Media freedom in Russia
|Part of a series on|
|Censorship by country|
Media freedom in Russia concerns both the ability of directors of mass media outlets to carry out independent policies and the ability of journalists to access sources of information and to work without outside pressure. Media of Russia include television and radio channels, periodicals, and Internet media, which according to the laws of the Russian Federation may be either state or private property.
In 2013 Russia ranked 148th out of 179 countries in the Press Freedom Index from Reporters Without Borders. In 2015 Freedom House report Russia got score of 83 (100 being the worst), mostly because of new laws introduced in 2014 that further extended the state control over mass-media. The situation was characterised as even worse in Crimea where, after annexation by Russia, both Russian jurisdiction and extrajudical means are routinely applied to limit freedom of expression.
Various aspects of the contemporary press freedom situation are criticized by multiple international organizations. While much attention is paid to political influences, media expert William Dunkerley, a senior fellow at American University in Moscow, argues that the genesis of Russia's press freedom woes lies in sectoral economic dysfunction.
- 1 History
- 2 Legislative framework
- 3 Attacks and threats against journalists
- 4 Censorship
- 5 Judicial prosecution of journalists and media outlets
- 6 Government ownership and control of media outlets
- 6.1 Government control over the broadcast media
- 6.2 Foreign media owners
- 6.3 Official stance towards the issues of state dominance
- 6.4 War propaganda
- 7 Political pressure on independent media
- 8 Internet censorship and surveillance
- 9 Banned images
- 10 See also
- 11 References
- 12 External links
The Russian constitution provides for freedom of speech and press; however, government application of law, bureaucratic regulation, and politically motivated criminal investigations have forced the press to exercise self-censorship constraining its coverage of certain controversial issues, resulting in infringements of these rights. According to Human Rights Watch, the Russian government exerts control over civil society through selective implementation of the law, restriction and censure.
Commissioner for Human Rights (ombudsman)
Russia's ombudsman, named officially the Commissioner for Human Rights, is appointed for a certain term by the Parliament. The ombudsman cannot be dismissed before the end of his term, and is not subordinate to any body of power, including the President or the Government. Russia’s 83 administrative regions have the right to elect a local ombudsman whose authority is limited to that region. Less than half have done so.
Russian Ombudsman Vladimir Lukin reported in 2006, that suggesting that freedom of speech is non-existent in Russia would be an exaggeration, the constitutional right for speech freedom is basically observed, as well as that there was no institutionalised censorship. Apparently for these very reasons journalists and publishers seldom appeal to the Commissioner protesting restrictions of their right of seeking, receiving, transferring, publishing or distributing information. Yet disguised restrictions exist to a considerable degree, they are often put through the economic pressure on mass media by the authorities and loyal business. The so-called "self-censorship" which induces journalists to refrain from disseminating information which, in their opinion, may not please the authorities, is also widespread. So in many places the right to praise the authorities is ensured, while the opposite right is just formally declared.
In 2008 annual report Vladimir Lukin wrote, that it is important to have the comprehensive legal interpretation of the terms that may limit the freedom of thought and word. He spoke against the election legislation amendment that is "a practical prohibition" of contesting candidates criticism, calling it obviously excessive. And Lukin was critical about the Law on combating extremist activities, noting that extremism and dissent must be strictly legally divided.
Attacks and threats against journalists
The dangers to journalists in Russia have been well known since the early 1990s but concern at the number of unsolved killings soared after Anna Politkovskaya's murder in Moscow on 7 October 2006. While international monitors spoke of several dozen deaths, some sources within Russia talked of over two hundred fatalities.
Remembrance Day of Journalists Killed in the Line of Duty in Russia is observed on 15 December every year.
Assaults on journalists
Since the early 1990s, a number of Russian reporters who have covered the situation in Chechnya, contentious stories on organized crime, state and administrative officials, and large businesses have been killed. According to the Committee to Protect Journalists, since 1992, 50 journalists have been murdered for their professional activity in Russia (which made it the third deadliest country for journalist in the 1992–2006 period): 30 journalists from 1993 to 2000, and 20 journalists since 2000.
According to Glasnost Defence Foundation, there were 9 cases of suspicious deaths of journalists in 2006, as well as 59 assaults on journalists, and 12 attacks on editorial offices. In 2005, the list of all cases included 7 deaths, 63 assaults, 12 attacks on editorial offices, 23 incidents of censorship, 42 criminal prosecutions, 11 illegal layoffs, 47 cases of detention by militsiya, 382 lawsuits, 233 cases of obstruction, 23 closings of editorial offices, 10 evictions, 28 confiscations of printed production, 23 cases of stopping broadcasting, 38 refusals to distribute or print production, 25 acts of intimidation, and 344 other violations of Russian journalist's rights.
On 7 October 2006, Russian journalist Anna Politkovskaya, well known for her criticisms of Russia's actions in Chechnya and the pro-Russia Chechen government, was shot in the lobby of her apartment building. The death of this Russian journalist triggered an outcry of criticism of Russia in the Western media, with accusations that, at best, Putin has failed to protect the country's new independent media.
International Press Institute reports selective use of regulations, politically motivated criminal investigations, journalist imprisonments, outlet shutdowns and aggressive harassments by security services. According to the organization, Russia remains the most dangerous European country for journalists, with four killed in 2009.
The Amnesty International reported in 2009, that "Human rights defenders, journalists and lawyers who spoke openly about human rights abuses faced threats and intimidation. The police appeared to be reluctant to investigate such threats and a climate of impunity for attacks on civil society activists prevailed." The Amnesty International reported also a "climate of growing intolerance towards independent views". According to the Committee to Protect Journalists, Russia is a more dangerous place now than it was during the Cold War. Only Iraq and Algeria outrank it on the list of most life-threatening countries for the press.
In October 2016 a group of Chechen journalists published an anonymous, dramatic appeal in The Guardian describing the intimidation and physical attacks they are experiencing under the Ramzan Kadyrov government and complete control the officials are enforcing over the media organisations in the republic.
at the alarming incidence of threats, violent assaults and murders of journalists and human rights defenders, which has created a climate of fear and a chilling effect on the media, including for those working in the North Caucasus, and regrets the lack of effective measures taken to protect the right to life and security of these persons.
- In August 2014 the Pskov-based publisher Lev Shlosberg, member of the opposition Yabloko party, suffered a serious attack that left him unconscious. He claims the attack was related to his paper's investigations on the deployment of Russian soldiers from Pskov to Ukraine.
- In August 2014 the investigative reporter Aleksandr Krutov was attacked and beaten in Saratov - the fourth time in his 20-years career in covering crime for a local publication.
- In September 2014 a TV crew reporting on fraud was attacked in Novosibirsk. Their equipment was destroyed and the videographer was injured.
- In December 2014 in Novosibirsk the editor in chief of taiga.info was beaten by two men in the website premises.
Denial of entry and deportation of foreign journalists
- In February 2011, Guardian journalist Luke Harding, from Britain, was refused entry into Russia, contrary to OCSE regulations. He thus became the first foreign journalist to be expelled from Russia since the end of the Cold War. Some linked his expulsion with unflattering coverage of Russia, including speculation about Vladimir Putin's wealth. On 9 February Russia reversed the decision.
- In July 2014, the Ukrainian journalist Yevgeniy Agarkov (1+1 TV) was arrested in Voronezh while reporting on the trial of a Ukrainian prisoner of war. He was charged with missing proper accreditation, and was convicted, deported and banned for five years.
- In September 2014 a BBC team was attacked in Astrakhan while investigating the deaths of Russian soldiers in Ukraine - at the time still denied by the Kremlin. They had their equipment destroyed.
- In 2015, an Australian journalist, Helen Womack, who spent over 30 years reporting from Russia was denied accreditation after listing on a nationalist-operated "list of enemies of Russia" website and forced to leave the country.
- Also in 2015, following the documentary on Russian soldiers serving in war in Donbass, Simon Ostrovsky was denied accreditation to Russia.
- Wacław Radziwinowicz was expelled in December 2015.
