S. forces.
- Gowind-class corvette
- Independence-class littoral combat ship
- Kamorta-class corvette
- Project 20386
- La Fayette–class frigate
- Type 054A frigate
- Braunschweig-class corvette
- "The Navy Is Looking for a New Frigate to Replace the Troubled Littoral Combat Ship". 11 July 2017. Archived from the original on 14 July 2017. Retrieved 13 July 2017.
- News, Defense. "Frigate competition wide open: US Navy specs reveal major design shift". Defense News.
- Trevithick, Joseph. "In a Blow to LCS, the US Navy Finally Admits it Needs a Real Frigate". Archived from the original on 12 July 2017. Retrieved 13 July 2017.
- Wetzel, Gary. "The Littoral Combat Ship Is A Disaster And This Is The Solution". Foxtrot Alpha. Jalopnik. Archived from the original on 12 July 2017. Retrieved 13 July 2017.
- Barrett, Rick (2 April 2015). "Navy orders another combat ship from Marinette Marine". Archived from the original on 7 April 2015. Retrieved 9 April 2015.
- "LCS". Fincantieri. Archived from the original on 27 December 2018. Retrieved 26 December 2018.
- "Colt-Pielstcik PA6B-STC". Fairbanks Morse. Archived from the original on 27 December 2018. Retrieved 26 December 2018.
- "LCS Littoral Combat Ship". Archived from the original on 8 August 2007. Retrieved 20 September 2008.
- Cavas, Christopher P. (6 January 2014). "Next LCS Deployment To Last 16 Months". defensenews.com. Gannett Government Media Corporation. Retrieved 14 March 2015.
- "TRS-4D radar finishes factory acceptance test". www.shephardmedia.com. The Shephard News. 14 November 2016. Archived from the original on 14 November 2016. Retrieved 14 November 2016.
- "AN/SQR-20". deagel.com. Archived from the original on 12 August 2015. Retrieved 14 March 2015.
- Littoral Combat Ship at the Joint Meeting INTERNATIONAL HYDROFOIL SOCIETY SNAME Panel SD-5 Archived 8 March 2012 at the Wayback Machine
- "Littoral Combat Ship". Navsea – NSWC Dahlgren Division. Archived from the original on 13 June 2015. Retrieved 14 March 2015.
- "Q & A with the U.S. Navy on Lockheed Martin Hellfire missiles for Littoral Combat Ships". navyrecognition.com. 17 July 2014. Archived from the original on 27 July 2014. Retrieved 14 March 2015.
- Freedburg Jr., Sydney J. (17 December 2014). "Fire Scout Grows Up: Drone Getting Radar, Rockets, 2016 IOC". Breakingdefense.com. Archived from the original on 27 June 2015. Retrieved 14 March 2015.
- "US Navy Fact File: LITTORAL COMBAT SHIP CLASS – LCS". United States Department of the Navy. Archived from the original on 2 March 2015. Retrieved 14 March 2015.
- Special from Navy Office of Information (29 December 2010). "Littoral Combat Ship Contract Award Announced" (Press release). United States Navy. Archived from the original on 25 September 2015. Retrieved 30 October 2015.
- "U.S. Navy announces Littoral Combat Ship program overhaul". Archived from the original on 16 September 2016. Retrieved 15 September 2016.
- Brad Lendon and Ryan Browne. "US Navy overhauls troubled littoral combat ship program". CNN. Archived from the original on 27 August 2017. Retrieved 13 July 2017.
- Kyle Mizokami (12 February 2020). "The Navy Wants to Retire a Ship That's Only Six Years Old". Popular Mechanics. Retrieved 17 February 2020.
- Ross, Ken (15 April 2003). "Lockheed Martin LCS Team Introduces Sea Blade Concept for Navy's LCS Program". Lockheed Martin.[dead link]
- "LCS Brochure" Archived 5 July 2010 at the Wayback Machine
- Onley, Dawn. "Lockheed Martin to build advanced Navy ship". Government Computer News. Archived from the original on 4 March 2007. Retrieved 23 September 2006.