Article 29(5) of the Constitution of Russia states, "The freedom of the mass media shall be guaranteed. Censorship shall be prohibited." The World Report 2009 by Human Rights Watch claimed that the Russian government controlled over civil society through selective implementation of the law, media restrictions and harassment of activists and human rights defenders.
The Commissioner for Human Rights of the Council of Europe in 2005 interview to Russian radio Ekho Moskvy said there was pressure on media from authorities in Russia's regions, and situation with the central media caused concerns, as many central TV media looked to lose former independence; his conclusion was that the most important task in Russia was to protect the victories of the 1991 Law on mass media, and to let journalists work fully independently; yet he said that with all the difficulties the Russian media were free as a whole, and the fact he was interviewed in a direct broadcast without censorship spoke also about press freedom.
According to 2005 research conducted by the Russian Public Opinion Research Center (WCIOM), the number of Russians who approve of censorship on TV has grown in a year from 63% to 82%; sociologists believe that Russians are not voting in favour of press freedom suppression, but rather for expulsion of ethically doubtful material such as scenes of violence and sex (57% for restricting of violence / sex depiction on TV, 30% for ban of fraudulent businesses ads; and 24% for products for sex ads, and 'criminal way of life propaganda' films).
According to journalist Maxim Kononenko, "People invent censorship for themselves, and what happens on some TV channels, some newspapers, happens not because Putin dials them and says: No, this mustn't go. But because their bosses are fools." However, political scientist Yevgenia Albats in interview with Eduard Steiner has disputed this assertion: "Today the directors of the television channels and the newspapers are invited every Thursday into the Kremlin office of the deputy head of administration, Vladislav Surkov to learn what news should be presented, and where. Journalists are bought with enormous salaries. In discussions they tell us then how horrible it is to work in the state television service."
Access to information
Russia’s Law on Providing Access to Information on the Activities of State Bodies and Bodies of Local Self-Government, was enacted by the lower house of the legislature (State Duma) on January 21, 2009.  The law positively guarantees the rights of Russian citizens to request and receive information, outlines a procedure for such requests, and determines government responsibility for providing such information. Such adoption was welcomed by the Human Rights Committee of United Nations in 2009.
However, even if the right to information is also legally guaranteed in Russia by the first Article of the Russian Law on Mass Media (December 27, 1991) and by Article 29 of the 1993 Constitution, the realm of information is characterized by secrecy rather than openness.  The Law on Mass Media assigns a direct right to receive information only to mass media, while Russian citizens have the right to receive reliable information on the state activities and representants via the mass media (Art. 38.1). State officials, in turn, are obliged to inform the media about their activities: on demand, but also actively.
According to the Global Right to Information Rating (GRIR), the Russian legal framework (including jurisprudence) does not recognise a fundamental right of access to information. The GRIR appointed score 1 to Russia, where 6 is the maximum possible score with regard to the right to access information. However, when considered together with the scope and the requesting procedures provided by the Russian Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), the GRIR assigned Russia a total score of 98, out of the maximum score of 150. The Penal Code (Art. 144) fixes high penalties for unlawful refusal of information and for hindering the professional activity of journalists. The right to access public information is particularly undermined by the legal exception valid for refusing the information’s disclosure, namely the category of "confidential information" (commercial, state, or military secrets) is open to wide interpretations.  The Law "on state secrets" was adopted on July 21,1993 (amended in October 1997). In addition to a list of categories of information that could be classified as state secrets, the President of Russia can elaborate and approve such list through the publication of a public decree.
In 2015, the FSB (Federal Security Service of the Russian Federation), the principal security agency of Russia, proposed a new regulation that will restrict access to public property registers, that were previously frequently used by whistleblowers to expose multi-million dollars mansions belonging to public officials that couldn't afford them from the official salary. The regulation was proposed shortly after the media exposed an undeclared mansion belonging to FSB vice-director Sergey Smirnov using the public registers. In the same year, a group of deputies proposed a new law that would penalize "anti-Russian" or "anti-patriotic" statements. The law was criticized as unconstitutional and vague due to lack of definition of what these terms would really mean.
Another regulation enacted in 2015 is based on the European right to be forgotten concept, but without any of the safeguards for the public interest and freedom of speech. According to some experts, the regulation's scope is to silence publications about specific corrupted politicians, even if the accusations were true and confirmed in courts. Public land registers were also anonymized to hide names of property owners after they were frequently used by watchdogs to question unexplainable wealth of public officers.
Open data and proactive disclosure
Beyond the duty to disclose public information upon request, public authorities in Russia have an affirmative obligation to publish information (i.e. proactive disclosure). Such information consists in: 
- Full and brief official names of the government body, postal address, email for requests/messages from citizens, reference phone numbers - usually published and actualized Information on powers and competence;
- Information on head officials (full names, opther information - upon agreement);
- Official symbols;
- Approved forms (templates) for applications and other documents acceptable for review by the government body;
- Information on services provided by the government body in the field of licensing works performed abroad and using information containing state secret;
- Procedure for entering state service in the government body;
- Procedure for submission and review of applications from individuals and organizations Procedure, address, and schedule for reception of individuals and organizations;
- Name of the government body's structure department in charge of reception, contact data (email, reference phones).
Proactive disclosure of information by public bodies is provided by a series of laws, many of them aimed at contrasting corruption. One of them is the Russian Federation Federal Law “On providing access to information on the activities of state bodies and local governments”, adopted by the State Duma on January 21, 2009.
The Russian legislation provides several ways for government bodies to publish their open data: it can be done through the federal Open Data Portal (data.gov.ru), dedicating a section on a government body's own official website or on a special open data portal, regional or municipal.
In 2016, the association Infometer  has audited open data of 166 websites belonging to administrations of the largest Russian cities, those populated over 100,000. This study revealed that most cities' administrations do not publish open data:
- most of those publishing open data do it at their own resources that is not always the best solution;
- quite few city administrations approve normative acts regarding open data;
- the very few city administrations work with the community of open data software developers.
73 out of the 166 cities under survey do publish open data. They observe the requirements on open data publication for 47.9%.
Infometer, from July to October 2014, made an audit of compliance of various level courts' official websites with the Federal Law “On Providing Access to Information on the Activities of Courts in the Russian Federation” No. 262-FZ from Dec 22, 2008. The experts focused on the openness of information on Russian general jurisdiction courts' activities, focusing on online publication of templates for documents used for filing applications to courts. The results showed that, with regard to the Supreme Court of Russia, information is available at 24,1%. Referring to Regional Court, out of the 85 examined their openness level appears to be 42,4%. Finally, with regard to First Instance courts, their openness resulted to be 31%.
With regard to open data, as to 2015 the Infometer association calculated that 69 Russian regions publish open data and for 36,6% at average regions observe requirements for open data publication. Most of these open data are published in the governmental field.
Prosecution of "extremist" content
In the summer of 2012, the Russian State Duma considered Bill 89417-6 which would create a blacklist of internet sites including child pornography, drug related material, and extremist material; as well as making providers of telecom services liable for such breaches. The bill was criticized as not being aimed at combating the causes of illegal content and its distribution through the internet, nor contribute to the effectiveness of law enforcement and prosecution of criminals, and its subjective criteria could allow Russian authorities to mass block internet resources with legal content. In December 2013, a law criminalizing "calls for separatism" was proposed. Under the law, violators face a fine of up to 306,700 rubles ($9,500) or jail terms of up to five years for making public calls for action aimed against the country's territorial integrity.
Since 2009, the practice of the law enforcement agencies (most notably FSB) was to abuse newly introduced anti-extremism laws to suppress freedom of speech, including corruption investigations. Publications and activities classified as "extremist" included protests against the court rulings in Bolotnaya Square case ("calling for illegal action") and criticism of overspending of local governor ("insult of the authorities") or publishing a poem in support of Ukraine ("inciting hatred") In 2015, the fines for "extremist" content were raised to a maximum of 1 million rubles ($16,069).