- "Lockheed Martin Team Delivers Nation's First Littoral Combat Ship to U.S. Navy". Archived from the original on 1 July 2012. Retrieved 20 September 2008.
- Ewing, Philip (9 December 2009). "Navy: InSurv recommends accepting LCS 2". Military Times. Retrieved 14 March 2015. (subscription required)
- "Assessments of Selected Weapon Programs" (PDF). United States Government Accountability Office. March 2009. p. 106. GAO-09-326SP. Archived (PDF) from the original on 6 December 2014. Retrieved 14 March 2015.
- "Cost Growth Leads To Stop-Work On Team Lockheed LCS-3 Construction". Defense Industry Daily. 16 April 2007. Archived from the original on 2 April 2015. Retrieved 14 March 2015.
- Sessions, Jeff (3 November 2010). "Sessions comments today regarding the Navy's proposal to purchase additional Littoral Combat Ship". Office of Jeff Sessions. Archived from the original on 14 October 2011. Retrieved 14 March 2015.
- "US Navy said to buy LCS warships from both bidders". Reuters. 3 November 2010. Archived from the original on 2 April 2015. Retrieved 14 March 2015.
- Cavas, Christopher P. (4 November 2010). "Navy asks Congress to buy both LCS designs". NavyTimes. Retrieved 14 March 2015.
- "Nation's First Littoral Combat Ship Demonstrates Key Mission Package Launch And Recovery System". Lockheed Martin. 11 October 2007. Archived from the original on 20 August 2009.
- Freedberg Jr., Sydney J. (17 January 2014). "Littoral Combat Ship Cut Plan Reopens Navy Riff: Build 'Em Fast Or Rugged". Breakingdefense.com. Archived from the original on 20 March 2015. Retrieved 14 March 2015.
- Sobie, Brendan (24 August 2010). "AUVSI: Making a splash". Flightglobal. Reed Business Information. Archived from the original on 1 January 2015. Retrieved 14 March 2015.
- Jean, Grace V. (September 2010). "Duty Aboard the Littoral Combat Ship: 'Grueling but Manageable'". National Defense. Archived from the original on 5 March 2012. Retrieved 14 March 2015.
- Jones, Meg (5 November 2008). "Navy's Vessel Of Versatility". Milwaukee Journal Sentinel. Archived from the original on 8 January 2009. Retrieved 14 March 2015.
- Howard, Courtenay E. (1 April 2008). "USS Freedom demonstrates its power plant can handle vessel's sensors and electronics". Military & Aerospace Electronics. Retrieved 14 March 2015.[permanent dead link]
- "Life-Cycle Costs of Selected Navy Ships". Congressional Budget Office. 28 April 2010. Archived from the original on 2 April 2015. Retrieved 14 March 2015.
- "CBO Report Calls into Question Navy's LCS Evaluation". Bignews.biz. 29 April 2010. Archived from the original on 2 April 2015. Retrieved 14 March 2015.
- Capaccio, Tony (23 April 2013). "Littoral Combat Ship Network Can Be Hacked, Navy Finds". Bloomberg News. Archived from the original on 26 January 2015. Retrieved 14 March 2015.
- Lawlor, Maryann (December 2005). "Littoral Combat Ship Launches Change". SIGNAL Online. AFCEA International. Archived from the original on 2 April 2015. Retrieved 14 March 2015.
- Freedberg Jr., Sydney J. (10 June 2014). "Lockheed Says It Can 'Easily' Improve LCS". Breakingdefense.com. Archived from the original on 27 March 2015. Retrieved 14 March 2015.
- Szondy, David (6 February 2013). "New water jets to give U.S. Navy littoral combat ships extra punch". Newatlas.com. Archived from the original on 7 February 2018. Retrieved 6 February 2018.
- Osborn, Kris (15 May 2014). "LCS5 Gets New Waterjets". Defensetech.org. Archived from the original on 2 April 2015. Retrieved 14 March 2015.
- Osborn, Kris (27 June 2014). "Navy Engineers LCS Changes". DoDBuzz.com. Archived from the original on 29 April 2015. Retrieved 14 March 2015.