- In June 2015, Alexandr Byvshev, the poet whose works were banned as "extremist" earlier, was also listed on the official "list of terrorists and extremists" maintained by the Federal Service for Financial Monitoring (Росфинмониторинг, Rosfinmonitoring) and a "spontaneous collective condemnation" campaign was started in his village described as Soviet-esque by independent media.
- Litvinenko's book "Blowing Up Russia" was also listed as an "extremist publication" and banned in 2015.
- In November 2015, just before the Holodomor anniversary in Ukraine, the articles of Raphael Lemkin, who coined the term genocide and used it to describe the Holodomor, were also added to the federal index of extremist materials in Russia.
- In February 2016, police in Saint Petersburg confiscated a whole print run of a book by a Polish war-time author Jan Nowak-Jeziorański because of an allegedly "extremist content".
Criticism of annexation of Crimea
After Russia took control of Crimea, the Russian parliament passed a law making it a criminal offense to question Russia's territorial integrity within what the government considers its borders. A man named Andrei Bubayev was jailed for two years for reposting a picture of a toothpaste tube with the words "squeeze Russia out of yourself" and an article under the headline "Crimea is Ukraine" by a controversial blogger, who is in jail now, calling for military aggression against Russia.
Judicial prosecution of journalists and media outlets
Prosecutors in Russia have the custom of charging individuals - including journalists, bloggers, and whistle-blowers - with trumped-up criminal offenses including defamation, extremism, and other common criminal charges, as part of an effort to deter and limit their activities.
- In a three-year court case beginning in 2008, Chernovik, Dagestan's largest independent newspaper, saw its editor-in-chief Nadira Isayeva and several reporters prosecuted on charges of "inciting hatred toward law enforcement officials" following criticism of the Federal Security Service's counterinsurgency tactics. Reporters Without Borders, Committee to Protect Journalists, and ARTICLE 19 all protested the charges, and Isayeva was ultimately acquitted. She described the case as "a test for the institution of press freedom" in Dagestan.
- In November 2013 the Rostov-na-Donu investigative journalist and blogger Sergey Reznik (often reporting on corruption and abuses by politicians) was sentenced to 1,5 years in jail on various charges, including insult to a governmental official. The jail term was upheld in appeal in April 2014. A new defamation case was open against him in July 2014.
- In January 2014 Aksana Panova, former chief editor of the Ura.ru website in Yekaterinburg was given a 2-year suspended sentence - including a ban on journalist activities - after being tried for extortion. She rejected all charges, claiming to be targeted in retribution for critical coverage of local officials.
- In September 2015 the Siberian journalist and blogger Dmitriy Shipilov was arrested after he had interviewed the organisers of a march for Siberian autonomy. The official reason included failure to serve a three-month sentence for "insulting a public official". Shipilov claims the detention is politically motivated.
- In October 2014 the Rostov-na-Donu journalist Aleksandr Tolmachev was convicted to 9 years of hard labor on extortion charges, after having already spent three years in pre-trial detention.
Judicial harassment of the blogger and politician Aleksey Navalny continued in 2014. Navalny was fined $8,400 in April for defaming a Moscow city councillor on Twitter. In December he was sentenced to three and a half years (with suspended sentence) together with his brother Oleg Navalny upon fraud charges. Roskomnadzor warned four media that reported on the sentence and relied a video of Navalny calling for demonstration, accusing them of inciting extremism.
Government ownership and control of media outlets
The government has been using direct ownership, or ownership by large private companies with government links, to control or influence major national media and regional media outlets, especially television. There were reports of self-censorship in the television and print media, particularly on issues critical of the government.
As to a 2016 Mediastandart Foundation survey, most of the Russian journalists feel that they are not free and independent, and believe that media owners undermine the independence of journalists. According to Alexey Kudrin, Russia’s former Minister of Finance and current head of the Civil Initiative Committee, “in the regions, the number of independent media is progressively declining. The same happens on the federal level—major corporations and state institutions exercise influence on the media.”
In the first 15 years after Russia’s independence (1990) most of the Russian print media underwent a change of ownership in this period. Many of them disappeared, others changed owners repeatedly. After the new Law on Mass Media was adopted in 1991, the first stage of privatization of the media market followed. The term “oligarchs”, including “media oligarchs”, started to be used specifically in Russia indicating powerful businessmen close to political power. The latter, made them the “chosen ones” in the redistribution of the country’s wealth after the Soviet Union’s dissolution. Since 1999 election of Vladimir Putin, only oligarchs loyal to the government were able to maintain their control on strategic sectors of Russian economy and politic such as the information one. 
All but one national TV channels are fully or partially owned by the state. The last channel – NTV – is owned by Gazprom, in which the state has a controlling stake. The situation in the radio market is similar. Major information channels are somehow controlled by the state.
As to the IREX association Media Sustainability Index, in smaller cities, private independent media are often the only sources of local news, because local municipal newspapers publish only official information.
Russian antimonopoly regulation is still evolving, with many uncertainties and compliance challenges remaining. Many of the key provisions of the Competition Law are unclear and open to interpretation. For this reason, they require further interpretation by Russian courts.
Moreover, governmental control over media is exercised also through the distribution of state subsidies and advertising revenues.
Government control over the broadcast media
Many observers have noted the loss of the independence of national television stations. As stated by the BBC, two out of the three main federal channels Channel One and Russia TV are controlled by the government, since they are completely or partially owned by the Rosimuschestvo (the Federal Agency for State Property Management). Instead, state-controlled energy giant Gazprom owns NTV.
Russia TV (Rossiya) covers 98.5 percent of the country’s territory and is state- owned. Channel One (Pervyj Kanal) covers 98.8 percent of Russia’s territory and has a shared state and private ownership (51 % state- 49% private). However, most of the private shareholders include National Media Group (controlled by the structures of Yuri Kovalchuk, Chairman of the Board of Rossiya Bank, one of the largest banks in Russia, and Vladimir Putin’s personal friend; and Roman Abramovich, owner of Chelsea football club and Putin’s ally). NTV covers 84 percent of the national territory.
According to the Committee to Protect Journalists, "All three major television networks are now in the hands of Kremlin loyalists." Indeed, while Rossiya TV (Сhannel Russia) was state-owned since its foundation in 1991, major shareholders of ORT and NTV (Boris Berezovsky and Vladimir Gusinsky, respectively) sold their stocks to the government and Gazprom in 2000-2001. Moreover, TV6, a media outlet owned by Berezovsky, was closed in 2002 using a legal loophole. In 2003 TVS channel which was formed mainly of former NTV and TV6 was closed due to financial problems. 
Along with that, plenty of media outlets actively develop now while state participation in them is minimal. There are private Russian TV networks with the broadcast cover reaching the majority of the Russia's population: REN TV (known for the daily analytical talk show with Tigran Keosayan, analytical news program "Week" with Marianna Maksimovskaya), TV Center ( known for "Postscriptum" with Aleksey Pushkov, "Moment of Truth" with Andrey Karaulov), Petersburg - Channel 5.
Liberal opposition TV-Channel RTVi owned by Vladimir Gusinsky is not broadcast in Russia, but available in that country through networks of cable and satellite television, MMDS and IPTV networks. A former editor of a program on that channel, Vladimir Kara-Murza, believes it is the merit of the RTVi that the possibility of a third presidential term of Vladimir Putin was prevented, and that the "backdoor political technologists" were made to "abide to the Constitution, albeit with the Successor operation".
On 29 January 2014, the largest Russian TV providers, after key politicians expressed their discontent, disconnected Dozhd channel in response to a survey on its website and in live "Dilettants" discussing program. The survey asked if Leningrad should have been surrendered to the invading Nazi army in order to save hundreds of thousands of lives.
Top state television channels frequently apply self-censorship, avoiding any controversial topics that might impact the public image of the authorities. For example, massive truck drivers protests across the country were never even mentioned in the First Channel in spite of wide coverage in local and independent media and requests of the viewers.
The situation in the radio market is similar. Major information channels are in one way or another controlled by the state. Only three Russian radios broadcast political talk shows: Mayak, Radio Rossiya, and Ekho Moskvy. Mayak and Radio Rossiya are state-owned (Rosimushchestvo), while Ekho Moskvy is owned by the state-controlled Gazprom Media. A complete list of the audiovisual services in Russia can be found in the MAVISE Database, made by the European Audiovisual Observatory. Such list includes the ownership of TV channels and on-demand services.
Government control over print media
Kommersant-Vlast, Expert, and the New Times are weeklies that provide serious analysis of the current political issues . However, they are owned by oligarchs who openly support theo government. Kommersant-Vlast is produced by Kommersant Publishing House that is owned by Alisher Usmanov. Expert is a part of Expert Media Holding that is owned by Oleg Deripaska’s Basic Element and a Russian state corporation—Vnesheconombank.
Government control over web-sites
Most popular websites, if they are not internationally owned such as Google and Facebook, are state-owned or owned by a couple of influential businessmen such as Alexander Mamut and Alisher Usmanov.
Foreign media owners
A law signed in 2014 provided to limit foreign ownership stakes in any Russian media assets to 20% by early 2017. As a consequence, in 2015, the German Springer Publishing House sold the Russian edition of Forbes, and Finland’s Sanoma sold its stakes in the business newspaper Vedomosti and the English-language Moscow Times. Russian media executives were bought such stakes in both transactions. The Moscow Times subsequently switched from daily to weekly publication, and its chief editor resigned due to conflicts with the new owner. The new publisher of Forbes said that the magazine would carry fewer stories on politics and focus on business and economics.
"Black lists" controversy
As reported by Clifford J. Levy in a 2008 New York Times article, all Putin's opponents are being made to vanish from Russian TV. They are blacklisted and not allowed to appear in TV shows. In one example, a presentation critical of Putin's policies has been digitally erased. This is the case of Boris Berezovsky and Vladimir Gusinsky, two powerful Russian oligarchs in the ‘90’s . Berezovsky had invested in the former public broadcaster ORT’s first channel while Gusinsky, created Russia’s first independent TV station, NTV. After Putin’s power takeover, the media owned by Berezovsky and Gusinsky were the first victims of this “purge.” Tax controls, raids by armed men, searches and arrests forced their bosses to flee the country and to sell their media outlets.
As reported by Russian scientist Sergey L. Lopatnikov, information about "black lists" is nonsense; an argument was made that not less than 35-40% of participants of NTV-aired talk show "At a barrier" hosted by Vladimir Solovyov during the last two years represented the liberal opposition (including Novodvorskaya, Ivanenko, Nemtsov, Hakamada); from January to May 2008, overt adversaries of Vladimir Putin participated in 9 of 16 (more than 50%) issues of the talk show.
REN-TV and Channel 5 news ban controversy
On 16 October 2009, Kommersant newspaper reported that the owner of private television channels REN TV and Channel 5 had made changes to the managing structures of the channels. Referring to an anonymous source, Kommersant stated that as the result these channels would cease to broadcast independent news; instead, since 2010 they would receive the news from the state-powered TV-channel RT. As Kommersant wrote, "the Channel 5 and REN-TV are the only Russian TV channels today whose editorial policy is different than state news. Only through these channeles opposition politicians are aired, as well as other events adversed by authorities are reported " However, the head of a REN-TV analytical news program "Week" Marianna Maksimovskaya was quoted by Kommersant as saying she held optimistic about the new executive director of REN-TV and sure that its editorial policy won't be altered.
On 19 October 2009, press secretary of REN-TV channel Nazarov asserted that REN-TV and Channel 5 will receive from the RT "exclusively technological support", and the state channel will impose no influence on the informational part of the news.
On 22 October 2009, Alexander Orjonikize, a former head of REN-TV, and now CEO of National Media Group that owns TV channels in question, said that while the possibility of partnership in order to produce more saturated and interesting news is discussed, "it's important to note that whatever business strategy would be chosen in that direction, editorial policy regarding news and its informational contents will not be altered."
Channel 5 employs 1700 people in St. Petersburg. Its sales in 2009 accounted for 20 millions USD, while the expenditures exceeded 100 millions. On 19 October 2009, employees of the TV channel published an open letter to the top Russian politicians, concerned over a possibility of mass dismissals. On October 23, 2009, CEO of NMG-TV Vladimir Khanumyan in an interview promised no mass dismissals will take place; he also commented that "Information about Russia Today is generally some misunderstanding. I don't even understand how could it be used in our project. It's the TV channel which makes programs for the abroad audience in English and Arab languages. How does that relate to Channel 5?"
In 2016 leadership and top journalists of RBC media holding left the company following an investigation launched by the authorities into an alleged "fraud", which was widely associated with the non-mainstream coverage of political affairs and the government, including the latest Panama Papers publications on the wealth of Vladimir Putin. One journalist described the situation as "having a strong resemblance to the takeover of NTV in the early 2000s".
Official stance towards the issues of state dominance
In 2000, prior to the presidential election, Kommersant published a long document titled "The Reform of the Administration of the President of the Russian Federation", allegedly leaked from the election committee of Vladimir Putin. The programme proposed a number of changes to government information policy, including strict centralization of mass media and suppression of criticism from both media as well as from opposition in Duma.
"The Directorate, setting a goal for itself, needs to act more effectively and actively than the opposition, must be harsher in its work and claims than the opposition, it must use sharper and more crushing facts. There should be no weakness or liberalism, there is no time left for this. For every claim directed against the Leadership of the country or its policy, the Presidential Press Center of the Administration must immediately answer. Operational information about the intentions of opposition forces to conduct political events comes to the Directorate. The Directorate implements all preemptive actions before the action to be conducted by the opposition, but in a beneficial “light” for the Presidential side".
The document also offered a number of case studies and examples on how journalists or members of Duma exposing cases of corruption or suspicious purchases (e.g. foreign property) by members of the administration should be silenced with "preventive political actions", involving release of compromising personal details about the whistleblowers, journalists and protesters or organizing "spontaneous" counter-pickets in support of the administration. These methods were also applied to foreign journalists reporting from Russia and included ostensible surveillance, tapping of apartments and threats to relatives.
In 2006, President of Russia Vladimir Putin commented that in the period of 1990s freedom of press in Russia "was indeed under threat, not from the former state ideology that once held a monopoly on expression, but from the dictates of oligarchic capital". When asked about media freedom in 2006 interview with NBC TV channel, Putin replied: "We have more than 3,500 television and radio companies here in Russia and state participation in them is decreasing with every passing year. As for print media, there are more than 40,000 publications and we could not control them all even if we wanted to."
"[A]s was the case 20 years ago, the bureaucracy still does not trust free citizens and free activity. This logic pushes it into dangerous conclusions and acts. The bureaucracy from time to time casts fear over the business world, pressuring it to keep in line and not to take what they consider wrong action, takes control of this or that media outlet, trying to stop it from saying what they consider the wrong thing, meddles in the electoral process, preventing the election of what they consider the wrong person, and puts pressure on the courts, stopping them from handing down what they consider the wrong verdict."
The policies adopted in that address answered that criticism the following way:
"Ninth, parliamentary parties should have clear guarantees that their work will be covered by the state media.
Tenth, freedom of speech should be backed up by technological innovation. Experience shows that it is practically of no use to persuade the bureaucrats to "leave the media in peace". Instead of persuading, we should work more actively to expand the free internet and digital television space. No bureaucrat can obstruct discussion on the internet or censor thousands of channels at once." 
In May 2009, a Federal Law "On Guarantees of Equality of Parliamentary Parties in Covering their Activities by the National State-Owned TV and Radio Channels" was adopted.
In his 2009 State of the Nation Address Dmitry Medvedev recommended all regions of the Russian Federation to pass laws on guarantees of equal media coverage of activity of parties represented in regional parliaments.
In 2007, a report by professor of politics Nicolai N. Petro asserted that foreign companies owned shares in over half of all Russian broadcasting companies and not the state. According to him, the Russian state's share in the newspaper and journal market is estimated to be less than 10%, while its share in electronic media is even smaller.