- Successful Factory Acceptance for US Navy Freedom class LCS' TRS-4D AESA Radar Archived 24 January 2016 at the Wayback Machine – Navyrecognition.com, 2 December 2015
- Brad Lendon and Zachary Cohen. "Third breakdown in year for $360M US Navy warships". CNN. Archived from the original on 30 August 2016. Retrieved 30 August 2016.
- "Navy awards contract for LCS-25". Archived from the original on 6 April 2016. Retrieved 4 April 2016.
- "On Your Mark… Get Set… Go! LCS 17, 19 at the Starting Line". Lockheed Martin. 10 March 2014. Archived from the original on 20 March 2015. Retrieved 14 March 2015.
- Jean, Grace (1 April 2015). "USN awards FY 2015 LCS contracts". IHS Jane's Navy International. Archived from the original on 2 July 2015. Retrieved 11 June 2015.
- "Lockheed Martin and Fincantieri Marinette Marine Awarded Contract to Build LCS 27" (PDF) (Press release). Marinette Marine. 9 October 2017. Archived (PDF) from the original on 10 October 2017. Retrieved 9 October 2017.
- "Secretary of the Navy Names Two Littoral Combat Ships". navy.mil. 13 February 2018. Archived from the original on 14 February 2018. Retrieved 14 February 2018.
- "Navy Awards Three Littoral Combat Ships". navy.mil. 18 September 2018. Archived from the original on 19 September 2018. Retrieved 19 September 2018.
- "Navy Statement on Littoral Combat Ship" (Press release). NAVSEA. 15 January 2019. Archived from the original on 20 January 2019. Retrieved 5 February 2019.
- LeGrone, Sam (10 June 2014). "Lockheed Outlines Post Littoral Combat Ship Pitch". U.S. Naval Institute. Archived from the original on 22 December 2014. Retrieved 14 March 2015.
- Osborn, Kris (3 September 2014). "Lockheed Offers Navy New LCS Variant". Defensetech.org. Archived from the original on 26 March 2015. Retrieved 14 March 2015.
- Cavas, Christopher P. (11 December 2014). "Split Decision on New US Navy Ship". Defensenews.com. Archived from the original on 14 December 2014. Retrieved 14 March 2015.
- Blenkey, Nick (10 December 2012). "Lockheed Martin Offers LCS-derived Multi-Mission Combatant". Marine Log. Archived from the original on 10 December 2012.
- Wall, Robert (26 October 2012). "BAE and Thales plot course for smaller warships to fight pirates". The Independent. London. Archived from the original on 14 July 2015. Retrieved 14 March 2015.
- Cavas, Christopher P. (17 February 2013). "China Shipbuilder Calls for Greater Cooperation with U.S. Firms". DefenseNews. Retrieved 14 March 2015.
- LeGrone, Sam (20 October 2015). "Saudi Arabia Set to Buy Four Lockheed Martin Freedom-Class Variants in $11.25B Deal". U.S. Naval Institute. Archived from the original on 22 December 2015. Retrieved 10 December 2015.
- Cavas, Christopher P. (20 October 2015). "US OKs Potential $11.25B Saudi Deal for LCS Variant". Defensenews.com. Retrieved 10 December 2015.
- Wolf, Jim (8 April 2011). "Saudis ask U.S. for price quotes for warships". Reuters. Archived from the original on 22 February 2015. Retrieved 14 March 2015.
- "Surface Combat Ship Designed as a Multi-mission Ship."[dead link]
- "Lockheed proposes $5bn Aegis ships sale to Saudi Arabia". Arabian Business.com. Bloomberg News. 26 May 2011. Archived from the original on 18 March 2015. Retrieved 14 March 2015.
- Shalal-Esa, Andrea (21 November 2013). "BIW could get $20 billion contract as Saudi Arabia looks to expand Navy". Bangor Daily News. Archived from the original on 6 November 2014. Retrieved 14 March 2015.
- Saudis Said To Zero In on Lockheed LCS – Defensenews.com, 15 September 2015