Russian head of the Parliamentary Committee on Foreign Affairs Konstantin Kosachev said in a 2005 interview that there were no differences between freedom of speech in Russia and Western countries in regards to the printed media: "there is an enormous amount of newspapers which write any sort of stuff." Speaking of electronic media, he acknowledged that they were mainly under the control of the authorities, but added that that's not a specifically Russian phenomenon.
According to the BBC, the Russian newspaper market offers its consumers a more diverse range of views than those same consumers can sample on the country's leading television channels.
The Russian military intervention in Ukraine and the occupation of Crimea, in 2014, led to a reinforcement of propaganda and disinformation from state-owned media outlets, including by altered or misidentified images, stories that were distorted or invented from scratch. Russian authorities also kept using paid commentators to influence online contents and comments related to the conflict. According to war reporter and veteran of the First Chechen War Arkadiy Babchenko, Russian mass media played a significant role in actually starting the war in Donbass stating that "this is the first war in history started exclusively by Goebbels-like propaganda".
Independent coverage of war-related issues led to official pressures on media outlets. Lenta.ru was warned by Roskomnadzor in March 2014 after publishing an interview with a member of Right Sector; the following day the owner replaced the editor with a pro-governmental one, and 40 employees resigned in protest. In October 2014, Ekho Moskvy was warned by Roskomnadzor after airing first-hand testimonies of the fighting in eastern Ukraine, allegedly "justifying war crimes".
Political pressure on independent media
According to the World Press Freedom Review 2008 by International Press Institute, the pressure on Russian independent media outlets and their employees increased considerably in 2007. The government use variety of methods to control of broadcasters, to sideline critical journalists, and to intimidate them into self-censorship.
According to International Press Institute, even bolder publications have to curtail their coverage to avoid problems with the authorities.
Selective use of bureaucratic regulations were employed to inhibit media outlets, vague laws were passed to restrict independent activities, politically motivated criminal investigations against critics were used, independent journalists were imprisoned on trumped-up charges and their media outlets were closed, controlling interests in independent news outlets were purchased, aggressive harassment of journalists by security services took place and the failure to bring justice in the murders of journalists and in other violent attacks against the press prevailed.
In 2016, the PEN association concluded that using a combination of methods including taking control over large media companies and TV channels and selective and flexible usage of newly introduced laws, the government has acquired practical control over what is published in mass-media in Russia:
Although the press has not given in without a struggle and some key independent outlets, reporters, and editors continue to speak and publish, state television and a limited selection of other “loyal” outlets dominate today’s Russian media landscape. With the mainstream press increasingly toeing the Kremlin line, government restrictions have expanded to encroach upon other cultural spaces and modes of expression, including social activism, literature, art, and theater.
While there are provisions in the Russian Constitution that guarantee freedom of speech and specifically forbid censorship, the practical execution of numerous legal acts and dependence of courts results in practically unlimited control of the government over what is published and where. The laws in question are the anti-extremism laws, law on protection of children from harmful information, law on insult to religious believers, foreign agents law and undesirable organisations law. An important role in the censorship system is played by Roskomnadzor (Federal Service for Supervision in the Sphere of Telecom, Information Technologies and Mass Communications), an institution that- according to PEN- "has reawakened people’s internal editors — the voice in your head that consciously or unconsciously makes you question what you are writing or publishing: does this cross the line? Will this get me in trouble?"
According to an expert, the expulsion of competitive political actors from media ownership has gradually led to the depoliticisation of media content. Depoliticization of media content, however, led to its patriotisation as well.
Selective use of regulations and criminal investigations
As stated by IPI, the Russian Government use selectively politicized regulations and bureaucratic harassment to inhibit media outlets. Main legal tools used here are anti-extremism laws (described above) and foreign agents law.
In 2008, Amnesty International criticized the run-up to parliamentary and presidential elections as "a clampdown on the freedoms of assembly and expression", stating that "the authorities have violently dispersed some opposition demonstrations, while pro-government events have gone ahead without interference."
In 2015, PolitPress initiated a database of various forms of repression applied to journalists and activists in Russia, counting overall 302 of those subject to various forms of repression, including 17 journalists. Memorial has published a list of political prisoners in Russia, that also includes journalists.
Internet censorship and surveillance
SORM, a System for Operative Investigative Activities, was amended in July 1998 to allow monitoring of the Internet in addition to telephone communications. SORM allows law enforcement agents to monitor Internet traffic and requires ISPs to assist law enforcement in their investigations. In late 2000, the Russian Supreme Court ruled that the law enforcement agents are required to obtain a warrant and inform ISPs when the SORM is going to be used. In 2015, the European Court for Human Rights found Russia's SORM surveillance legislation and practice in violation of the European Convention on Human Rights (Zakharov v. Russia).
In 2004, only a minority of Russians (8% of the population) had Internet access. In May 2008, some 32.7 million users in Russia had access to the Internet (almost 30% of the population). In 2012, 75.9 million Russians (53% of the population) had access.
Russia was found to engage in selective Internet filtering in the political and social areas and no evidence of filtering was found in the conflict/security and Internet tools areas by the OpenNet Initiative in December 2010. Russia was on Reporters Without Borders list of countries under surveillance from 2010 to 2013 and was moved to the Internet Enemies list in 2014. On 31 March 2013, the New York Times reported that Russia was beginning 'Selectively Blocking [the] Internet'.
The absence of overt state-mandated Internet filtering in Russia before 2012 had led some observers to conclude that the Russian Internet represents an open and uncontested space. As reported by Agence France-Presse, "The Internet is the freest area of the media in Russia, where almost all television and many newspapers are under formal or unofficial government control". In fact, the Russian government actively competes in Russian cyberspace employing second- and third-generation strategies as a means to shape the national information space and promote pro-government political messages and strategies. This approach is consistent with the government’s strategic view of cyberspace that is articulated in strategies such as the doctrine of information security. DoS attacks against Estonia (May 2007) and Georgia (August 2008) may be an indication of the government’s active interest in mobilizing and shaping activities in Russian cyberspace.
In 2014 two new laws extended the state control over the internet. According to the Federal Law 398 (February 2014), the prosecutor general may bypass the courts and make use of the federal regulator agency Roskomnadzor to directly block websites in order to prevent mass riots, "extremist" activities and illegal assemblies. In the first year of the law, Roskomnadzor blocked over 85 websites, including Aleksey Navalny's blog on Ekho Moskvy's website (which removed it) as well as the news site Grani.ru, the online magazine Yezhednevny Zhurnal, and Kasparov.ru, the website of the opposition activist Garry Kasparov. In July 2014, the online extremism law was used to prevent a march for Siberian autonomy.
The "bloggers' law" no. 97 (May 2014) required any website with over 3,000 daily visits to register with Roskomnadzor as a media outlet, subjecting personal blogs and other websites to the same restrictions foreseen for major publications - including a ban on anonymous authorship and obscenities, as well as legal responsibility for users' comments. Under a follow-up law passed in July 2014, social networks are required to store their data in Russia in order for them to be accessible by the authorities.
Social media platforms came under increased pressure in 2014. In April the founder of Vkontakte, Pavel Durov, announced he'd resign and leave the country due to FSB intimidation, after he refused to hand over the account data of Ukrainian activists. In September 2014 Vkontakte was taken over by mail.ru, owned by Kremlin-friendly businessman Alisher Usmanov.
- In 2004, Russia pressured Lithuania and in 2006 Sweden into shutting down the Kavkaz Center website, a site that supports creation of a Sharia state in North Caucasus and hosts videos on terrorist attacks on Russian forces in North Caucasus.
- Magomed Yevloyev, editor of Ingushetia.org, a vocal critic of the region's administration, was murdered in August 2008.
- At the background of December 2008 demonstrations in Vladivostok, it was reported by Kontury news website that FSB officers addressed moderators of the ru_auto Internet community with a request to remove stories about the Vladivostok protests. The major reason, as reported by a moderator of the resource, was that a number of repeating posts with the information about protests worsened some sort of statistics on people's attitudes. The moderator in question requested bloggers to publish only unique posts about protest actions.
- In December 2009, Internet provider Yota with over 100,000 subscribers has blocked access to some Russian opposition Internet resources for its Moscow-based subscribers for a few days. The block occurred after the chief prosecutor of St. Petersburg recommended the company to block access to extremist resources. At the time, the only Internet resource listed as extremist by the Ministry of Justice of Russia was the site of Caucasian separatists Kavkaz Center. Since the evening of 6 December 2009, Yota opened access to all previously blocked resources, save for Kavkaz Center.
- In July 2012, the Russian State Duma passed the Bill 89417-6 which created a blacklist of Internet sites containing alleged child pornography, drug-related material, extremist material and other content illegal in Russia. The Russian Internet blacklist was officially launched in November 2012 despite criticism by major websites and NGOs.
- On 5 April 2013, it was confirmed by a spokesperson for the Federal Service for Supervision of Communications, Information Technology and Mass Media that Wikipedia had been blacklisted over the article 'Cannabis Smoking' on Russian Wikipedia.
- On 7 August 2013, the Central District Court of the city of Tver, located 100 miles (roughly 160 km) northwest of Moscow, ruled that the official website of Jehovah's Witnesses should be banned throughout the Russian Federation. On 22 January 2014 the Regional Court of Tver ruled in favor of Jehovah’s Witnesses and reversed the earlier ruling by the lower court. The Regional Court conducted a new trial, which concluded that the decision of the Central District Court was unjustified, since there was no legal reason to ban the site.
The Ministry of Justice maintains a list of "Extremest Materials" which are illegal to share.
- Human rights in Russia
- List of journalists killed in Russia
- Media of Russia
- Political repression of cyber-dissidents § Russia
- Russian Internet blacklist
- Telecommunications in Russia
- "Russia". Freedom of the Press. Freedom House. 2015. Retrieved 2015-05-05.
- "Harsh Laws and Violence Drive Global Decline". Freedom House. 2015. Retrieved 2015-05-05.
- International Press Institute: Russia[dead link]
- Human Rights Reports: Russia; US BUREAU OF DEMOCRACY, HUMAN RIGHTS, AND LABOR; 2013
- "Europe no longer so exemplary, Russian tragedy deepens - Reporters Without Borders". Archived from the original on 14 February 2015. Retrieved 14 February 2015.
- Reporters Without Borders: Indeks svabody pressy 2009 god Archived 4 November 2009 at the Wayback Machine., (Russian).
- Human Rights Watch: World Report, Russia p. 393
- Amnesty International: Amnesty International Report 2009 - Russia Archived 5 August 2009 at the Wayback Machine.
- "Freedom curtailed in the Russian Federation - Amnesty International". 26 February 2008. Retrieved 14 February 2015.
- The October 2009 Concluding Observations of the United Nations Human Rights Committee
- Medvedev's Media Affairs, William Dunkerley, Omnicom Press, 2011
- Shaun Walker (2015-04-15). "Hollywood's Child 44 pulled in Russia after falling foul of culture ministry". The Guardian. Retrieved 2015-04-15.
- Index of Reporters without Borders Archived 22 October 2009 at the Wayback Machine., 2009
- St. Petersburg Times: Controversial Ombudsman Mikhailov Dismissed, 23 October 2009.
- Lukin, Vladimir (9 February 2007). "Report Of the Commissioner for Human Rights in the Russian Federation For the Year 2006". Official Website of the High Commissioner for Human Rights in the Russian Federation. Archived from the original (DOC) on 5 March 2009.
- 2008 Report of Russian Ombudsman (Russian)
- "Czar Putin". CNN. Transcripts.cnn.com. 9 December 2007. Retrieved 18 October 2014.
- CPJ calls on Putin to take responsibility for Politkovskaya murder probe - Committee to Protect Journalists
- "Attacks on the Press 2005: Russia", Committee to Protect Journalists, 16 February 2006.
- "Motive Confirmed: Deaths of journalists where the CPJ is reasonably certain that the journalist was murdered in direct reprisal for his or her work; was killed in crossfire during combat situations; or was killed while carrying out a dangerous assignment such as coverage of a street protest", spreadsheet, Committee to Protect Journalists, 15 August 2009.
- Конфликты, зафиксированные службой мониторинга ФЗГ на территории РФ в течение 2006 года
- Конфликты, зафиксированные ФЗГ в течение 2005 года на территории РФ Archived 7 August 2007 at the Wayback Machine.
- Putin's Russia failed to protect this brave woman Archived 27 September 2007 at the Wayback Machine., Joan Smith.
- Anna Politkovskaya, Prominent Russian Journalist, Putin Critic and Human Rights Activist, Murdered in Moscow Archived 14 November 2007 at the Wayback Machine., Democracy Now
- International Press Institute: Europe Overview[dead link]
- "Anatomy of injustice", The Committee to Protect Journalists, September 2009.
- "Chechen journalists, international journalists – Ramzan Kadyrov has silenced us all". The Guardian. 2016-10-10. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 2016-10-14.
- Freedom House, [freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-press/2015/russia Russia 2015 Press Freedom report]
- Russia U-turns over Guardian journalist's deportation, Guardian
- "Why I had to leave Russia, after three decades as a foreign correspondent there". Retrieved 21 June 2015.
- "Автору фильма о "селфи-солдатах" в Донбассе отказали в аккредитации в России". TV Rain. 22 June 2015. Retrieved 22 June 2015.
- Russia expels Gazeta Wyborcza's corresponend
- Article 29, Chapter 2: Rights and Freedoms of Man and Citizen, The Constitution of Russia, Kremlin Archive. Retrieved 14 September 2013.
- Human Rights Watch: World Report 2009: Russia
- Interview of Alvaro Gil-Robles to M. Ganapolsky, Echo of Moscow, 24 April 2005, (Russian).
- Russian Public Opinion Research Center (WCIOM), web site. Retrieved 14 September 2013.
- Dembinskaia, Natalia (24 June 2005). 82% россиян выступают за цензуру на телевидении [82% of Russians approve of television censorship]. Russian Development Portal (in Russian). Archived from the original on 29 September 2007.
- Interview with Maxim Kononenko, Эдуарду Коридорову, ТАСС-Прогноз, 15 July 2005, (Russian). (English translation).
- Steiner, Eduard (April 2007). "What should I be afraid of?". Magazine for Arts and Civil Society in Central and Eastern Europe. Retrieved 26 April 2016.
- "Federal Law "On Providing Access to Information on the Activities of Government Bodies and Bodies of Local Self-Government", No. 8-FZ, February 9, 2009". legislationline.org. February 9, 2009. Retrieved May 15, 2017.
- "CONSIDERATION OF REPORTS SUBMITTED BY STATES PARTIES UNDER ARTICLE 40 OF THE COVENANT. Concluding observations of the Human Rights Committee." (PDF). www2.ohchr.org. UN Human Rights Committee. October 30, 2009. Retrieved May 15, 2017.
- "CONSTITUTIONAL PROTECTIONS OF THE RIGHT TO INFORMATION". right2info.org. Right2INFO.org. January 9, 2012. Retrieved May 15, 2017.
- "The Constitution of the Russian Federation". constitution.ru. December 12, 1993. Retrieved May 15, 2017.
- De Smaele, Hedwig (November 7, 2014). "Limited Access to Information as a Means of Censorship in Post-Communist Russia". academia.edu. Retrieved May 15, 2017.
- "Global Right to Information Rating- Russia". rti-rating.org. Access Info Europe, Centre for Law and Democracy. Retrieved May 15, 2017.
- "REGIONAL CONSULTATION ON NATIONAL SECURITY AND THE RIGHT TO INFORMATION National Questionnaire European Consultation". right2info.org. Right2INFO.org. September 21, 2012. Retrieved May 15, 2017.
- "Daching: How to Get Beaten Up in the Russian Countryside | News". Retrieved 10 July 2015.
- "ФСБ предложила засекретить данные о владельцах недвижимости после громких разоблачений госслужащих". realty.newsru.com. Retrieved 10 July 2015.
- ""Второго человека в ФСБ" обвинили в укрытии элитной недвижимости, которая может стоить его дохода за 10 лет". realty.newsru.com. Retrieved 10 July 2015.
- "‘Anti-Russian,’ a Dangerously Unconstitutional Update of ‘Anti-Soviet,’ Reznik Says". The Interpreter Magazine. 27 July 2015.
- "Legal Analysis: Russia's Right To Be Forgotten · Article 19". www.article19.org. Retrieved 5 November 2015.
- "Знакомьтесь, сыновья генпрокурора - ЛСДУ3 и ЙФЯУ9". Алексей Навальный. Retrieved 2016-06-10.
- "РосОтвет". rosotvet.ru (in Russian). RosOtvet. Retrieved May 15, 2017.
- "The regulatory and legal framework for the study of the openness of the highest regional executive bodies". translate.google.com. Infometer. Retrieved May 15, 2017.
- "Open Data Portal- Russia". data.gov.ru. Retrieved May 15, 2017.
- "Infometer". en.infometer.org/. Retrieved May 15, 2017.
- "Infometer". od.infometer.org. Retrieved May 15, 2017.
- "Russian Cities' Open Data: Audit Results – 2016". en.infometer.org. Infometer. Retrieved May 15, 2017.
- "Russian Cities' Open Data Map". en.infometer.org. Infometer. March 2016. Retrieved May 15, 2017.
- "Informational Openness of Russian Judicial Websites: General Jurisdiction Courts". en.infometer.org. Infometer. October 2014. Retrieved May 15, 2017.
- "Russian Lawmakers Set to Debate Internet Blacklist", RIA Novosti (Moscow), 6 July 2012.
- President's Council for the Development of Civil Society Institutions and Human Rights, Statement by the Council in respect of the bill № 89417-6 "On Amendments to the Federal Law" On protection of children from information harmful to their health and development " - retrieved 9 July 2012
- Paul Goble (29 March 2015). "FSB Increasingly Involved in Misuse of ‘Anti-Extremism’ Laws, SOVA Says". The Interpreter Magazine. Retrieved 1 April 2015.
- "Examples of forbidden content". Zapretno.info. 2014. Retrieved 29 October 2014.
- "Putin Raises 'Extremism' Fines for Russian Media Tenfold". The Moscow Times. 4 May 2015. Retrieved 6 May 2015.
- "Росфинмониторинг - Перечень террористов и экстремистов (действующие)". www.fedsfm.ru. Retrieved 10 June 2015.
- Neef, Christian; Schepp, Matthias (22 April 2014). "The Propaganda War: Opposition Sings Kremlin Tune on Ukraine". Spiegel Online. Retrieved 10 June 2015.
- "Грани.Ру: Книга "ФСБ взрывает Россию" включена в список экстремистских материалов". grani.ru. Retrieved 10 June 2015.
- "Федеральный список экстремистских материалов дорос до п. 3152". SOVA Center for Information and Analysis. Retrieved 28 November 2015.
- "Изъят тираж книги Яна Новака-Езёраньского". Retrieved 15 February 2016.
- "Trial Postponed For Crimean Journalist Charged With Separatism".
- "Dozens in Russia imprisoned for social media likes, reposts". The Big Story. Archived from the original on 27 April 2017. Retrieved 2016-06-10.
- "Court acquits Dagestan’s leading independent newspaper". Reporters Without Borders. 20 May 2011. Retrieved 26 May 2011.
- "CPJ to honor brave international journalists". Committee to Protect Journalists. 2010. Archived from the original on 11 August 2012. Retrieved 26 May 2011.
- "ARTICLE 19 is concerned about ongoing prosecution of independent newspaper staff in Dagestan". ARTICLE 19. 21 March 2010. Retrieved 26 May 2011.
- "Dagestan court acquits Chernovik journalists". Committee to Protect Journalists. 19 March 2011. Retrieved 26 May 2011.
- Russia Freedom of the Press 2013; Freedom House
- "Russia - Media Landscape - European Journalism Centre (EJC)". European Journalism Centre (EJC). Retrieved 14 February 2015.
- "IREX - Media Sustainability Index". rcmediafreedom.eu. International Research & Exchanges Board (IREX). February 1, 2017. Retrieved May 11, 2017.
- Krasnoboka, Natalya (2017). "Media Landscapes- Russia". ejc.net. European Journalism Centre. Retrieved May 11, 2017.
- KHVOSTUNOVA, Olga (December 9, 2013). "A complete guide to who controls the Russian news media". indexoncensorship.org. Index on Censorship. Retrieved May 11, 2017.
- Levy, Alexandre (July 2016). "Media oligarchs go shopping" (PDF). rsf.org. Reporters Without Borders. Retrieved May 11, 2017.
- "Freedom of Press 2009", Freedom House.
- BBC: The press in Russia (16 May 2008)
- Petrov, Valentin; Shevtsov, Petr (July 10, 2014). "Russian Federation: Russian Antitrust Law: Important Considerations For Non-Russian Investors". mondaq.com. Mondaq. Retrieved May 11, 2017.
- "Report by Mr. Alvaro Gil-Robles on his Visits to the Russian Federation". Council of Europe, Commissioner for Human Rights. 20 April 2005. Retrieved 16 March 2008.
- "Dissenting voices to be silenced as liberal Russian TV channels come under state control", Guardian, 16 October 2009.
- "Russia, Heroes and Henchmen, The Work of Journalist and the Media in Russian Regions" Archived 19 November 2011 at the Wayback Machine., Reporters Without Borders, September 2009.
- Country profile: Russia, BBC News, 6 March 2012. Retrieved 13 September 2013.
- "Who will be Russia's conscience?", Joel Simon, Newark Star-Ledger, 22 October 2006.
- Financial Times: Russian media set for landmark deals, 8 January 2002
- Russia as friend, not foe, By Nicolai N Petro.
- Official site of RTVi
- Near the broken air, by Novata Gazeta, 2008
- Телеканал "Дождь" начали отключать в регионах, Синдеева назвала истинную причину таких решений [TV channel "Rain" has begun to be switched off in the regions; Sindeeva has named the true cause behind such decisions] (in Russian). NEWSru.com. 29 January 2014. Retrieved 26 April 2016.
- ЗЗрители добились от Первого канала сюжета про дальнобойщиков. (Но получили не то) [Channel One viewers managed to push for a story about truckers. (But didn't get the right story)]. tvrain.ru (in Russian). Retrieved 26 April 2016.
- "MAVISE Database on TV and on-demand audiovisual services in Europe". rcmediafreedom.eu. European Audiovisual Observatory. September 1, 2016. Retrieved May 11, 2017.
- Vendil Pallin, Carolina (January 4, 2016). "Internet control through ownership: the case of Russia". tandfonline.com. Post- Soviet Affairs. Retrieved May 15, 2017.
- Ibragimova, Galiya (September 24, 2014). "New law further restricts foreign media investment". rbth.com. Russia Beyond the Headlines. Retrieved May 15, 2017.
- "Freedom of the Press 2016- Russia". freedomhouse.org. Freedom House. 2016. Retrieved May 15, 2017.
- Sinelschikova, Yekaterina (April 28, 2015). "New Russian media ownership law: How will changes affect foreign players?". rbth.com. Russia Beyond the Headlines. Retrieved May 15, 2017.
- It Isn’t Magic: Putin Opponents Vanish From TV New York Times, 3 June 2008. Related discussion.
- New York Times врет про "черные списки" на российском ТВ [New York Times is lying about Russian TV "black lists"]. Young Guard of United Russia (in Russian). 4 June 2008. Archived from the original on 16 December 2008.
- REN-TV and Channel 5 will get different news, by Kommersant, 16 October 2008
- REN-TV will retain its own news, by lenta.ru, 19 October 2009
- CEO of NMG: editorial policy regarding news on Channel 5 and REN-TV won't be altered, by Lenizdat.Ru, 22 October 2009, (Russian).
- Employees of the Channel 5 threaten mass protests, (Russian).
- Interview of Vladimir Khanumyan, Business Peterburg, 23 October 2009.
- "The dismantling of the independent news organization ‘RBC’: How Russia gained and today lost a great source of news — Meduza". Meduza. Retrieved 2016-05-13.
- "Reuters назвало ставшую "последней каплей" статью РБК". slon.ru. Retrieved 2016-05-13.
- "Three Top Editors Leave Russia's RBC Media Holding". RadioFreeEurope/RadioLiberty. 2016-05-13. Retrieved 2016-05-13.
- "Журналисты РБК объявили об уходе вслед за руководством". slon.ru. Retrieved 2016-05-13.
- "Reform of the Administration of the President of the Russian Federation". miamioh.edu. Miami University. May 2000. Retrieved May 15, 2017.
- "The Reform of the Administration of the President of the Russian Federation" (PDF). Kommersant. miamioh.edu. 18. 5 May 2000. Retrieved 26 April 2016.
- "My starring role in Russian propaganda". StopFake.org. Retrieved 5 November 2015.
- "Speech at Opening Ceremony of the 59th World Newspaper Congress (Moscow)", Valadimir Putin, Kremlin archive, 5 June 2006. Retrieved 13 September 2013.
- "Interview with NBC Channel", 12 July 2006.
- IFJ Welcomes "Fresh Start" in Russia as Medvedev Opens Door to Media Dialogue, May 2008, IFJ
- Address to the Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation, Dmitry Medvedev, Kremlin archive, 5 November 2008. Retrieved 13 September 2013.
- Text of the Federal Law "On Guarantees of Equality of Parliamentary Parties in Covering their Activities by the National State-Owned TV and Radio Channels" (Russian)
- "Address to the Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation" (full text) (Russian), (digest) (English), November 2009
- Interview of Konstantin Kosachev, 2005, (Russian).
- Murdoch didn't manage to find buyers for Russian radio stations, by Lenta.Ru, 2009 (Russian).
- "The propagandist's translation dictionary: How Russia's pro-Kremlin media 'translates' the news". Meduza.io. Retrieved 17 March 2016.
- Babchenko, Arkadiy (15 April 2015). Аркадий Бабченко: "Если бы не российское телевидение, этой войны бы не было" [Arkadiy Babchenko, "If it were not for Russian TV, this war would not have occurred"] (in Russian). OpenRussia. Retrieved 24 April 2015.
- Volkov, Denis (10 September 2015). "Supporting a War that isn't: Russian Public Opinion and the Ukraine Conflict". StopFake.org. Retrieved 12 September 2015.
- "Сергей Шойгу наградил победителей конкурса "МЕДИА-АС"". Российская газета. Retrieved 17 March 2016.
- "Discourse in Danger. Attacks on free expression in Putin's Russia" (PDF). PEN. 2016. Retrieved 15 February 2016.
- "PolitPressing.org • политические преследования в России". PolitPressing.org. Retrieved 18 June 2015.
- "List of Political Prisoners in the Russian Federation" (PDF). Norwegian Helsinki Committee. 1 June 2015. Retrieved 26 April 2016.
- 33m internet users in Russia, IT & Telecoms in Russia
- "Percentage of Individuals using the Internet 2000-2012", International Telecommunications Union (Geneva), June 2013, retrieved 22 June 2013
- "ONI Country Profiles", Research section at the OpenNet Initiative web site, a collaborative partnership of the Citizen Lab at the Munk School of Global Affairs, University of Toronto; the Berkman Center for Internet & Society at Harvard University; and the SecDev Group, Ottawa
- Internet Enemies Archived 23 March 2012 at the Wayback Machine., Reporters Without Borders (Paris), 12 March 2012
- "Internet Enemies", Enemies of the Internet 2014: Entities at the heart of censorship and surveillance, Reporters Without Borders (Paris), 11 March 2014. Retrieved 24 June 2014.
- "Russians Selectively Blocking Internet". New York Times. 31 March 2013.
- Russian prosecutors eye Internet censorship, AFP
- "ONI Country Profile: Russia", OpenNet Initiative, 19 December 2010
- "Нас блокируют. Что делать?". Grani.ru. 2014.
- "Lithuania shuts Chechen rebel site", BBC News, 18 September 2004
- "Chechen rebel website reopens", BBC News, 8 October 2004
- "Sweden Closed Kavkaz Center On Request From Russia", Education and Media section at Abovetopsecret.com, 6 May 2006
- Kremlin critic shot in Ingushetia, BBC
- Protests on Car Tariffs Erupt in Russia, New York Times, 22 December 2008
- http://kontury.info/news/2008-12-23-607[not in citation given]
- "Yota: subscriber growth", 18 August 2009
- "Абоненты расследуют «фильтрацию» оппозиционных сайтов" ("Subscribers are investigating the 'filtering' of opposition websites"), Olga Ivanova, New Russia News Agency (NR2), 3 December 2009, (Russian). (English translation)).
- "Абоненты Yota несколько дней не имели доступа к оппозиционным сайтам" ("Yota blocked access to opposition sites for several days"), Lenta.Ru, 7 December 2009 (Russian). (English translation).
- Internet Restriction Bill Passes First Reading, The Moscow Times, 8 July 2012, retrieved 9 July 2012
- "Law concerning the illegal websites register has come into force", Lyudmila Ternovaya, Кызыл тан, 30 July 2012, accessed 7 August 2012
- "Russia internet blacklist law takes effect". BBC. 31 October 2012. Retrieved 3 November 2012.
- "Russia May Block Wikipedia Access Over Narcotics Article". RIA Novosti. 6 May 2013.
- "Russian media regulator confirms Wikipedia blacklisted". Russia Beyond The Headlines. Interfax. 5 April 2013.
- "Russian Court Overturns Attempt to Ban Bible-Education Website-JW.org", Johovah's Witnesses, 21 January 2014. Retrieved 23 January 2014.[better source needed]
- http://minjust.ru/ru/node/243787 page 453, item 4071 "Плакат с изображением человека, похожего на президента РФ В.В. Путина, на лице которого макияж – накрашены ресницы и губы, что, по замыслу автора/авторов плаката, должно служить намеком на якобы нестандартную сексуальную ориентацию президента РФ. Текст под изображением (воспроизводится с сохранением особенностей орфографии и пунктуации, с сокрытием нецензурной лексики): «Избиратели Путина, как ... вроде бы их много, но среди моих знакомых их нет», размещенный 07 мая 2014 года в социальной сети «Вконтакте» на аккаунте http://vk.com/id161877484 с ник-неймом «Александр Цветков» (решение Центрального районного суда г. Твери от 11.05.2016);"
- "Mass Media Defence Center". mmdc.ru. Retrieved May 15, 2017.
- "World Press Freedom Index 2017, Reporters Without Borders: Russia". rsf.org/. Retrieved May 15, 2017.
- "Faculty of Journalism, Lomonosov Moscow State University". journ.msu.ru. Retrieved May 15, 2017.
- "The Russia Media Fund". russianmediamarket.com. Retrieved May 15, 2017.
- Rosenholm, Arja; Nordenstreng, Kaarle; Trubina, Elena. "Russian Mass Media and Changing Values". rcmediafreedom.eu. Retrieved May 15, 2017.
- "Transparency International Russia". transparency.org.ru/. Retrieved May 15, 2017.
- Harassment Chronicles, an English-language resource run by the oppositional Other Russia (a coalition including Kasparov's United Civil Front)
- Freedom House 2010 Press Survey: Russia
- A guide to the troubled world of independent Russian media, The Calvert Journal, April 2014
- "НАЦИОНАЛЬНЫЙ ДОКЛАД О ДОСТУПЕ К ИНФОРМАЦИИ О ДЕЯТЕЛЬНОСТИ ОРГАНОВ ВЛАСТИ В РОССИЙСКОЙ ФЕДЕРАЦИИ (Access to Information: State Secrets and Human Rights)" (PDF). freedominfo.org. Institute for Information Freedom Development (IIFD). September 2008. Retrieved May 15, 2017.